Graphs and tables on French CSPs Inventory

HAL Id: hal-02403483

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02403483

Submitted on 10 Dec 2019

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-entific research documents, whether they are pub-lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivatives| 4.0 International License

Graphs and tables on French CSPs Inventory

Jean-Jacques Chitrit

To cite this version:

Jean-Jacques Chitrit. Graphs and tables on French CSPs Inventory. [Technical Report] European Union. 1997, 17 p. �hal-02403483�

t

t

RESEARCH PROIECT

IN

THE

FRAMEWORK

OF

THE

EU-FAIR PROGRAMME

MARKET

EFFECTS OF COUNTRYSIDE STES/ARDSHIP POLICIES

(FArR1-CT9s-070e)

GRAPIIS

AND TABLES

ON F.RENCH

CSPs

INVENTORY

Jean-Jacques

Chitrit,

Chantal Guerrier

INRA-ESR Rennes, Environment

Policy

and Risk

Unit

December 1997 I

I

r

I

l"

tr' I { !

I

l t

ï

I Abstract

This report presents the results of task 2 of the

project,

"inventory and classification

of

Countryside Stewardship

Policies

" (CSPs).

_It

is based on some graphics and tables

drawing

up on the

dffirentfieldname

of the survey qaestionnaire :

c

Policy

details (tables 2, 31 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8)

o _Responsible

_Authorities

_{(table 9)}

o

_Financial

_{aspects (table 10)}

o Extend

of andertaking

(table 11)

o

_Markets

_{(tables 12 and 14)}

o Technical aspects (tables 13

and

15) o Gent matrixes

(table

16).

For

each

of

them, measures under 2078/92 regulation are

_{dffirentiated from}

others

policies.

Graphics show the increasing of CSPs surveyed during the three last programm-years

1993/1996: extend

of undertakingfor

2078/92 measures (graphs 1 to 3) and others crossing

dffirent

classification keys as

policy

objectives, target areas and

policy

tools (legal

nature,

policy

measures)

with

quantitative informations: areas andfunds assigned (graphs 4

to

6).

r'

I T l1

I-[,

2

lt-

r-l r=

r'

-

r-L

f- i-I L I t t ! t

[;

r

t"

L-r I f-i I Summary 2

- graphic 1-: Extend of undertaking , the case of Grassland premium... ...4

- graphic 2: Extend of undertaking , the case of Zonal

measures

...4

- graphic 3: Extend of undertaking , the case of Local programms ...4

- graphic 4: areas and funds assigned to voluntary CSPs per main objective... 5

- graphic 5: areas and funds assigned to voluntary CSPs per target area...5

- graphic

6:

areaunder mandatory CSPs per main

objective

... 5

- table 1:

List

of policies surveyed 6 - table 2: Policies by administrative tier... - table 3:

Links

with

specific programmes... - table 4: Number of CSPs

with

more than one objective... ...7

..,...7

...8

- table 5: Frequency of objectives in the policies surveyed 8 - table 6: Frequency of the main objective in the CSPs surveyed... - table

7:Target

areas of the surveyed CSPs... - tables 8: Legal nature (tabtes 8a, 8b), Measures of the policy(tables 8c to _{8e )} - table 9 : Authorities involved... ....,9

...9

...10-11 ...12

- table 10: Funds sources... - table

11:Uptake....

- table 12:

Agnatltural

markets affected

by

CSPs... ... 13

... 13

I4

- table 13: Technical aspects of the CS

measures...

... 15

- table 14:

Marketability

of Environmental Goods Services (EGS) produced... 15

- table 15: Relationship between EGS and agricultural products

l6

- tables 16:Gent matrix for CSPs' analysis and

classification

...1,7

f-'

Graph I - Extend ofudertaking for 2078/92 Fr€nch measures : Case ofGrassland premium

ha æ6 6.0m.000 5.8m.000 5.600.000 5_4m_m0 5.2m.000 5.0m.mo 1993/94 t995 t996

Graph 2 - Exiend of undertakin e fot 2078/92 French measures : Case of Zonal measures

(cumulated daa) ha ecLs 120.000 20.000.000 240.000.000 220.000.000 200.000.000 180.000.000 160.000.000 140.m0.000 120.000.000 1m.000.000 N ecus Bl ha 100.m0 80.m0 60.000 40.000 20.000 15.000.0m 10.000.000 5.000.000 30.000.000 25.000.000 20.000.000 15.000.000 1993194 t995

