• Aucun résultat trouvé

Recurrent geodesics and related results

5 Prescribing the penetration of geodesic lines

5.3 Recurrent geodesics and related results

In this subsection, when M is geometrically finite, we construct locally geodesic lines that have a prescribed height in a cusp neighbourhood of M , and furthermore satisfy some recurrence properties. We will use the notation introduced in Section5.1 con-cerning the cusps e, and the objects hte,Ve,He, ξe.

Corollary 5.11 Let M be a complete, nonelementary, geometrically finite Rieman-nian manifold with compact totally geodesic boundary, with sectional curvature at most−1and dimension at least 3. Let e be a cusp of M . Then there exists a constant c′′3 =c′′3(e,M)such that for every hc′′3, there exists a locally geodesic line γ in M with maxhte(γ)=h, such that the spiraling length times ofγ along the boundary∂M are at most c′′3.

Up to changing the constant c′′3, we may also assume that γ stays away from some fixed (small enough) cusp neighbourhood of every cusp different from e. Note that, up to changing the constant c′′3, the last assertion of the corollary does not depend on the choice of f =ℓ,bp,ftp,crp, with respect to which the spiraling times are computed, and we will use f =ℓ.

Proof. As ∂M is compact, there exists ǫ ∈ ]0,1[ such that the ǫ-neighbourhood of the geodesic boundary ∂M is a tubular neighbourhood of ∂M . By definition of manifolds with totally geodesic boundary, there exists a complete simply connected Riemannian manifold M , a nonelementary, torsion-free, geometrically finite discretee subgroup Γ of isometries of M , ae Γ-equivariant collection (L+k )kN of pairwise dis-joint open halfspaces with totally geodesic boundary (Lk)kN, such that M is isometric

withΓ\(Me −S

kNL+k ). We will identify M andΓ\(Me −S

kNL+k) by such an isom-etry from now on. Note that (NǫL+k)kN is a family of pairwise disjoint ǫ-convex subsets inM .e

Let te,∂M = max{0,maxx∂Mhte(x)} ≥ 0, which exists since ∂M is compact. Note that the family (gHe[te,∂M+1])gΓ/Γξ

e is a Γ-equivariant family of pairwise disjoint horoballs in M , which are disjoint frome NǫL+n for all n ∈ N. Let us relabel this family of horoballs as (Hk)kN such that H0 =He[te,∂M +1]. Note that the horoballs Hk, k∈N, areǫ-convex.

Define

c′′3 =h1 ǫ,0,h0,0,c1(∞))

+te,∂M+1+c1)(c3)+1).

and let hc′′3. We apply Corollary 4.11with X = M ;e ǫ0 = ǫ; δ0 = 0; κ0 = c1(∞); C0 = H0; f0 = phC0; h0 = h00, δ0, κ0); C2k+1 = NǫL+k ; C2k = Hk; h = 2h2(te,∂M +1). Note that f0 is a κ0-penetration map in C0 by Lemma3.3, and that hh10, δ0,h0), as hc′′3. As M is a manifold of dimension at least 2,e there does exist a geodesic line γ0 in X with f00)=h. The family (Cn)nN, whose elements have pairwise disjoint interiors, satisfies the assertion (iii). It also satisfies (iv), by Proposition 3.7 Case (1), as h2c′′32(te,∂M +1) ≥ 2c1). Hence, by Corollary4.11, there exists a geodesic line eγ in X withphH0(eγ)=h and

Cn(eγ)≤h′′1 =h10, δ0,h0)+c10)(c30)+1)≤c′′3 for all n6=0.

AsℓC2n+1(eγ) is finite, the geodesiceγ does not cross the boundary of L+n , hence it stays in Me −S

kNL+k . Let π : Me −S

kNL+kM be the canonical projection, and let γ =π◦eγ. Hence, the length spiraling times ofγ are at most c′′3.

Note that

phHe(eγ) =phC0(eγ)+2(te,∂M+1)=h+2(te,∂M+1)=2h,

by the paragraph above Lemma3.3. Furthermore, if g ∈ (Γ−Γξe)/Γξe, then there exists k inN− {0} such that

phgHe(γe)=phC2k(eγ)+2(te,∂M+1)≤ℓC2k(γe)+c1(∞)+2(te,∂M+1)

h′′1 +c1(∞)+2(te,∂M+1)≤2c′′32h .

Therefore maxhte(γ) = h by the same proof as in the end of the proof of Corollary

5.4.

