A NNALES DE L ’I. H. P., SECTION C
M ASSIMO L ANZA DE C RISTOFORIS
S TUART S. A NTMAN
The large deformation of nonlinearly elastic shells in axisymmetric flows
Annales de l’I. H. P., section C, tome 9, n
o4 (1992), p. 433-464
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=AIHPC_1992__9_4_433_0>
© Gauthier-Villars, 1992, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annales de l’I. H. P., section C » (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/anihpc) implique l’accord avec les condi- tions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute uti- lisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit conte- nir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
The large deformation of nonlinearly elastic shells
in axisymmetric flows
Massimo LANZA DE CRISTOFORIS
Dipartimento di Matematica Pura ed Applicata,
Universita di Padova, Via Belzoni 7, 35131 Padova, Italy
Stuart S. ANTMAN
Department of Mathematics
and Institute for Physical Science and Technology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, U.S.A Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré,
Vol. 9, n° 4, 1992, p. 433-464. Analyse non linéaire
-- ---
ABSTRACT. - This paper treats the
large
deformation of closed nonlin-early
elasticaxisymmetric
shells under an external pressure fieldgenerated by
thesteady, irrotational, axisymmetric
flow of anincompressible,
inviscidfluid. The flow is assumed to have a
prescribed velocity
U and pressure P atinfinity.
The deformation of the shells is describedby
ageometrically
exact
theory.
Theparameters
U and P and the deformedshape
of theshell
uniquely
determine thevelocity
field of thesteady
flow. The most difficultpart
of theanalysis
is to show that thevelocity
and pressure of the flow on the shelldepend continuously
andcompactly
on the functiondescribing
theshape.
The pressure field on the shell is substituted into theequilibrium equations
for theshell, yielding
asystem
ofordinary
functional-differential
equations.
These are converted into afixed-pbint form,
which isanalyzed by
aglobal implicit
function theorem. Theproblem
has technical difficulties that do not arise in
problems
withrigid
obstacles.Key words : Nonlinearly elastic shells, fluid-solid interactions, incompressible inviscid fluids, global implicit function theorem, compactness, Schauder estimates, potential theory.
RESUME. 2014 On s’interesse aux
grandes
deformations d’une coque fermeeaxisymetrique
soumise a l’action duchamp
depression
externeengendre
par 1’ecoulement stationnaire et irrotationnel d’un fluide
parfait incompres-
sible autour de la coque. On utilise pour modeliser la coque une theorie
geometriquement
exacte avec une loi decomportement elastique
nonlineaire
generale.
La vitesse et lapression
de 1’ecoulement a l’infini sont deux constantes donnees U et P. Lechamp
de vitesse du fluide est determine defacon unique
par ces deuxparametres
et par la forme de la coque dans saconfiguration
déformée. Lapartie
laplus
delicate de notreanalyse
consiste a montrer que leschamps
de vitesse et depression
sur lasurface de la coque
dependent
continument et defacon compacte
de la fonctionqui
decrit la forme de la coque. Substituant lapression
dans lesequations d’equilibre
de la coque, on obtient unsysteme d’equations
fonctionnelles-différentielles ordinaires que l’on transforme ensuite en pro- bleme de
point
fixe. Ceprobleme
est lui-meme resolu a l’aide d’un theo- reme des fonctionsimplicites global.
On rencontre ici les difficultes tech-niques qui
ne sepresentent
pas dans lesproblemes
avec obstaclerigide.
1. INTRODUCTION
In this paper we
study
thelarge
deformation of a closednonlinearly
elastic
spherical
shellproduced by
an external pressure fieldgenerated by
the
steady, irrotational, axisymmetric
flow of anincompressible,
inviscidfluid.
(With
very little additional work all our results can be extended to shells with any closedaxisymmetric
referenceshape).
The flow is assumed to have aprescribed velocity
U and pressure P atinfinity.
We describethe deformation of these shells with a
geometrically
exacttheory (ef [19])
that accounts for
flexure, compression,
andshear.
We allow the materialproperties
of the shell to be describedby
a verygeneral
class of nonlinear constitutive relations.We
begin
ouranalysis by observing
thatU, P,
and the deformedshape
of the shell
uniquely
determine thevelocity
field of thesteady
exteriorflow. We show that the
velocity
of theflow on
the shelldepends
continu-ously
andcompactly
on the functiondescribing
theshape
of the outersurface of the shell. We then use Bernoulli’s theorem to express the
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Analyse non linéaire
435
ELASTIC SHELLS IN FLOWS
pressure field on the shell in terms of
U, P,
and thevelocity
field on theshell. We substitute this pressure into the
equilibrium equtions
for theelastic shell. We transform these
equations
into afixed-point equation
for the
shape, involving
afamily
ofcompact operators
anddepending parametrically
upon U and P. Weapply
ageneralization
of the GlobalImplicit
Function Theorem of[3]
to theseequations
to deduce the existence of connected families of solutions. In this program we encounter serious technical difficulties inshowing
that the pressure on the shelldepends continuously
andcompactly
on anappropriate
functiondescribing
theshape
and inconstructing
a suitable fixedpoint equation.
