• Aucun résultat trouvé

Measurements of production cross sections of polarized same-sign W boson pairs in association with two jets in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Measurements of production cross sections of polarized same-sign W boson pairs in association with two jets in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV"

Copied!
27
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Contents lists available atScienceDirect

Physics Letters B

www.elsevier.com/locate/physletb

Measurements of production cross sections of polarized same-sign W boson pairs in association with two jets in proton-proton collisions at

s = 13 TeV

.The CMSCollaboration

CERN,Geneva,Switzerland

a rt i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t

Articlehistory:

Received20September2020

Receivedinrevisedform18November2020 Accepted8December2020

Availableonline11December2020 Editor:M.Doser

Keywords:

CMS Diboson Electroweak Polarized Longitudinal

The first measurements of production cross sections of polarized same-sign W±W± boson pairs in proton-protoncollisions are reported. The measurements are based ona data sample collectedwith the CMS detector at the LHC at a center-of-mass energy of13 TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 137 fb1.Events are selected byrequiring exactly two same-sign leptons, electrons or muons, moderate missing transverse momentum, and two jets with a large rapidity separation and a large dijet mass to enhancethe contribution ofsame-sign W±W± scattering events. Anobserved (expected)95% confidencelevel upperlimitof1.17(0.88) fb isset ontheproductioncrosssectionfor longitudinallypolarizedsame-signW±W±bosonpairs.Theelectroweakproductionofsame-signW±W± bosonpairswithatleastoneoftheW bosonslongitudinallypolarizedismeasuredwithanobserved (expected)significanceof2.3(3.1)standarddeviations.

©2020TheAuthor(s).PublishedbyElsevierB.V.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBYlicense (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).FundedbySCOAP3.

1. Introduction

Vectorbosonscattering(VBS)processesprobetheelectroweak (EW) symmetry breaking mechanism at high energy scales. The unitarity of thetree-level amplitudeof the scatteringoflongitu- dinallypolarizedgaugebosons athighenergies isrestoredinthe standard model (SM) by a Higgs boson with a mass lower than about1 TeV [1,2]. Theobservationofa Higgsbosonwitha mass of about 125 GeV [3–5] provides an explanation that W and Z gauge bosons acquire mass via the Brout–Englert–Higgs mecha- nism,butadditionalHiggsbosons maystill playaroleintheEW symmetrybreaking.ModificationsoftheVBS crosssectionforthe longitudinally polarized W and Z bosons are predicted in mod- els ofphysics beyondthe SM throughmodifications ofthe Higgs bosoncouplings togaugebosons orthroughthepresenceofnew resonances [6,7].Themeasurementsofthelongitudinallypolarized scattering ofthe W and Z bosons provide complementary infor- mation to direct measurements of the Higgs boson couplings to gaugebosons [8,9].ModelsofbeyondSMphysics thatmodifythe crosssectionsofVBSprocesseswithtransverselypolarizedW and Z bosonsarediscussedinRef. [10].

At the CERN LHC, VBS interactions are characterized by the presenceoftwogaugebosonsinassociationwithtwoforwardjets

E-mailaddress:cms-publication-committee-chair@cern.ch.

that have a large rapidity separation. Theyare part ofa class of processescontributingtothesame-signW±W± productioninas- sociation with two jets that proceeds via the EW interaction at treelevel,O(α4),where α istheEW coupling,referred toasEW W±W± production.Theleptonic decaymode W±W±±ν ±ν, whereboth W bosonsdecayintoelectronsormuons,,=e,μ, is a promising final state to study the polarized scattering from gaugebosons.The backgroundcontributionofthequantumchro- modynamics(QCD)induced productionof W±W± boson pairsin associationwithtwojetswithtree-levelcontributionsatO(α2α2S), where αSisthestrongcoupling,issmall.Fig.1showsrepresenta- tiveFeynmandiagramsofVBSprocessesinvolvingself-interactions betweengaugebosons throughtripleandquarticgaugecouplings andthet-channelHiggsbosonexchange.

