UNEXPECTED CAUSE(S) OF CEREBRAL MICROEMBOLISATION INVESTIGATED BY TRANSCRANIAL DOPPLER DUPLEX COLOUR
SONOGRAPHY
Muriel SPRYNGER
CASE REPORT
• 72-year old hypertensive man
• december 2008 : right internal carotid thrombotic occlusion with left hemispheral stroke + 80% left internal carotid stenosis
• january 2009 : stenting of the left internal carotid • october 2009 : admitted for suspected worsening
CAROTID ULTRASOUND
– Right internal carotid occlusion
– Moderate narrowing at the distal part of the left internal carotid stent
CEREBRAL MRI
TEE + CONTRAST
• multiple irregular aortic plaques
• interatrial septal aneurysm + right-to-left interatrial shunt through a patent foramen ovale (PFO)
CONTRAST TCD
• Saline contrast TCD withinjection of 10 cc of 9°/°° saline infusion in the right forearm
• Bilateral middle cerebral artery recording
CONTRAST TCD : middle
cerebral artery
Microembolic signals (MES) were recorded on both sides
CARDIOEMBOLIC STROKE
• approximately 20% of strokes are cardioembolic (40% in younger
populations)
• atrial fibrillation
• valvular heart disease • endocarditis
• mitral valve prolapse • prosthetic heart valves,
• recent myocardial infarction (0,8% strokes, 1-2%/y), • intracardiac thrombus,
• dilated cardiomyopathy • sick sinus syndrome, • patent foramen ovale,
• hypokinetic/akinetic left ventricular segment • calcification of the mitral valve
TEE
• « gold standard » for the
detection of :
– PFO :
• < 20 bubbles : small shunt • > 20 bubbles : large shunt
– Atrial septal aneurysm
• PFO is found in 25% of the
healthy population
• PFO + aneurysm : dangerous association?
CLINICAL RELEVANCE OF TCD
AND TEE IN PFO DETECTION
• cTEE = gold standard ? Semi-invasive
• 90% concordance • cTCD :cTCD :
– 20’’ after 1st MB 20’’ after 1st MB
– at rest, more sensitive than at rest, more sensitive than
cTEE
cTEE
– sensitivity 97%, specificity sensitivity 97%, specificity
78%
78%
– Semi-quantitative Semi-quantitative
(« curtain »)
(« curtain »)
Bilateral MES
• despite or because of
right internal carotid
occlusion
• Origins ?
– Venous – Aortic
CONCLUSION
• In case of right-to-left shunts, cTCD can
complete cTEE :
– better sensitivity
– Semi-quantitative method
• cTCD can also detect potential ME in
unexpected cerebral areas and/or explain
unexpected strokes.
CONCLUSION
• Contrast-TCD can diagnose large PFO
PFO - CLOSING DEVICE ?
• The data supporting risk factors (ie, atrial
septal aneurysm or large PFO) are weak.
• Right-to-left shunting may not be the only
possible mechanism for stroke ? More AF.
• High-level evidence for PFO management
TCD and PFO
Contrast Transcranial Doppler Can Diagnose Large Patent Foramen Ovale
• Small PFO : 19 MES/78 (24%)
• Large PFO : 27 MES/27 (100%)
• No PFO : 3 MES/216 • 2 MES is the cutoff to
predict large PFO :
– Sensitivity : 96,3% – Specificity : 96.8% – Accuracy : 96.9%