To handle the first of these difficulties(which
can beignored
in thestudy
of flowspast rigid bodies)
we coulddevelop
andexploit
refined results frompotential theory.
We are able to shortcut thislengthy
processby using
avariety
ofSchauder estimates
(which,
atbottom,
rest onpotential-theoretic
argu-ments) together
with a constructionrelying
on a conformalmapping.
InSection
7,
we sketch thesteps
needed for a directproof
ofcompactness by using potential theory.
Thus we
replace
thecoupled problem
for the deformation of the shell and the external flow of the fluid with asingle problem
for the deformation of the shell in which the pressure field on itdepends nonlocally
on itsshape.
One of thegoals
of this paper is todevelop
effective methods fortreating
well-set nonlinearproblems
from mechanics with such nonlocal terms.(The corresponding problem
for the two-dimensional flowpast
aring
was solved in[ 13] by using
conformalmapping theory.
Its mathemati- cal treatment differsconsiderably
from that usedhere.)
Notation
Vectors in Euclidean
3-space
andn-tuples
of real numbers are each denotedby
bold-face lower-case Roman letters. Partial derivatives are denotedby subscripts
andordinary
derivativesby primes.
Iff and g
arefunctions of u and v,
then 20142014’2014
denotes the matrix ofp artial
derivatives a(u, v)
of f and g
withrespect
to u and v. We denote the closure of a set Eby cl ~
theboundary
of gby a~,
and the set of elementsbelonging
to setj~ and not
belonging
to set ~by
We denote the norm on a Banach
space ~
Let Q be a bounded open connected subset of IRn with aboundary
of classC 1.
Thespace of m-times
continuously
differentiable functions on cl Q with its usual norm is denoted C""(cl Q).
Thesubspace
of C"’(cl Q)
whose functionsThe space is
equip- ped
with its usual norm:where
(Pi,
..., E (~nand I = ~1
+ ... + p(~2)
denotes the Sobolev space of all functions in LP(Q)
all of whose distributional deriva- tives up to order m are in LP(Q).
If 00 is of classCm,
then the Sobolev space W~~ P can be defined for each SE[0, m]. (Consult [ 1 ], [7], [ 16]
fordetails about these
spaces.)
The domain(Q
or cl Q or00)
of the functions under consideration will not be indicated when it is evident from the context.If lt is a space of real-valued
functions,
then wesimply
write u ifeach
component
of the vector-valued function u is in PI. Wetypically
usebrackets to denote the value of a
mapping f
defined on a function space.Thus the value
of f at
a function u inits.
domain of definition is denotedf [u]. If f [u]
is a function on aninterval,
then its value at apoint s
on thisinterval is of course
f [u] (s).
2.
EQUILIBRIUM EQUATIONS
FOR THE AXISYMMETRIC DEFORMATION OF NONLINEARLY ELASTIC SHELLSLet {i, j, k}
be a fixedright-handed
orthonormal basis for Euclidean3-space.
For each real number cp we setGeometry
of deformationTo’ each
(s, p)
E[0,7i:]
x[0,2 7r] corresponds exactly
onepoint
on thesphere
of radius 1 centered at theorigin
withposition
vectorNote that s measures the arc
length
of r~(., p)
from the southpole
of thesphere
to r,~(s,
Weinterpret
thesphere (2. 2)
as the natural reference state of the outer surface of a thin three-dimensional shell. The coordinates(s, p) identify
materialpoints
on this surface.The
axisymmetric configuration of
a shell that can sufferflexure,
in-surface
extension,
and shear is determinedby
apair
of vector-valuedAnnales de I’Institut Henri Poincaré - Analyse non linéaire
ELASTIC SHELLS IN FLOWS
functions
rand
b of sand p of the formThe reference
configuration
of the shell isgiven by r=r~ b= 2014r~.
Thevector
r (s, p)
isinterpreted
as the deformedposition
of the materialpoint
r*
(s, cp).
The vector b(s, cp)
isinterpreted
ascharacterizing
the deformedconfiguration
of the material fiber whose referenceconfiguration
is on thenormal to the mid-surface
through
r*(s,
We defineWe define the set of strain variables
by
The arc
length
fromr(0, p)
tor (s, p) along
a deformed circle oflongitude
is
Let the reference
configuration
of a three-dimensionalspherical
shelloccupy the
region
where
hE (0,1)
is thegiven
constant thickness. We caninterpret
the vectorsr
and b ascorresponding
to the deformation that takes(1 2014~)r~(~(p)
tor (s, p) + ç
b(s, p).
