Some methodological aspects of local advection measurements :
Some methodological aspects of local advection measurements :
Some methodological aspects of local advection measurements :
Some methodological aspects of local advection measurements :
a case study
a case study
a case study
a case study
B. Heinesch
1, M. Yernaux
1, M. Aubinet
11Biosystems Physics Unit
Gembloux Agricultural University, Avenue de la Faculté 8, B-5030 Gembloux, Belgium, heinesch.b@fsagx.ac.be
Acknowledgements : This work was financially supported by
- European project CARBOEUROFLUX (DGXII, EVK2-CT-1999-00032) - Fonds national de la recherche scientifique (FNRS) - Faculté des Sciences Agronomiques de Gembloux.
RESULTS
RESULTS
RESULTS
RESULTS
Introduction
Assessing the NEE of a forest requires a better understanding of horizontal (Fh) and vertical (Fv)
CO2advective fluxes. In this study we used [CO2] measurements performed with a 2D array of sampling points spread throughout the trunk space in conjunction with wind speed measurements
to address methodological questions concerning the validity and the representativity of local CO2
advection evaluation.
Site description
Research is conducted at the Vielsalm experimental site (Belgium; see poster by D. Perrin for details). The uniform slope is of 3%. The two dominant species on the site (27 m tall beech and 35 m tall Douglas fir) are forming two sub-plots, without undercover vegetation, at the interface of which is placed the tower. In stable atmospheric conditions, katabatic flows develop in the trunk space that are decoupled with air motion above the canopy.
The turbulent integral time scale of the perturbations is 300s, giving a spatial extent of 80m (using Taylor hypothesis). In order to follow the perturbation, two samplings at the endpoints of the transect should be separated by an interval between 200 and 500s (time needed by the perturbation to advect).
Simultaneity in measurements is not desirable
I. Sampling strategy for [CO2]
I. Sampling strategy for [CO2]
I. Sampling strategy for [CO2]
I. Sampling strategy for [CO2]
II. Spatial
II. Spatial
II. Spatial
II. Spatial representativity
representativity
representativity of grad
representativity
of grad
of grad
of grad
CO2,horCO2,horCO2,horCO2,horIV. PFM and
IV. PFM and
IV. PFM and
IV. PFM and sonics
sonics
sonics
sonics
intercomparison
intercomparison
intercomparison
intercomparison
on w
on w
on w
on w
VII. CO
VII. CO
VII. CO
VII. CO
2222budget
budget
budget
budget
Katabatic flows along the slope are sometimes associated with a vertical flow from above the canopy down into the trunk space. This incoming air, poor in CO2, mixes with the horizontal flow and produces a negative gradCO2,horalong the slope (dilution effect). When the entrainment of air is not present, the dilution does not occur. The former case occurs when the wind above the canopy is blowing from the Douglas sector, the latter case when the wind is blowing from the Beech sector. We have no explanation for this difference of air flow pattern between sectors of above wind direction but the impact on the horizontal CO2gradient is clear. This result is a strong argument in favour of the reliability of gradCO2,horand w measurements and of the dilution mechanism.
The occurrence of those katabatic flows does not systematically imply horizontal advection.
The total concentration difference of -2.6 ppm is quite uniformly distributed along the transect. The impact of a possible contamination of the horizontal gradient (gradCO2,hor) by the vertical one and of very local source heterogeneities is thus limited. The 2 campaigns give similar results despite local differences in CO2sources intensity.
The gradCO2,horis representative at the ecosystem scale.
Poster presented at the Carboeurope meeting – Dublin – January 13-17th2005
VI. Entrainment and dilution mechanism
VI. Entrainment and dilution mechanism
VI. Entrainment and dilution mechanism
VI. Entrainment and dilution mechanism
Material
-20 CO2sampling points, LICOR 6262, multiplexer
with rotating cycle of 200s;
- 2 3D sonic anemometers (Gill R2 and R3) - 8 2D sonic anemometers (home-made) The main data set was obtained during a summer campaign in 2002 (930 katabatic half-hours). The horizontal transect was situated in the Beech sub-plot, along the slope direction.
