Under the assumption
sup ll a,llo,rr,r+1y <
-,
Lemma 6.3 and Rellich's compactness theorem guarantee the existence
of
a sub-sequencezl,
convergingin
Z,(O(^S+1)) and hencein H?#(q to
an elementu$?#@).
Clearly, rz satisfies (6.12) and (6.13)with .q;:0,
as well as(6.16)
(ulLh)s,j2:0
forall
h€rf@).AIso,
z
isin
"r(O):With X
and u2 as in the proof of Lemma 6.3,f ::
PIL)u,belongs
to 9(R')
and by Lemma 6.2 (i) there exists a unique solution ,?€"/(R')of
P(DA: i.
Putting
u,,
:: (l-X)un,, i,, : f lqu;
and continuing these functions by zero, we see from interior regularity results, that
,tT
ll(t*
lxlz)r(l-i)il,,
"" :
o'Hence, by (6.5),
u,
tendsto fr in
H?k@). But thenuz:fr.(J(R");
thus uU(A1.It
remains to lead the assumption,lim ll
z,llo,e1s+r):-Exterior boundary value problems for elliptic equations
to a contradiction. For this we consider the normalized sequence w,
:
ll uoll o, a(s + ry -14,,.As above we can conclude that a subsequence 1e;, conv€rges
in
Hffi(CI) to a solu-tionw(J(Q) of P(L)w:0,yrw:0,
which satisfies (6.16). By the choiceof r/
this impliesw:0,
which contradicts the normalizationof
wo,.Let us now consider problem (6.12;6.13) with nonzero
g;. It
is possible to construct a functionwct*!-(Q
satisfying(6.17)
Tiw: 9i' i :
O'"'' ffi-l'
supp wnsupp rlr
:
0.Green's identity gives
for u(.,{*(A)
(r
1r1wlv)o, o: 2) G
1lr, ryo.,.Hence,
if
(6.14) is valid, we have(f-P(L)wlo)0,, : 0 for all
u(,/r*(Q).By the first part
of
the proof there is a solution{i<J@) of P(L)fr:f -P(L)w, y.ifr:O.
Moreover, the functionfi
satisfies (6.16). Then the functionu:: il*w
solves (6.12; 6.13) and, in addition, by (6.17), satisfies (6.16).
Since condition (6.14)
is
also necessaryfor
the solvability, Theorem 6.4 is proved.From the proofofTheorem 6,4 one easily deduces a pseudoinverse for problem (6.12;6.13)
o-'
: x (a)x'fi' p'- -' -'t' (t) *
J (a) j:owhich is continuous as a mapping from
H!,,(qXIIf=or pzm-i-rtz(f)
into äffi(O).For this we choose
a
nonnegative testfunctionE€0(A)
such that the mapping.,(*(Q)*K19), u-eu is
injective. Denotingby
uL,...,Dda
basisof ,f*(A)
for which
(rpuilui\s,e: öii,
the mapping
Q:
K(o)xfi' g'^-t-'t2(f) *1((o)x fi' g'*-i-'21r1,
j:0 j:r
e(f; s): (f-
i:t* «f,,.;,,,o-Z'k,lr,u,)o,,)vu,;
j:o s)is a
continuous projectionof K(O)XII!;LHzn-i-u2(f)
onto the rangeof
the mappingg
iJ(O)*K@)X ilf;'
Hzn-i-uz(I'),
where39
(6.18)
9u - (P(L)u)
loul., ...,y*-fllr).
(6.19)
40 J. SnnnNEN and K. J. Wrrscrl
A
pseudoinverseof I is
given by assigningto
any(f;go,.",8^-t)
the unique solutionu€J(A) of
P(L)u
: f, !iu : 8i, i :
O, ...,m-1,
with the property (6.16).
Hete (f
;80,...,8.-r):Qff,80, "',8,-r)'
We have
to
show the continuityof 9-r.
