{
Pto*S.i.^.,
Plant Science 93 (1993) 55-61Scoparone
eliciting activity
released
by
phosphonic
acid
treatment
of
Phytophthora
citrophthora
mycelia
mimics
the
incompatible
response
of
phosphonic
acid-treated
Citrus
leaves
inoculated
with
this
fungus
M.K.
Aliu,
P. Lepoivre*b,
J.
Semalb "Unit'ersitl' Ain Shams, I1310 Cairo, EglptbLaboratoire de Parhologie Vëgétale, Facultë des Sriences Agronontiques, 8-5030 Genbloux, Belgiunt
(Received 3 February 1993; revision received 23 April 1993; accepted l6 June 1993)
Abstract
Cllras leaves floating on H3PO, (10 pglml) were protected lrom inlection by a strain ol Phvtophthora citophthora sensitive in vitro to H3PO, (S strain). Protection was associated with significant scoparone accumulation at the inlec-tion site. On the contrary, an H,PO, relatively insensitive (RI) mutant of the lungus inlected leaves floating on H3PO3 (10 pglml), and did not produce scoparone accumulation. S and RI strains were inlectious in leaves floating on control
buller devoid of HrPO3. Both scoparone accumulation and inhibition ol the S strain in Citras leaves floating on HrPOr (10 pglml) were reversed by pretreatment with AOA. In vitro incubation of P. citrophthora mycelia in HrPO, (10 pglml) released a significant scoparone eliciting activity lrom the S strain, but not from the RI strain, as tested
in Citrus leaves. Application ol the scoparone eliciting preparation ol S strain towards Cilrrs leaves protected them against inlection by either S or
RI
strain; both scoparone accumulation and leal protection were suppressed byO
pietreatment of the leaves with AOA. Thus, scoparone elicitors released in vitro by H3PO1 (10 pglml) trèatment of mycelia of the S strain (but not of the RI strain) ol P. citrophthora, mimic the incompatible response observed in HrPOr-treated Citrus leaves inoculated with the S strain (but not with the RI strain) of the fungus.Key v'ords: Phosphonic acid; Phytophthora citrophthora, Citrus; Elicitor; Scoparone
* Corresponding author.
Abbreviations'. AOA, a-aminoacetic acid; CEP, crude elicitor
preparation; CMA, corn meal agar: EP, eliciting preparations; MES, N-morpholino ethane sullonic acid.
0168-9452/93/506.00 @ 1993 Elsevier Scientific Publishers Ireland
ssDl
0168-9452(93)036i9-P1. Introduction
Fosetyl-Al (aluminium
tris-O-ethylphosphon-ate, trade name Aliette@), has little in vitro effect on mycelial growth of most oomycetes, while con-trolling a number ol diseases they cause in plants.
56
In
treated plants, fosetyl-Al is degraded to phos-phonic acid (H3PO3), which appearsto
be the active component involved in disease control[].
A
number of observations supported the hypo-thesis that host reactions are involved in thepro-tection of plants by phosphonates [2-4], but it was also suggested
that
these chemicalsmight
actthrough a direct toxicity towards plant pathogens
t5,61.
We have shown previously that floating leaves on fosetyl-Al
or
H3PO3 prevented infection by afosetyl-Al and H3PO1 sensitive S strain of Phyto-phthora citroPhyto-phthora, but not infection by a mutant
of the fungus relatively insensitive (RI) to fosetyl-Al and H3PO3 [7]. We also found that preinocula-tion of leaves floating on H3PO3 with the S strain prevented infection by the subsequently inoculated R strain. This suggested that a general resistance mechanism was induced by inoculating the S strain (but not the RI strain) of P. citrophthora to
fosetyl-Al
(or H3POJ) treated Citrus leaves.Resistance
of
Citrus stems towardsP.
citro-phthora was found to be linkedto
the accumula-tionof
scoparone, a phytoalexin associated withdisease resistance
in
Citrus [8]. This led us to test whether elicitors of scoparone might be associatedwith
the
different behaviourof
the S
and RI strainsof
P.
citrophthora, when inoculated toCitrus leaves in the presence of phosphonic acid.
