• Aucun résultat trouvé

CHAPITRE 6 CONCLUSIONS

6.2 Recommandations pour travaux futurs

• L’algorithme d’identification et évaluation des ponts peut être inclus dans un logiciel. L’approche d’optimisation numérique peut être utilisée pour identifier la topologie du réseau d’échangeurs de chaleur résultant de modifications pontales.

• La méthode pontale peut être appliquée et testée pour l’intégration de systèmes traversés par plusieurs formes d’énergie. Le rapport exergie/énergie peut remplacer la température afin de représenter la dégradation en général. Ceci permettrait par exemple d’analyser la production d’électricité dans une turbine et son intégration dans un site industriel.

• Le principe pontal peut être utilisé pour améliorer d’autres approches d’intégration énergétique basées sur l’analyse de procédé ou sur l’optimisation. Les principes de la méthode pontale peuvent être adaptés pour l’intégration massique. Ils pourraient être étendus afin d’analyser d’autres systèmes traversés par des flux respectant les principes de conservation et dégradation.

BIBLIOGRAPHIE

[1] T. Umeda, J. Itoh and K. Shiroko, Heat Exchnage System Synthesis, Chemical Engineering Progress, 70-76 (1978)

[2] J.R. Flower and B. Linnhof, A Thermodynamic-Combinatorial Approach to the Design of optimum Heat Exchnager Networks, AIChE Journal, 26(1): 1-9 (1980)

[3] J.R. Flower and B. Linnhof, Thermodynamic Analysis in the Design of Process Networks, Computers & Chemical Enginnering, 3: 283-291 (1979)

[4] D. Boland and B. Linnhof, The Preliminary Design of Networks for Heat Exchange by Systematic Methods, The Chemical Engineer, p9-15 (1979)

[5] B. Linnhof and J.A. Turner, Simple Concepts in Process Synthesis Give Energy Savings and Elegant Designs, The Chemical Engineer, p621-633 (1980)

[6] B. Linnhof and J.A. Turner, Heat-Recovery networks: new insights yield big saving, Chemical Engineering, p56-70 (1981)

[7] B. Linnhof and E. Hindmarsh, The Pinch Design Method for Heat Exchanger Networks, Understanding Process Integration, Lancaster (1982)

[8] B. Linnhof, D.R. Mason and I. Wardle, Understanding heat exchanger networks, Computers and Chemical Engineering, 3(1-4): p. 295-302 (1979)

[9] J.E. Hendry, D.F. Rudd and J.D. Saeder, Synthesis in the design of Chemical Processes, AIChE Journal, 19: p1-15 (1973)

[10] Marechal, F., Kalitventzeff, B., Energy integration of industrial sites: tools, methodology and application, Applied Thermal Engineering 18, 921-933 (1998)

[11] Klemes, J., Friedler, F., Bulatov, I., Varbanov, P., Sustainability in the Process Industries: Integration and Optimization, McGraw-Hill, New York (2011)

[12] Tjoe, T.N., Linnhof, B., Using pinch technology for process retrofit, Chemical Engineering 93, 47-60 (1986)

[13] Linnhof, B., Ahmad, S., “Cost optimum heat exchanger networks, Part 1: minimum energy and capital using simple models for capital costs”, Computers & Chemical Engineering 14 (1990) 729-750.

[14] Linnhof March, Introduction to Pinch Technology, Linnhof March, UL (1998). [15] Kemp, I.C., Pinch Analysis and Process Integration: A User’s Guide to Process

Integration for the Efficient Use of Energy, Butterworth-Heinemann Oxford (2007). [16] Linnhof, B., Hindmarsh, E., “The pinch design method for heat exchanger networks”,

Chemical Engineering Science (1983) 745-763.

