• Aucun résultat trouvé

Forests for agriculture: new perspectives in European landscapes

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Forests for agriculture: new perspectives in European landscapes"

Copied!
14
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Open Archive TOULOUSE Archive Ouverte (OATAO)

OATAO is an open access repository that collects the work of Toulouse researchers and makes it freely available over the web where possible.

This is an author-deposited version published in : http://oatao.univ-toulouse.fr/

Eprints ID : 18582

To cite this version : Deconchat, Marc and Andrieux, Emilie

Forests for agriculture: new perspectives in European landscapes.

(2017) In: IUFRO 8.01.02 Landscape Ecology Conference 2017, 24 September 2017 - 29 September 2017 (Halle, Germany). (Unpublished)

Any correspondence concerning this service should be sent to the repository administrator: [email protected]

(2)

UMR1201 Dynafor INRA/INP ENSAT/ INP EIPurpan Dynamiques et écologie des paysages agriforestiers dynafor.toulouse.inra.fr

Deconchat, Marc; Andrieu, Emilie

(3)

Proportion of « islets » (Guidos) in 25km squares (High - Low)

(4)

Mean: 9 ha

~ ½ of private forests

cover less than 25 ha

(5)

Brandl, H., 2007. The small-scale forestry group 1986– 2006: an overview on the group activities during the last 20 years. Small-scale Forestry 6, 1-18.

Wiersum, K.F., Elands, B.H.M., Hoogstra, M.A., 2005. Small-scale forest ownership across Europe: Characteristics and future

potential. Small-scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy 4, 1-19.

Nijnik, M., Nijnik, A., Bizikova, L., 2009. Analysing the

Development of Small-Scale Forestry in Central and Eastern Europe. Small-scale Forestry 8, 159-174.

(6)

Farm forest: forest (woodlot) owned by

active farmer

17% of French private forest area (and up to 44% in several departments) is farm forests Few and not reliable statistics

OR

Farm forest: forest owned or managed by

active or retired farmer, or in direct interaction with farming.

Broader view not taken into account in statistics

Cinotti, B., Normandin, D., 2002. Exploitants agricoles et propriété

forestière : où est passée la “forêt paysanne” ? Revue Forestière

(7)

Ecological infrastructure =

more stable in time than most of the crops

Edges as interfaces

Species move between

forest and crops

Maybe not all the time, but crucial when populations collapse in cropland N u m b e r o f in d iv id u a ls /t ra p /week

Distance (m) from the border

Roume, A., Deconchat, M., Raison, L., Balent, G., Ouin, A., 2011.

Edge effects on ground beetles at the woodlot-field interface are short-range and asymmetrical. Agricultural and Forest

(8)

Decocq, G., Andrieu, E., Brunet, J., Chabrerie, O., De Frenne, P., De Smedt, P., Deconchat, M., Diekmann, M., Ehrmann, S., Giffard, B., Mifsud, E.G., Hansen, K., Hermy, M., Kolb, A., Lenoir, J., Liira, J., Moldan, F., Prokofieva, I., Rosenqvist, L., Varela, E., Valdés, A., Verheyen, K., Wulf, M., 2016. Ecosystem Services from Small Forest

Patches in Agricultural Landscapes. Current Forestry

(9)

Andrieu, E., Vialatte, A., Sirami, C., 2015.

Misconceptions of Fragmentation's Effects on Ecosystem Services: A Response to Mitchell et al. Trends Ecol Evol 30, 633-634.

Mitchell, M.G., Suarez-Castro, A.F., Martinez-Harms, M., Maron, M., McAlpine, C., Gaston, K.J., Johansen, K., Rhodes, J.R., 2015. Reframing landscape fragmentation's effects on

(10)

 High volumes available (many mature forests)

 Scattered in the countryside

How to collect?

But close to potential final users

 New logging and processing technics

 New markets and customers  How farmers may include

forestry activities in their system?

(11)

Mulching with wood chips for

plantation (horticulture)

Organic matter (compost) and

Biochar for crops

Bedding for livestock

Fence post and wood based

structures

…

How to help farmers to use more

of their own wood or the wood of their neighbours?

(12)

Products and services to be used

locally

Strongly dependent on land

characteristics

• What can be produced? What is needed?

But with a better connection with

other places through new technologies

How to get more income from a

(13)

Forests are not just trees and wood: a place

where to live, a symbol

High cultural values associated to the forests in

many regions

Sourdril, A., Andrieu, E., Cabanettes, A., Elyakime, B., Ladet, S., 2012. How to maintain

domesticity of usages in small rural forests? Lessons from forest management continuity through a French case study. Ecol. Soc. 17.

Need to develop participatory approaches to

(14)

Woods are available in rural landscapes

There are new opportunities to use them

More benefits can be obtained from products and services

Références

Documents relatifs