Our earlier observations have shown that in vitro incubation
of
the myceliof P.
citrophthora infosetyl-Al released scoparone
eliciting
activityfrom the S, but not from the
RI
strain [9].In
the present paper, we investigated the possi-ble involvementof
scoparone elicitorsin
the in-compatible response observed when Citrus leaves, floatingon
H3PO3, were inoculatedwith
the S strain of P. citrophthora, while a compatiblereac-tion
was obtained upon inoculationof
the RIstrain by itself.
In order to avoid the problems linked to
possi-ble direct eflects
of
H3PO3 on the leafor
on theinoculum, we choose to use the in vitro release of scoparone elicitors by P. citrophthora mycelia as a
differential marker of the in planta effects of
phos-phonic acid on leaf infection by the S
or
the RI strain.M.K. Ali et al. / Plant Sci. 93 ( 1993) 55-61
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Fungal isolates, plants and inoculation
pro-cedure
Two strains of P. citrophthora, either sensitive (S
strain; ECso = 6.5 ptglml), or relatively insensitive (RI) mutant (EC50
=
125.3pflml)
[7] to fosetyl-Aland H3PO3, were maintained on
CMA at
25'C,and
were inoculatedonto
wounded leavesof
rough lemon (Citrus jambhiri)
|01.
Surface-sterilized leaves were wounded along the main vein and were placed to float, adaxial side up, on a solution
of
l0
pglml H3PO3 buffered atpH
6.2 with 0.03M
MES, with/without 300 pM AOA. This concentration of phosphonic acid was chosen as in planta, it inhibited lesion size with theS
strain,
but not with
the
RI
strain
of
P.citrophthora; such inhibition was entirely reversed
by pretreatment with AOA. Inoculation was per-formed 2 h after wounding by placing an agar disc (0.4 cm in diameter) taken from 5-day-old colonies of P. citrophthora, at the site of the wound. After
5
daysof
incubationat
25oCin
thedark,
thediameter of lesions was recorded.
2.2.
Releaseof
scoparoneelicilors
by
P.citrophthora mycelia
Mycelia of the S strain (or of the
RI
strain)of
P. citrophthora, were incubated in vitro
lor
6 daysin
0.03M
MES buffer,pH
6.2, with/without l0 py'ml H3PO3. The incubation fluids were filtered,treated
with
ethanol, and the precipitates were resuspended in 0.03M
MES (pH 6.2) containingl0 py'ml neomycin sulfate, to obtain CEP [9].
Car-bohydrate concentration
ol
the elicitor prepara-tions were determined as D-glucose equivalents,using the phenol-sulfuric acid technique
[1].
2.3. Fractionationof
CEP ona
Sephacryl 5-300 columnCEP (500 trrl containing 500 pg glucose equiva-lent) was applied
to
a
2.5x
28 cm columnof
Sephacryl S-300 (Pharmacia) equilibrated and
eluted
with
MES 0.03M
(pH
6.2)at
I
ml/min. Fractions (0.5-ml) were collected to make the EP. Carbohydrate concentrationand
scoparone-eliciting activity were determined as shown below.
