• Aucun résultat trouvé

Efficiency of conservation biological control depends on interaction effects between landscape and pesticide use intensity

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Efficiency of conservation biological control depends on interaction effects between landscape and pesticide use intensity"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Any correspondence concerning this service should be sent

to the repository administrator: tech-oatao@listes-diff.inp-toulouse.fr

This is an author’s version published in:

http://oatao.univ-toulouse.fr/21345

To cite this version:

Ricci, Benoit and Lavigne, Claire and Alignier, Audrey and

Aviron, Stéphanie and Biju-Duval, Luc and Bouvier,

Jean-Charles and Choisis, Jean-Philippe

and Franck, Pierre and

Joannon, Alexandre and Ladet, Sylvie

and Mezerette,

Florian and Plantegenest, Manuel and Roger, Jean-Luc and

Savary, Gérard and Thomas, Cecile and Vialatte, Aude

and

Petit, Sandrine Efficiency of conservation biological control

depends on interaction effects between landscape and

pesticide use intensity.

(2018) In: Sfécologie-2018,

International Conference of Ecological Sciences, 22 October

2018 - 25 October 2018 (Rennes, France).

Open Archive Toulouse Archive Ouverte

OATAO is an open access repository that collects the work of Toulouse

researchers and makes it freely available over the web where possible

(2)

Efficiency of conservation biological control depends

on interaction effects between landscape and

pesticide use intensity

Benoit Ricci

∗1

, Claire Lavigne

2

, Audrey Alignier

3

, St´

ephanie Aviron

3

, Luc Biju-Duval

1

,

Jean-Charles Bouvier

2

, Jean-Philippe Choisis

4

, Pierre Franck

2

, Alexandre Joannon

3

,

Sylvie Ladet

4

, Florian M´

ezerette

1

, Manuel Plantegenest

5

, Jean-Luc Roger

3

, G´

erard

Savary

3

, C´

ecile Thomas

2

, Aude Vialatte

4

, and Sandrine Petit

1

1Agro´ecologie [Dijon] – Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique : UMRINRA 1347, Universit´e

de Bourgogne, AgroSup Dijon - Institut National Sup´erieur des Sciences Agronomiques, de l ´Alimentation et de l ´Environnement : UMR1347 – Universit´e de Bourgogne 17 rue Sully BP 86510

-21000 Dijon, France

2Unit´e de recherche Plantes et Syst`emes de Culture Horticoles (PSH) – Institut National de la

Recherche Agronomique : UR1115 – Domaine St Paul, Site Agroparc, 84941 Avignon Cedex 9, France, France

3Biodiversit´e agro´ecologie et am´enagement du paysage (UMR BAGAP) – ESA - Ecole sup´erieure

d ´Agriculture d ´Angers, Agrocampus Ouest, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique – 65 rue de Saint-Brieuc 35042 Rennes, France

4Dynamiques Foresti`eres dans l ´Espace Rural (DYNAFOR) – Institut National Polytechnique

[Toulouse], Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique : UR1201, Ecole Nationale Sup´erieure Agronomique de Toulouse – France

5Institut de G´en´etique, Environnement et Protection des Plantes (IGEPP) – Institut National de la

Recherche Agronomique : UMR1349, Universite de Rennes 1 : UMR1349, Agrocampus Ouest : UMR1349 – Domaine de la Motte au Vicomte BP 3532735653 Le Rheu, France

Abstract

Control of crop pests by their natural enemies provides a valuable but poorly quantified ecosystem service. Many studies have addressed the multiple scale drivers of pest control but results from such studies appear variable, if not equivocal. The variability of landscape responses can result from its modulation factors by local practices, among which pesticide use intensity which affects pests and natural enemies and could be a major driver of natural pest control. In this study, we examine the relative contribution of pesticide use and landscape on biological control along a double gradient of pesticide use and landscape simplification. Eighty commercial fields were monitored during three years in four contrasted regions in France. Biocontrol in each field was estimated using three different types of sentinel preys (Ephestia kuehniella eggs, Acyrthosiphon pisum aphids and Viola arvensis seeds). For each one, the interaction effects of landscape variables with the intensity of pesticide use on predation patterns were analyzed.

The predation of weed seeds was negatively influenced by both pesticide use and landscape ∗

(3)

simplification, without interaction between the two scales. The predation of Ephestia was negatively influenced by landscape simplification only in case of low pesticide use intensity whereas the effect was positive in case of high pesticide use intensity. There was a significant interaction between pesticide use and the length of interfaces between crops and woods on the predation aphids. These landscape variables had a positive effects on the predation of aphids in case of low or medium pesticide use intensity but a negative effect in case of high pesticide use intensity. These results could indicate that in fields with low local pesticide use, landscape complexity enhance biological control whereas in intensive fields, the presence of semi-natural habitat could be unsuitable for natural enemies adapted to intensive situations.

Références

Documents relatifs

Given the high mobility of spiders, we expect that the composition of the surrounding landscape would affect local spider communities in wheat fields as follows: Species richness

Parmi les parcelles fauchées et pâturées (tableau 4), les proportions de surface en pente sont rela- tivement faibles dans toutes les classes, avec cependant des parcelles en

Role of the predatory mites Amblyseius aberrans (Oud.), Typhlodromus pyri Scheuten and Amblyseius andersoni (Chant) (Acari, Phytoseiidae) in vineyards.. The effects of single or

The national network SEBIOPAG (http://sebiopag.inra.fr) was set up in 2013 to monitor pest control services and their dynamic in 100 fields located in 5 regions of France and selected

We assessed the effect of the cover area of grassland in the landscapes surrounding fields at different spatial scales, on both in-field seed-eating

By comparing similar farms using high or low levels of pesticides, the scientists found that 94% of farms would lose no production if they cut pesticides and two-fifths of these would

In the first system, the crop sequence was winter field beans – winter wheat- winter oilseed rape –winter wheat- spring barley, with mustard as a Table 2 | Yield losses resulting

Their application on crop fields impacts both the expected crop yield and its variability (Just and Pope