• Aucun résultat trouvé

Preventing Manipulation in Aggregating Audiences in Value-Based Argumentation Frameworks

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Preventing Manipulation in Aggregating Audiences in Value-Based Argumentation Frameworks"

Copied!
13
0
0

Texte intégral

Loading

Figure

Figure 1. Value-based argumentation framework VAF of Example 2.1
Figure 4. Collective defeat graph for the panel P, under the Borda rule

Références

Documents relatifs

We tested for two additional contrasts an- alyzed by Smolka et al.: the difference in priming strength between Transparent and Opaque Deriva- tion (not significant in either

To what extent are the observed price deviations from the fundamental values in experimental asset markets (Smith et al., 1988) caused by strategic uncertainty (uncertainty about

The multiple uses argument does not merely say that the same image can be described in multiple ways, it claims that since the phenomenal aspect is not sufficient to distinguish

The purpose of this study is to investigate and analyze Azeri translation of English extraposition constructions involving copular verbs and followed by that–clause and

Suppose R is a right noetherian, left P-injective, and left min-CS ring such that every nonzero complement left ideal is not small (or not singular).. Then R

RUSSELL LYONS, Characterizations of measures whose Fourier---Stieltjes transforms vanish at infinity, Bull. RUSSELL LYONS, A characterization of measures whose

• Shared decision making is most relevant when there is a close trade-off between the harms and the benefits of a screening decision that could be altered by individual

Thus a Cartan subalgebra h of g is abelian, and since every element of h is diagonalizable under ad, and they all commute, it follows that the adjoint representation of h on g