[17] B Linnhof and T.N. Tjoe, Pinch technology retrofit: Setting targets for existing plant, AIChE National Meeting, Houston, TX (1985)

[18] B. Linnhof, Pinch Analysis - A State-Of-The-Art Overview, Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 71(A5), p503-522 (1993)

[19] Townsend, D.W., Linnhof, B., “Surface area targets for heat exchanger networks”, Proc. of the IChemE Annual Research Meeting, Bath, April 1984.

[20] A. Carlsson, Optimum Design of Heat Exchnager Networks in Retrofit Situations, PhD thesis, Chalmers, Univerity of Technology, Gothenburg (1996)

[21] Carlsson, A., Franck, P., Berntsson, T., Design better heat exchanger network retrofits, Chemical Engineering Progress 89, 87-96 (1993).

[22] X.X. Zhu and X.R. Nie, Pressure drop considerations for heat exchanger network grassrrots design, Computers & Chemical Engineering, 26 (12): p1661-1676 (2002) [23] G.T. Polley and D. Green, Perry’s chemical enginners’handbook 7th edition, The

McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc (1997)

[24] G.T. Polley and M.H. Panjeh Shahi, and F.O. Jegede, Pressure-Drop Considerations in the Retrofit of Heat-Exchnager Networks, Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 78(A2): p161-167 (2000)

[25] F.O. Jegede and G.T. Polley, Optimum heat exchanger design, Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 70(2): p.133-141 (1992)

[26] G.T. Polley, Selecting stream splits in heat-exchnager network design, Heat Recovery Systems and CHP, 15(1): p.85-94 (1995)

[27] S.G. Hall, A. Ahmad and R. Smith, Capital cost Targets for Heat-Exchanger Networks Comprising Miced Materials of Construction, Pressure Ratings and Exchanger Types, Computers and Chemical Engineering, 14(3): p. 319-335 (1990)

[28] van Reisen, J.L.B., Grievink, J., Polley, G.T., Verheijen, P.J.T., The placement of two- stream and multi-stream heat exchangers in an existing network through path analysis, Comput. Chem. Engineering 19, S143-S148 (1995)

[29] van Reisen, J.L.B., Polley, G.T., Verheijen, P.J.T., Structural targeting for heat integration retrofit, Applied Thermal Engineering, 18(5): p. 283-294 (1998).

[30] Asante, N.D.K., Zhu, X.X., An automated and interactive approach for heat exchanger network retrofit, Transactions, Institute of Chemical Engineers 75, 349–360 (1997) [31] Osman, A., Mutalib, M.I.A., Shuhaimi, M., Amminudin, K.A., Path combinations for

HEN retrofit, Applied Thermal Engineering 29, 3103-3109 (2009).

[32] Zhu, X.X., Asante, N.D.K., Diagnosis and optimization approach for heat exchanger network retrofit, AIChE J. 45, 1488-1503 (1999).

[33] Varbanov, P.S., Klemes, J., Rules for path construction for HEN debottlenecking, Applied Thermal Engineering 20, 1409-1420 (2000).

[34] Bakhtiari, B., Bedard, S., Retrofitting heat exchanger networks using a modified network pinch approach, Applied Thermal Emgineering, 51 (2013) 973-979

[35] Ciric, A.R., Floudas, C.A., A retrofit approach for heat exchanger networks, Computers and Chemical Engineering 13, 703-715 (1989).

[36] Ciric, A.R., Floudas, C.A., A mixed integer nonlinear programming model for retrofitting heat exchanger networks, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 29, 239-251 (1990).

[37] Yee, T.F., Grossmann, I.E., A screening optimization approach for the retrofit of heat exchanger networks, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 30, 146-162 (1991).

[38] M.M. Daichendt and Grossmann, A Preliminary Screening Procedure for MINLP Heat- Exchanger Network Synthesis Using Aggregated Models, Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 72(A5): p. 708-709 (1994)

[39] M.M. Daichendt and Grossmann, Preliminary Screening Procedure for the MINLP Synthesis of process systems - II. Heat exchanger networks, Using Aggregated Models, Computers & Chemical Engineering, 18(8): p. 679-709 (1994)

[40] Furman, K.C., Sahinidis, N.V., Computational complexity of heat exchanger network synthesis, Comp. Chem. Eng. 25, 1371–1390 (2001).

