• Aucun résultat trouvé

فعالية بعض إستراتيجيات تعديل السلوك في تنمية مهارة توكيد الذات و الشعور بالأمن النفسي لدى التلاميذ ضحايا التنمر المدرسي

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "فعالية بعض إستراتيجيات تعديل السلوك في تنمية مهارة توكيد الذات و الشعور بالأمن النفسي لدى التلاميذ ضحايا التنمر المدرسي"

Copied!
258
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

République Algérienne Démocratique et populaire

1

1

1

1019

1010

Ministère de l’Enseignement Supérieure Et de La Recherche Scientifique

Université –BATNA 01-

Faculté des Sciences Humaines et Sociales DEPARTEMENTDE PSYCHOLOGIE ET

SCIENCES DE L’EDUCATION ET L’ORTHOPHONIE

(2)

République Algérienne Démocratique et populaire

Ministère de l’Enseignement Supérieure Et de La Recherche Scientifique

Université –BATNA 01-

Faculté des Sciences Humaines et Sociales DEPARTEMENTDE PSYCHOLOGIE ET

SCIENCES DE L’EDUCATION ET L’ORTHOPHONIE

(3)
(4)

لوصولاو انع هاضر هللاخ نم يغتبن يذلا ،لمعلا اذه لامكإ ىلع انناعأ يذلا لله دملحا

ابه انرمأ تيلا ةفرعلماو ملعلا لىإ

نوعلاب اندمأ نم ينلحاصلا هدابع نم انل رخس هنأ هدمنح امك ،

ةدعاسلماو

اهفارشإ ىلع ةدح يفسوي ةلضافلا ةذاتسلأا لىإ زازتعلااو نافرعلاو ركشلا ليزبج مدقتأ اذلهو

امك ةحورطلأا ىلع

أ

نسحأ ىلع لمعلا اذه ماتملإ ةميق حئاصن نم لي هتمدق ام لك ىلع اهركش

هبرص ىلع اضيأو هجو

نأ وجرأو عساولا اهملعب عفني نأ للها لأسأ تارلما نم يرثك في يلع ا

.ركش فلأ اركشف اهسماب قيليو اهيضري ام ميدقت في تقفو دق نوكأ

نيملع نم لك لىإ لوصوم ركشلاو ،ةحورطلأا ةشقانم ملهوبق ىلع ةذتاسلأا ةداسلل اضيأ ركشلا

انتملااو ركشلا اضيأو ،يميلعتلا يراسم للاخ افرح

في اوهماس نيذلا ةذتاسلأا لك لىإ ن

ةمولعبم ولو ىتح ينودعاسو جمانبرلاو ةساردلا سيياقم ميكتح

يونعمو يدام دهج نم هولذب ام لك ىلع ينيمركلا نيدلاولا لىإ لوصوم ركشلا

اهمرب نيقزري نأ لجو زع للها نم ةيجار ةعاسلا هذه دح لىإ ايندلا هذه في لي موي لوأ نم

و نيع اهماضرو

فلا ةنج امهقزري ناو امتهايح في ءانلهاو ةيفاعلاو ةحصلا امهيلع ميديو لي امهظفيح

سودر

.

(5)

لىإ

هعمتمج في اركفم اناسنإ نوكيل هنبا دعأ بأ لك

لىإ

لاجر هنطو يطعي فيك هتملعو ،لافط هل تللهو اهديلو دهم تزه مأ لك

لىإ

دلاو

نم لاغ لك لي رفو يذلا زيزعلا ي

أ

لج

. ةيفاعلاو ةحصلا هدمأو هرمع للها لاطأ ملعلا

لىإ

اهافشو اهرمع للها لاطأ رغصلا ذنم ملعلا بح يسفن في تعرز تيلا ةيلاغلا يتدلاو

لىإ

ةحورطلأا زانجا ةدم ةليط نيتلمتح تيلا اهرمع للها لاطأ يجوز مأ

لىإ

امئاد نيعجشي ناك يذلا ميركلا يجوز

لىإ

است تناك تيلا لانم تيخأ

هانتمأ ام لىإ لصلأ يندن

لىإ

بوقعي يداؤف ةجبهو لياغلا نيبا

لىإ

براقلأاو ءاقدصلأا نم بمح لك

لىإ

هقيرط في ةعشم ءاضأو ملعلا بلط نم لك

عيملجا هب عفني نأ للها نم ةلئاس عضاوتلما دهلجا اذه يدهأ

(6)

82 7     

(7)

𝑟𝑟𝑏 = 1

(8)

The Effectiveness of Some Behavior Modification Strategies in Developing Self- assertiveness Skill and Psychological Security Feeling among Students

of School Bullying Victims - Experimental study - Abstract

The present study aimed to identify the effectiveness of some behavior modification strategies in developing self- assertiveness skill and psychological security feeling among students of school bullying victims.

