• Aucun résultat trouvé

BIM as built : tool for demolition or deconstruction

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "BIM as built : tool for demolition or deconstruction"

Copied!
44
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

26 June 2019 A. Halbach / S. Jancart – ToB3 ERASMUS +

THE "AS-BUILT" BIM AS A DECISION-MAKING TOOL

BETWEEN DEMOLITION OR DECONSTRUCTION

(2)

26 June 2019

A. Halbach / S. Jancart – ToB3 ERASMUS + 2

Issue

©Web

« On Spaceship Earth there are no passengers; everybody is a member of the crew. We

have moved into an age in which everybody’s activities affect everybody else. »

(3)

26 June 2019

A. Halbach / S. Jancart – ToB3 ERASMUS + 3

Two possible solutions

CIRCULAR ECONOMY

BIM

©WSP ©Denis, 2015

(4)

26 June 2019

A. Halbach / S. Jancart – ToB3 ERASMUS + 4

Motivations?

Challenges and solutions?

?

Tools?

Data backup?

New skills?

Types of projets?

Research questions

©Rob Schneider © Pixabay

(5)

26 June 2019

A. Halbach / S. Jancart – ToB3 ERASMUS + 5

Methodology

State of the art

Online survey

Interviews

 Research questions

 Challenges, solutions and desires

(6)

26 June 2019

A. Halbach / S. Jancart – ToB3 ERASMUS + 6

(7)

26 June 2019

A. Halbach / S. Jancart – ToB3 ERASMUS + 7

Online survey methodology

Target audience

 BIM and/or EC Architects

Belgium & neighbouring countries

Type of survey

 Standardized online questionnaire

Type of questions

 MCQ + open questions

Diffusion

 +

+

Sections

 Demographic data

 CE

 BIM

(8)

26 June 2019

A. Halbach / S. Jancart – ToB3 ERASMUS + 8

Description of the sample

 26 architects surveyed

 Categorization of the offices that participated in the survey

 Size and location of offices

Neither BIM, nor reuse enthusiasts

Only a supporter of reuse

Only BIM enthusiast

Adherent to both practices but do not combine them on the same project

Adherent to both practices and combining them on the same project

4%

27%

31%

23%

15%

0

2

4

6

8

Wallonia

Brussels

Flanders

Abroad

Number

of

offic

es

Small

Medium

Large

Extra large

(9)

26 June 2019

A. Halbach / S. Jancart – ToB3 ERASMUS + 9

Circular economy

 Knowledge and application of CE principles based on office size

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

Small Medium Large Extra large

R atio o f o ff ic e s

We do not know what circular economy is

We know what circular economy is, but

that’s it

We apply the principles of circular economy

whenever possible

We apply all the principles of the circular

economy as much as possiblee

(10)

26 June 2019

A. Halbach / S. Jancart – ToB3 ERASMUS + 10

Circular economy

 Main reasons for using reuse materials

(order of importance)

(11)

26 June 2019

A. Halbach / S. Jancart – ToB3 ERASMUS + 11

Circular economy

 « The lack of knowledge and information on reused building materials is the

(12)

26 June 2019

A. Halbach / S. Jancart – ToB3 ERASMUS + 12

Circular economy

 Brakes and solutions for reuse

Brakes on reuse

Possible solutions

Lack of interest

Positive advertising

Lack of information

Quality and performance standards

Lack of visibility

Complete courses on the issue of re-use

Price

Taxes and subsidies

(13)

26 June 2019

A. Halbach / S. Jancart – ToB3 ERASMUS + 13

Circular economy

 Probability of using reuse materials if there were more incentives or tools in

place

Very probably

Probably

Undecided

Probably not

Definitively not

44 %

36%

20%

0%

0%

80 %

(14)

26 June 2019

A. Halbach / S. Jancart – ToB3 ERASMUS + 14

BIM

 BIM knowledge according to office size

 BIM knowledge according to office location

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Small Medium Large Extra large

R at io o f o ff ices

We are experts in BIM

We apply the available potential of BIM as much as possible We know the technique and are informed about all the potentialities/opportunities

We know the term BIM but we are not interested in it We do not know the term BIM

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Wallonia Brussels Flanders Abroad