[41] Athier, G., Floquet, P., Pibouleau, L., Domenech, S. (1998). A mixed method for retrofitting heat exchanger networks, Comp. Chem. Eng. 22, 505-511 (1998).

[42] Bochenek, R., Jezowski, J.M., Genetic algorithm approach for retrofitting heat exchanger network with standard heat exchangers. In 16th European Symposium on Computer- Aided Process Engineering and 9th International Symposium on Process Systems

[43] Jezowski, J.M., Bochenek, R., Poplewski, G. (2007). On application of stochastic optimization techniques to designing heat exchanger and water networks, Chem. Eng. Proc., article in press.

[44] Rezaei, E., Shafiei, S., Heat exchanger network retrofit by coupling genetic algorithm with NLP and ILP methods, Computers and Chemical Engineering 33, 1451-1459 (2009). [45] Barbaro, A., Bagajewicz, M. J., New rigorous one-step MILP formulation for heat

exchanger network synthesis, Computers and Chemical Engineering 29 (2005) 1945– 1976.

[46] Barbaro, A., Nguyen, D., Viparunat, N., Bagajewicz, M. J., All-at-one and step-wise detailed retrofit of heat exchanger networks using an MILP model

[47] J. Calloway, H. Cripps and T. Retsina, Pinch technology in practical kraft mill optimization, Engineering Conference, TAPPI Press, Seattle, USA (1990)

[48] H. Cripps, R. Capell, A. Melton and T. Retsina: Pinch Integration Achieves Minimum Energy Evaporation Capacity, Tappi Engineering Conference, Atlanta, USA, (1996)

[49] G. Noel, G. Boisvert, Project design in energy efficiency using Pinch analysis shows its use at an Abitibi-Consolidated mill in Beaupre, Quebec, Pulp and paper Canada, 99(12) 103-105 (1998)

[50] J. Stromberg, N. Berglin, T. Berntsson, Using process integration to approach the minimum impact pulp mill, TAPPI Environmental Conference and Exhibit, TAPPI Press (1997)

[51] “Energy efficient water utilization systems in process plants”, Bagajewicz, M., Rodera, H., Savelski, M., Comput. Chem. Eng., 26 (2002), 59-79

[52] E. Axelsson and T. Berntsson, Pinch analyses of a model mill: Economic and environmental gains from thermal process-integration in a state-of-the-art magazine paper mill, Nord. Pulp Paper Res. J. (20)3, 308-315, (2005)

[53] C. Bengtsson, Novel Process Integration Opportunities in Existing Kraft Pulp Mills with Low Water Consumption, PhD thesis, Department of Heat and Power Technology, Chalmers, Univerity of Technology, Gothenburg (2004)

[54] B. Rydberg, J. Collins, P. Nakanishi and A. Ahlen, Results of energy reduction program at Marathon Pulp, 89th Annual meeting, Montreal, QC, Canada, session 1B-2, 4pp, (2003) [55] M. Towers, Energy reduction at a kraft mill: Examining the effects of process integration,

benchmarking, and water reduction, Tappi, 4(3), 15-21 (2005)

[56] P Persson, J. and Berntsson, T. (2010), Influence of short-term variations on energy- savings opportunities in a pulp mill, Journal of Cleaner Production 18, 935–-943.