The researcher used the experimental method with quasi- experimental design and two homogeneous groups (control and experimental) by pre and post tests.

The study sample consisted of 30 pupils who were victims of school bullying, from primary school ( fourth and fifth year ) at Essani El-Saleh primary school in Lazro - Batna - were chosen in a purposive manner after they obtained the highest scores in the school bullying questionnaire and were randomly assigned to two homogeneous groups (control and experimental), where the homogeneity between them in the level of self- assertiveness skill and psychological security feeling, age, economic and sociocultural level.

The program designed in this study was applied for two months and is based on some behavioral modification techniques from behavioral cognitive approach by collective counseling style.

The study tools are :

Self-assertiveness skill Questionnaire (prepared by the researcher). School Bullying victims Questionnaire (prepared by the researcher).

The Psychological Security Feeling Questionnare (prepared by Aqil bin Sassi). Economic, Social and Cultural Level Form (prepared by Bashir Mammaria). Counseling Program prepared by the researcher

The results are :

1. The proposed counseling program based on behavior modification strategies is effective in developing self- assertiveness skill among school bullying victims pupils, where the differences between the rank mean of the experimental and control groups were also significant and the calculated impact size is significant by rrb = 1.

(9)

where the differences between the rank mean of the experimental and control groups were also significant and the calculated impact size is significant by rrb = 1.

3. The counseling program based on behavior modification strategies is effective in reducing the scores on bullying school victims questionnaire among school bullying victims pupils where the calculated impact size was high by 1.05.

Keywords : Behavior modification strategies, Self- assertiveness skill, Psychological

security feeling, School bulling victims

(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)

.5 5.1 .8 5.7 .0 5.2 .1 5.1 .1 5.1 .0 55. .7 551 .2 551 .1 551 5. 551 55 552 58 552 50 551 51 551 51 585 50 588

(15)

52 501 51 507 8. 51. 85 518 88 510 80 511 81 511 81 510 80 517 87 512

(16)

5

521

8

521

0

520

1

511

1

8..

0

8.5

7

8.0

2

8.2

1

8.1

5.

855

55

850

58

88.

50

885

51

801

51

801

50

801

57

800

52

ةصق درقلا دسلأاو رمنلاو

802

51

جمانربلا روص ضعب

801

(17)
(18)

5508.55 8008.58 508.50 808..0 8. 85 808.51 58108.5.

(19)

8.58 8 8..7 0008 208 5100 702 508.55 8.58 55 008.50 8.50 1

(20)

5110 kandal

(21)
(22)

1

1

3

4

5

6

(23)

1

Dan olweus 508.55 51 8. 0. (Corvo &Delara,2010 ,181) 00 55 (Hawley, 2007 ,13) 2108..1 18808.55 1508..1 5. 51 (Smith & shu, 2000 ,19)

(24)

(Nansel et al, 2001) 8.55 811 ( 8..0 52 51 Acting Friedman et. Al, 1982, 15

5110 (Lovoie,1999,3 108.50 8..1 001 (Olweus, 1997, 502 5121

(25)

5121 5.2 808.50 (Cook et al,2010) 5088 517. 8.5. (Cook et al , 2010 , 65-83) 508.50

(26)

1

    

3

(27)

4

5 8 5 1001 1.0

(28)

8..08.58 دمحم ( 2004 ثحب ﻣ 31 ﻣ ﻳب ﻳب ﻳب ﻣ 1006 0. 51 57 8..0 ( 1009 172 100 151

(29)

8..1 1001 200 5110 8..1 1011 111 Dan Olweus rosenberg 8.58 1019 58.. 1 80 0.

(30)

8.51 (O’Moore, Kirkham,2001) 50558 7050 1711 2 52 2 55 7051 1717 58 52 0208..1 1004 8.8 58 51 1 1 8108.5 klirfox et michal 2005 0 5. 51208.58

(31)

55 58 508 502 1008.57 8 1004 11 1004 58 ) 8..1 1002 51 510

(32)

9.7 5801 5500 8..7 1002 8..2 1011 81 58 8.55 1013 101 5110 5122 0508.50

(33)

1014 . 2 52 50 8.51 1015 81 51 8.51 Glass, 1977 1008..8 (derosier.2005)

(34)

(stacie and colleen2008) 7. 18208.51 8..5 8..1 8.51

(35)

8..1 8.51 8.58 8..5 8..1 8.55 8.51 1 58 51

(36)

50      

(37)

1708..7 8.08.5. 18808.5. 85 0. 0

(38)

1 . 1 . 3 .