R atio o f o ff ic e s

We are experts in BIM

We apply the available potential of BIM as much as possible We know the technique and are informed about all the potentialities/opportunities

We know the term BIM but we are not interested in it We do not know the term BIM

(15)

26 June 2019

A. Halbach / S. Jancart – ToB3 ERASMUS + 15

BIM

 Advantages and disadvantages of BIM

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Is a time saver

Allows error detection

Centralizes information

Reduces the overall cost of the project

Allows simulations/analyses

Improves collaboration and dialogue between

the different actors of the project

(16)

26 June 2019

A. Halbach / S. Jancart – ToB3 ERASMUS + 16

BIM

 Architects' willingness to share information with project partners (contractors,

engineers, subcontractors, specialists, manufacturers, etc.)

We never share

We are very careful when sharing information

We only share information when requested to do so

We share the information with a proactive vision

Sharing is multiplying so that transparency benefits the

project

11%

17%

22%

22%

28%

(17)

26 June 2019

A. Halbach / S. Jancart – ToB3 ERASMUS + 17

CE + BIM combination

 Offices that have tried to integrate information about recovered materials into a

BIM model

Yes

No

15%

85%

We do not use BIM

The digitization work is too tedious

We don't know how to do it

We are in need of time

We are in need of resources

We consider the digitization work

unnecessary

21 %

22 %

25 %

11 %

4 %

21 %

(18)

26 June 2019

A. Halbach / S. Jancart – ToB3 ERASMUS + 18

CE + BIM interviews

(19)

26 June 2019

A. Halbach / S. Jancart – ToB3 ERASMUS + 19

Interview methodology

Architects

 EC+ BIM according to the online survey

Type of interview

 Semi-directive

Type of questions

 Open questions

Duration

 ± 1 hour

Sections

 Information about the architectural office

 General use of BIM & EC

 Analysis of one or two projects

 Global questions

(20)

26 June 2019

A. Halbach / S. Jancart – ToB3 ERASMUS + 20

Project Type Selective

deconstruction

Reuse DfD

Home extension Renovation * * Yes

Alleray Renovation Yes * Yes

Dethy Renovation Yes Yes No

City hall Renovation Yes Yes Yes

PIT lab New N.A. Yes Yes

Circle house New N.A. Yes Yes

Studied projects

(21)

26 June 2019

A. Halbach / S. Jancart – ToB3 ERASMUS + 21

Home extension

(22)

26 June 2019

A. Halbach / S. Jancart – ToB3 ERASMUS + 22

Project Type Selective

deconstruction

Reuse DfD

Home extension Renovation * * Yes

Alleray Renovation Yes * Yes

Dethy Renovation Yes Yes No

City hall Renovation Yes Yes Yes

PIT lab New N.A. Yes Yes

Circle house New N.A. Yes Yes

*question not addressed during the interview

(23)

26 June 2019

A. Halbach / S. Jancart – ToB3 ERASMUS + 23

Alleray

(24)

26 June 2019

A. Halbach / S. Jancart – ToB3 ERASMUS + 24

Alleray

(25)

26 June 2019

A. Halbach / S. Jancart – ToB3 ERASMUS + 25

Alleray

(26)

26 June 2019

A. Halbach / S. Jancart – ToB3 ERASMUS + 26

Project Type Selective

deconstruction

Reuse DfD

Home extension Renovation * * Yes

Alleray Renovation Yes * Yes

Dethy Renovation Yes Yes No

City hall Renovation Yes Yes Yes

PIT lab New N.A. Yes Yes

Circle house New N.A. Yes Yes

Studied projects

(27)

26 June 2019

A. Halbach / S. Jancart – ToB3 ERASMUS + 27

Dethy

(28)

26 June 2019

A. Halbach / S. Jancart – ToB3 ERASMUS + 28

Dethy

(29)

26 June 2019

A. Halbach / S. Jancart – ToB3 ERASMUS + 29

Studied projects

Project Type Selective

deconstruction

Reuse DfD

Home extension Renovation * * Yes

Alleray Renovation Yes * Yes

Dethy Renovation Yes Yes No

City hall Renovation Yes Yes Yes

PIT lab New N.A. Yes Yes

Circle house New N.A. Yes Yes

(30)

26 June 2019

A. Halbach / S. Jancart – ToB3 ERASMUS + 30

Eindhoven City Hall

(31)

26 June 2019

A. Halbach / S. Jancart – ToB3 ERASMUS + 31

Eindhoven City Hall

What are the reasons that led you to consider the use of BIM/DfD in this

project?

