• Aucun résultat trouvé

Surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in Streptococcus agalactiae isolated from patients in Belgium (1989-1991 versus 1996-1999)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in Streptococcus agalactiae isolated from patients in Belgium (1989-1991 versus 1996-1999)"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT

Background:

Background:Streptococcus agalactiae is the major cause of early onset infectious disease (EOD) in neonates, but it is also responsible for severe infections among adults. Associated with high mortality and morbidity, empiric therapy can start before availability of susceptibility results and most of EOD can be prevented through intrapartum chemoprophylaxis. Therefore surveillance for emerging resistance (R) has to be conducted.

Methods:

Methods:Activity of 11 antibiotics was studied against 393 strains referred to the Belgian GBS reference laboratory. Their susceptibilities were determined by the agar dilution method according to NCCLS guidelines. Between 1989 – 1991, 158 strains (S1) were collected: 56 were recovered from infected adults and 102 from colonization. And between 1996 – 1999, 235 strains (S2) were collected: 67 were recovered from severe infections in neonates, 80 from invasive infections in adults and 88 from colonization.

Results:

Results:All strains were fully susceptible to the tested β-lactam antibiotics (penicillin,

ampicillin and cefriaxone) with MICs < 0,0625 mg/L. With 100 % of susceptibility, a MIC90<

0.25 mg/L was found for vancomycin; ciprofloxacin and rifampin showed MIC90< 0.5 mg/L

and < 0.125 mg/L respectively. For erythromycin (E), R/intermediate rates detected were 3.2/1.9% and 6.8/2.1% for S1 and S2 isolates. For clindamycin, R rates were 1.9% and 3% respectively for S1 and S2. Tetracyclines remain active against 17.1% of S1 isolates and 17.9% of S2. No high level of -gentamicin or -amikacin resistance was observed: gentamicin

MIC90 was 8 mg/L for S1 and S2 and for amikacin MIC90was 8 mg/L for S1 and 16 mg/L for

S2 isolates.

Conclusions:

Conclusions:1) Susceptibility patterns remained relatively constant between the S1 and S2 isolates. Any significant difference was observed but just a trend of increasing R to E. 2) b-lactams have maintained a high level of activity. 3) Ongoing surveillance for R and mechanisms of R to erythromycin – clindamycin is imperative.

INTRODUCTION

INTRODUCTION

Streptococcus agalactiae (GBS) continues to be the

major cause of early onset infectious disease (EOD) in

neonates, but it is also responsible for late onset disease

(LOD) in neonates and for severe infections among

adults.

Associated with high mortality and morbidity, empiric

therapy is usually

started before availability of

susceptibility results and most of EOD can be prevented

through intrapartum

chemoprophylaxis. Furthermore,

increasing resistance in streptococci is currently

becoming recognized, therefore surveillance for emerging

resistance among GBS has to be conducted.

RESULTS

RESULTS

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

To prevent EOD in neonates, intrapartum chemoprophylaxis with penicillin or ampicillin is recommended; alternatively for

penicillin allergic patient, clindamycin or erythromycin is used. And, for empiric therapy, penicillin and an aminoglycoside are

frequently used for management of serious infections. As tolerance to penicillin, increased resistance to erythromycin

-clindamycin and high level of resistance (HLR) to aminoglycosides are reported for GBS, our study was designed to determine

and to compare susceptibilities of Belgian GBS isolates collected recently to isolates collected between 1989 - 91.





No significant change was observed in the in vitro susceptibility of GBS strains to the 11 tested antibiotics.



All isolates have remained uniformly susceptible to

β

-lactam antibiotics.



No strains with HLR to aminoglycosides was detected.



An increasing trend in the isolation rate of erythromycin resistant strains is shown.



Ongoing monitoring for resistance and mechanisms of resistance to erythromycin and clindamycin is imperative.

REFERENCES

REFERENCES

NCCLS. 1997. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically, 4th Ed. Approved Standard: Document M7-A4. NCCLS, Wayne.PA

NCCLS. 1997. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Tests, 6th Ed. Approved Standard: Document M2-A6. NCCLS, Wayne.PA

NCCLS. 1998. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, Eighth Informational Supplement, NCCLS Document M100-S8. NCCLS, Wayne.PA

CDC. 1996. Prevention of perinatal Group B Streptococcal Disease: A public health Perspective, MWR 199, Vol.45 / No.RR-7, CDC, Atlanta

A.Fleites, S.Panizo, M.J. Santos Rionda, 1998. Antimicrobial Susceptibility and Characterization of Macrolide Resistance Phenotypes in Streptococcus agalactiae , ICAAC 1998, Abstract # E-154.

# 2108

Medical Microbiology CHU, B-23, Sart Tilman, B 4000 Liège, BELGIUM Phone: (32)4 366 24 38; Fax: (32)4 366 24 40 Email: [email protected]

MATERIAL & METHODS

MATERIAL & METHODS

Bacterial strains

Bacterial strains

Clinical isolates

A total of 393 isolates collected through the whole country

during two periods, 1989-1991 and 1996-1999, and referred to

the Belgian GBS reference laboratory were tested in this study.

