• Aucun résultat trouvé

Pépite | Segmentation d’images mammographiques pour l’aide au diagnostic

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Pépite | Segmentation d’images mammographiques pour l’aide au diagnostic"

Copied!
155
0
0

Texte intégral

Figure

Figure 2.2: Common signs of breast cancer: (a) masse, (b) microcalcifications, (c) distortion in parenchymal tissue.
Figure 2.4: Type of mammographic image formats. (a) two mammographic films hanged on a ligth-box for reading purpose, (b) digitized version of a screen-film mammogram, (c) digital mammogram
Figure 2.6: Mammographic images obtained under different projection angles of the X-rays system
Figure 2.7: Example of breast cancer signs identified in mammograms. (a) manually cir- cir-cumscribed mass with a bold black ellipse, (b) microcalcifications appearing as bright spots in the focused ROI.
+7

Références

Documents relatifs

– Comme nous l’avons vu au chapitre VI, la reconstruction de la forme 3D de vert`ebres peut ˆetre am´elior´ee `a l’aide d’un algorithme de contours actifs : si la reconstruction

The prior (5) is complemented by a Potts-Markov ran- dom field which promotes spatial homogeneity of the class labels [14]. It is known to be particularly suitable for

An image database of N = 30 gray-tone images of the human corneal endothelium acquired with a specular microscope is employed to evaluate the segmentation processes realized by

Motivated by practical problems of image segmentation in the med- ical field, we present in this paper a GPU framework based on explicit discrete deformable models, implemented over

Region-based models have more advantages over edge based models, especially by introducing local statistical image intensities instead of the global statistical