• Aucun résultat trouvé

A Patient-Specific 3D Model for Port Placement in Robotic Surgery

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "A Patient-Specific 3D Model for Port Placement in Robotic Surgery"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-01831302

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01831302

Submitted on 19 Jul 2018

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access

archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-entific research documents, whether they are pub-lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

A Patient-Specific 3D Model for Port Placement in Robotic Surgery

Mohammadreza Maddah, Cédric Dumas, Caroline G. L. Cao

To cite this version:

Mohammadreza Maddah, Cédric Dumas, Caroline G. L. Cao. A Patient-Specific 3D Model for Port Placement in Robotic Surgery. Surgetica 2017, Nov 2017, Strasbourg, France. �hal-01831302�

(2)

A Patient-Specific 3D Model for Port Placement in Robotic Surgery

M.R Maddah1,2 ,Cedric Dumas2, Caroline G.L. Cao1

1 Department of Biomedical, Industrial and Human Factors Engineering, Wright State University, OH, USA 2 LS2N, Institut Mines-Télécom, Nantes, France

Method

Discussion

Introduction

Results

Mock Left VentricleMock Right Ventricle RV Cavity

Planning port placement is a vital task in a robotic laparoscopic hysterectomy procedure. Decision aids for optimal port-placement can be developed based on:

➢ Known geometric model of the robotic system (Fig 1) ➢ Estimated geometric model of the surgical site

➢ Patient-specific morphology

One critical component of this decision-aid requires the reconstruction of a 3D model of a patient’s abdominal cavity, and the robot model.

Patient-specific model:

➢ The internal 3D model is constructed from pre-operative CT scans. Using 3D image segmentation, the target organ (uterus) is located in the internal model.

➢Considering the target organ location, the robot joints configuration, and the abdominal shape after insufflation, the accessible points with the highest performance index (manipulability) were calculated. These points are the preliminary locations of the entrance ports that are marked on the patient-specific model.

Objective

To find the optimal ports location on the patient's abdomen, the suitability of the points (on the abdominal surface, patient-specific model) for the ports location is preliminary evaluated based on the points accessibility for the robot manipulators. The accessible points are then filtered, and selected by the manipulability index (the manipulators ability to manipulate and pivot the surgical tools at RCM point). The points with the highest manipulability index are marked on the patient’s abdomen as the preliminary candidates for the entry ports location of the manipulators.

Fig 2: Top: Kinect was mounted above the patient,

Bottom: The external model.

➢ The accessible points (in green) for the endoscope manipulator are shown on the patient specific model in Fig 3.

Fig 3: Accessible points for the endoscope (green points)

Highest manipulability points for the endoscope (blue)

Fig 4: The points with Highest manipulability for the Si manipulators

Blue: endoscope; Green:arm3; Red:arm2; Brown:arm1

Kinect

Insufflated Abdomen

➢ The external model is constructed from Kinect images after insufflation (Fig 2). The abdominal shape, after insufflation, is demonstrated as a 3D mesh in the external model.

➢ Using 4 natural landmarks (on the pelvic bone and rib cage), the internal and the external models are aligned to form the patient-specific model (Fig 3).

Robot Model:

➢ The robotic manipulator (actuated joints) is modeled by D-H parameters (Fig 1).

➢ Given the target organ location in the patient-specific model, the points on the patient-specific model are assessed if they are accessible for the manipulator by

solving the inverse kinematics equation, X’=J𝜃′. If the

Jacobian det(JJ+) is not zero, the point is accessible for the robot manipulator.

➢ The manipulability index, W= JJ+ , is defined based on the manipulators ability to pivot and manipulate the surgical tool at RCM point uniformly (Fig 1). For any

specific configuration of the manipulator, 𝜃5~𝜃8 in Fig 1,

W is calculated for all the points on the patient-specific model. The points that satisfy W>0.18 are selected as the preliminary locations of the ports for each of the manipulator (Da Vinci Si).

➢ The points with the highest manipulability index for the endoscope, arm1, arm2, and arm3 are shown in Fig 4.

Manipulator actuated joints

Fig 1: Left: Da Vinci robot assembled to the operating trocars (courtesy of

Intuitive Surgical Inc.)

Right: The manipulators actuated joints configuration.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a grant from the Ohio Third Frontier to the Ohio Imaging Research and Innovation Network (OIRAIN).

Références

Documents relatifs

Note that our uniqueness result is stated for bounded potentials with, roughly speaking, half of the data C q considered in [12, Theorem 4.2] which seems to be, with [3], the

Enfin, pour vérifier mes hypothèses et répondre à ma question de recherche, j’ai interviewé quatre professionnel-le-s du social présents dans le milieu scolaire en tant

Methods We compared microstructure and finite-element analysis estimates of strength and stiffness by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) in 33

For the fourth step in our method we used this estimated tumor infiltration tail as the initial condition to the FK model (developed by Clatz [1] and Konukoglu et al. [9]) to

Using a biomechanical lower leg model, we propose to estimate the influence of the patient-specific calcaneus shape on the strains within the foot and to determine if

Prevalence of anxiety and depression among medical and pharmaceutical students in Alexandria University. Alexandria Journal of Medicine Volume 51, Issue 2 , June 2015,

We order the edges with respect to an increasing number of minimal configurations and generate the configuration variables and the associated constraints iteratively as long as

Taking into account this model, the customization of a service entails the selection of the different service modules needed for the service and for each one of the mod- ules,