(39)

1

1

3

4

5

(40)

( Bullying )

1

(Bullying) 0108..2 (mobbing) (Arora,1994 8108.57 108.50

(41)

(Melor,1997) Dehaan,1997 (Glew, 2000) 0108..2 8..0 Jouvonen-Graham-and shuster bully victim 208.50 rigby2002

(42)

rigby2010 18808.51 (Herrich,Williams,Wolke2005, Horwood,Waylen) 0108..2 (Gordillo, 2011) 8.5. 1 Coloroso 5 8 0 1 Smith, 2004 ,1

(43)

Olweus Roberts, 2006,3 Rigby,2002,9 Victims 8..7 1. 8..1 00 0008.51

(44)

(Culling ford,1995) 00 (Saraz,2002) 8..1 15

(Smith & Sharp,1994)

(45)

8..1 5. 88508.5. 8..1 870 8..2 55. 8..1 15 forero1999 (hawker et boulton2000)

(46)

perry.kusel et perry1988 1208.58 (Rigby,1997) (Rigby,2003) 1208..1 8208.50

(47)

Sutoon    8108.57

3

(Banks,1997,& Sandra,2000) 5

The direct bullying

8

The indirect bullying

8..7

17 8.5.

(48)

     8.5. 5. 55 8.58 1 1 3

(49)

4

5

(Jerome & Segal,2003) 8..8 87 8.58 17 0. (Rigby,2003) 1 1     (Rigby, 2003 , 13-14)

(50)

5

1

.(Judith & Malcolm,1997, 485)

(Sullivan et al, 2004, 18) 8..1 18 (Rigby, 2002, 67) (Rigby,2002)

(51)

8..7 15 . 1 1 3 4 5 6 2 8508.57 5

(52)

8 0 1 8.5.     0008.51 5 8 0

(53)

1 1 8808.57 Smith, 2000, 294 (Culling ford,1995) 00 (Sarazen,2002) 8..1 15

(54)

5

Lazarus

(55)

) 7808.57 1 (Crick & dodge,1996)

(Crick & Dodge,1990)

(56)

3 (Social Learning Theory)

Bandura (Walters) 8..8 810 8..0 81 8..8 011 5121 011 5118 00

(57)

Gelles, 1989 , 25 8... 805 5111 858 Modeling Bandura

(58)

7008.57 5 attention 8 retention 0 motor reproduction motivation 511. 70 77

(59)

(Line et al, 2001) 8..2 502 4 5111 855

(60)

Eros Thanatos 5110 171 5121 81 0. 8..7 075 078 0.08.50

(61)

5 (Hypothalamus) 8.5. 818 5171 20 XYY XY 5177 8.1 (Testosterone (Androgen)

(62)

8... 15 0 Lorenz Ardrey Sinder Tenbbergen Hind 8..8 007 Hydraulic model) Loranz, 1971, 121

(63)

5121 18 8..5 017 2 Dollard Miller 8..8 018

(64)

Harriman

8..1

(65)
(66)
(67)

5

8

0

1

1

(68)

kazdan1978 lightner witmer

1

01 8108.50 8..2018 10

(69)

5112 0.08..2

1

A. Goldstein W. Mikulas 550511.

(70)

1108..2 58508.50 8108..2 5 8 0 1 1 0 55108.50

(71)

5 8 0 1 1 0 7 2 8108..1

(72)

(73)

58508.50 1 51.08.50 1 0808..1 3 51508.50

(74)

0 5 8 0     1 51108..2 

(75)

 50008.50 7108..1 1 1   58108..7 5.108...  

(76)

 58008..7 1 3 8.808..2 8 .

(77)

1 1 5 8 01708..7 3 Crafts Mallesan 5111 81008.50 7208..1

(78)

3 1  .  . 81708.50 4 2108.51 5

(79)

82.05110

6

51008... master and rim

51508..7 6 1    51008...    51208.50 6 1

(80)

    51208... 81008..7

(81)

81808.50

51108.50

(82)

      51708.50

(83)

2508..1

(84)

82208.50 1 Modeli 2508..1 1 1           81508.50

(85)

1 51108.50 1 2108.51 1 Self-Assertiveness

(86)

1 1      1 3 5 8 0 4 81008.50 3

(87)

81108.50 4 5177 5177 0.508.50 1921 5

(88)

8 0 1 1 0.808.50

(89)
(90)

1

1

3

4

5

(91)

