• Aucun résultat trouvé

participants  (A).  A  single  analyte  showed  a  peak  value  in  11  patients,  two  peaks  were  found  in  7   patients.   In   the   remaining   12   patients   between   3   and   10   analytes   showed   peak   values.   For   individuals  with  2  or  more  peaks,  the  mean  values  of  PD  and  BOP  were  within  the  range  of  the   other  patients  (PD:  4.41;  BOP:  86.6).  

The   second   bar   graph   in   Figure   26   (B)   shows   the   number   of   analytes   with   peak   values   per   subject  after  therapy.  Therapy  did  not  significantly  reduce  the  number  of  subjects  having  at  least   one   peak   (BL:   30   subjects,   M3:   27   subjects,   p=0.62).   The   number   of   subjects   with   4   or   more   peaks,  however,  was  greatly  reduced  (BL:  11  subjects,  M3:  1  subject,  p=0.003).  With  regards  to   the  reduction  of  peaks,  no  specific  benefit  of  adjunctive  antibiotics  could  be  seen.  A  single  patient   still  showed  8  peaks  after  treatment.  This  particular  subject  had  8  peaks  at  BL  also,  was  treated   with   antibiotics   and   responded   well   to   therapy   as   far   as   clinical   parameters   are   concerned   (mean   PD   at   BL:   6.26   mm,   BOP   at   BL:   100%,   PD   after   therapy:   3.07   mm,   BOP   after   therapy:  

39.9%).  

Table  4  shows  the  mean  serum  biomarker  levels  in  periodontitis  patients  per  treatment  group  at   baseline   and   M3   of   those   13   analytes   with   a   frequency   of   detection   >75%.   The   levels   were   significantly  lower  at  M3  than  at  baseline  for  most  of  these  markers.  Differences  between  groups   were  not  significant.  

   

Levels of 13 serum biomarkers with a detection frequency of >75% in periodontitis patients per treatment group, at BL and M3. Data are means (standard deviation), n=40 participants.

Parameters Baseline Month 3 p

Placebo Test Placebo Test BL-M3

Participants, n 21 19 21 19

IL-1ra, pg/ml 12.6 (29.3) 5.8 (8.5) 0.5 (1.2) 2.0 (7.3) <0.001

IL-8, pg/ml 5.7 (8.6) 6.7 (6.3) 5.6 (9.5) 6.1 (7.3) n.s.

IL-12-p70, pg/ml 25.8 (20.9) 30.0 (30.6) 5.8 (4.6) 8.4 (6.1) <0.001 MIP-1β, pg/ml 189.4 (157.9) 157.0 (74.4) 97.0 (50.1) 99.0 (52.6) <0.001 VEGF, pg/ml 237.6 (244.3) 354.3 (544.8) 148.7 (130.0) 499.0 (1253.4) 0.002 α2M, mg/ml 1.3 (0.6) 1.6 (0.5) 1.7 (0.3) 1.6 (0.3) 0.04

CRP, µg/ml 5.7 (8.1) 6.4 (11.7) 4.6 (4.4) 5.1 (7.6) n.s.

Hp, mg/ml 1.0 (1.5) 2.3 (2.5) 2.8 (2.7) 3.2 (3.0) 0.004

SAP, µg/ml 56.2 (20.0) 56.5 (13.9) 67.1 (25.7) 58.2 (13.5) 0.02

Ferritin, ng/ml 117.0 (166.9) 109.4 (122.6) 99.0 (128.4) 97.0 (107.0) 0.002

Fibrinogen, µg/ml 2.6 (0.9) 2.3 (1.0) 1.9 (0.6) 1.8 (0.6) 0.001

PCT, ng/ml 2.5 (2.1) 2.3 (1.8) 0.5 (0.6) 0.5 (0.8) <0.001

SAA, µg/ml 8.9 (7.0) 6.5 (5.2) 3.6 (3.5) 3.7 (6.7) <0.001

We   measured   a   range   of   24   analytes   in   serum   of   periodontally   diseased   patients   before   and   standard  for  measuring  inflammatory  mediators,  MBBA  offers  a  number  of  advantages,  notably   the  possibility  to  simultaneously  measure  up  to  100  different  analytes  in  a  single  sample  across   patients.  Among  40  patients  with  untreated  periodontitis,  11  exhibited  levels  above  threshold  of   four   and   up   to   ten   inflammatory   markers   at   the   same   time.   After   treatment,   the   number   of   subjects  with  four  or  more  peaks  was  significantly  reduced.  Only  a  single  patient  remained  with   multiple  peaks  (8  analytes  above  threshold).  The  fact  that  this  person  was  the  only  one  having   also   8   peaks   at   BL   and   responding   well   to   therapy   suggests   that   the   reason   for   this   unusual   pattern  was  not  periodontal  disease.  The  number  of  subjects  with  peaks  increased  significantly   after  treatment  for  only  one  analyte  (Hp,  p=0.01).  This  was  probably  due  to  random  variability.   biomarkers  were  highly  heterogeneous  following  periodontal  therapy  in  a  trial  of  another  group   where  a  large  number  of  analytes  was  assessed  simultaneously  13.  1/3  of  the  patients  showed  a  

change  in  systemic  inflammation.   inflammatory  markers  and  changes  in  the  clinical  periodontal  status  after  therapy,  reduction  of   periodontal  pathogens  and  reduction  of  serum  IgG  antibody  levels  to  periodontal  microbiota  5  13  