Let M be a compact, connected, orientable, irreducible, acylindrical, atoroidal, bound-ary incompressible 3-manifold with nonempty boundbound-ary (see for instance [MT] for references on 3-manifolds and Kleinian groups). A hyperbolic structure on a mani-fold is a complete Riemannian metric with constant sectional curvature −1. A cusp e of a geometrically finite hyperbolic structure is maximal if the maximal Margulis neighbourhood of e is a neighbourhood of an end of the manifold. Let P be the union of the torus components of ∂M , and G F(M)=G F(M,P) be the (nonempty) space of complete geometrically finite hyperbolic structures in the interior of M whose cusps are maximal, up to isometries isotopic to the identity. Recall that G F(M) is homeo-morphic to the Teichmüller space of∂0M=∂M−P.

For every σ in G F(M), the cusps of σ are in one-to-one correspondence with the torus components of ∂M , as any minimizing geodesic ray representing a cusp con-verges to an end of the interior of M corresponding to a torus component of∂M . If e is a torus component of∂M , let maxhtσ,e(γ) denote the maximum height of a locally geodesic lineγ inσ with respect to the cusp corresponding to e. The convex core of a structureσ inG F(M) is the smallest closed convex subset of the interior of M , whose injection in the interior of M induces an isomorphism on the fundamental groups.

The following result generalizes Theorem1.5in the introduction to the case of several cusps.

Corollary 5.12 Let M be a compact, connected, orientable, irreducible, acylindrical, atoroidal, boundary incompressible 3-manifold with boundary, and let e be a torus component of ∂M. For every compact subset K in G F(M), there exists a constant c′′4 = c′′4(K) such that for every hc′′4 and every σ ∈ K, there exists a locally geodesic line γ contained in the convex core of σ such that maxhtσ,e(γ) = h, and maxhtσ,e(γ)≤c′′4 for every torus component e 6=eof∂M.

Proof. For a subset A ofH3R, we denote by ConvA the hyperbolic convex hull of A inH3R. A subgroupΓ ofπ1M is called a boundary subgroup if there are an element γ ∈π1M , a component C of0M , and a point xC such that Γ =γIm π1(C,x)→ π1(M,x)

γ1. Let (Γn)nN be the collection of boundary subgroups of π1M . Letn)nN be the collection of maximal (rank 2) abelian subgroups of π1M , with Γ0 conjugate toπ1e.

Let ρσ1M → Isom(H3R) be a holonomy representation corresponding to σ ∈ K , appropriately normalized to depend continuously onσ. By assumption,Γ =ρσ1M) is a (particular) web group (see for instance [AM]). More precisely, for all n ∈ N, ρσn) is a quasifuchsian subgroup of Γ stabilizing a connected, simply connected

component Ωn,σ of the domain of discontinuity of ρσπ1M , such thatn,σ and Ωm,σ have disjoint closures if n6=m, and that ∂Ωn,σ contains no parabolic fixed points of Γ. Let (Hk,σ)kN be a maximal family of horoballs with pairwise disjoint interiors such that Hk,σ is ρσk)-invariant (such a family is unique if M has only one torus component). To make this family canonical over G F(M), we may fix an ordering e1 = e,e2, . . . ,em of the torus components of ∂M , and take by induction Hk,σ, for the k’s in N such that Γk is conjugate to π1(ei), to be equivariant and maximal with respect to having pairwise disjoint interiors as well as having their interior disjoint with the interior of Hk, for the k’s inNsuch thatΓ

k is conjugate to π1(ej) with j<i.

Note that the Hk,σ’s, besides the ones such that Γk is conjugate to π1e, are not the maximal horospheres that allow to define the height functions, but this changes their values only by a constant (uniform on K ).

Hence, as K is compact, there exists δ >0 such that for every σ ∈ K , the 1-convex subsetsN1(ConvΩn,σ) and Hk,σ for n,k ∈Nmeet pairwise with diameter at mostδ. The claim follows as in Corollary5.11by applying Corollary4.11to X =H3R, ǫ0 = 1, δ0 = δ, κ0 = c1(∞), C0 = H0,σ, f0 = phC0, h0 = h00, δ0, κ0), C2n+1 = N1(ConvΩn,σ), C2n=Hn,σ to get a geodesic line eγ in X with prescribed penetration in C0, and penetration bounded by a constant in Cn for n 6= 0. The finiteness of the intersection lengthsℓC2n+1(eγ) for n∈N implies thateγ stays in the convex hull of the

limit set ofΓ.

Remark. The fact that a locally geodesic line stays in the convex core of the manifold and does not converge (either way) to a cusp is equivalent with the locally geodesic line being two-sided recurrent.