The isolates were maintained at -70°C

.

Q.C. Strains

Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC®49619

Enterococcus faecalis ATCC®29212

Staphylococcus aureus ATCC®29213

Determination of MIC

Determination of MIC

s

s

Susceptibilities to penicillin, ampicillin, ceftriaxone, vancomycin,

erythromycin, ciprofloxacine, rifampicin, gentamicin, amikacin

and tetracyclines were determined by the agar dilution

technique according to criteria from the National Committee for

Clinical Laboratory Standards, guidelines M-100-S8, for

interpretation.

For clindamycin, susceptibility was evaluated by disk diffusion

(2

µ

g ; BBL). For all strains presenting a reduced susceptibility

and for those which were intermediate or resistant to

erythromycin, MIC’s were further determined by the Etest

technique (AB Biodisk, Sweden).

Strains isolated from

1989-1991

1996-1999

Total

EOD and LOD in neonates - 67 67

Invasive infections in adults 56 80 136

Colonization 102 88 190 TOTAL 158 235 393

Antimicrobial

agent

1989 - 91

1996 - 99

1989 - 91

1996 - 99

1989 - 91

1996 - 99

Penicillin

0

0

0

0

< 0.062

< 0.062

Ampicillin

0

0

0

0

< 0.062

< 0.062

Ceftriaxone

0

0

0

0

< 0.062

< 0.062

Vancomycin

0

0

0

0

0.25

0.25

Erythromycin

3.2

6.8

1.9

2.1

0.125

0.25

Clindamycin

1.3

3

0

0

Ciprofloxacin

0

0

0

0

< 0.5

< 0.5

Rifampicin

0

0

0

0

0.125

0.125

Gentamicin

HLR: 0

HLR: 0

8

8

Amikacin

HLR: 0

HLR: 0

8

16

Tetracycline

82.9

82.1

0

0

> 8

> 8

% Intermediate isolates

MIC90

% Resistant isolates

Table 1: Susceptibility profile and MIC ’s (mg/L) of several antimicrobial agents for 393 S.agalactiae isolates from

Belgium (158 isolates collected in 1989-91 vs. 235 isolates collected in 1996-99)

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Adult Infections 89-91 Colonization 89-91 Neonatal Infections 96-99 Adult Infections 96-99 Colonization 96-99 Fig.1 - Percent of Intermediate/Resistant S.agalactiae to erythromycin in

158 isolates collected in 1989-91 and 235 isolates collected in1996-99.

R I 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Adult Infections 89-91 Colonization 89-91 Neonatal Infections 96-99 Adult Infections 96-99 Colonization 96-99 Fig.2 - Percent of Resistant S.agalactiae to clindamycin in 158 isolates

collected in 1989-91 and 235 isolates collected in1996-99.

SURVEILLANCE OF ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE IN

SURVEILLANCE OF ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE IN

STREPTOCOCCUS AGALACTIAE

STREPTOCOCCUS AGALACTIAE

ISOLATED FROM PATIENTS IN BELGIUM (1989

ISOLATED FROM PATIENTS IN BELGIUM (1989

-

-

1991 vs.1996

1991 vs.1996

-

-

1999)

1999)

P.Melin

P.Melin

1

1

, G. Rodriguez Cuns

, G. Rodriguez Cuns

2

2

,

,

W.Vicentino

W.Vicentino

Fernandez

Fernandez

2

2

, M.P. Hayette

, M.P. Hayette

1

1

, P. De Mol

, P. De Mol

1

1

1

Figure

Table 1: Susceptibility profile and MIC ’s (mg/L) of several antimicrobial agents for 393 S.agalactiae isolates from  Belgium (158 isolates collected in 1989-91 vs

Références

Documents relatifs

On parlera de diastème inter incisif lorsque l’espace est situé entre les deux incisives centrales ou entre incisive centrale et latérale, maxillaire ou mandibulaire Dans

Les lésions de la muqueuse buccale chez l’enfant peuvent être découvertes par l’enfant lui-même ou ses parents et dans ce cas constituer le motif de consultation initiale, ou

A joint contribution from the Meteorological Branch, Department of Transport, and the Division of Building Research, National Research Council. The great diversity

Objectif : Les guides de pratique recommandent que les patients avec une maladie artérielle périphérique (MAP) soient traités médicalement afin de réduire la

Two building performance simulation models are created reflecting the average energy consumption characteristics of air- conditioned residential apartments in

increased the extinction risks at the introduction site, and the occupancy of peripheral patches 102. (Table 1, Figure

Following the naive policy the agent will choose to trade at every time step of the trading horizon.. Under this decision, the agent selects a combination of orders that

This work addresses a signal-based FDI process for inverter open-switch and open-phase fault real-time diagnosis in a drive composed of two electrical series-connected