In this case, we find that the Jacobian of this transforma- tion and its restriction to the(ei (p), k)-plane
for each p arepositive
ifand
only
ifTo be
specific,
weadopt
theserequirements
ascharacterizing
deformations that preserve orientation. It is easy to handle far moregeneral requirements stemming
from a moregeneral interpretation
ofr
and b.Equilibrium equations
Let
N (s)
a(s, cp)
+H (s)
b(s, cp)
and -M (s)
e2 denote the resultant(p !2014~ r*
(s, (p)
of radius r*(s)
that are exerted across the deformedimage
ofthis material section at the material
point
r*(s, cp).
Let T(s) e2
andX (s)
a(s, (p)
denote the resultant contact force and contactcouple
per unitreference
length
of the curve s~r*(s, (p)
that are exerted across thedeformed
image
of this material section at r*(s, (p).
These forms of the resultants reflect ourassumption of axisymmetry.
If theonly
external forceapplied
to the shell is ahydrodynamical
pressure ofintensity
p(s)
per unit deformed area atr (s, cp),
then the classical form of theequilibrium
equa-tions have the form
Constitutive
equations
Let
[cfl (2 . 9)].
The material of the shell is elastic(and homogeneous)
it thereare functions
T, N, H, E,
M : ~ -~ R such thatWe assume that these functions are thrice
continuously
differentiable. Werequire
that these functionssatisfy
themonotonicity
condition : The matrixThis
condition,
which is a shell-theoreticanalog
of the strongellipticity
condition of three-dimensional
elasticity,
ensures that an increase in thebending strain ~.
isaccompanied by
an increase in thebending couple M,
etc. We also
require
that extreme strains be enforcedby corresponding
extreme values of the stress resultants.
Specific
realizations of suchgrowth
conditions are
given by [19].
Wecomplement (2. 15)
with therequirement
that
(2 . 16) (h, oo) e
N(k, k, 0, 0, 0) strictly
increases from - oo to oo, Werequire
that the material meet thefollowing
minimal restrictions onits
symmetry:
(2 . 17) T, N, E,
M are even in r~, H is odd in r~ .Annales de l’lnstitut Henri Poincaré - Analyse non linéaire
439
ELASTIC SHELLS IN FLOWS
We further
require
that the shell meet the restrictedisotropy
conditionsTo ensure that the reference
configuration
is stress-free we assume thatWe
impose
theboundary
conditionswhich
require
that the deformation beregular
at thepoles,
and theintegral
condition
which fixes translation in the k-direction.
We
require
that:These conditions ensure that the outer surface of the shell is
simple
andhas
r (0, p)
as the southpole.
3. THE BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEM FOR THE SHELL In this section we formulate the
boundary
valueproblem
for the shell when the pressure field has the form deliveredby
theanalysis
of the flowproblem,
which is carried out in Sections 6 and 7. We then convert theboundary
valueproblem
to afixed-point problem,
to which weapply
aglobal implicit
function theorem.Since the
dependence
ofr,
a, b on p is determinedby
the form of these functions when(p=0 (cf (2 . 3)],
we defineand henceforth use
only
these new functions.To
give
aprecise
statement of ourboundary
valueproblem
we mustintroduce certain sets of functions. For
r~C1 [0,7r]
we defineFor
8>0,
we set(3 . .4)
LEMMA. - £* is the setof
thosefunctions
r in the linear spacethat
satisfy (2 . 22)
and have stretchesI r’ I
that areeverywhere positive.
Moreover, ~ (8) (and consequently ~)
are open in A.We omit the
proof
of thislemma,
because it is astraightforward
variantof those of Lemmas 4. 11 and 4.13 of
[13].
We introduce the space
equipped
with the norm(3.8)
LEMMA. 2014 ~ ~ ~ Banach space. It iscontinuously
embedded in1/2
[0,
.Proof -
It is easy toverify
thatI
is a norm. We now prove thatPI is
complete.
be aCauchy
sequence in PI. Since it is aCauchy
sequence in
C 1,
there existsan fE C1
such that{~}
convergesto f in C 1.
Since
(3. 7) implies
is aCauchy
sequence inC°,
there exists a g E
CO
to which it convergesuniformly.
Thusf’
is continu-ously
differentiable on(0,~),y(.)
convergesto f
in ~’.
The statement about
embedding
is an immediate consequence of thefollowing inequality (for
ts):
We assume that the shell is
subjected
to a pressure fieldgenerated by
the
axisymmetric,
irrotational flow of aninviscid, incompressible
fluid.The fluid
velocity
at thepoint r (s)
on theshell,
denoted u[r, U] (s),
willAnnales de l’lnstitut Henri Poincaré - Analyse non linéaire
441
ELASTIC SHELLS IN FLOWS
be shown to
depend
on theshape
r of the shell and the constantvelocity
U
(in
thek-direction)
atinfinity
and to beindependent
of the pressure P atinfinity.