SinceQ
is continuous,9-r
iscontinuous
if
llullr*,o(R)
=
g(ttr Q)u|| 0, o(s)+ 2t
lly iullr,,- j -Lp, r) J:0holds
for
anyu€.I(A)
with the properties (6.16-6.18). Estimate (6.19) has to be shown for any Å,§,
and the constantc:c(R, S)
may not dependon a. If
(6.15)were wrong, ttrere would exist numbers Ä, ,S>0 and a sequence uo(J(Q) such that
lluollzm,e(R)
: l,
l.-3 (tt
r
@)uoli,, ,,(s).Zilv
iuollr,,- i -ttz,r):
0and that (6.15) are valid. Without loss of generality, we may suppose that .R
>'S* l.
Then by Lemma 6.3 and Rellich's compactness theorem there exists a subsequence
uk,,
cotyerging to somea in Hffi(O).
As in the proof of Theorem 6.4, we canconclude,
that u
belongsto
.,4r(A) and hence vanishes by (6.16). This contra-dicts (6.20).We have shown that for any exterior domain
O
with smooth boundary the Dirichlet operator, as defined by (6.18), is a weakly indexed operator with index0
and admits a pseudoinverse0-,
whichis
continuous asa
mapping fromK@)xJIf;t gzn-i-rtz(f) into
H?*@) and for whichQ:gth-' it
a continuousprojection
of
iK(O) onto the rangeof 9.
Since the adjoint Dirichlet problem is a problem of the same kind, this is truefor 9* too.
Therefore all assumptions(A1)-(A6)
are validin
the case under discussion and one can conclude that Theorem 3.6is
applicablefor
exterior boundary value problemswith
respect to the operatorA-
P(L).Remark. To
solve problemQ.l5),
one could proceed asin
the proof of Theorem 6.4, using estimate (6.5)with
1l; replacedby Bi.
However, this would yield neither the index of the problem nor the finiteness of the codimension of the range.References
[l]
AcrraoN, S.: 6ctures on elliptic boundary value problems. - D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc., Princeton, N. J. - Toronto, Ont.-New York-London' 1965.[2] AcuoN, S. and L. HönrrlnNorn: Asymptotic properties of solutions of differential equations with simple characteristics. - J. Analyse Math' 30, 1976,
l-38,
[3] CarprröN, A. P.: Uniqueness in the Cauchy problem for partial differential equations. - Amer.
J. Math. 80, 1958, 16-36.
(6.20)
Exterior boundary value problems for elliptic equations
[11] Hönlr,c'Nprn, L.: Linear partial diflerential operators. - Springer Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, 1969.
[12] HönuaNorn, L.: Lower bounds at inlinity for solutions of differential equations with constant coefficients. - Israel J. Math. 16, 1973, 103-116.
[13] JÄcnn, 'Vl.: Zrtr Theorie der Schwingungsgleichung mit variablen Koeffizienten
in
AuBen-gebieten. - Math. Z. tO2, 1967.62-88.
[14] JöncrNs, K.: Lineare Integraloperatoren. Mathematische kitfäden. - B. G, Teubner, Stutt-gart,197O.
[lI
Lsts, R.: Zur Monotonie der Eigenwerte selbstadjungierter elliptischer Differentialgleichungen.- Math. z. 96, 1967,26-32.
[18] Luts, R.: AuBenraumaufgaben zur Plattengleichung. - Arch. Rational Mech. Anal.35, 1969,
226-233.
[19] Lus, R.: Zur Theorie der Plattengleichung. - Ber. Ges. Math. Datenverarb. Bonn 101, Ig75.
[20] LrvrNr, L. M.: A uniqueness theorem for the reduced wave equation. - comm. pure Appl.
Math. 17, 1964, 14'7-176.
[21] Ltoxs, J. L. and E. MlcrNes: Non-homogeneous boundary value problems and applications I.
- Springer Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New york., 1972.
[22] Mrvens, N. and J. SnnnrN: The exterior Dirichlet problem for second order elliptic partial differential equations. - J. Math. Mech. 9, 1960, 513-538.
[23] NrnruNvärr, P.: Randwertaufgaben zur Plattengleichung.
-
Ann. Acad, sci. Fenn. ser.A
I
Math. Dissertationes 16, 1978, 1-71.[24] PnNrvnn, B. P.: Existence and uniqueness of the solution of the r-metaharmonic equation on an unbounded case. - Vestnik Moscov. Univ. Ser. Mat. Meh. Astronom. Fiz. Him.