Graph 3 - Exiend ofurderAking for 2078/92 French measures : Local programs

(cumulaæd <lata) ha cc6 1996 450.000 400.000 350.000 300.0m 250000 200.0m 150.000 100.000 4 N æus Eha

t

N accuha 1993/94 1995 19% 10.000.0m

r

I

T'

raph 4 - Funds assigned and area under volontary CSPs per main objective

ha æN 6.000.m0 250.0m.m0 5.ofr).0m 2000m.m0 4.m.m0 150.m.m0 3.000.000 100.000.m0 2.000.000 1.000.000 50.000000

l@dæN av@ wildcons rærqtion reduct qurlity conv6

Graph 5 - Fund assigned and area under voluntary CSPS per target areas

6.000.000 250.0m.000 5,000.000 200.000.000 4.000.000 150.000,000 3_m0.000 100.000.000 2.000.m0 L000.000 50.000.000

wholecomty sprrificôdminisf. sp@iicledûse spoific gægraphic specific d6igût

Graph 6 - Area under mandatory CSPs per main objective and target area

ha r c

r

i t Nl ecus tha N ecus Eha f,t I L I

t-I T-F t t r I t 5

f'

L

I f

t,

L

L

I

L

L

L

4tm0 20000 m.000 80.000 60.000 4t000 20m0 spæiflc gægmph sil pml4lion

spæific lald use quâlity label

t {

r

I

r

i tr I i t_i I t f"' i

r-I

F

r-t

t-

_! I r I

f-L

I {,-I I

t,

I t

l-I

t.

!

[,

( L.

L

I

[-I

L

f {

L-Table

I

-

List

of policies surveyed (database

file

_Questio.mdb) :

National Régional Régional Régional Régional Régional local local local National National National National National National Régional local National National national local national 1,2,3 2,34,6 4,6 1,3 1,6 7 t,2,3,4,5,6,7 1,,2,3 7 6 6 6 I 8 6 1,3,6 7 7 t,2,3,4,5 1,2,3,4 3,5 gtassland premium

taking land out ofagricultural production

conversion from arable to extensive grassland

rearing of threatened breeds

reduced livestock densities

conversion to organic farming

local programmes (total)

bocage à ormes

marais du Cotentin

sustainable development scheme

scheme for improving fertilisation

European initiative for integrated farming

agricultural pollution monitoring scheme

countrysise maintenance funding scheme

afforestation

reduced use of agri-inputs

local programme Monts d'Arrée

AOC Bordeaux wines

AOC Beaufort cheese

coast and lake shore protection

local programme Normandie-Maine

set aside for fauna protection 1993 1993 1993 t993 I 993 1993 I 993 1995 1991 1992 1991 1993 1994 I 995 1992 1993 1993 1935 1968 l97s 1994 t994 1 J 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1t 12 13 t4 15 t6 l7 18 19 20 2l 22 Administrative tier (Level) Policy measure (table Form 01) Policy name Year of lssue NO 6

r-li

.

Policy

details

Table 2 - Policies

by

administrative

tier

Table 3 -

Links

with

specific programms ( I ! t.

r-t t l' ( I

I

I

i,

r

t-i t f

["

I j I-r i-100 22 10

t2

total

4t

4t

18 9 9 4 8 2

I

7 4

o

National

o

Regional

o

Local % total Others P.2078192

Administrative

tier

Number

of

CSPs

100 22 10

t2

total 27 50

l4

9 6 11 J 2 5 2

I

2

I

9 2

.

applied

directly

o

through an agricultural programme

.

through an environmental programme

o

through a landscape programme

o/_/o

total

Others 2078/92

C^SPs have been:

Number

of

CSPs

r

ll

Table 4 - Number

of

CSPs

with

more than one objective

Table 5 - Frequency

of

objectives in the policies surveyed

r/

li N lr* I I

r'

I

r.

I I t-I t I

t"

t I

f'

f i

L

I I

l

I

t.