The unpolarized EW W±W± production has been previously measuredattheLHC intheleptonic decaymodesat

s=8 and 13 TeV [11–15]. Thefirst differentialcross section measurements werereportedinRef. [15].ThisLetterpresentsthefirstmeasure- mentoftheEWproductioncrosssectionsforpolarizedsame-sign W±W± bosonpairs. Thedatasample ofproton-proton(pp) colli- sions at

s=13 TeV correspondsto an integratedluminosity of 137 fb1 [16–18], collected withthe CMS detector [19] in three LHCoperatingperiodsduringtheyears2016,2017,and2018.The threedata setsare analyzedindependently, withappropriate cal- ibrations and corrections, because of the various LHC operating conditionsand the upgrades in the performance of theCMS de-

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2020.136018

0370-2693/©2020TheAuthor(s).PublishedbyElsevierB.V.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBYlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).Fundedby SCOAP3.

(2)

Fig. 1. IllustrativeFeynmandiagrams ofVBSprocesses, whereW bosonsareradiated fromincoming quarks(q),contributingtotheEW-inducedproductionofevents containingtwoforwardjetsandW±W±bosonpairsdecayingtoleptons.Diagramswiththetriplegaugecouplingvertex(left),thequarticgaugecouplingvertex(center), andthet-channelHiggsbosonexchange(right)areshown.

tector. Candidate events contain exactlytwo identified same-sign leptons, moderate missing transverse momentum, and two jets withalargerapidityseparationandahighdijetmass.

In the W±W± channel, each of the W bosons can be polar- ized either longitudinally (WL) or transversely (WT), leading to threedistinct contributions W±LW±L,W±LW±T,andW±TW±T.Ideally, wewouldmeasureallthreecontributionsseparately,butthecur- rent data sample size is too limited. Therefore, two maximum- likelihood fits are performed: one for W±LW±L and W±XW±T; and another forW±LW±X andW±TW±T.The index X indicates eitherof the two polarization states.The eventkinematical propertiesare used to extractthe various contributions. Twosets ofresultsare reported with the helicity eigenstates defined either in the WW center-of-massreferenceframeorintheinitial-stateparton-parton one.

2. TheCMSdetector

The central feature of the CMS apparatus is a superconduct- ing solenoidof6 m internal diameter,providinga magneticfield of3.8 T. Withinthe solenoidvolumeare asiliconpixel andstrip tracker,aleadtungstatecrystalelectromagneticcalorimeter(ECAL), andabrassandscintillatorhadroncalorimeter,each composedof abarrelandtwoendcapsections.Forwardcalorimetersextendthe pseudorapidity(η)coverageprovidedbythebarrelandendcapde- tectors. Muonsare detectedingas-ionizationdetectorsembedded inthesteelflux-returnyokeoutsidethesolenoid.Amoredetailed descriptionofthe CMSdetector,togetherwitha definitionofthe coordinate system used and the relevant kinematic variables, is giveninRef. [19].

Thefirst leveloftheCMStriggersystem,composed ofcustom hardware processors, uses informationfromthe calorimetersand muon detectorsto selecteventsofinterestwitha latencyofless than4 μs. Thesecondlevel,knownasthehigh-leveltrigger,con- sists of a farm of processors running a version of the full event reconstructionsoftwareoptimizedforfastprocessing,andreduces theeventratetoabout1 kHz beforedatastorage [20].

3. Signalandbackgroundsimulation

Several MonteCarlo(MC) event generators are used to simu- late the signal and backgroundcontributions. Three independent setsofsimulatedeventsforeachprocessareneededtomatchthe data-taking conditions inthe various years. All generated events areprocessedthrougha simulationoftheCMSdetectorbasedon Geant4 [21] andarereconstructedwiththesamealgorithmsused fordata.Additionalpp interactionsinthesameandnearbybunch crossings,referredtoaspileup,arealsosimulated.Thedistribution ofthenumberofpileupinteractionsinthesimulationisadjusted to match the one observed in the data. The average number of pileupinteractionswas23(32)in2016(2017and2018).

