• Aucun résultat trouvé

Waste management evolution through years: evaluation of improvement using Life Cycle Assessment methodology

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Waste management evolution through years: evaluation of improvement using Life Cycle Assessment methodology"

Copied!
20
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

1

Waste management evolution

through years :evaluation of

improvement using LCA

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING

Processes and Sustainable Development

S. Belboom, R. Renzoni, J-M. Digneffe & A. Léonard

(2)

Contents

1.

Context of research

2.

Definition of studied systems

3.

Environmental evaluation of waste

management

(3)

Context

Waste = important concern of our century

Tool to help management

 Life Cycle Assessment

Improvement of waste management processes

 Reduction of waste quantity  Increase of valorization

 Decrease of the induced environmental impacts

(4)

Waste management – Goals

Goals of study

 To evaluate the improvement of waste management

through years

 Belgian situation (Liège) from 1970 until now

 To help making the best sustainable choice in the

future

Functional unit

 Treatment and valorization of one ton of average

(5)

5

Contents

1.

Context of research

2.

Definition of studied systems

3.

Environmental evaluation of waste

management

(6)

4 systems through years

Before 1970

 Open dump

From 1990 until 2009

 Waste grinding and sorting

(7)

4 systems through years

From 2009 until now

 Incineration of the whole fraction of waste

Short term project

 Sorting and collection of the biodegradable fraction

7

(8)

Type of waste

Functional unit is composed of

 Municipal waste = 67,47%

 Common industrial waste = 24,90%  Non-milled bulky = 5,20%

 Sludge = 2,43%

(9)

Included steps

9

Steps taken into account are:

 Landfill – with or without collection of gas and

leachates

 Incineration with

 Chemicals consumptions for flue gas cleaning  Flue gas emissions

 By-products treatment

 Biogas with anaerobic digestion and digestate

valorization

(10)

Contents

1.

Context of research

2.

Definition of studied systems

3.

Environmental evaluation of waste

management

(11)

Waste management – LCI

Use of ReCiPe 2008 method

 Midpoint  Hierarchist

Use of databases

 Ecoinvent

 From producers

 From scientific literature

(12)
(13)

Waste management - Impact assessment

(14)
(15)

Waste management - Impact assessment

(16)

Waste management – Interpretation

Global warming and fossil fuel depletion are

reduced through years

Valorization of electricity is helpful

(17)

17

Waste management – Interpretation

Limitations of the study

 Assumptions about landfilling – uncertainties

 Infrastructure to take into account

 Possibility in the future ( economic situation and

feasibility to evaluate)

 Other techniques to consider?

(18)

Contents

1.

Context of research

2.

Definition of studied systems

3.

Environmental evaluation of waste

management

(19)

19

Waste management – Perspectives

Life Cycle Assessment = environmental

management tool

 Decision support tool

 Need of other tools for economic and sociological

aspects  3 pillars of sustainable development

Waste

 FIRST: reduce the quantity  to prevent

(20)

Waste management – Perspectives

Références

Documents relatifs

The framework consist of two main components: CALDEA, an information quality model based on maturity levels which serves as references when assesing and guidance when improving;

INPRO sustainability assessment criteria on the safety issues of waste management installations operating as parts of nuclear fuel cycle facilities, including spent nuclear

• Database exploitation requires a good understanding of database structure as well as data model especially in the context where the data is heterogeneous and the links

In the absence of such studies and in the absence of regulations for medical waste disposal in Palestine, we investigated the handling and disposal of various types of dental waste

URGES Member States 1 to assess the health aspects of waste management in order to make it safe and environmentally sound and to explore options to work more closely with the

Recalling WHO’s Constitution, and recognizing the following relevant international agreements and instruments: the Bali declaration on waste management for human health and

(4) to work with UNEP, in connection with the WHO/UNEP Health Environment Linkages Initiative and the Strategic Approach to International Chemicals Management, as well as with

However, pilot projects are being carried out to allow a validation from WHO regarding the ease of use and safety of needles removers which may carry a risk of needle stick