(joseph wolpe) (salter) 5111 (joseph wolpe (salter) 5112

1

8108..5

(92)

(w.James) Andronikof sanclade 51708.58 55205127 1.05121 5112

(93)

wolpe

(wolpe)

Alberti and emmons

8108..1

RAKOS

1005112

(94)

18108.50 wolpe lazaruse lang et jakobowski 8..7 10 17 5120 75 5110 5110 5008.50

(95)

5008..0

1708..7

1

(96)

8008.50 Gambrilly et rich whitly et flowers 1808..1   8008.50

(97)

3

1208.55 5110 8008..0 1 1 1 herson 1108..5 5171 kagan et carlson 1 0 2 1 5. 58 5122

(98)

5122 1108.50 1 1 1 3 Patterson 71 71 1108.55

(99)

1 4 1208.50 1208.55 1950 1960 8508.55

(100)

1108.50 wolpe 8808.55 1108.50 1950 1961 Ellis 

(101)

   8808.55 townend 1008.50 townend 8.

(102)

Ellis

4

townend 5115 5118 (deluty) 5121 8508..0 8.50 80508.50 80.

(103)

01105110 8..0

80508..0

(104)

0808.50

(105)
(106)

1

1

3

4

5

6

(107)

1

1108.5. 5121 81005121 Ryff 5 8 0 1

(108)

1 0 5808.55 ( 5110 " 8..1 . 8..0 5808.58 ﺗ ﻧ ﺧ ﺷ (1987 ﻣ ﻧ ﺳ ﺷ ب ﻧﻳﻛﺳ ﺳ ﺣﻳ ﻳ ﻧﺋﻣ ﻛ ﺣ ﻛ ﺟ ﻧ ﻣ ﺟ ﻧ ﻳﺣ ﺗ ﻳ ﺷﻳ 5708.5.  .  .  .  .  .

(109)

1

8.08.58 5110   8008.5.

(110)

1988       5108.51

3

: : 8..0 0.

(111)

0.08.58 ناﻛ ﺻ ﺣ ﻧ ﻳ ةيسفﻧ دﻛؤﻳ ﺗ ضرعتﻳ تاونﺳ هبعلﺗ ءاﺳ ةيﺳاﺳ ﻳ ﻣﺗﻛﻳ بﻛ ةﻳاهﻧ ﻣ ﻣ ﻣﻛ ﻳ ﺗ ﺗ ﻣ ةﻳامﺣ ب ﺋ جتنﺗ زﺋارغب ب ﺷ تعب اهانعﻣ ٕ عبشﺗ يدؤﻳ كولﺳ ﻧ ىنعمب مهتﺟاﺣ عبشﺗ ﻣ ﻣ ﻧﺳ ساسﺣ نﻣلأاب لﺣارﻣ تامﺳ هتيصخﺷ لابقتسﻣ امﻛ دﻛ دعب هﻣأب ةلﺣرﻣ ﻛبﻣ ليكشﺗ تامﺳ تطاﺣ وجب ﻣ ةبحﻣ ﺣ ةﻧوﻧ ناﻛ ﺛ ةيصخﺷ لابقتسﻣ 0508.5. Freud)

(112)

" 0008.58 (Horney,K 5111 0508..0 ﺗ ﻧ نيتﺟاﺣ ﺳ ﻳﺗﻳﺳ ﻣ ﻣ دمتعﻳ

(113)