I

L

f

L

I x 1 100 22 10

t2

total

9 9

l4

18 50 2 2 J 4 11 1 1 8

I

2 J J J a _{5 objectives or more}

o

4 objectives

r

3 objectives o2 objectives o 1 objective % total Others 2078192 CSPs

with

Number

of

CSPs 45 27

4t

23

t4

4l

23 5 10 6 9 5 J 9 5

I

a J 2 2 1 2 a J J 1 7 4 7 4

I

6 2

o

Landscape conservation

o

Environment conservation

o'Wildlifeconservation

o

Soil conservation

o

Recreation

o

Reduction of negative impacts

o

_Quality labels

o

Conversion of agricultural land

7o of surveyed CSPs

total

Others 2078192

Objectives

Number

of cases

r

l

I

r

l

n

I t I rn at

[-I

fr-lr

(-t

Ir

{1 F I T t

il

f

L

t,,

L

f

L

t-,.

L

{;

L-100 22 10 T2 total 9 4,5 32 5 32

t4

4,5 2 1 7 1 7 J 1 1

I

I

4 2 1

I

1 6 J 1

o

Landscapeconservation

o

Environmentconservation

o

Wildlife

conservation

o

Soil conservation

o

Recreation

o

Reduction of negative impacts

o

Support to local quality labels

o

Conversion

of

agricultural land

o

Pure multi-objective CSPs

%

CSPs

total

Others 2078192

Main

objective

Number

of

CSPs

Table 6 - Frequency of the main objective in the CSPs surveyed

Table

7

-Target areas of the surveyed CSPs

4l

5

t4

5 64

4t

7 1 1 1 J 4 2 2 11 5

o

whole country

o

whole Region

o

Mountainous or

LFAs

areas

a Specific geographic areas

o

Specific administrative areas

o

Specifically designated areas

o

Areas

with

specific land use

% CSPs

Others 2078/92

Target areus Suweyed CSPs

r

l

["

t { i

I

I r1 I

I

rr

t ir-l t

r'

r t

r-F

Ir

f t I h, I

t

t t

[,

I I

t

L

I L; I

L

L

Table 8a. - Legal nature

of

surveyed CSPs

Table 8b - Regulation and definition/assignement of property rights

100 22 10

t2

totâl 86,5 64 13,5 9

t9

t4

J 2 7 2 J 2

t2

t2

Volontary o _{Financial measurcs} o Market measures a _{Persuasion measutes} 13,5 J 3 2 1 Mandatory

o Regulalion and def/ass, ofproperty rights

o Land purchase by public bodies

o Land management by public bodies

o Land purchase by wildlive proteclion _lunds/lrusts

c Land management by wildlive proleclionfunds/tru.

%

CSPs

total

Others 2078192

Policy

tool

Number

of

CSPs

27 32

4t

J 2 5 J 5 4

o

Land use contraint

o

Environmental standarts

o

Technical standarts/code ofpractices

o

Authorisations/concessions

o

Physical planning by local authorities

% CSPs

Others 2078192

Surveyed CSPs

Table 8c - Financial measures

Table 8d - Market measures

Table 8e - Persuasion measures

r

I

r

I

r

l I t

r

I

t-i

l-t L I I L I

L

r'

i.

r-I L] lr r-, I ( ["r t I r

t.

lr

[., I

i

I

L

L

I I

L

L

2

t2

o

Tax concessions

o

Credits

facilities

.

Compensations (total and/or partial)

o

Incentives

(including

surpluses)

o

Levies Others 2078192 Surveyed C^SPs J

I

2

o

Managementagreements

o

Covenants

o

Aunction of incentives

.

Appellationsd'origine

Others 2078192 Suweyed C,SPs

I

1

o

Cross compliance

o

Experimental and demonstration farms

o

Advice, extension services and training

o

Information and communication

Others 2078192

Sarveyed CSPs

fft t- L

-Tl

it-

T---': a I t

i- r* r- r:

o _Responsible

_Authorities

Table 9 - Authorities

involved

Implementation

o

nationaVregional (22 Régions)

o

local (95 Départements) examination

o

nationaVre glonaIQ2 Régions)

o

1ocal(95 Departements

control

o

nationaUre gional(22 Régions)

o

local (95 Départements Phases

of

CSPs procedure 52

r84

200 25 351 2078192

Number of diferent Authorities

15 100 10 95 10 5 Others PHB,6 MAE.5 OPL MA,Prëf.DMF, CME

Préf.DDAF, CDOA, CPO, OPA

Préf.DDAF, ADASEA, PNR

CNASEA-Region

Préf. DDAF,ONIC, CPO, PNR

C,SPs survEled

PDD. PMP. FGE. BTA. JFS.CLIT

MA,ME, DATAR,ANDA,OPA CELR CNS,

Agences, P réf. DDAF, O PA

Préf. DDAF, CD OA, C P O, C o llect. Territ., CEL

DSV, CDH

FTM. FAR. AOCV.AOCF

ANDA, OPA,, FARRE, ,INAO,CIT/B

CPL, Syndicats

ANDA,FAR,INAO

FAR, NAO

Syndicats,

r* rT rî rT r:: n-

cT

!