o
M.K. Ali et al. / Planr Sci. 93 (1993) 55-61
2.4. Assay of elicitor preparations
Leaves taken from rough lemon plants grown in
a greenhouse, were surface-sterilized for 5 min in 2% NaClO, followed by 2 washes
with
distilledwater. They were then placed, adaxial side up, on moist filter papers. A longitudinal incision (5-mm-long) was made with a scalpel along the main vein
of
each leaf, followed bylifting
up veinal tissue and some adjacent epidermis. Twènty pl of CEP or EP (containing 20 p.g glucose equivalentin
MES buffer) were deposited into each leaf incision; con-trol leaves were treated similarly with MES buffer.To
test the biological effectsof
CEPor
EP oninfection, leaves were then placed to float on 0.03 M MES (pH 6.2) for 2 h, belore inoculating them as described above. The diameter
of
lesions was recorded after 5 days in the dark.In
orderto
evaluate scoparone induction by CEP or EP, non-inoculated control leaves werein-cubated for 4 days in the dark at 25oC. A leaf disk, 2 cm in diameter, containing the wounded site and the elicitor droplet, was then excised from each site. Scoparone concentrations were determined by
the
methodof
Afek
and
Sztejnberg[2]
andSulistyowati et.al.
[3],
usingI
g fresh weight of tissue collected from several treated leaves.57
3. Results
Results showed scoparone accumulation (7 I
pglg fresh weight) and protection against infection
(lesions of 9 mm),
in
Citrus leaves floating on l0pglml H3PO3 and inoculated with the S strain, but not in leaves inoculated with the RI mutant (Table l).
Pretreatment with AOA had no effect on lesion size and scoparone accumulation in leaves floating
on
MES. However, such pretreatment sharply decreased scoparone concentration (12.6pgg
vs.71
pùù
and increased lesion size (25 mm vs. 9mm), in leaves floating on H3PO3 (10 py'ml) and
inoculated
with
the S strain, while showing no effect on scoparone concentration or lesion size inleaves inoculated with the
RI
strain.Eliciting activity of CEP (adjusted at 20 pg glu-cose equivalent in 20 pl) was estimated by
quanti-fying scoparone accumulation
in
l-g
aliquotsof
leaf tissue. The protective effect of CEP treatment
towards subsequent infection by P. citrophthora, was evaluated
by
measuringthe
diameterol
lesions (Table 2).
Scoparone accumulation was observed in leaves
treated with CEP released upon mycelia
incuba-Table I
Diameter of lesions and concentrarion of scoparone in Citrus leaves floating on dillerent solutions and inoculated wilh P. ciÛophthora strains
Floating solution Inoculated strain(u)
RI Lesion size (mm) Scoparone(b) concentration Lesion size (mm) Scoparone b concentration MES bulfer (0.03M, pH 6.2) AOA (300 pM) in MES H3PO3 (l0pg/ml) in MES H3PO, + AOA in MES
28 + 3.lu 27 + 4.0 9 +2.3 25 + 3.7 10.6
*
0.34 9.8 + 1.6 71.5 + 14.0 12.6 + 2.0 35*
3.4 33 + 3.5 29 + 3.2 28 + 3.1 9.8 + 0.3 I1.3 + 0.8 15.3*
7.0 ll.8 + l.loS, H3PO3 sensitive strain; RI, H3PO3 relatively insensitive strain. Data are the mean result ol 4 independent experiments with l0 replicates + S.D.
bscopurone concentrations are expressed as pglg fresh weight of leal tissue inoculated control) produced 0.1 pdg ol scoparone.
(non-ù1.K. Ali et ol. / Plant Sci. 93 ( 1993) 55-61 ÔL :4a o:ç
e
{9
LO'', ' rt .2: {.
^
i ç: É Éu tA qca tr.l " i .9 \J F3 + à)-E +6 a)? ôtÈ È:
\LX = :;9! t L rrY x Q- - -+-bEeo
E .=E=i eË!,i3
-U tû.--ec.)a.,'19e2
Ë ^,'- a - '1---==^? c2
-= ^ :
=.: >; À 1, ?.b =u!= -^ .= > (_-) € Y--ô 9c!H6 Ju i=-.cE FI---2 aa : -^E u ; .== Xi-o. -â Ë,oËr= I âi5 o: e! :=49 è0 i.:# o 2 i 9.q-y h q -U:i u .o-É- " ! -2-Ê =4 : X a-.É û â zE X o È -r=-.^F ô ? 9 oÀ 6 *Ë.= hr 9 .; E Y 2 Y dO^1 Xa>Èû E>-;ii:û"îS3E
Ê.9
9.=eâ
.3û>rs3
i!9
I.l
-:u1t+l+
+r+r++l cç$-+r+
+l J't r-F-aieiçri+11++l
€--,Ô
Y--1-: €-,d-,+++l
+ d-----dd-ç-iôi+
+++l+l
6Ncæ i-o--dd-+lll++
r---nq11
+tullti
€OæO -INN.:
^?
u)v
q?hr!