The SM EW W±LW±L, W±LW±T, and W±TW±T signal processes, where both bosons decay leptonically, are separately simulated using MadGraph5_amc@nlo 2.7.2, with the implementation of polarized parton scattering [22–24], at leading order (LO) with six EW (O(α6)) and zero QCD vertices. The NNPDF 3.1 next- to-next-to-leading-order(NNLO) [25] partondistributionfunctions (PDFs) are used. Signal processes are simulated with the helic- ity eigenstates defined either in the W±W± center-of-mass ref- erenceframe orinthe initial parton-partonreferenceframe. The Phantom1.5.1generator [26,27] usestheon-shellprojectiontech- nique forthe predictions of the signal processes asdiscussed in Ref. [28].TheMadGraph5_amc@nlopredictionsshowsatisfactory agreement within the statistical uncertainties with the Phantom predictions in the relevant fiducial region, defined in Section 8, forthisanalysis.ComparisonsoftheMadGraph5_amc@nlopredic- tionswithpredictionsbasedon theon-shellprojection technique arereportedin Ref. [24]. The smallcontributionsofoff-shell and nonresonantproduction [28] arenotincludedinthesimulatedsig- nalsamplesandamountto1–2%inthefiducialregion.

The full next-to-leading-order (NLO) QCD and EW corrections fortheleptonicunpolarized W±W± scatteringprocesshavebeen computed [29,30], and they reduce the LOcross section for the EW W±W± process by approximately 10–15%, with the correc- tionincreasinginmagnitudetoupto25%withincreasingdilepton and dijet masses. The NLO corrections for the W±LW±L, W±LW±T, andW±TW±T processesarenotknown.Thecorrectionsfortheun- polarized EW W±W± process at orders of O(αSα6) and O(α7) areappliedtotheMadGraph5_amc@nloLOcrosssectionsforthe W±TW±T process. Only the corrections at order of O(αSα6) are applied to the MadGraph5_amc@nlo LO cross sections for the W±LW±L and W±LW±T processes because the corrections at order O(α7)areexpectedtobesmallerfortheW±LW±L andW±LW±T pro- cesses comparedto the size ofthe corresponding corrections for theunpolarizedEW W±W± process [31].Thereisanegligibleef- fectin themeasured crosssectionsfromdifferencesinthe event kinematicalpropertiescausedbythetreatmentoftheNLOcorrec- tions.

The EW WZ background process is simulated with MadGraph5_amc@nlo2.4.2atorderO(α6).TheQCD-inducedWZ processissimulatedatLOwithupto threeadditionalpartonsin the matrix element calculations using the MadGraph5_amc@nlo generatorwithatleastoneQCDvertexattreelevel.Thedifferent jetmultiplicitiesaremergedusingtheMLMscheme [32] tomatch matrixelementandpartonshowerjets.TheMadGraph5_amc@nlo generatoris alsoused to simulatetheQCD-induced W±W± pro- cess.

The interference betweenthe EW and QCD diagrams for the W±W±andWZ processesisgeneratedwithMadGraph5_amc@nlo including the contributions of order αSα5. The relative contri- butions in the fiducial region of the interference term between the EW and the QCD diagrams for the W±LW±L, W±LW±T, and

(3)

W±TW±T processes arecomparable to therelative contributions of the W±LW±L, W±LW±T, and W±TW±T processes to the EW W±W± cross section. The interferences betweenthe signal processesare expected to be small [24], and good agreement is observed be- tweentheincoherentsumofthepolarizedcrosssectionsandthe unpolarizedcrosssectionsforthedistributionsoftheobservables.

The powheg v2 [33–37] generator is used to simulate the t¯t, tW,andotherdibosonprocessesatNLO accuracyinQCD.Produc- tionoft¯tW,t¯tZ,t¯tγ,andtriplevectorboson(VVV)eventsissimu- latedatNLOaccuracyinQCDusingtheMadGraph5_amc@nlo2.2.2 (2.4.2) generator for 2016(2017 and 2018) [22,23] samples. The tZq process is simulatedat NLO in the four-flavor scheme using MadGraph5_amc@nlo2.3.3.ThetZq MC simulationisnormalized usingacrosssectioncomputedatNLOwithMadGraph5_amc@nlo in the five-flavor scheme, following the procedure described in Ref. [38].ThedoublepartonscatteringW±W±productionisgen- erated atLOusing pythia8.226 (8.230) [39] for 2016 (2017and 2018)samples.