Let the fluid have constant unitdensity.
Bernoulli’s theoremimplies
that the pressure on the shell at r(s)
isOur basic theorem about the
flow, proved
in Sec.6,
is(3 .10)
THEOREM. - The scaledspeed U -1
u[r, U] I
isindependent of
U(and
is thus determinedsolely by r.)
The operatoris continuous and its restriction to ~’
(8)
is compactfor every ~ >
0.The operator p
[ . , . , . ] : X ~ R
xR2 ~ C°
is continuous and its restriction to ~’(8)
x~2
is compactfor
every 8> 0.Our
boundary
valueproblem
BVP is to find andsatisfying (2 .1), (2 . 3), (2 . 4), (2 . 6) (with 0), (2 . 9)-(2 . 12), (2 . 14),. (2 . 20)-(2 . 22).
We now follow
[ 19]
intransforming
BVP to afixed-point
forminvolving compact operators
to which we canapply
aglobal implicit
functiontheorem.
Let L denote the
Legendre
differential operator .definedby
which is associated with the linearization of the
governing equations
abouta
spherical
state and whichcaptures
the behavior of thepolar singularities.
We introduce new variables v
(vl,
v2,v3) by
The
following
two results are obtainedby
astraightforward (but lengthy) computation.
(3. 13)
PROPOSITION. - The linear operator Ydefined by
is continuous
from CO [0, ~c]
to ~’.Moreover,
(3.16)
PROPOSITION. - The linear operator Zdefined by
I
is
continuous from
CLet
~
equipped
with thenorm ~.,
isclearly
a Banach space.We can use
(3.12)-(3.18)
torepresent
ourgeometric
variables in termsof v
by
means of thefollowing
functions:We now turn to the
equilibrium equations.
We substitute(2. 14)
into(2 . 10)-(2 . 12),
carry out thedifferentiations,
and use Cramer’s rule[valid by
virtue of(2.15)]
to obtainAnnales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Analyse non linéaire
443
ELASTIC SHELLS IN FI nws
where D is
defined
in(2 . 15),
whereand where is the k-th component of
(D -1 f).
Now(2 . 6)
and(3 .11 ) imply
thatWe now
replace
the left-hand sides of(3.22)
with the left-hand sides of(3.12),
we substitute(3 . 21 )
into theright-hand
sides of(3 . 22),
we substi-tute
(3.20)
into theresulting
form of theright-hand
sides of(3.22),
andwe divide the
resulting equations by sin 1/2 s
to obtain theoperator equation
Our
boundary
valueproblem
isequivalent
tofinding
such thatr [v] E,
for all~e[0,7r],
and(3 . 23)
is satisfied.Unfortunately
theoperator
g does notmap 1/
xf~2
into because ofthe side condition in
(3. 19),
and isconsequently
not in thefixed-point
form we
require.
Weaccordingly replace (3.23)
with a modifiedproblem having
the same solutions.We introduce a
projection
J ofC°
onto 1/by
We define the
operator
k :C°
x[R2 ~ C° by
We seek solutions of
(3.27)
PROPOSITION. 2014 Forgiven
U P let v eC0
and satisfy(3.26),
/~~
~//~
~J ~~ 77~~~~
~~(~)sm~~~~=0, ~
let
§ [Jv] (s)
e 9for
all s, and letI [Jv]
e k . ThenJo
03BD2(s) sin1
/2 s ds =0,
sothat v e
V,
Jv = v, and vsatisfies (3.23).
To effect the
proof,
we observe that ifthen
has the form~2
~~2
whereWe need
only
show that x2 = 0. For this purpose, wemerely
have to tracethrough
thesteps leading
to(3.26).
We omit thedetails,
which arestraightforward.
Let us now
study
theproblem
in whichU=0,
We seek trivial solutions in which the shell remainsspherical, unsheared,
anduniformly compressed,
so that i = v = k(Const.), ~==0, 0(~)=~,
r(s)
= k sin s,z(s)= -kcoss.
Under theseconditions,
the constitutiveassumptions (2 . 17)
and(2 . 18)
reduce(2 . 10) - (2 . 12)
to(3 . 29)
N(k, k, o, 0, o) --_
T(k, k, 0,0,0) = -
Pk2/2.
Condition
(2 . 16)
ensures that for eachequation (3 . 29)
has aunique
solution for
k,
denotedk (P),
withk (. ) : [0, oo )
-(h, 1] twice continuously
differentiable andstrictly decreasing. (C,f: [19].)