TN

-=

T-ï

I A

oFinancial

aspects and extent

of undertaking:

Table 10 - Funds sources

Table 11 - Uptake (since

first year to

3111211996)

* _{7 ecu= 6,60}

_FF.-

₁

_MECU:1

_{000 ecus.}

r

European

Union

o

State

o

Local Authorities a _Participants soarces T2

t2

T2 2078192 Surveyed C,SPs J 9 7 5 Others 55 100 86 23

%

CSPs

o

Mandatory (3 CSP)

o

Volontary **(12+7)

780 900 2078/92

Funds

assigned

(MECU*)

1s3.636 120 000 Others 126 800 2078192

Namber

offarms

13 62s 33 300 Others s 987 700 2078192

Area

156 000

I

573 000 Others 27 700 2078192

Namber

of heads 10 400 495 000 Others

**

_{included total local}

_programm

_{but not the}

four

examples

_for

these

programm.

f- r- t- r- r* rT f:*

r

.

Market

and

Marketability

of EGS

linked

to stewardship

practices:

Table 12 -

Agricultural

markets affected

by

CSPs

I

-t

t

T

I

-*:j

---1

:-o

all agricultural commodities

o

cereals

e

root crops

o

fruits

o

fresh vegetables

.

wlne

.

seeds, ornemental plants, tree-nursery

o

other crop products (hay, fodder)

o

meat

o

milk

Agricultural

commo

dity

8 1 1 1 2 6 11 8 2078192 Suweyed C,SPs 5 1 2 J 2 1 Others 13 1 1

I

2 1 2 9 13 9

total

59 4 4 4 9 4 9 4L 59 4T % CSPs T4

i:: rT t- r

rî r:t rT r:

t

-n

î::')

*1--t1

-':

Table 13 - Technical aspects of the CS measures

Table 14 -

Marketability

of Environmental Goods Services (EGS) produced

o

cultivations and related landscapes

o

natural environments

.

single elements

of

landscapes/environment

o

recreation and access

o

agnculturalpractices Technical aspects 44 T6 6 J 83 2078/92

Number

of cases 46 T4 1 J 48 Others 49 53 86 s0 63

%of

CSPs

.

already marketed

o

potentially marketable

o

not marketable

Nature

of EGS 2 0 10 2078/92 Sarveyed C,SPs J a J 4 Others 5 J 14 total 23

t4

63 % CSPs 15

i:_ -- r- t- rî r--

r*:

f-

:-ï-l

..J

T-*1

--1 --j

:-t

I

o Jointness between

Environmental

Goods and Services and Cuontryside Stewardship Table 15 - Relationship between EGS and agricultural products

Non

competitive:

r

CS and related EGS as a production factor

o

CS and related EGS as incidental by-product Competitive

o

CS and related EGS as intentional product

.

CS and related EGS as the main product

o

CS and related EGS as the only product Answer not possible

Total

Nature

of

EGS

5 4

I

6 J J 1

t2

2078/92 Sumelted C,SPs 5 2 J 5 J

I

I

10 Others 10 6 4 11 6 1 4

I

22 total 45 27 18 50 27 5 18 5 100 %

%

CSPs

I6

L

-l]

l

Table 16 - Gent

matrix

for analysis and classification

of

CSPs - area (ha)

or livestock

(LID

per legal nature and objective

POLICY

MAIN

OBJECTIVE

o

Regulation/assignement of property rights

.

Land purchase/management by public bodies

o

Land purchase/management by

wildlife

trusts

o

Compensations

o

Others financial measures (tax concessions,...)

o

Managementagreements

o

Others markets measures (Covenants,...) oPersuasion

LEGAL

NATURE

167 200 70 831 Quality labels 1

<.-

market ase-value 5 550 Convers. ofagric. land 2 27 000 Soil protect. J 24 200 Recreat. 4 495 000 LU 82 400 ha, 17 500 LU 1 s06 500 Reduction

of

impacts 5

non market non use-valae----)

252 000 Landscape conservation 6 41 800 ha,4 500 000 LU 5 427 000 Environment conservation 7 281 000 Wildlife conser 8 T7