The NNPDF 3.0 NLO [40] (NNPDF 3.1 NNLO [25]) PDFs are used for generating all 2016 (2017 and 2018) background sam- ples. For all processes, the parton showering and hadronization are simulated using pythia 8.226 (8.230) for 2016 (2017 and 2018). The modeling of the underlying event is done using the CUETP8M1 [41,42] (CP5 [43]) tune for simulated samples corre- spondingtothe2016(2017and2018)data.

4. Eventreconstructionandselection

EventsarereconstructedusingtheCMSparticle-flow(PF)algo- rithm [44] that reconstructsandidentifieseachindividualparticle withanoptimizedcombinationofallsubdetectorinformation.The missingtransversemomentumvector pTmiss isdefinedasthepro- jectionontotheplane perpendiculartothebeamaxisoftheneg- ativevectorsumofthemomentaofallreconstructedPFobjectsin anevent.ItsmagnitudeisreferredtoaspmissT .

Jets are reconstructed by clustering PF candidates using the anti-kTalgorithm [45,46] withadistanceparameterof0.4.Jetsare calibratedinthesimulation,andseparatelyindata,accountingfor energydepositsofneutralparticlesfrompileupandanynonlinear detector response [47]. The effect of pileup is mitigated through a charged-hadron subtraction technique, which removes the en- ergy ofcharged hadronsnot originatingfromthe primary vertex (PV) [48] oftheevent.Correctionstojetenergiestoaccountforthe detectorresponseare propagatedto pmissT [49]. ThePVisdefined asthevertexwiththelargestvalueofsummedphysics-object p2T. The physics objects are derived from onlythe tracks assignedto thevertexasinputsbyclusteringthemintojets,includingleptons.

The pmissT is also recalculated only from those jets by summing theirnegative pT vectors.

Electrons and muonsare reconstructed by associating a track reconstructed in the tracking detectors with either a cluster of energy in the ECAL [50,51] or a track inthe muon system [52].

Electronandmuoncandidatesmustpasscertainidentificationcri- teria to be further selected in theanalysis. Forthe “loose” iden- tification, they must satisfy pT>10 GeV and |η|<2.5 (2.4) for electrons (muons). At the final stage of the lepton selection the

“tight” workingpoints criteriafollowing the definitions provided inRefs. [50,52] arechosen,includingrequirementsonthe impact parameterofthecandidateswithrespecttothePVandtheiriso- lationwithrespecttootherparticlesintheevent [9].

Forelectrons,thebackgroundcontributioncomingfromamis- measurement of the track charge is not negligible. The sign of thischarge isevaluatedusingthreeobservablesthatmeasure the electron curvatureapplyingdifferentmethods; requiringall three charge evaluations toagree reducesthis backgroundcontribution

Table 1

SummaryoftherequirementsdefiningtheW±W±SR.The|m mZ|requirementisappliedtothedielectronfinalstateonly.

Variable Requirement

Leptons Exactly 2 same-sign leptons,pT>25/20 GeV pjT >50 GeV

|mmZ| >15 GeV (ee)

m >20 GeV

pmissT >30 GeV b quark veto Required Max(z) <0.75 mjj >500 GeV

|ηjj| >2.5

byafactoroffivewithanefficiencyofabout97% [50].Thecharge mismeasurementisnegligibleformuons [53,54].

Collision events are collected using single-electron (single- muon)triggersthatrequirethepresenceofanisolatedleptonwith pT>27(24)GeV.Inaddition,asetofdileptontriggerswithlower pTthresholds,withathresholdof23 GeV orlowerfortheleading lepton andwitha threshold of 8 GeV for the subleadinglepton, isused.Thisensuresatriggerefficiencyabove99%foreventsthat satisfythesubsequentofflineselection.