Systems (3 . 23)
and(3 . 26)
admit thecorresponding
solutionwith
4. EXISTENCE THEORY FOR THE SHELL We
analyze (3 . 26)
with(4 . 1 )
GLOBAL IMPLICIT FUNCTION THEOREM. - Let J?-J be a Banach space and afamily of
open sets(not necessarily bounded)
in Y x
for
whichAnnales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Analyse non linéaire
445
ELASTIC SHELLS IN FLOWS
Let F : be continuous, let F
(0, 0)
=0,
and let F : (~(f:)
~ ~ be compactfor
where E is agiven positive
number. Let I denote theidentity
operator on Let the Fréchet derivative I -
Fx (0, 0) :
Y ~ Yof
x H x - F
(x, À)
at(0, 0)
exist and be invertible. Letand let be the connected component
of
~containing (0, 0).
Then oneof
the
following
statements is true:(i) L0
is bounded and there is an ~* E(0, E)
such that c (9(£*).
Thereis an essential map
(i.
e., a continuous map nothomotopic
to aconstant)
(Jfrom
onto the m-dimensionalsphere
~m whose restriction to(0, 0) }
is inessential.
Moreover,
contains a connected subsetL00
that contains(0, 0),
that has the sameproperties
as with respect to (J, and that has the property that eachpoint of
it hasLebesgue
dimension at least m.(ii ) (E) ~ 0
V E E(0, E)
or is unbounded. For each ~ E(0, E)
there is a
modified equation
x = p(x, ~,, E)
F(x, À) [cf (7 . 4)) defined
on allof
~J X ~m that agrees with x = F
(x, À)
on (~(E).
Theone-point compactification
~o (E) of
the connected component(E) containing (0, 0) of
the setof
solution
pairs of
themodified equation
may beunbounded,
but otherwise has the sameproperties
as in statement(i).
This
theorem,
a variant of that of[3],
isproved
in[13].
The statementabout
topological
dimension follows from the treatment of[2].
Let
For each s E
[0, E)
we defineIt can
easily
be verified that (9(E)
satisfies(4 . 2) - (4 . 4) provided
weidentify
thepoint (v [P], (0, P))
associated with(4 . 7)
with thepoint (0, 0)
arising
in Theorem 4. 1 .The restriction
of
k to (!)(E)
is compactfor
every E E(0, E).
The Fréchet derivative I -(ðkjðv) [v [P], 0, P] of
I - k with respect to v at(v [P], 0, P)
isan invertible linear
mapping of CO
ontoitself for
all P>_-
0 exceptfor
the set~
of eigenvalues of
the linearizationof (3.26)
about(3.30). Moreover, (3 . 26)
isequivalent
to BVP.(Specfically, if
v ECO
andsatisfies (3 . 26), f
q [Jv] (s) for
all s, andif r [Jv] E,
then Jv = v and(r [v], ê [v]) sa tisfies BVP,
andconversely.)
Proof. -
Under aslightly specialized
version of our constitutivehypo-
theses Shih and Antman
[ 19] proved
that theoperators
gand
g2 of(3 . 23)
are
continuously
differentiableon {v: (v, U, P)
E (9(0) ~
andcompact
on{
v :(v, U, P)
E (9(E)}
for E>0,
that the Fréchet derivative I -(8gj8v) [v [P], 0, P]
of I - g withrespect
to v at(v [P], 0, P)
has a trivial null space in ~ for all P > 0except
for values ing,
and that(3 . 26)
isequivalent
toBVP. The
proof
of[19]
carries over to our moregeneral
case. Since thelinear
operators Y, Z,
and J arecontinuous,
thedifferentiability
andcompactness
of k follows from that of g. Thus we needonly
prove the statement about I -(8k/8v) [v [P], 0, P].
Thecorresponding
statementabout g,
proved
in[19],
isequivalent
toVe must show that
We reduce
(4.10)
to(4.9) by
thesimple
device ofshowing
that thehypotheses
of(4 .10) imply
that v EY,
i. e., thatf V2 (s) sin1/2 s ds = 0. We
omit the details,
which form a straightforward analog
of those of the
proof
ofProposition
3. 27. 0We define
~ow under very mild additional constitutive restrictions it can be shown hat
0 ~ ~.
Aspecific
set of conditions aregiven by [19], Eq. (4 . 21).
Bt1ore
general
conditions can be constructed from thedevelopment
of[5],
VIII . 5. Theorem 4. 8 would then ensure that * contains a nonempty nterval
containing
0. We assume that this is the case.(Actually,
all we-equire
is that ~ not beempty.)
LetAnnales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Analyse non linéaire
447
ELASTIC SHELLS IN FLOWS
Let
P0~P
and letVo=v*[Po].
LetL0
to be the connectedcomponent
of~
containing (vo, 0, Po).
Theorems3 .10, 4 .1,
and 4 . 8together
with thefact that is continuous from
C°
to X and maps bounded sequences into bounded sequencesimmediately imply
(4 .13)
THEOREM. - At least oneof the following
statements holds:If (4 .14 b) holds,
then there is an essentialmapping
afrom L0 to S2
whoserestriction to
(vo, 0, Po)}
is inessential.Moreover, L0
contains asubset
L00
eachpoint of
which hastopological
dimension at least 2. Therestriction
of
(J toL00
is essential. ’ As in[ 13]
we obtain4 .15. COROLLARY. -
Let P0~P.