[57] “Direct and Indirect Heat Transfer in Water Network System”, Savulescu, L., Sorin, M., Smith, R., Applied Thermal Engineering 22 (2002), 981-988

[58] “The potential for energy savings when reducing the water consumption in a kraft pulp mill”, Wising, U., Berntsson, T., Stuart, P.R., Appl. Therm. Eng., 25 (2005) 1057-1066 [59] U. Wising, Process Integration in Model Kraft Pulp Mills: Technical, Economic and

Environmental Implications, PhD thesis, Department of Chemical Engineering and Environmental Science, Chalmers, Univerity of Technology, Gothenburg (2005)

[60] E. Wallin, Process Integration of Industrial Heat Pumps in Grass-root and Retrofit Situations, PhD thesis, Chalmers, Univerity of Technology, Gothenburg (1996)

[61] IEA, Industrial heat pumps: Experiences, potential and global environmental benefits, IEA Report No. HPP-AN21-1 (ISBN 90-73741-14-9)

[62] Nordman, R., Berntsson, T., Design of Kraft pulp mill hot water system—A new method that maximizes excess heat, Applied Thermal Engineering 26, 363 (2006).

[63] Roadmap to minimum energy and water use for integrated newsprint mills, Lafourcade, S., Fairbank, M.; Stuart, P., Annual Meeting of the Pulp and Paper Technical Association of Canada (PAPTAC), v A, p A63-A69, 2006, PAPTAC 92nd Annual Meeting Preprints 2006.

[64] Thermal pinch analysis with process streams mixing at a TMP-newsprint mill, Lafourcade, S., Labidi, J., Koteles, R., Gélinas, C., Stuart, P., Pulp and Paper Canada, v 104, n 12, p 74-77, December 2003

[65] “A process integration-based decision support system for the identification of water and energy efficiency improvements in the pulp and paper industry”, Alva-Argaez, A., Savulescu, L., Poulin, B., Paptac 93rd Annual meeting 2007

[66] “Water and Energy savings at a Kraft Paperboard Mill Using Process Integration”,

Savulescu, L., Poulin, B., Hamache, A., Bedard, S., Gennaoui, S., Pulp and Paper Canada, 106: 9 (2005) 29-31

[67] “Direct heat transfer considerations for improving energy efficiency in pulp and paper Kraft mills”, Savulescu, L.E., and Alva-Argaez, A., Energy, 33: 1562-1571 (2008) [68] “Base case process development for energy efficiency improvement, application to a

Kraft pulp mill, Part I: definition and characterization”, Mateos-Espejel, E., Savulescu, L., Paris, J., Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 89 (2011) 729-741

[69] “Base case process development for energy efficiency improvement, application to a Kraft pulp mill, Part II: benchmarking analysis”, Mateos-Espejel, E., Savulescu, L., Paris, J., Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 89 (2011) 742-752

[70] M. Sorin and J. Paris, Integrated exergy load sistribution method and pinch analysis, Computers & Chemical Engineering, 23(4-5): p. 497-507 (1999)

[71] F. Stain and D. Favrat, Energy integration of industrial processes based on the pinch analysis method extended to include exergy factors, Applied Thermal Engineering, 16(6): p. 497-507

[72] “Energy and Water Pinch study at Parenco Paper mill”, Schaareman, M., Verstraeten, E., Blaak, R., Hoolmeijer, A., Chester, I., Paper Technology (2000)

[73] Mateos-Espejel E., Savulescu L., Marechal F., Paris J., Unified methodology for thermal energy efficiency improvement: application to Kraft process, Chemical Engineering Science 66, 135-151, 2011.

[74] “Improving energy recovery for water minimization”, Leewongtanawit, B., Kim, J., Energy, 34, (2009), 880-893

[75] “Studies on simultaneous energy and water minimization, part II: systems with maximum re-use”, Savulescu, L., Kim, J., Smith, R., Chem. Eng. Sci., 60 (2005), 3291-3308

[76] El Halwagi, M.M., Solve design puzzles with mass integration, Chemical engineering progress, 1998, v: 94, no 8: 25-44

[77] D.C.Y. Foo, Z.A. Manan, Y.L. Tan, Use cascade analysis to optimize water networks, Chem. Eng. Prog. 102(7): 45-52 (2006)

[78] D.C.Y. Foo, Water Cascade analysis for single and multiple impure fresh water feed, Trans. IChemE (Part A) 85 (A8) 1169-1177 (2007)

[79] D.C.Y. Foo, Flowrate targeting for threshold problems and plant-wide integration for water network synthesis, J. Environ. Manage., 88(2) 253-274 (2008)

[80] D.K.S. Ng, D.C.Y. Foo, Y.L. Tan, R.R. Tan, Ultimate flowrate targeting with regeneration placement, Trans. IChemE (Part A) 1253-1267 (2007)

[81] Savulescu, L., Simultaneous energy and water minimization, Ph.D. Thesis, UMIST, Manchester, 1999.