هتﺟاﺣ ﻣ يلاتلاب ﻣﻧﻳب ةلاابﻣ لب وحﻧ طبحﻳ ةﺟاﺣ ﻣ يﻧ كولﺳ ﻳ للقﻳ ﻣ روعﺷ اب ﻣ طرشلاب Basic evil ﻣ ﻧ اﻣ درفلاب ﻳ هنﻣ دوعولاب ﺧ ﻳ ءاسﺗ هتلﻣاعﻣ ةقﻳرطب ةربخب رعشيﻳ ءادعب ﺳ ﺳ Basic hostility ﺣﻧ ﺣ ﺷﻣ اهببسﻳ ىقبﺗ ﻧﻣ ب ﺗ هلﻛ رعشﻳ ناب لﻛ ءيﺷ نكﻳ ارطﺧ لاقﻳ ﻳ يﺳاﺳ روعﺷ ب دﺣ يﺋ ﺟﺗ ﻛﻳ ﻛ ﺗ ب ﺻﺧ ةب اﺳ ﺳ ﻛﻣﻳ ﻳ اض يدؤﺗ ﻣﺟﻣ ﻳبﻛ ﻣ مادعﻧاب ﺗﺣ هﺗاﺟاﺣ ﻳ ﻣ ﺗ ﻧ رعﺷ بوبحﻣ هﻧأب ةقيقﺣ هﻧ ﺳﻳ عيطﺗ بلغتﻳ اﻣ هاقلﻳ نيب رﺧ كرتﺗ لثﻣ اﺛ ضرﻣ ةي اﻣ رعشﻳ هﻧأب بﺣﻣ ﻧ ﻳ رعﺷ ءادعلاب ﺣﻧ ﻳ ﺳ و طقسﻳ ﻛ ﺷ ﻛ حبصﻳ ﻛ ايﺳاﺳ ﻳ حبصﻳ ميلﺳ 8705112 ﺗ ﻧ ﺧ ﻣ ﻣ ﻛ ﻧ ناﺳ دقتعﺗ ءوشﻧ ﻣ بﺗ روعشب ﺳﻧ قلقلاب ﺳ ا ﺳ حرطﺗ يﻧ موهفﻣ ﺻ ﺧ ضرعتب اﻣ ددهﻳ هروعﺷ اب ﻣ هضراعﺗ ﺗﺟ ةيعاﻣ ىرﺗ ضرعﺗ ﻣ ددهﻳ هروعﺷ نﻣلأاب هﻧ ﻳ أشﻧ هسفﻧ ﺻ ﺗ طض بر هب تاﻧوكﻣ هسفﻧ ةجيتﻧ هﻳرتعﺗ يﻧ دصقﺗ طبرﺗ نﻣ ثيﺣ نﻣ

(114)

ةدﺣوﻛ ةلﻣاكتﻣ شيعﺗ ﻧ ةدﺷ ﺛﻛ ﻣ هيﺟوﺗ ﺷ اﺧ ﻳ نوطيحﻳ هب ﻳ دمتعﻳ يدؤيﺳ مهب ةلاﺣ ةملؤﻣ يﻧاعيﺳ اهنﻣ تبكﻳ ﻳﻧ ةروصب ةعنقﻣ لاﺣ اﻣ طقسﻳ ءايﺷ ﺧ ميلﺳ 0108..8 ﻳ ﻳﻣ ﻧﺳ ﺳﺣ ب ﻣ ﻧ ﺳ ﻣ ﺣ ﻣ ﺗ ﻳﺛ ﻣﺳ ﺗﻳﺻﺧﺷ ﺟﺗ ﺗ ﺗﺳﻣ ب

4

(115)

 .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  8..7 5. 55

(116)

8..1 . . 8..1 81 8.5. . 8008.5.

5

:

.

(117)

8808.58     108..0

6

: .

(118)

.

(119)
(120)

1

1

3

4

5

0

(121)

1

(122)

(123)

 

3

5.. 0. 1. 0. 81 81 50 58 .8 8.57

(124)

51 50 58 8.57 5..

4

0. 51 51    mann-whithney-u test 1 w z Sig 15 16.90 153.50 91.500 111.500 0.222 0.05 0.32 15 14.10 111.50 5001. 81001.

(125)

z .0277 u 1501.. .002 .0.1 mann-whithney-u test 3 N u w z Sig 15 16.22 151.50 93.500 113.500 0.296 0.41 0.05 15 14.13 113.50 50077 81501. 51080 85001. w 85001.. z .0710 u 1001.. .018 .0.1 mann-whithney-u test

(126)

4 U w z Sig 15 13.52 103.50 23.500 103.5 00 0.111 0.11 0.05 15 12.43 161.50 50017 8.001. 57010 80501. w 8.001. z .0588 u 2001.. .085 .0.1 mann-whithney-u test 5 N u w z Sig 15 14 110 90.00 110 1.010 0.31 0.05 15 12 155

(127)

1 55 5. .077 1 55 5. .01. 51 85. 57 811 w 85. z 50.5. u 1.0.. .005 .0.1 mann-whithney-u test 6 N u w z Sig 15 11.10 103.00 42.00 103.00 0.915 0.19 0.05 15 11.20 109.00 5508. 5.00.. 5502. 5.1 w 5.0 z .0151 u 120..