Thenthere is a number U1>0, depend- ing
onPo,
such that the setcontains a connected subset
joining
theplanes
U = ::I::U 1. (Thus
there is asolution for
each Uwith I U __ U i .)
It is
important
to note thatProposition
3.27implies
that g andthat
Propositions 3 .13, 3 . 16,
and theOpen Mapping
Theoremimply
thatthe
change
of variables(r,
z,w) (3 . 12)]
is a linearhomeomorphism
of the Banach
space {(~z~)e~:~(0)=0=~(7c), (2 . 20 a). (2 . 21 ) hold}
onto f with inverse Y
v3).
Hence Theorem 4 .13 and Corol-lary
4.15 can be stated for theboundary
valueproblem
in terms of theoriginal
variables.For P held fixed at a
positive Po
thecontinuity of p [., ., ],
definedin
(3. 9),
ensures that the pressure on the shell iseverywhere positive
if Uis small
enough.
If the pressure becomesnegative
onpart
of theshell,
then cavitation occurs.(Our analysis
does not account for cavitation.Cf [12].)
5. THE EXTERIOR FLOW PROBLEM
We
study
thesteady, irrotational, axisymmetric
flow of anincompres- sible,
inviscid fluid of constantdensity
p in thesimply-connected
domainF[r]
exterior to the shell. We denote atypical point
in cl F[r] by
x,which
identify
with thedefined
by
where 03BB~
(0, 1 /2].
Then ~F is of classC1 À.
The fluid isrequired
to haveprescribed
pressure P andvelocity
U k atinfinity.
It is well known(c. f : [18])
that the
governing equations
areequivalent
to thefollowing boundary
value
problem
for the modifiedvelocity potential
~:where
v (x)
is the inner unit normal to a~ at x. Problem(5. 2)
has aunique
solution(cf. [20],
Lectures16, 19),
which we denoteby 03A6 [r, U].
The
velocity u (x)
and the pressurep (x)
of the fluid at x~cl F aregiven by
[Eq. (5 . 3 b)
is Bernoulli’sformula.]
The
uniqueness
of 03A6[r, U] yields
(5.4)
LEMMA. - Let(5 . 1 )
hold. Then the solution ~[r, U] of (5 . 2)
islinear in U and is
axisymmetric;
inparticular,
We define
6. COMPACTNESS
In this section we prove Theorem 3.10
by using
Schauder estimatesand conformal
mappings.
We first extend r of(3 .1 )
to theinterval [2014 ~ x]
by setting r ( - s) _ ( - Y (s), z (s))
fors E [o, ~).
We use the same notation for this extension. The extensionoperator
is continuousfrom ~’,
defined in(3 . 6),
toW~(-~7r) for p E (1,2).
We definel [r] by (3 . 2 a) with I
replaced by
cr(s, t)
whereAnnales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Analyse non linéaire
449
ELASTIC SHELLS IN FLOWS
and with
[0,7c] replaced by [-03C0, 03C0].
Inplace
of R(ö)
and R we define forthese extensions the sets
A
slight
modification of Lemma 4. 11 of[13]
shows that ~ isprecisely
the set of all
simple, planar, closed, positively oriented, continuously
differentiable r’s
symmetric
about the i-axiswith
> 0everywhere
andwith z
(x)
> z(0). (~’f.
Lemma 3 . 4. Hence it is the set ofpositively oriented, symmetric
extensions of the elements of~.)
Note thatwe define
For
1 R2
oo we define the open annularregions
For
0 R
oo and we define the open ballWe now
regard
r as a curveand E[r]
as a set in thecomplex (xl, x3)- plane. (E
is defined in(5.6).) By
the RiemannMapping Theorem,
foreach such curve r there exists a
unique biholomorphic mapping
such that
A theorem of
Caratheodory (el [17],
Thm.9.10)
states thatf [r]
can beextended to
cl d 2 (1, oo )
and that the extension is ahomeomorphism
ontocl ~ [r].
A theorem of Warschawski(el [17],
Thm.10 . 2)
states thatf[r]’
can also be extended to
cl ~2 ( 1, oo )
and that the extension vanishes nowhere. Theuniqueness of f [r],
ensuredby
the RiemannMapping
Theo-rem, and the
symmetry
of 06[r]
about theimaginary x3-axis imply
thatSince
f [r]
preserves orientation and since{6. 9} holds,
we observe. thatWe can now describe our basic
strategy
forproving
Theorem 3 . 10. Weuse the
mapping f [r]:
to convert ouroriginal
flowproblem
on aregion depending
on the unknown r to a newproblem
on a fixeddomain,
theexterior of a
ball,
with coefficientsdepending
on r. As. our firststep,
weuse the chain rule to prove
satisfy (5.5).
is a sol-ution
of boundary
valueproblem (5.2) if
andonly if the function U]
EC2 (d 3 (1, (0) (cl ~ 3 (1, (0) defined by
satisfies
thefollowing boundary
valueproblem :
where
and where v3 is the component
of
the unit normal vdefined
in Section 5.arguments r and U have been omitted in
(6 . 1 5).]