An additional campaign was made in summer 2003 in the Douglas sub-plot (transect laterally displaced by 50m)
V. Mass balance
V. Mass balance
V. Mass balance
V. Mass balance
The R10obtained with windy nights is around 3.5 µmolm-2s-1. Fhis negative and very limited. Fvis positive, presents great uncertainties and does not allow the CO2balance closure of katabatic nights. The use of wcontreduces the magnitude of Fvand thus improves the budget closure.
The CO2balance improves when using w obtained from the
continuity equation.
The wcontobtained with the continuity equation is integrated on the whole transect and is more representative of the real entrainment than the wPFMat the top of the tower, well above the katabatic layer. The wcontat the top of the katabatic layer (20m) is only one fourth of those predicted by a linear vertical profile of w and the direct measurement at the top of the tower.
The mass balance provides lower w (in absolute value) than the PFM.
III. Vertical profile of grad
III. Vertical profile of grad
III. Vertical profile of grad
III. Vertical profile of grad
CO2,horCO2,horCO2,horCO2,hor-0.14 -0.12 -0.10 -0.08 -0.06 -0.04 -0.02 0.00 0.02 -0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 surface velocity (ms-1) v e rt ic a l v e lo c it y ( m s -1) BEECH SECTOR DOUGLAS SECTOR -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 z/L h o ri z o n ta l [C O 2] d if fe re n c e (µµµµ m o l m o l -1) DOUGLAS SECTOR BEECH SECTOR -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Time (s) A u to -c o rr e la ti o n c o e ff ic ie n t R k
[CO2] autocorrelation function of a high-frequency signal obtained at a fixed point
(1m height) during katabatic nights. Evolution of the horizontal [CO2] concentration difference along the horizontal transect
(6 sampling points) at 1m above the soil under katabatic conditions.
The gradCO2,horis negative near the soil and falls off to zero at 6m. The depth of the katabatic layer being 20m, it means that only the lowest third of the this layer is relevant to the advection processes. Only the lowest part of the katabatic layer presents a gradCO2,hor.
Comparison of corrected vertical velocity for two sonics situated next together (2m) at the top of the main tower (stable conditions). The Planar Fit Method (PFM) presents an offset of instrumental origin. The departure from the sinusoidal behaviour denotes perturbations of the flow by obstacles. The standard error on the fixed second rotation angle is important (1°). Due to the sensitivity of w on the PFM, it is not surprising that the agreement between the two sonics anemometers is moderate. The resulting uncertainty on Fvis 27%
This comparison reflects the difficulty to obtain accurate w, despite the application of the PFM.
Comparison of w obtained by the sonic at the top of the tower and by divergence of u in the trunk space
Link between w above the canopy and projected surface velocity for two sectors of above canopy wind direction (stable conditions).
Evolution with stability of horizontal [CO2] difference at 1m
for two sector of wind direction above the canopy. Diagram of air flow pattern according to wind
direction above the canopy.
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 90 180 270 360 azimuthal angle (°) ti tl t a n g le ( °)
Relation between second rotation angle and azimutal angle Blue : Gill R2; Red : Gill R3.
u w z x ∆ = −∆ ∆ -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 0 20 40 60 80 100 Lenght (m) [C O 2 ]inte rm ed ia te [ C O 2 ]upslop e ( p p m ) BEECH CAMPAIGN DOUGLAS CAMPAIGN
Vertical profile gradCO2,horunder katabatic conditions.
y = 0.73x + 0.00 R2 = 0.56 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 wPFM from Gill R2 (ms-1) wP F M f ro m G il l R 3 ( m s -1 ) Continuity equation : y = 0.136x - 0.0065 R2 = 0.1255 -0.15 -0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 -0.30 -0.25 -0.20 -0.15 -0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 wPFM,40m (ms-1) wc o n t, 2 0 m ( m s -1 ) 1:2 line expected relation 0 2 4 6 8 -0.05 0.00 0.05
horizontal [CO2] gradient (ppm m-1 ) (downstream-upstream) z ( m ) 0% 5% 10% 15% z /hc BEECH CAMPAIGN DOUGLAS CAMPAIGN With ∆x fixed at 89m ∆z chosen at 20m
Night mean course of all fluxes under katabatic conditions
-20 -10 0 10 20 18:00 21:00 0:00 3:00 6:00 Time (Hours) FL U X C O M P O N E N TS [ ξξξξ m olm -2s -1] Fc Storage Vertical advection Horizontal advection Vertical advection with wcont,20m