5, 1959, 123-135 (Russian).
[25] Plt§, A.: Non-uniqueness in Cauchy's problem for differential equations of elliptic type.
-M. Math. Mech. 9, 1960,557-562.
[26] Pu§, A.: A smooth linear elliptic differential equation without any solution in a sphere.
-Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 14, 1961,599-617.
[2fl Pous, R.: AuBenraumaufgaben in der Theorie der Plattengleichung. - Bonn. Math. Schr.
No. 91, 1976.
[28] Pnorrnn, M. H.: unique continuation for elliptic equations. - Trans. Amer. Math, soc. 95, 1960,81-91.
4r
42 J. SlnaNEN and K. J. Wrrscn: Exterior boundary value problems for elliptic equations [29] Rrr-rrcrr, F.: Uber das asymptotische Verhalten der Lösungen von
/u*
kzu:O in unendlichenGebieten. - J. Ber. Deutsch. Math. Verein' 53, 1943,57-65'
[30] snmo, Y.: The principle of Iimiting absorption for second-order differential equations with operator-valued coefficients. - Publ. Res. Inst. Math. sci.7,l97ll72, 581-619' [3I] SnnaNrN, J.: A generalized plate equation with an exterior boundary value problem' - Ber'
Univ. Jyväskylä Math' Inst. 17,1977.
[32] SARINEN. J.: On decomposition of solutions of some higher order elliptic equations. - Ann.
Acad. Sci. Fenn. Ser.
AI4,
1978179,267-277'[33] SauxrN, J.: On electric and magnetic boundary problems for vector fields in nonhomogeneous anisotropic media. - J. Math' Anal. Appl' (to appear)'
[34] Scnur,rNsrncrn, J. R. and C. H. Wpcox: A Rellich uniqueness theorem for steady-state waYe propagation in inhomogeneous anisotropic media. - Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 41, 1971,18-45,
[35] VaiNssnc, B. R.: Principles of radiation, limit absorption and limit amplitude in the general theory of partial differential equations. - Russian Math. surveys 21,115-163.
[36] VeiNsrx.c, B. R.: On elliptic problems in unbounded domains.
-
Math. USSR-Sb' 4, 1968, 419-444.[37] Vrxul, I. N.: New methods in solving elliptic boundary value problems.
'
John wiley & sons,Inc., New York, 1967.
[3g] VocersaNc, V.: Eltiptische Diferentialgleichungen mit variablen Koeffizienten in Gebieten
mit unbeschränktem Rand. - Manuscripta Math' 14, 1975,397-4Ol'
[39] Voc4s,luc, v.: Das Ausstrahlungsproblem fiir elliptische Differentialgleichungen in Gebieten
mit unbeschränktem Rand' - Math. Z. 144, 1975, 101-124'
[40] Wrcrrr,, W.: AuBenraumaufgaben zur Plattengleichung mit Hilbertraummethoden'
-
Ber' Ges. Math. Datenverarb. Bonn 67, 1973.[41] wcxnl,
w.:
Zur Theorie der Dirichletschen Randwertaufgabe zum operator/2-ka
im Innen- und Augenraum mit der Integralgleichungsmethode.-
Bonn. Math. Schr.No.68, 1973.
[42] Wrrcox, c. H.: scattering theory for the d'Alembert equation in exterior domains. - Lecture Notes in Mathematics,2t42, Springer-Verlag' Berlin-New York' 1975'
[43] Wrscn, K. J.: Schiefe AuBenraumaufgaben zu elliptischen Differentialgleichungen zweiter Ordnung. - Bonn. Math. Schr' No' 64' 1973'
[44] Wrrsc.n, K. J.: The exterior Dirichlet problem for a class of fourth order elliptic equations. -J. Math. Anal. Appl. 49, 1975,734J47'
[45] Wrrsqr, K. J.: Radiation conditions and the exterior Dirichlet problem for a class of hieher order elliptic equations. - J. Math. Anal' Appl' 54, 1976,820-839'
J. Saranen