• Aucun résultat trouvé

Advanced genetic models for Piétrain boars involved in crossbreeding in the Walloon Region using test station and on-farm phenotypic and genomic data

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Advanced genetic models for Piétrain boars involved in crossbreeding in the Walloon Region using test station and on-farm phenotypic and genomic data"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

M. Dufrasne

1,2

, V. Jaspart

3

, J. Wavreille

4

et N. Gengler

1

1 University of Liège, Gembloux Agro Bio-Tech, Animal Science Unit - Gembloux 2 F.R.I.A. - Brussels

3 Walloon Pig Breeders Association (AWEP) - Ciney

4 Walloon Agricultural Research Centre (CRA-W) - Gembloux

ADVANCED GENETIC MODELS FOR PIÉTRAIN BOARS INVOLVED IN

CROSSBREEDING IN THE WALLOON REGION USING TEST STATION

AND ON-FARM PHENOTYPIC AND GENOMIC DATA

Contact: marie.dufrasne@ulg.ac.be

RESEARCH SUPPORTED BY THE WALLOON REGION OF BELGIUM

CONTEXT

New

genetic evaluation program

for Walloon

Piétrain boars

tested in

test station

 Test station progeny test

for production traits (growth, carcass quality traits and feed intake)

 On-farm performance test

for traits recorded on live pigs (weight and carcass quality traits)

Crossbred progeny from

Piétrain sires

and

Landrace K+ dams

OBJECTIVE

To

develop

genetic evaluation models combining

test station

and

on-farm data

to estimate the

genetic values

of

Piétrain boars

for

crossbred performances

Growth

Data:

17 483 live weight from 2 076 crossbred progeny of Piétrain boars recorded at the test station between 50 and 210 days of age  54 068 live weight from 50 824 purebred and crossbred pigs recorded on-farm between 175 and 250 days of age

 Breed types: purebred Piétrain and Landrace (on-farm); crossbred Piétrain X Landrace (test station and on-farm)  Data recorded on females, entire and castrated males

 Data standardized for each day of age and pre-adjusted at 210 days to take into account variance heterogeneity

Model

(Dufrasne et al., 2011): Bi-trait animal model with random regressions using linear splines (knots at 50, 100, 175 and 210 days for test station weight; knots at 175, 210 and 250 days for on-farm weight):

y = Xb + Q (Za + Zp) + e

y = vector of observations (test station and on-farm weight) e = vector of random residual

b = vector of fixed effects (sex, contemporary group (CG), heterosis) Q = matrix of linear spline coefficients

a = vector of random additive effect X, Z = incidence matrix

p = vector of random permanent environment effect

Carcass quality traits

Data:

 Three traits (backfat thickness (BFa), loin muscle depth (LMD) and meat percentage (%Ma)) recorded on live animals in test station for progeny of tested boars, and

on-farm for performance tested pigs (37 824 animal recorded for each traits)

 Four traits (backfat thisckness (BFb), meat percentage (%Mb), carcass weight (CW) and conformation index (CONF)) recorded on carcass only for crossbred progeny of boars tested in test station (1 980 animals recorded for each trait)

 Breed types: purebred Piétrain and Landrace (on-farm); crossbred Piétrain X Landrace (test station and on-farm)  Data recorded on females, entire and castrated males

 Linear pre-adjustment of data at 200 days of age

Model:

Multitrait animal model:

y = Xb + Za + e

y = vector of observations (BFa, LMD, %Ma, BFb; %Mb, CW and CONF)

b = vector of fixed effects (sex, CG and heterosis for live traits; sex, slaughtdate and heterosis for carcass traits)

Feed intake

Data:

 1 914 records of estimated individual feed intake (EFI) only for crossbred progeny of boars tested in test station

Data recorded on female and castrated males

 Individualization of records by linear regression on average daily gain (ADG) between 100 and 210 days and on live weight at 100 days (LW100), both expressed in breeding values

Model:

Unitrait animal model y = Xb +Za + e

y = vector of observations (EFI)

b = vector of fixed effects (sex and pen; ADG and LW100 as linear covariables)

RESULTS

For 75

Piétrain boars

already progeny tested until now,

breeding values

(EBV) were estimated using the data and the models described above.

For the moment Walloon pig breeders receive

EBV and associated reliabilities

for the following traits

to base their selection decisions

on:

UNDER DEVELOPMENT

Global

index combining different traits

Further

enhanced models

that will allow also estimation of

non-additive and crossbreeding effects

 Genomic selection

of Walloon Piétrain boars using

Single Nucleotid Polymorphism (SNP)

genotypes to estimate

additive

,

non-additive

and

crossbreeding

effects

• ADG between 100 and 210 days

• Live weight at 210 days

• Backfat thickness

• Loin Muscle depth

• Carcass weight

• Meat percentage

Références

Documents relatifs

Functionally important regulation of p70S6K by loading was empha- sized by a signiWcant 3.8-fold enhanced p70S6K-phospho- transfer activity in pCMV-FAK- versus pCMV transfected

Le taux d’événements dans les groupes placebo démon- tre bien le risque de base des différentes populations évaluées avec une population à plus haut risque dans 4S (28 %) et à

The objectives of this study were to investigate the use of genomic selection to improve breeding value accuracy and to identify major single nucleotide polymorphisms

We conducted this study to investigate the effect of host- microbiome interactions on meat quality and carcass composition traits in swine at different growth stages (Wean,

Our findings show that the non-additive genetic vari- ance in the Nile tilapia population was almost entirely additive-by-additive epistatic variance, when using genomic

Accuracy of genomic predictions of breeding values was evaluated by using a 5-fold cross-validation scheme and considering three models: Bayesian ridge regression (BRR), Bayes C

We herein report the results of a whole genome scan performed in a Piétrain × Large White intercross to map QTL influencing growth and carcass traits. The identification of an

The increase in predictive ability from using a social genetic effects model compared to a classical animal model was only significant for gilts in the univariate