(128)

.051 .0.1 57 .8 8.51 5 8 0. 51 51     0

(129)

5

     1 8.50 00 1 1 0. 0 0  1 5. 55 58 85 88 80 81 0.  1 0 7 2 57 52 51 8. 81 81

(130)

 5 8 0 1 50 51 51 50 80 87 82  0 8 5 . 5.. 1 55 0

(131)

7 2 2 9 0.50 5 0.60 1 0.52 0.05 0.01 10 0.49 6 0.55 1 0.52 11 0.45 2 0.53 3 0.55 11 0.42 2 0.50 4 0.55 11 0.51 12 0.49 13 0.53 11 0.50 12 0.42 14 0.49 13 0.55 19 0.55 15 0.62 19 0.49 10 0.49 16 0.66 30 0.53 14 0.55 16 0.66 15 0.53 12 0.56 12 0.55 2 1 0.23 0.52 0.26 0.05 0.23 1 0.21 0.91 0.52 0.21 1 0.22 0.26 0.91 0.22 1 7 2 .0.1 .0.5

(132)

87 9 12 14.111 1.21120 11.261 0.05 12 36.000 10.43221 .0.1 10 5. .0.1 0.69 0.05 0.65 0.62 0.26

(133)

.001 .077  ] . 8. [ ] 85 1. [ ] 15 0. [ 8 8.55 05 7 0.

(134)

50800 82 0  5 8 0 1 58 50 51 80 87 82  2 1 5. 55 57 52 8. 88 85 51  1 0 7 51 50 80 81 81 0    ج -سايقملل ةيرتموكيسلا صئاصخلا 5.. 2 21

(135)

يلخادلا قاستلاا ةقيرط : طابترا لماعم باسح مت يئانبلا قدصلا باسحل يذلا دعبلاب دنب لك ةجرد نوسريب طابترلاا لماعم مادختساب كلذو هيلإ يمتني مقر لودجلا يف ةحضوم جئاتنلاو (. 55 ) 58 11 1 0.60 2 0.61 5 0.62 0.05 0.01 3 0.62 9 0.55 6 0.52 4 0.69 10 0.52 2 0.52 11 0.42 11 0.53 15 0.10 13 0.50 12 0.69 16 0.50 14 0.05 12 0.52 13 0.52 16 0.51 10 0.55 14 0.62 12 0.49 11 0.69 15 0.66 12 0.69 11 0.62 19 0.52 11 1 1 0.10 0.012 0.539 0.05 0.10 1 0.46 0.24 0.012 0.46 111 0.262 0.539 0.24 0.262 1

(136)

58 .0.1 51 51 .0.1 87 13 12 31.25 1.3642 0.042 14.222 0.05 12 42.111 4.32944 .0.1 14 0.69 0.05 0.62 0.59

(137)

51 .0.1 .012 .001 82 1   ] . 18 [  ] 18 10 0 87 5. 0 8 5 87 25 5 87 87 11 11 25 .051 .015 .0.1 .0010 5..

(138)

51 15 1 0.24 16 0.25 0.05 0.01 0.52 12 0.52 1 3 0.56 12 0.50 4 0.55 19 0.55 5 0.66 10 0.42 6 0.60 11 0.46 2 0.22 11 0.52 2 0.66 13 0.66 9 0.69 14 0.60 10 0.52 15 0.62 11 0.20 16 0.62 11 0.55 12 0.69 13 0.52 12 0.69 14 0.59 15 0.25 51 .0.1 .0.5 87

(139)

16 87 11010 50.52 8805. .0.1 87 18000 50.71 .0.1 52 12 0.60 0.05 .00. .0.1 .021 .018 4 58

(140)

5 8 5 8 1 1

(141)

0 5 8 0 1 5 8 5 8 0 1 5

(142)

8 0 1 0 58 5 8 1 1

(143)

8 0 5 8 0

(144)

1 5 8 5 8 0 1 5 8 0 1

(145)

5

(146)

8..5 8..1 8..0 8..1 8..1 8..1 8..7    

(147)

1

(148)

 

(149)

       55 58 1 7 50 0. 50 1 82 51 51

(150)
(151)

2108.51

(152)

12 19 01 1019 60 13 01 1019 60 16 01 1019 60 1 03 1019 60

(153)

1 .0 8.51 5 60 58 0 8.51 8 60 50 .0 8.51 60 51 .0 8.51 90 80 .0 8.51 60

(154)

80 .0 8.51 0. 0 8.51 90 8 0 8.51 60 19 1 5 3 3 6 1 4 2 0 5 5 3 6 6 1 1

(155)

 0  1 3 8 .1 8.51      mann-whitney u  wilcoxon  

(156)
(157)

» « 10 p value z N 0.05 0.001 3.301 0.00 0.00 0 105.00 2.50 14 . . 701. 5.10.. Z -3.301 P .0..5 .0.1

