Transformation of OCL Constraints to FoCaLiZe Specifications

“essential safety requirements.” These requirements clarify important formal properties – both material and conceptual – that exclude some objects from

Electrical properties of tholins and derived constraints on the Huygens landing site composition at the surface of Titan.. Journal of

The example transformation model has four parts: a base part with datatypes and attributes for concepts commonly employed in the ER and relational model; a part for ER schemata

This section presents our approach to co-evolve OCL constraints. Figure 3 depicts an overview of our approach. We rst present the metamodel changes that we consider during an

Given a multiplicity greater than one, the result type should be a bag of the type of the class at this end, because a target object can be linked by multiple pairs consisting

As an example, consider the invariants in Figure 4 over the metamodel in Figure 1: (Inv1) there cannot be two attributes with the same name within the same class, (Inv2) a class and

e 1 OCL 1 , ... Phase 2 runs an impact analysis to identify the impacted OCL constraints that need to be co-evolved. After that, the appropriate resolutions are proposed for

In terms of continuous ranked probability skill score, spread calibration provides much more gain in skill than the traditional ensemble-mean calibration and extends for lead times