• Aucun résultat trouvé

Comprendre les migrations environnementales

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Comprendre les migrations environnementales"

Copied!
9
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

1

Comprendre

les migrations

environnementales

Pierre Ozer

Département des Sciences et Gestion de l’Environnement

One world

X 2 between

1960 and 2000

Human population of the Earth

World population (1961-2015) and projections

(2016-2050)

48% of the world population lives

within 200 km of the coast

(2)

14/12/2017 7

C har b o n

Pét r o l e

Gaz

nat ur el

N ucl éai r e

Hyd r aul i q ue

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

18 6 0 18 7 0 18 8 0 18 9 0 19 0 019 10 19 2 0 19 3 019 4 0 19 5 0 19 6 0 19 7 0 19 8 0 19 9 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 10

G t e p

With more energy needs

Total in 2010: 11.5 10

9

tep

(total estimation since 1860: 435 Gtep)

Source BP Statistical Review of World Energy June 2011, AIE (*) énergies commerciales uniquement: hors bois, déchets,.énergies solaire et éolienne, géothermie...

nucléaire = chaleur nucléaire = production électrique d’origine nucléaire / 33% hydraulique = production d’électricité hydraulique

X 4 between

1960 and 2000

(3)
(4)

Greenhouse is good for life

Anthropogenic perturbation of the global carbon cycle

Global Carbon Project 2016

Fate of anthropogenic CO

2

emissions (2006-2015)

Global Carbon Project 2016

Atmospheric concentration

D’après Petit (2003)

(5)

5

Estimations of the sea-level rise by 2100

Rahmstorf, 2010 & IPCC, 2013

IPCC

AR5

(6)

http://www.climatecentral.org/, 2015

http://www.climatecentral.org/, 2015

Vietnam

– Red River Delta

(7)

7

12-2002

02-2003

12-2003

Vulnerability of the large deltas

Large impacts …

VERY LIKELY

(90% to 99%)

TRES PROBABLE

(90% à 99%)

LIKELY

(66% to 90%)

LIKELY

(66% to 90%)

CERTAIN

(> 99%)

CERTAIN

(> 99%)

42

Source :

AR5 WGII GIEC 2014

(8)

43

Source :

AR5 WGII GIEC 2014

Are WE

ready to

CHANGE?

Growth rate 1990-2016: +74%

CO

2

Emissions from fossil fuel use and industry

Global Carbon Project 2016

Observed CO

2

emissions and emissions scenarios

Global Carbon Project 2016

(9)

9

Pierre Ozer

pozer@ulg.ac.be

http://labos.ulg.ac.be/hugo

Références

Documents relatifs

The components of the CO 2 budget that are reported in this paper include separate estimates for (1) the CO 2 emissions from fossil-fuel combustion and cement production (E FF ),

However, although the decadal mean generally agreed, the estimated annual variability was not consistent between the LUC emissions estimated based on the combined bookkeeping method

The main changes are (1) the in- clusion of data to year 2015 (inclusive) and a projection for fossil fuel emissions for year 2016; (2) the introduction of a projection for the

The main changes are (1) the inclusion of data to the year 2017 (inclusive) and a projection for the global carbon budget for the year 2018; (2) the introduction of metrics

The main changes are (1) the in- clusion of data to year 2016 (inclusive) and a projection for the global carbon budget for year 2017; (2) the use of two bookkeeping models to assess

Despite tracking surface and in situ CO 2 observations, the systems re- produce NOAA’s global annual CO 2 growth rate (Sect. 1) quantifies the mis- match between the estimated

ــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ يناثلا لصفلاـــــ ةيليلحت ةسارد ةيميلعتلا حلطصمل ةنراقم ميلعتلا حلطصم امأ ي ة لاخادتم