[82] “Wastewater minimization”, Wang, Y.P., and Smith, R., Chem. Eng., Sci. 49 (7): 981- 1006 (1994)

[83] “Pollution prevention through process integration Systematic tools”, El-Halwagi, M.M., 1st ed., San Diego, California: Academic Press (1997)

[84] El Halwagi, M. M., A.A. Hamad, and G.W. Garrison, Synthesis of waste Interception and Allocation Networks, AIChE J., 42 (11), pp 3087-3101 (1996)

[85] “Studies on simultaneous energy and water minimization, part I: systems with no water re-use”, Savulescu, L., Kim, J., Smith, R., Chem. Eng. Sci., 60 (2005), 3279-3290 [86] Savulescu, L., Simultaneous energy and water minimization, Ph.D. Thesis, UMIST,

Manchester, 1999.

[87] Nordman, R., Berntsson, T., Use of advanced composite curves for assessing cost-

effective HEN retrofit: I: Theory and concepts, Applied Thermal Engineering 29, 275-291 (2009).

[88] Lakshmanan, R., and R. Banares-Alcantara, A novel visualization tool for heat exchanger network retrofit. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 1996. 35: p 4507-4522 [89] Lakshmanan, R., and R. Banares-Alcantara, Retrofit by inspection using thermodynamic

process visualization. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 1998. 22: S809-S812

[90] T.J. Kotas, Exergy method of thermal and chemical plant analysis, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 64: p.212-229 (1986)

[91] Piacentino, A., “Thermal analysis and new insights to support decision making in retrofit and relaxation of heat exchanger networks”, Applied Thermal Engineering, 31 (2011) 3479-3499.

[92] Linnhoh, B., Townsend, D.W., Boland, D., A User Guide to Process Integration for the Efficient Use of Energy, 1st ed., Institute of Chemical Engineers (1982).

[93] Axelsson, E., Olsson, M.R., Berntsson, T., Heat integration opportunities in average Scandinavian Kraft pulp mills: Pinch analyses of model mills, Nordic Pulp and Paper Research Journal, 21(4), 466-475 (2006).

[94] J. Alghehed, Energy Efficient Evaporation in Future Kraft Pulp Mills, PhD thesis, Department of Heat and Power Technology, Chalmers, Univerity of Technology, Gothenburg (2002)

[95] E. Axelsson, M.R. Olsson and T. Berntsson: Increased capacity in kraft pulp mills: Lignin separation combined with reduced steam demand compared with recovery boiler upgrade, Nord. Pulp Paper Res. J. (21)4, 485-492, (2006)

[96] M.R. Olsson, E. Axelsson and T. Berntsson, Exporting lignin or power from heat integrated kraft pulp mills: A techno-economic comparison using model mills, Nord. Pulp Paper Res. J. (21)4, 476-484, (2006)

[97] Ruhonen, P., Ahtila, P., “Analysis of a mechanical pulp and paper mill using advanced composite curves”, Applied Thermal Engineering 30 (2010) 649-657.