(158)

matched-pairs rankbiserialcorrelation 𝑟𝑝𝑟𝑏 = 4(𝑡𝑖) 𝑛(𝑛+1)− 1 … . (5) rprb Ti N rprb 0.4 > rprb  0.8 > rprb ≥ 0.4  0.9 > rprb > 0.8  0.9 < rprb 87108.55  5 𝑅𝑝𝑟𝑏 = 4(105) 14(14+1)− 1 𝑅𝑝𝑟𝑏 = 420 210− 1 𝑅𝑝𝑟𝑏 = 1 rprb .01 » «

(159)

11 p value z w U n 0.05 0.000 4.513 105.0 0 0.000 301.00 11.50 14 105.00 2.50 14 8501. 0.50.. 701. 5.10.. w 5.10.. z 10180 u .0... p .0.1 Rank biserialcorrelation 𝑟𝑟𝑏 = 2(𝑀𝑅1−𝑀𝑅2) (𝑛1+𝑛2) … . (5) rrb

(160)

MR1 MR2 n1 n2 rrb  0.4 > 𝑟𝑟𝑏  0.7 > 𝑟𝑟𝑏 > 0.4  0.9 > 𝑟𝑟𝑏 > 0.7  0.9 < 𝑟𝑟𝑏 82.08.55 5 𝑟𝑟𝑏 = 2(21.50−7.50) (14+14) = 1 rrb .01 » « 11 p value z N 0.001 2.301 0.00 0.00 0 105.00 9.50 14

(161)

8.10.. Z 200.5 P 0.001 .0.1 𝑟𝑝𝑟𝑏 = 𝑛(𝑛+1)4(𝑡𝑖) − 1𝑟𝑝𝑟𝑏 = 14(14+1)4(205) − 1 𝑟𝑝𝑟𝑏 = 3.90 001. = 𝑟𝑝𝑟𝑏 .01 » « 13 p value z w u N 0.000 4.512 105.000 0.000 301.00 15.50 14 105.00 2.50 14 8101. 0.50. 701. 5.10.. w 5.1 z 10182 .0... .0.. .0.1

(162)

Rontbiserialcorrelation 𝑟𝑟𝑏 = 2(𝑀𝑅1−𝑀𝑅2) (𝑛1+𝑛2) 𝑟𝑟𝑏 = 2(21.50−7.50) (14+14) = 𝑟𝑟𝑏 = 1 𝑟𝑟𝑏 = 1 .01 » « 14 p value z N .0..5 000.0 .0... .0... . 5.20.. 701. 51 7.50) 105.0 0 0 3.303 Z p .0..5 . .0.1

(163)

𝑟𝑝𝑟𝑏 = 𝑛(𝑛+1)4(𝑡𝑖) − 1 𝑟𝑝𝑟𝑏 = 4(108) 14(14+1)− 1 𝑟𝑝𝑟𝑏 = 432 210− 1 𝑟𝑝𝑟𝑏 = 1.05 𝑟𝑟𝑏 = 1.05 .01 » « 15 p value z N 0.530 0.612 61.50 6.94 9 41.50 2.50 5 0 11 0801. 201. 1801. Z .0082 p .010. .0.1

(164)

» « 16 p value z n 0.316 0.923 15.00 5 5 11.00 3.62 3 1 81 0 55 Z .0120 p .0080 .0.1 » «

(165)

12 p value z N .0181 .0.21 080. 001. 1 010. 1007 0 001. 080. 0 010. Z .0.21 P .0181 .0.1

(166)

1

1

3

4

5

6

2

2

(167)

51

8.51

(168)

1105111 Merna et john

8..0

(169)

8. 8..1 8..7 8.55 5177

(170)

8.51 limber.2002 8..1 8..5 (Nansel et al, 2001)

(171)

8..7 8..1 85 8..2 8.50

(172)

8.50

8..1

(173)

karin horni 8..1 88 ) 8..1

(174)

5121

8008..1

(175)

0.08.5.

81105117

(176)

14

(177)

6

chambless et gill1993 whisman1991

(178)

(179)
(180)

(181)

chambless et gill1993 whisman1991

(182)
(183)
(184)
(185)
(186)
(187)
(188)
(189)
(190)
(191)
(192)
(193)
(194)
(195)
(196)
(197)

1. Cook, C.R., et al (2010): predictors of Bullying and Victimization in

Childhood and Adolescence, A Meta-Analytic Investigation, School

psychology Quarterly, 25(2)

2. Corvo, K. Delara, E. (2010): Towards in integrated theory of relational

violence, Is bullying a risk factor for domestic violence ? Aggression

and violence Behavior, 15(3)

3. Fox, C. & Boulton, M.J. (2005): The social skills problems of victims of

bullying, self, peer and teacher perceptions, British Journal of Educational

psychology(75) .