Severalselection requirementsare used to isolatethe W±W± topology defining the signal region (SR) whilereducing the con- tributions of backgroundprocesses. Candidate events contain ex- actly two isolated same-sign charged leptons and at least two jetswith pjT>50 GeV and |η|<4.7. Jets that are within R=

(φ)2+(η)2<0.4 of one of the identified leptons are not usedintheanalysis. Here φ andηrefer tothe differencesin the azimuthal angle φ and η of the jet and the charged-lepton candidate,respectively.Becauseofthepresenceofundetectedneu- trinosinthesignalevents,pmissT isrequiredtoexceed30 GeV.

TheW±W± SRselectionrequiresoneofthesame-signleptons tosatisfypT>25 GeV andtheotherpT>20 GeV.Themassofthe dileptonpairm mustbegreater than20 GeV.Candidateevents inthedielectronfinalstatewithin15 GeV ofthenominalZ boson massmZ[55] arerejectedtoreducethenumberofZ bosonback- groundeventswherethechargeofoneoftheelectroncandidates ismisidentified.

The VBS topology istargeted by requiringthe two highest-pT jetstohaveadijetmassmjj>500 GeV andapseudorapiditysepa- ration|ηjj|>2.5.TheW bosonsintheVBStopologiesaremostly produced in the central rapidity region with respect to the two selected jets. The candidate W±W± events are required to sat- isfy max(z)<0.75,where z= |ηj1+ηj2)/2|/|ηjj| isthe Zeppenfeldvariable [56], ηisthepseudorapidityofoneofthese- lectedleptons,and ηj1 and ηj2 arethepseudorapiditiesofthetwo candidateVBSjets.

CandidateeventswithoneormorejetswithpT>20 GeV and

|η|<2.4 that are consistentwith thefragmentation ofa bottom quarkarerejectedtoreducethenumberoftopquarkbackground events.The DeepCSV b taggingalgorithm [57] is usedforthisse- lection. For the chosen working point, the efficiency to select b quark jets is about 70% and the rate for incorrectly tagging jets originatingfromthe hadronization ofgluons oru, d, s quarks is about1%.Therateforincorrectlytaggingjetsoriginatingfromthe hadronizationofc quarksisabout10%.Theselectionrequirements todefinethesame-signW±W±SRaresummarizedinTable1.

5. Extractingpolarizationinformation

IntheW±W±channel,theW bosonscaneachbeeitherlongi- tudinally or transversely polarized leading to different kinematic distributions, reflected in the kinematical properties of the two leptons,thetwojets,andpTmiss.TheWLbosonstendtoberadiated

Références

Documents relatifs

The leading QCD-induced production of two Z bosons in as- sociation with jets, whose contribution with two jets in the final state is referred to as q q ¯ → ZZjj, is simulated

The boxes around the mg5 amc + pythia 8 to measurement ratio represent the uncertainty on the prediction, including statistical, theoretical (from scale variations), and

Given that cancer cell migration and metastasis are energy-demanding processes [23] and that both mediators, NO and CO, modulate cellular bioenergetics [24–28], in this

We investigated the preva- lence and associated factors of childbearing desire in HIV-infected women in care in Abi- djan, Coˆte d’Ivoire and explored whether such desires

95 in the muon (left) and electron (right) channels including the signal prediction from MadGraph 5_a mc@nlo interfaced with pythia parton showering (upper) and herwig++

In the random forest analysis, there are three control regions, one for Drell-Yan background, a second for t¯ t background, and a third for events with nonprompt leptons (e.g., W

26: Also at Physics Department, Faculty of Science, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt 27: Also at Institute of Nuclear Research ATOMKI, Debrecen, Hungary. 28: Also at MTA-ELTE Lend

Deux voies différentes peuvent donc être étudiées pour pérenniser un Syal : – limiter l’expansion spatiale, afin de maintenir la rente territoriale liée à la différenciation