• Aucun résultat trouvé

Automatic Determination of Sedimentary Units from Well Data

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Automatic Determination of Sedimentary Units from Well Data"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-01775154

https://hal-mines-paristech.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01775154

Submitted on 24 Apr 2018

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access

archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-entific research documents, whether they are pub-lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Automatic Determination of Sedimentary Units from Well Data

Anna Bubnova, Jacques Rivoirard, Fabien Ors, Isabelle Cojan

To cite this version:

Anna Bubnova, Jacques Rivoirard, Fabien Ors, Isabelle Cojan. Automatic Determination of Sedimen-tary Units from Well Data. EAGE 2017, 2017, Paris, France. �hal-01775154�

(2)

Automatic Determination of Sedimentary Units

from Well Data

Introduction

Heterogeneous reservoirs often consist in several sub-horizontal geological units. The determination of these units is important in order to create realistic models of the reservoirs. The best solution is a geological expertise, which will provide all the information about reservoir stratigraphy. But if it is impossible to perform such expertise, or if there is no exact conclusion, we propose a new numerical analysis method which is able to describe the vertical heterogeneity of the reservoir and help defining optimally the geological units from the well data. This method can be useful for modeling heterogeneous reservoirs, using for instance a process-based modeling (e.g., Flumy software for meandering channelized reservoirs, Lopez et al., 2008) or a stochastic modeling like Truncated or Plurigaussian simulations (M. Armstrong et al., 2011).

Problematic

Vertical Proportion Curves (VPC)

Aim

To automate the geological units determination from the

VPC data by a procedure

“stronger” than a visual

criterion

Note: for now, it is enough to compute strictly horizontal

simulation units. Flumy performs the simulations in paleogeographic space (relative geological age).

Conclusions

The proposed clustering method for analyzing wells VPC shows good results on synthetic tests: it permits to determine the initial simulation units even if the extracted

wells VPC are not clearly representative. Results for real

data set (Loranca) are also quite interesting: geological units proposed by geologists are almost similar to the units obtained by clustering.

This method can be applied automatically in order to propose a division of a heterogeneous reservoir into several contrasted horizontal units.

Perspectives

• Automation of the choice of the units optimal number (from the graph of Clusters Dissimilarities).

• Implementation of the method into Flumy as a wells analysis tool.

• Non-horizontal units from the well data.

Results

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to ENGIE and ENI,

partners of the Flumy Research

Program.

(a) Simulation VPC, red lines represent the limits between the initial units (b) VPC of 20 extracted wells

(c) Clusters Dissimilarities graph, the 3 last clusters are the most dissimilar (d) Sand part of the wells VPC, the colors correspond to the 3 last clusters

Contact

Information

anna.bubnova@mines-paristech.fr

FLUMY® [2017] © MINES PARISTECH / ARMINES,

http://cg.ensmp.fr/flumy

A. BUBNOVA

1

, J. RIVOIRARD

1

, F. ORS

1

, I. COJAN

1

(1) Center of Geosciences MINES ParisTech (Fontainebleau, France)

References

1) Lopez S., Cojan I., Rivoirard J., Galli A., 2008. Process-based

stochastic modeling: meandering channelized reservoirs. Spec. Publ. Int. Assoc. Sedimentol. 40 – 139 :144.

2) T. Romary, F. Ors, J. Rivoirard, J. Deraisme. Unsupervised

classification of multivariate geostatistical data: Two algorithms.

Computers and Geosciences, Elsevier, 2015, Statistical learning in geoscience modeling: Novel algorithms and challenging case studies, 85, pp. 96-103.

3) M. Armstrong, A. Galli, H. Beucher, G. Loc’h, D. Renard, B. Doligez, R. Eschard, F. Geffroy. Plurigaussian simulations in Geosciences. Springer, 2011.

Method

Contrasted simulation units:

Non-contrasted simulation units:

Real data example

– 8 wells

(Loranca, Spain):

(a) Simulation VPC, red lines represent the limits between the initial units (b) VPC of 8 extracted wells

(c) Clusters Dissimilarities graph, the 5 last clusters are the most dissimilar. (d) Sand part of VPC, the colors correspond to 5 last clusters.

(a) VPC of 8 Loranca wells, plain red lines show 3 units proposed by geologists

(b) Clusters Dissimilarities graph, the 3 last clusters are the most dissimilar (c) Sand part of VPC (3 last clusters)

(d) VPC of 8 Loranca wells, dotted red lines show the 3 simulation units proposed by clustering

Question: how to choose the geological units?

Geostatistical Hierarchical Clustering (T. Romary, 2015):

Hierarchical clustering: A division of data set into partitions (clusters) which become

larger and larger with each step of the algorithm: each new cluster is obtained by a successive consolidation of two similar clusters.

Graphical Representation: Dendrogram (a) or graph of Clusters Dissimilarities (b):

Data set: We use the wells VPC statistics (Flumy):

• Vertical 1D data

Each sample i has a vertical elevation value (zi) and a sand proportion value (sandi)

Additional method concepts:

Only adjacent VPC intervals can be grouped into clusters. Example:

Initial dissimilarity between unit clusters i and j:

dij = (sandi – sandj)2

Compute initial dissimilarities between all the samples

Group the two most similar clusters

Update the intercluster dissimilarities (LC)

2 i j i j ds a n ds a n d 1st cluster 2nd cluster 1st cluster 3rd cluster Bad! 1st cluster 2nd cluster 3rd cluster 4th cluster Good! Sand proportion Vertical elevation

Linkage Criterion (LC) is used to compute the updated intercluster dissimilarity value

resulting from the cluster merger.

Ward’s Minimum Variance: intercluster dissimilarity is the increase of within-cluster variance after merging.

Sandy Point Bars Silty Levees

Clay paleosols

Sandy Point Bars

Fluvial reservoir analog, Loranca basin, Spain

25m 57m Sand = 43% Sand = 26% Sand = 28% Sand = 32% or

Example of wells VPC, data source – 8 wells of Loranca basin, Spain

???

Références

Documents relatifs

We have simulated our proposal by using fine grain thermal simulator and the simulation results indicated the strong dependency between placement and temperature gradients

The pure strike slip segments display some similarities with the Côte d’Ivoire Ghana margin, showing a narrow ocean to continent transition, and in some places

Indeed, instead of conceiving sentences or utterances as the sole “maximal-units” of syntactic description, our framework suggests that two different kinds of

The study carried out by on the frequency of use of English and French proverbs shows that First come, first served is the most frequently used elliptical proverb in the

Blue channel on SM9: best plane defocus determination as a function of fiber (left) or wavelength (right), from first scan data (top) and after tilt correction scan data

In Section 2, notations, estimation and model selection are fixed for model-based clustering and model-based co- clustering by underlying also the case of various types of

Combining the shifted duration of education with a Poisson model improves the best BIC clustering model A Co-Cluster Analysis Example (using BlockCluster a software).. ·

For determining reservoir geological units by using this method, a number of synthetic tests were performed: firstly, we have created a multiple units block-model