:Eà-*
cr'a&l
58 o ôLÀû
âoJ .! çôç^
AoJ N 'a ç o ô .= À" è a-o -Ë o o a u o O Ê-o o c^ o t o E o ç '! I ç a C -o t -.c lrl U C o d o. c. .9 a ! L o E o o .à o o té .E .:o do. OC r! d Y_Ë Uçi ,Go.= FA ! c 5:È3
l=^ cAûY N tr o oÈ a63 .! o 5M.K. Ali et al. / Plant Sci. 93 ( 1993) 55-61
Table 3
Scoparone eliciting activity ol diflerent preparations made from CEP of mycelia from the S strain of Phytophthora citrophthoro incubated or non-incubated in phosphonic acid
Eliciting
preparation a
Mycelia incubated in MES bulfer Mycelia incubated in l0 pglml H3PO3
% glucose Scoparone concentration % glucose Scoparone concentration l0 7 t2 7 9 CEP A B C D 100 t2 29 l4 l6 + 0.4b
*
2.4 + 3.2*
3.0 + 2.5 + ll.3 + 4.2 + 3.8 + 4.6 + t4 t00 26 2I 32 l8 74 46 l4 l2 oaCEP was obtained by incubating the mycelia olS strain in H3PO3 and was then submitted to chromatography on Sephacryl 5-300 column. Eighty fractions were collected and pooled to make 4 eliciting preparations (A,B,C,D) which were applied at the rate of 20 pg glucose equivalent on each wounded site ol Citrrs leaves. Scoparone concentration are expressed as 4glg lresh rleight of leaf
tissue.
bMean ol 3 replicates + S.D.
tion
of
the S strainof
P. citrophthorain
H3POI(but
not with
a
similar preparationwith
themycelia
of
RI
mutant). Correlatively, the size of lesions induced by inoculating either S or RI strainwas sharply reduced by treatment
of
leaves with CEPof
the
S
strain(but not
with
a
similar preparation of theRI
mutant).Pretreatment with AOA
ol
leaves submitted to applicationol
CEP
of
the
S
strain,
reducedscoparone accumulation
to
the
levels found inleaves without CEP, and increased correlatively the size of the lesions formed after inoculation of
either S or
RI
strains.CEP
was fractionatedinto
80
lractions by column chromatographyon
Sephacryl 5-300. Afirst peak (fractions 30-40) was present only in the
preparation from S strain incubated in H3PO3. A second peak (fractions 40-60) was observed in all
4 combinations (S or RI strain incubated in either
H3PO3
or
MES buffer). Fractions30-40
were pooledto
make preparationA,
while fractions40-60 were used to make preparations B, C and D, which were tested for their scoparone eliciting
activity and
their
protective effect (Table 3).Scoparone accumulation was found only in leaves treated with CEP of S strain incubated
in
H3PO3(but not with CEP ol S strain incubated in MES).