[98] C. Bengtsson, R. Nordman and T. Berntsson, utilization of excess heat in the pulp and paper industry - a case study of technical and economic opportunities, Applied Thermal Engineering, 22(9): 1069-1081 (2002)

[99] R. Nordman, New process integration methods for heat-saving retrofit in industrial systems, PhD thesis, Department of Heat and Power Technology, Chalmers, Univerity of Technology, Gothenburg (2005)

[100] T. Gundersen and I.E. Grossmann, Improved Optimization Strategies for automated heat exchanger network synthesis through physical insights, Computers & Chemical Engineering, 14(9): p925-944 (1990)

[101] T.B. Challand, R.W. Colbert and C.K. Venkatesh, Computerized Heat Exchnager Networks, Chemical Engineering Progress, p. 65-71 (1981)

[102] R.W. Colbert, Industrial Heat Exchanger Networks, Chemical Engineering Progress, p. 47-54 (1982)

[103] K.K. Trivedi, Systematic energy relaxation in MER heat exchanger networks, Computers and Chemical Engineering, 14(6): p601-611 (1990)

[104] K.K. Trivedi, A new dual-temperature design method for the synthesis of heat exchanger networks, Computers and Chemical Engineering, 13(6): p667-685 (1989)

[105] Nordman, R., Berntsson, T., Use of advanced composite curves for assessing cost- effective HEN retrofit: II: Case Sudies, Applied Thermal Engineering 29, 292-291 (2009). [106] Serth, R.W., Process Heat Transfer - Principles and applications, Academic Press -Imprint

[107] Smith, R., Chemical Process—Design and Integration, McGraw-Hill, New York (2005). [108] Smith, R., Jobson, M., Chen, L., Recent development in the retrofit of heat exchanger

networks, Applied Thermal Engineering, 30, 2281-2289 (2010).

[109] J. Cerda, Minimum utility usage in heat exchanger network synthesis: A transportation problem, Chemical Engineering Science, 38(3): p. 373-387 (1983)

[110] J. Cerda, and W. Westerburg, Synthesizing heat exchanger networks having restricted stream/stream matches using transportation problem formulations, Chemical Engineering Science, 38(3): p. 1723-1740 (1983)

[111] Pettersson, F., Synthesis of large-scale heat exchanger networks using a sequential match reduction approach, Computers & Chemical Engineering, Volume 29, Issue 5, 15 April 2005, Pages 993–1007

ANNEXES

Annexe 1: Article - Bridge Analysis to Reduce the Industrial Energy Requirements by Heat Exchanger Network Retrofit: Part 1 - Concepts

Annexe 2: Article - Bridge Analysis to Reduce the Industrial Energy Requirements by Heat Exchanger Network Retrofit: Part 2 - Applications

Annexe 3: Article - Application of Bridge Analysis to Retrofitting Direct- and Indirect- Contact Exchange networks

Annexe 4: Article - Energy Transfer Diagram for improving integration of industrial systems Annexe 5: Rapport - Formulation pour identifier la topologie du réseau résultant de

ANNEXE 1

Article

Titre: Bridge Analysis to Reduce the Industrial Energy Requirements by Heat Exchanger Network Retrofit: Part 1 – Concepts

Auteurs : J.-C. Bonhivers, S. Bala et P. R. Stuart Journal : soumis à Energy.

Bridge Analysis to Reduce the Industrial Energy Requirements by Heat-

Exchanger Network Retrofit: Part 1 - Concepts

Jean-Christophe Bonhivers, Balasubrahmanyan Srinivasan, Paul R. Stuarta

a

NSERC Chair in Design Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal, P.O. Box 6079, Station Centre-Ville, Montreal, Quebec H3C 3A7, CANADA

E-mail: paul.stuart@polymtl.ca

Abstract

Energy savings in existing plants usually have positive economic and environmental impacts. Mathematical approaches to heat-exchanger network (HEN) retrofit are usually complex and do not guarantee identification of the global optimum. Thanks to its simplicity the pinch-based approach is widely used, even though difficulties for its adaption to HEN retrofit are encountered. The energy supplied is degraded throughout the industrial process. Reducing heat consumption implies a reduction in the flow rate of heat transferred from the heating utility through the existing heat exchanger network until rejected to the environment. This progressive transfer of heat in the existing heat exchanges from the heating utility to the environment is not explicitly analyzed in the present approaches for HEN retrofit. This paper presents the concepts supporting a method for HEN retrofit. The fundamental set of modifications necessary to reduce the heat consumption is made explicit and is represented by a “bridge”. A method to enumerate the bridges is described. A heat transfer diagram to identify bridges is also presented. Finally a network table to easily identify and evaluate bridges is proposed. A global procedure for HEN retrofit and case studies are presented in a second paper.