"We used BIM because we wanted to work constructively with the

different project partners. Thanks to the high level of cooperation, many

errors were discovered during the design phase.“

(Terry Pater)

(32)

26 June 2019

A. Halbach / S. Jancart – ToB3 ERASMUS + 32

Eindhoven City Hall

At what stage of the project did BIM help you in relation to the

traditional working method?

"BIM allows us to

facilitate the production

of documents and get a

good overview of

connections.“

(Terry Pater)

(33)

26 June 2019

A. Halbach / S. Jancart – ToB3 ERASMUS + 33

(34)

26 June 2019

A. Halbach / S. Jancart – ToB3 ERASMUS + 34

Project Type Selective

deconstruction

Reuse DfD

Home extension Renovation * * Yes

Alleray Renovation Yes * Yes

Dethy Renovation Yes Yes No

City hall Renovation Yes Yes Yes

PIT lab New N.A. Yes Yes

Circle house New N.A. Yes Yes

*question not addressed during the interview

(35)

26 June 2019

A. Halbach / S. Jancart – ToB3 ERASMUS + 35

(36)

26 June 2019

A. Halbach / S. Jancart – ToB3 ERASMUS + 36

(37)

26 June 2019

A. Halbach / S. Jancart – ToB3 ERASMUS + 37

Project Type Selective

deconstruction

Reuse DfD

Home extension Renovation * * Yes

Alleray Renovation Yes * Yes

Dethy Renovation Yes Yes No

City hall Renovation Yes Yes Yes

PIT lab New N.A. Yes Yes

Circle house New N.A. Yes Yes

Studied projects

(38)

26 June 2019

A. Halbach / S. Jancart – ToB3 ERASMUS + 38

Circle House

(39)

26 June 2019

A. Halbach / S. Jancart – ToB3 ERASMUS + 39

Circle House

(40)

26 June 2019

A. Halbach / S. Jancart – ToB3 ERASMUS + 40

Conclusions of interviews

BIM + CE avantages

 Improves collaboration between stakeholders

 Better knowledge of the building (inventory)

Database (material characteristics)

Types of projects

 Size

 Dlexibility

Wishes in relation to BIM modeling softwares

 Ultimate software (compatibility issues)

 DfD from the design stage

(41)

26 June 2019

A. Halbach / S. Jancart – ToB3 ERASMUS + 41

Conclusions

(42)

26 June 2019

A. Halbach / S. Jancart – ToB3 ERASMUS + 42

The BIM as a decision-making tool between

demolition or deconstruction

(43)

26 June 2019

A. Halbach / S. Jancart – ToB3 ERASMUS + 43

(44)

26 June 2019

A. Halbach / S. Jancart – ToB3 ERASMUS + 44

Références

Documents relatifs

– The state of the art provides completeness statements and oracles for simple queries. ● Semantic Web is

Emphasis was given on micro-planning (day-to-day and sprint), issue resolution – with users or other technical staff, and self estimation. TexCo made a plan for SoftCo

So, this study is an in-depth, narrative exploration of the cultural experiences, perceptions and identities, of these twelve, academically 'successful', British

Numerous core tasks within information retrieval and natural lan- guage processing are often viewed as solved and unworthy of fur- ther research attention.. I suggest we know less

We know that it begins when the felted beech coccus or beech scale, Cryptococcus fagisuga Lindinger (C. fagi Bderensprung) infests the living bark of Fagus

11 In addition, managers can be subject to high costs (stock exchange penalties, reputation, revocation…). Thus, to avoid the negative effects of a delisting, managers

DH is about creating digital toolsets that allow users to undertake new forms of research in the humanities.. Growing interest

Atlantic Provinces Library Association Lisa Goddard.. Memorial University Libraries