• Aucun résultat trouvé

Analysis of Kids’ Athletics implementation in Wallonia

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Analysis of Kids’ Athletics implementation in Wallonia"

Copied!
7
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Analysis of Kids’ Athletics

implementation in Wallonia

Jidovtseff Boris Wuillaume Sandrine Cloes Marc 1

Children's Physical Activity and Sport, January 26-28, 2017 , Jyväskylä, Finland University of Liège, Belgium

Research Unit on Childhood

Department of Sport and Rehabilitation Sciences

Introduction

2

Track & field competitions for children in Belgium

60m sprint Long jump Hockey ball throwing

(2)

Introduction

3

Track & field competitions for children in Belgium

60m sprint Long jump Hockey ball throwing

10 sec 3 trials (20-30sec) 3 trials (20-30sec) Total < 60sec during competition

Time spent on site : 2 to 5 hours Time spent on site : 2 to 5 hours

Very low motor engagement ! Very low motor engagement !

1

1

Introduction

4

Track & field competitions for children in Belgium

60m sprint Long jump Hockey ball throwing

Performance Risk : false start

Performance Risk : fault

Performance Risk : fault

Risky activity based on performance ! Risky activity based on performance !

2

2

(3)

Introduction

5

Track & field competitions for children in Belgium

60m sprint Long jump Hockey ball throwing

Miniaturized adult model of competition Miniaturized adult model of competition

Not based on motor learning Not based on participation Risk of pressure and anxiety

Not meeting Long Term Models recommendations (Côté, 2015, DLTA, …)

Introduction

6

IAAF recommandation since 2002 =

Hurdles Relay

Hurdles Relay ThrowingThrowing Cross jumpCross jump RelayRelay Rocket throwingRocket throwing Long jumpsLong jumps EnduranceEndurance

Team event for children

6 to 8 athletics games base on fundamentals and athletic learning

No individual performance, no PB BUT team ranking At the end of the meeting : Diploma + social drink and snack

Team event for children

6 to 8 athletics games base on fundamentals and athletic learning

No individual performance, no PB BUT team ranking At the end of the meeting : Diploma + social drink and snack

KA = More adapted model of competition for children ! KA = More adapted model of competition for children !

(4)

Problematic in Wallonia

Kids’ Athletics is well known BUT it has not already been selected by the Wallonian federation as the gold standard. Why ?

7

Aim of the study

To analyze the perceived interest of a group of experts about KA

To identify the strategies that could be envisaged for KA implementation in Wallonia.

Methods

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 athletics or marketing experts

Interview includes the following subjects: brief presentation;

knowledge about KA

personal experience with KA ;

opinion about KA model in comparison with the traditional one

Perceived interest about organization Perceived interest about children

strategies that could be helpful to implement KA in Wallonia.

(5)

Results

12/14 experts know KA model of competition 9/14 experts have already organized KA in their club None have already organized official KA competition 9

1. Knowledge and experience with KA

10

2. Perceived interest of KA model about ORGANIZATION

Results

Volunteers required Volunteers required Limited Nb Children Limited Nb Children New Concept New Concept Incomes ? Incomes ? Limited duration Limited duration Flexible Flexible Limited cost Limited cost Any official Any official Transportable equipment Transportable equipment

/

(6)

11

3. Perceived interest of KA model about CHILDREN

Results

Any learning on competition Any learning on

competition Any direct opponent Any direct opponent Any information on individual progression Any information on individual progression Any personal best/ranking Any personal best/ranking Low pressure/anxiety Low pressure/anxiety Based on Participation Based on Participation Team competition Team competition Amusement Amusement Adapted exercises Adapted exercises Any specialization Any specialization Motor engagement Motor engagement

/

12

Introduce KA in official competition programme Promote KA organisation in clubs and on website Promote the interest of KA in each involved population (coachs, officials, parents,…)

Increase the information about KA during coach trainee Develop and share files on KA events and organization Make adapted equipment available for organizing clubs Develop a “quality label” for organizing clubs

Start with the most convinced clubs

5. Strategies for KA implementation in Wallonia

(7)

The study confirms the interest of KA

for organisation reasons

as it’s more adapted to the children.

KA has to be actively promoted by the Wallonian Federation

Critical to introduce KA in the official calendar We should start first with the convinced clubs. Clubs which are organizing KA should be valorized.

13

Conclusion

14

b.jidovtseff@ulg.ac.be

Références

Documents relatifs

El simposi «Vigència de Manuel de Pedrolo», que se celebrarà a l'IEC els dies 11 i 12 d’abril de 2018, vol analitzar la importància de. l’obra d’aquest escriptor en el marc de

Publishers Scholar Metrics Scholarly Publishers Indicators (SPI). Sello de

Then files may be copied one at a time (or with a wild card transfer) to the dual density diskette.. Using the Filer under the UCSD O/S, do an E)xtended listing of the files on

to the hope of a longer period of survival, to the hope of good quality of life, to the hope of being able to enjoy the present moment and prepare for one’s death?. And hope goes

1 The goal of the program, known as P-PROMPT (Provider and Patient Reminders in Ontario: Multi-strategy Prevention Tools), which was supported by the Primary Health Care

I urge all family physicians to take up the challenge and become the instruments of much needed change in the Canadian health care system.. —Micheal Howard-Tripp MB ChB

Don’t be ashamed, go and see your local nurse or doctor for a check-up if you have any of these symptoms. The earlier breast cancer is found, the greater your chance

Inherent in the assertion that phy- sicians in the pilot projects ”…do not accept or support many of the charac- teristics that [Dr Mulligan] assumes are inevitable in the