Our main effort in this section is to use standard interior and
boundary
estimates to prove
(6.16)
LEMMA. -Let 3q2p4,
R>1, 0h1 h2,
ð>O. Then the operator(r, U) ~
t~[r, ~J]
is continuousfrom
and maps bounded sequenees into bounded
sequences.
".
Annales de I’Institut Henri Poincare - Analyse non linéaire
.
451
ELASTIC SHELLS IN FLOWS
We
exploit (5 . 3 a)
and(6.13)
to obtain(6.17)
LEMMA. - Let32~4,R>1,0A~~.S>0.
Then the opera- tor(r, U) - u [r,
continuous and compactfrom
Theorem 3.10 follows
easily
from this last result and Bernoulli’s Theorem.We
begin
this programby obtaining
a technical result on conformalmappings.
For r~L let
be the
arc-length parametrization
of the curve r. For letbe the
arc-length parametrization
of the. curve Since f preserves orientation and satisfies(6 . 9)
and(6 . 1 0),
it mustsatisfy
Our definitions
imply
thatfor
(6 . 22)
PROPOSITION. - Let3 2 p 4,
1
_ R1 R2,
Õ>O. The operator is continuousfrom w2,
p( _ ~, ~) h2, õ)
toW2, 2p (~2 (R1, R2))
and maps boundedsequences into bounded sequences.
Let be a bounded open subset
of d2 (1,00).
Then is continuousfrom C 1 ~ °‘ ~ [-1[, x]
m ~h2, Õ)
to~(a %)
and m.aps bounded sequences into bounded sequences. -If
d ~ c~2 (1, 00),
then r ~ f[r]
is continuousfrom
and maps bounded sequences into bounded sequences
for
all k E N and 03B4 > 0.If ~
is a bounded sequence[ - ~t, ~~
(~ ~h 2, õ),
then thereexists a constant c > 0 such that
The first- statement of this
proposition
isproved by [11].
Theremaining
It
is
convenient to define an operator S thatconverts
functions of thecylindrical
coordinates~1~ ~3
toaxisymmetric
functions of Cartesian coordinates~i, Ç2’ ~3 by
.A
straightforward computation yields
(6 . 25)
LEMMA. - Let 3 q and let 1__ R1 R2.
For each let u" -~ u andbe bounded in {w~Ck(clA2 (Rt", R2)) : w ( - ç, Ç3)= w(03BE, 03BE3)}.
Then S
[u~] ~
S[u] and ~
S is bounded inCk (cl ~3 (R1, R2)) for
each k.S is linear and
continuous from from
to
W’~D~O, 1)) and from
Our next lemma
gives important
technicalproperties
of the coefficients and data of the modifiedproblem (6 .14).
(6.26)
LEMMA. - Let3q2p4,
0a1 , ~>0, 0hl h2,
1
R1 R2,
k E Then ’.(i )
Themappings r H a1 [r], defined
in(6. 15),
arecontinuous from w2,
P(
_ ~~x) (h 1 ~ h2 ~ ö)
andfrom [
- ~,~] (h 1, h2, õ)
toCk (R 1, R2))
and map bounded sequences in to bounded sequences..
(ii )
Themappings
r ~ ai[r]
are continuousfrom
-and map bounded sequences into bounded
sequences
(iii )
Let be . a bounded open subsetof ~ 3 ( 1, oo )
with(0, 0, ~ 1) cl.
Then
(iv)
themapping ,
b[ . , . ], defined
in(6 .15),
is continuousfrom
p
( _ ~~ ~) h2~ õ)]
X ~- toW1-1~2
p, 2 p(a~3 (l, (0))
and maps bounded sequences into bounded sequences.We define a* and
aj by
.Proposition
6 .22,
Lemma 6.25,
and the fact that p(ç, Ç3)
= 0only if ç
= 0imply
that theproof
of statements(i )
and(ii )
follows fromAnnales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Analyse non linéaire
453
ELASTIC SHELLS IN FLOWS
(6.29)
LEMMA. - Let thehypotheses of
Lemma 6. 26hold..
Let.At(E)={(ç,ç3)EIR2:1+Elç311+-,lçlE} for EE(O,I).