After
chromatographyon
Sephacryl column,scoparone eliciting activity was mainly located in
preparation
A,
which contained 26%of
CEP glucose equivalent (Table 3). Applicationol
frac-tion
A
(20 p,g glucose equivalent)to
Clrrut.ç leavesinduced the accumulation of 46.5 pg scoparone/g
fresh weight
ol
leaf tissue (as comparedto
8.3-14.2 pg scoparone/g with fractions B, Cor
D).Table 4
Ellect ol treatment of Citrus leaves with diflerent scoparone
eliciting preparations, on subsequent infection by P'
cilrophthora Inoculated Eliciting straino preparationsb Size of lesions (mm) MES.CEPC H3POT-CEP' CEP A B C D CEP À B C D 29 30 29 29 28
+3.1
6*l.l
*4.0
7+1.4 r)1 )1 +)\ +2.1
26 *. 3.'7 +3.2
28 + 3.2 33 + 2.4 32 + 2.1 34*
3.4 33 + 3.5 34 + 2.8 5+1.5 6 *. l.'7 34 + 2.2 33 + 3.4 30 + 4.2il
aD hulnoculation with the H3PO3-sensitive S strain, or with the Rl
relatively insensitive mutant, were perlormed 2 h after treat' ment of Citrus leaves with the total crude eliciting preparation (CEP), or with the diflerent eliciting preparations (30 pg glu-cose equivalent).
bA,B,C,D,, eliciting preparations obtained alter chroma-tography of CEP on Sephacryl 5-300 column'
'CEP obtained by incubating mycelia ol S strain of P' citrophrhora in MES pH 6.2 amended with/without l0 pglml
60
Correlatively, treatment
of
woundswith
CEP released by S mycelia incubated in H3PO3 (or with preparationA
obtainedafter
CEP
chroma-tographyon
Sephacryl),greatly
reduced thediameter
of
lesions formed by inoculating the Sstrain or the
RI
mutant of P. citrophthora, while preparations B, C or D had no elfect on lesion size for both strains (Table 4).4. Discussion
Afek and Sztejnberg [8] reported that the
phyto-alexin scoparone accumulated
in
Cilrurs stemsinoculated with P. citrophthora in the presence
ol
fosetyl-Al.
Scoparone accumulationwas
alsoobserved
in
inoculated
genetically resistantvarieties [4]. Besides, Saindrenan et al.
[4]
show-ed that in vitro treatment of the mycelia of Phyto-phthora uyptogeawith
H3PO3 released com-pounds eliciting a resistance response towards thislungus
in
Vigna unguiculata.We found that inoculation with P. citrophthora
ol
detached Cilrus leaves floatingon
10 pglmlH3PO3 provides a suitable experimental model to test the relationship between scoparone accumula-tion and induction of resistance to this fungus. In
all
our
experiments, incompatible reactions in planta were associated with scoparone accumula-tion, as shown in H3PO3-treated leaves inoculated with the S strain, andin
CEP-treated leaves in-oculated with either the S or theRI
strain.Cor-relatively,
the
compatible reaction observed inplanta by inoculating H3PO3-treated leaves with the RI strain was linked to low scoparone content' Periodate oxidation
of
CEP gradually decreased its scoparone eliciting capacity, together with the protection effectit
induced, thus suggesting that scoparone accumulation and leaf protection are related to the release ofcarbohydrate elicitors [15]. The cross protection phenomenon, by virtueof
which Citras leaves preinoculated with the S strain
of P. citrophthora
in
the presenceof
H3PO3 wereprotected against superinfection by the
RI
strain[7], was also linked
to
scoparone accumulation(unpublished results).
All
incompatible reactionsbecame compatible when H3PO3-treated leaves were pretreated with AOA thus suggesting a role
ol
the phenylpropanoid pathwayin
inducing theM.K. Ali et al. / Plant Sci. 93 ( 1993) 55-61
defence mechanism correlated
to
scoparone accumulation.Our
overali results indicate that applicationto
Citus leavesol
scoparone elicitorsreleased by in
vitro
incubationof
the mycelia of the S strain of P. citrophthorain
l0 p"/mlH3PO3, mimic all in planta results obtained upon inocula-tion by the S or the RI strain, respectively, both in termsof
compatible(or
incompatible) reactionsand in terms
of
scoparone accumulation.5. References
I Y. Cohen and Nl.D. Coffey, Systemic fungicides and the
control of oomycetes. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol., 24 ( 1986)