4. Fox, C. & Boulton, M.J. (2005): The social skills problems of victims of

bullying, self, peer and teacher perceptions, British Journal of Educational

psychology(75) .

5. Friedman, R. M. et, al (1982): Social skills with in A day Treatment program for Emotionally Disturbed Adolescents, Journal of child and

youth services, Vol. 5, No. 3

6. Furlong, m. & chung, A. & Bates, m. & Morrison, R. (1995): Who are

the victims of school violence? A comparison of student non – victims and multi- victims, Education and Treatment of children.

7. Gelles, R. J. Strause, M. A. (1989) Physical Violence in American Families, Risk Factor and Adaption to Violence, New Brunswick, N.Y. U.S.A.

8. Gelles, R. J. Strause, M. A. (1989) Physical Violence in American Families, Risk Factor and Adaption to Violence, New Brunswick, N.Y. U.S.A.

9. -Gilbert,s.(1999).study finds bullies and victims are more a like than different both group likely to be suffering from depression.retrived

.1 / .5 /

(198)

10. Judith, Y. and Malcolm, W. (1997): Children who are targets of

bullying: A victim pattern. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Vol.12, No

11. Loranz, Konrad , (1971) An Aggression, London, Methuem, U.K.

12. Lovoie, Richard (1999): The teacher's Role in Developing social skills, Teacher's Guide, http://www.Idonline.org

13. Nansel, T. R., Over peck, M., Pilla, R. S., Ruan, W. J., Simons-Orton, B. & Scheldt, P.(2001): Bullying behaviors among U.S. youth: Prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. Journal of the American Medical Association, (285) .

14. Olweus, D. (1995): Bullying or peer abuse in school, fact and intervention, Current Directions Psychological science,(4).

15. Olweus, D. (1997): Annotation Bullying at school basic fact and Effects of a school based intervention program, journal of child psychology and psychiatry and Akied disciplines, (35) .

16. Olweus, D. (2001): Peer harassment, A critical analysis and some important issues. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school, The plight of the vulnerable and victimized , New York: Guilford Press

17. -Rigby .K (2002),New Perspective son bullying London Jessica Kingsley Publisher

18. Rigby, K. (2003): Stop the bullying, This revised edition first published, by Australian Council for Educational Research Ltd,19 Prospect Hill Road, Camber well, Melbourne, Victoria, 3124

19. Riggio, R. C. & et, al (1990): Social skills and self-esteem Journal of

personality and individual Differences

20. Robert ,w (2006) Bullying from Both sides: strategic intervention for working with Bullies and victims , USA: corwin press

(199)

22. -Sarazen, J. A. (2002). Bullies and their victims: Identification and interventions A Research paper. University of Wisconsin

23. Smith, C. A. (2004). Raising courageous kids bullying facts. Extension Specialist in Kansas state University research and extension

24. Smith, P. K. and Shu, S. (2000): What good school can do about bullying, findings from a survey in English school after a decade of research and action. Childhood, 7,

25. Smith, P.K. and Sharb,S. (1994): School bullying: Insights and perspectives. London, Rout ledge .

26. Smith, P.K. and Sharb,S. (1994): School bullying: Insights and perspectives. London, Rout ledge.

27. Sullivan, Keith and Cleary, Mark (2004): Bulling in Secondary Schools, What it looks like and How to Manage it? , New York: Sage publishing

(200)

Références

Documents relatifs

Il est apparaît, au vu de cette analyse, que les savoirs sont cités plutôt de manière générale, que les attentes vis-à-vis des savoirs appris en physique sont surtout de

4.3 Spatial and Semantic Context Extraction In order to provide additional information to help subsequent compo- nents predict the unknown object, we augment the scene description

4 ثادحأ نأ حضتي ،قبس اممو 11 ربمتبس 2001 تايلاولا باستكا نع ترفسأ تايعادت نم اهلات امو اهتفظو ،يلودلا ماظنلا يف ةديدج ةيدايق ةطلُس ةيكيرملأا

nouvelles substances actives vers des molécules plus hydrophobes. Une autre raison possible de cette insolubilité peut être la nature d’acide faible ou de base faible des

A similar structure is observed along cross section S2 (Fig. For this cross section, the horizontal structure is disturbed at 22 m by high-angle fault plans, and at 70 m. The

Conclusions: The results reveal that the presence of a mutation in the inhA regulatory region together with a mutation in the inhA coding region can lead to the development

Three types of modified polymers containing dif- ferent silyl functional groups were prepared by a general two-stage process entailing lithiation of the polymer followed by the

Joint Segmentation and Deconvolution of Ultrasound Images Using a Hierarchical Bayesian Model Based on..