Then thereE .
exists an E E
(0, 1 )
such that[r]
and r Haj [r]
are continuousfrom C1’ °‘ [-03C0, 03C0] ~ L (h 1, .h2, ö)
andfrom w2,
p(-03C0, 03C0) ~ L (h 1, h2, ö)
toCk (E))
and mapbounded
sequences into bounded sequencesfor
each k.(6.30)
LEMMA. - Let thehypotheses of
Lemma 6.26 hold. Then there exists an E E(0,1 )
such that themappings taking
r to thefunctions
withvalues
,~~~+
a*[r] (, J~~+ , Ç3)
anda3 [r] + , Ç3)
continuousfrom
___., _.. _ - - ~ - - .... .
’
to
and map bounded sequences into bounded sequences.
Proof of
Lemma 6 . 29. - Thesymmetry
condition(6 .10)
and theinequality (6. 23) imply
thatfor s
sufficiently
small. Thecontinuity of 03C1 [r]
and condition(6 .
31b)
I§
’enable us to
get
from the Mean Value Theoremrepresentations
like- , ..
for
(~ Ç3)
E ~f(E).
We substitute thisrepresentation
and similarrepresenta-
tions for p[r] (03BE 03BE3) - 03BE~ 03C1 [r] (03BE, Ç3)
and03BE-1~ ~03BE3
p[r] (03BE, Ç3)
into theexpres-
sions for and
aj
obtained from(6. 28)
and(6. 15).
We invokeProposi-
tion 6..22 to
complete
theproof.
DProof of
Lemma 6. 30. - We first observe thatfor I ç31
1. we cannotuse the Mean Value Theorem as in the
proof
of Lemma 6.29 becauseexists a
symmetrized
extension(p, ~)
of anypair (p,Q satisfying (6.10)
tothe entire
complex plane
withcontinuous for and each
R2 E (1, oo).
We denote theresulting symmetrized
extension off [r] --_ (p [r], ç [r])
--(p [r], ç [r]). (Note
thatin
general f[r]
is notholomorphic
on@~ (0, 1).)
Let {
be a bounded sequence in~V2° ~ ( _ ~, ~) ~ ~ (hl, h~, ö). Proposi- tion 6.22,
thecompactness
of theembedding
ofW~(2014~ir)
intoC~"(2014~~)
for0al2014 -,
and the boundedness of(6.33) imply
thatp
the
family
y2014 p[r.],20142014 is equicontinuous
in C° (cl EØ2 (0,
for
(~
p 1.,~l~ ~~3
~ LJ ~ ~
2 l2))
R2E(1, oo).
Hence condition(6.10)
andinequality (6 . 23) imply
that thereexists an and an E > 0
independent of j
such thatBy
virtue of the extension we hadeffected,
we can use the Mean Value Theorem to writeThus
Since
{~~ 2
+~~ 2jt - ~
+~j~2 ~
L,q{©, ~
+E j )
if2 ,
we conclude that1-
(3
there is a
positive
constant c such thatAnnales de l’Insitut Henri Poincaré - Analyse non linéaire
455
ELASTIC SHELLS IN FLOWS
Proposition
6.22implies
that themapping
that takes r to the function with valuesJçî + ç~
a*[r] (Jçî + ç~, ~3)
maps bounded sequences into bounded sequences as in Lemma 6. 30.Now let converge to r in
W~(-~?r)r~(~i~2.S).
Lemma6.26(i) implies
thatpointwise
on[D3 ((0, 0,1 ), E)
UD3 ((0, 0, -1 ) (0, 1 ). Inequality (6.36)
andProposition
6.22 enable us to use theLebesgue
DominatedConvergence
Theorem to prove that a* converges to a*[r]
as in Lemma6. 30. The
proof
of theanalogous
results fora3
is identical. DStatement
(iii)
of Lemma 6. 26 followsdirectly
from(6.15),
statement(i),
andProposition
6 . 22.Proof of
Lemma 6 . 26(iv). - By computing
v3 of(6.15)
we obtainfrom (6 .15) that
(Here
we suppress theargument r.) Proposition 6.22,
Lemma6.25,
andthe fact that
W 1- ~ 1 ~q~~ q (a~73 (0,1 ))
is a Banachalgebra
if q > 3implies
theconclusion. D
Thus the
proof
of Lemma 6. 26 iscomplete. Having
determined crucialproperties
of the coefficients in(6.14)
we are nowready
to obtaina priori
estimates on its solution. Our next result
gives
a maximumprinciple
andan associated
uniqueness
theorem.(6.40)
LEMMA. - Letsatisfies boundary
valueproblem (6.14)
and isaxisymmetric,
thenProblem
(6. 14)
has at most one such solution.Proof -
Since the coefficients ai[r]
arecontinuous on A3 ( 1, ~)
andsince
(6. 14 c)
musthold,
acorollary
of the MaximumPrinciple yields (6.41).
Theuniqueness
then follows in the standard way. 0(6.42)
LEMMA. - Let3q2p4,0hlh2, IR1,
andr E