3 I I -338.
2 G. Bompeix, A. Ravise, G. Raynal, F. Fettouche and
M.C. Durand, Modalités de transmission de I'obtention des nécroses bloquantes sur leuilles détachées de tomate
par I'action du tris-O-éthyl phosphonate d'aluminium
(phoséthyl d'aluminium), hypothèses sur son mode
d'ac-tion in vitro. Ann. Phytopathol., l2 (1980) 337-351' 3 D.l. Guest, Modiflcation of delence responses in tobacco
and capsicum following treatment with fosetyl-Al (alu-minium tris (o-ethyl phosphonate). Physiol. Plant Pathol', 25 (1984) t25-134.
4 A.J. Khan, A. Vernenghi and A. Ravise, Incidence of
losetyl-AL and elicitors on the delence reactions of Citrus atracked by Phytophthora sp. Fruits, 4l (1986) 587-595.
5 T.E. Dolan and M.D. Coffey, Correlative in vitro and in
vivo behavior of mutant strains of Ph)'-tophthora palmivora expressing diflerent resistances to phosphorous acid and fosetyl-Na. Phytopathology, 78 (1988) 974-978.
6 M.E. Fenn and M.D. Coffey, Further evidence for the
direct mode of action of fosethyl-Al and phosphorous acid. Phytopathology, 75 (1985) 1064-1068.
lt
M.K. Ali, Prémunition contre I'infection de feuilles de
Citrus linton par des souches de Phytophthora citrophthora
en présence de tris-o-éthyl phosphonate d'aluminium.
Bull. Rech. Agron. Gembloux, 24 (1989) 329-334. U. Alek and A. Sztejnberg, Eflects ol fosetyl-Al and phos-phorous acid on scoparone, a phytoalexin associated with resistance oî Citrus to Pht'tophthoru citrophthora' Phyropathology, 79 (1989) 736-139.
M.K. Ali, P. Lepoivre and J. Semal, Fosetyl-Al treatment ofmycelium oî P. citrophthora releases a higher scoparone
elicitor activity from a losetyl-Al sensitive strain than
from an insensitive mutant. Fruit,46 (1991) 5l-55. M.K. Ali, P. Lepoivre and J. Semal, In vitro selection of
Phytophthora citrophthora isolates resistant to phospho-rous acid and fosetyl-Al. Med. Fac. Landbouww
Rijk-suniv. Gent., 53/2b (1988) 597-604.
M. Dubois, K.E. Gilles, J.K. Hamilton, P.A. Rebers and
F. Smith, Colorimetric method of determination ol sugar and related substances. Anal. Chem., 28 (1956) 350-356'
U. Alek and A. Sztejnberg, Accumulation of scoparone,
l0
a\
M.K. Ali et al. / Plant Sci. 93 (1993) 55-6t
l4
l3
a phytoalexin associated with resistance olcitrus to p/:1,
tophthora citrophthora. Phytopathology, 78 (1988) 1678-1682.
L. Sulistyowati, P.J. Keane and J.W. Anderson, Accumu-lation olthe phytoalexin 6,7-dimethoxycoumarin, in roots and stems of Citrus seedlings following inoculation with
P. citrophthora. Physiol. Mol. Plant pathol., 37 (1990) 451-461.
P. Saindrenan, T. Barchietto and G. Bompeix, Elfects of
phosphonate on the elicitor activity of culture filtrates ol
6l
Phy'tophthora ulptogea in Vignu unguiculata. plant Sci.. 67 (1990) 245-25t.
M.K. Ali, P. Lepoivre and J. Semal, Scoparone elicitors
released upon losetyl treatment of phytophthora citrophthora mycelium protect Cilnl.r leaves against
subse-quent infection by this fungus. Proceeding olthe 2nd
con-lerence of EFPP 'Mechanisms ol plant Delense Response'. Strasbourg, August 1992. Kluwer Academic Publisher, 1993, p. 173 (Abstract).