1. Introduction 1.1. Problem context

The manufacturing process industries are large energy users. Energy analysis methods for new and existing plants have been developed in last decades to increase their profitability and reduce the environmental impacts of their activities. Energy analysis can involve the following areas in a plant: (1) the utilities which include the production of heat and electricity, and the cooling, (2) the heat exchanger network (HEN), and (3) the process operations. This paper presents concepts to reduce the heat consumption by HEN retrofit. However these concepts can also be applied for energy analysis of utilities and process operations in new or existing plants.

1.2. Literature review about HEN retrofit methods

Heat integration, since its development in the late 1970s, has demonstrated large energy reductions across numerous industry sectors. The different approaches used in heat integration can be broadly classified as either (i) insight-based methods or (ii) optimization-based methods. Insight-based methods use graphical tools such as composite curves to calculate energy targets and heuristics for network design to achieve these targets [1-5]. The main advantages of these methods are their simplicity, their graphical representation of the problem, and the involvement of the designer throughout the steps. Optimization-based methods use mathematical programming to minimize or maximize an objective function such as cost or profit with respect to constraints such as energy balances and heat-exchange models. However, optimization approaches for retrofitting heat- exchanger networks are complex and do not guarantee identification of the global optimum. Pinch- based approaches, which do not guarantee to find the global optimum either, are widely used for heat integration due to the simplicity of the concepts.

Pinch analysis for thermal energy reduction has been widely used throughout the refining and petrochemical industries for several decades. Other industries such as chemicals, pulp and paper, and the food and beverage industries have also benefitted from pinch analysis. However, energy savings in such industries often require consideration of the interactions between mass and heat networks. Therefore, much recent progress in process integration has been focused on developing methodologies to combine heat integration and mass/water integration. The classical thermal pinch analysis technique was initially developed to analyze indirect-contact heat exchange in networks for energy use reduction and has evolved over recent decades to address key industry energy analysis and design needs such as (a) network retrofit, (b) stream mixing, and (c) site-wide energy analysis. Thermal pinch analysis has served these industry sectors well, even though many believe that thermal pinch analysis requires considerable experience, especially with regard to data extraction.

Although pinch analysis has been successfully used in retrofit situations, difficulties are encountered when considering constraints specific to each connection, especially if the network involves both direct- and indirect-contact heat exchanges. Pinch analysis requires summing of the heat loads in each temperature interval to obtain the composite curves and then setting a minimum temperature difference between these curves to identify the pinch temperatures and the minimum energy requirement. Consequently, the minimum energy requirement and the pinch temperatures, which

divide the network into two parts, are evaluated without considering constraints specific to each connection. Even in the ideal case for the application of pinch analysis, i.e., a network where all the connections are practically feasible and involve only indirect-contact heat exchanges, dividing the network into portions above and below the pinch by setting a common minimum temperature difference for streams with different heat-transfer coefficient values is a significant assumption. Pinch analysts sometimes include in the definition of each source and sink a value “DTmin/2”, which represents the stream’s contribution to the minimum temperature driving force. The composite curves of the process are computed using the value of the DTmin/2 contribution from each stream. This makes it possible to account for the different heat-transfer coefficient values. This approach is an improvement over using a global temperature difference; however it still does not allow temperature constraints to be set in accordance with the type of heat exchange taking place. Most industrial processes include both indirect-contact heat exchanges, where a minimum difference in stream temperature expresses the trade-off between energy savings and capital spending for