17.   It   seems   that   serum   levels   of   specific   cytokines   or   acute   phase   proteins   do   not   reflect   the   clinical   periodontal   health   status   independently;   pre-­‐existing   susceptibility   for   systemic   inflammation  may  influence  the  individual  response.  However,  the  reduction  of  most  of  the  peak   values,  defined  as  >mean+2SD  in  periodontally  healthy  subjects,  can  be  attributed  to  periodontal   therapy.  A  marked  increase  of  CRP  has  been  reported  24  h  after  instrumentation  12,  indicating   that   patients   undergoing   periodontal   treatment   experience   short-­‐term   perturbations   of   systemic  inflammation.  Due  to  the  timing  of  our  trial  we  could  not  corroborate  the  existence  of   short  termed  peaks  of  some  of  the  acute  phase  proteins.  But  even  if  they  exist  it  seems  that  they   are  short-­‐lived,  as  they  were  undetectable  at  M3  in  our  study.  

Systemic  amoxicillin  plus  metronidazole  significantly  improved  clinical  outcomes  of  periodontal   therapy,   similar   to   previous   studies   18.   No   significant   difference   on   the   biologic   response   to   therapy  was  however  found  between  the  two  groups.  We  assume  that  the  mechanical  removal  of   pathogenic  bacteria  by  SRP  was  sufficient  to  suppress  peak  values  of  inflammatory  biomarkers.  

The   current   analysis   is   part   of   a   large   randomized   clinical   trial   on   the   adjunctive   effects   of   antibiotics   given   at   different   time   points   during   periodontal   therapy,   i.e.   surgical   phase   and   maintenance   phase.   For   the   present   analysis   we   focused   on   the   outcomes   at   the   3-­‐month   re-­‐

evaluation  after  initial  therapy.    

There   is   ongoing   debate   on   the   clinical   usefulness   of   the   current   periodontal   disease   classification  that  discriminates  aggressive  and  chronic  periodontitis  19.  Given  this  controversy,   in  our  study  we  did  not  differentiate  between  chronic  and  aggressive  type  of  periodontitis  from   our  sample  selection  criteria.  Periodontal  treatment  may  have  stronger  effect  on  serum  proteins   in   aggressive   periodontitis   patient   as   has   been   shown   recently  20.   However,   in   this   study   adjunctive  antibiotics  yielded  better  clinical  results  in  both  groups  than  in  nonsurgical  therapy   alone.    

In   the   current   study,   single   rooted   teeth   and   molar   flat   surfaces   were   measured.   For   practical   reasons,  furcation  involvement  and  intrabony  defects  were  not  included  in  the  current  analysis.  

It   is   still   unknown   the   degree   of   response   of   these   specific   periodontal   lesions   to   the   current   therapeutic  regime  as  far  as  the  clinical  parameters  are  concerned.  It  was  shown  that  these  sites   represent  a  challenge  for  the  nonsurgical  mechanical  therapy  alone  due  to  arduous  accessibility  

21  22.    

Finally,  few  questions  will  need  further  investigation  in  the  future.  For  example,  how  long  does   the   effects   of   periodontal   therapy   on   systemic   inflammation   persist?   Which   factors   may   influence  long-­‐term  effects?  Longitudinal  studies  should  address  these  questions.  

   

The  following  can  be  concluded  from  our  work:  

 

1. Subjects  with  untreated  periodontitis  may  show  isolated  high  peaks  for  one  or  several   inflammatory  markers  in  serum.  

 

2. Non-­‐surgical  periodontal  treatment  with  or  without  antibiotics  reduced  most  peak  levels  of   serum  markers.  

 

3. Non-­‐surgical  periodontal  therapy  with  adjunctive  systemic  antibiotics  showed  better  clinical   outcomes  than  the  mechanical  therapy  alone.  

 

4. No  serious  adverse  events  were  associated  with  the  treatment  regime.  

 

5. MBAA  is  an  efficient  method  for  the  quantitative  analysis  of  multiple  cytokines.  

 

 

1. Löe  H,  Silness  J.  (1963)  Periodontal  disease  in  pregnancy.  I.  Prevalence  and  severity.  Acta   factor-­‐alpha,  and  interleukin-­‐6.  J  Periodontol;  75:  420-­‐428.  

9. D'Aiuto   F,   Parkar   M,   Tonetti   MS.(2007)   Acute   effects   of   periodontal   therapy   on   bio-­‐

markers  of  vascular  health.  J  Clin  Periodontol;  34:  124-­‐129.  

10. Yamazaki   K,   Honda   T,   Oda   T,   et   al.(2005)   Effect   of   periodontal   treatment   on   the   C-­‐

reactive  protein  and  proinflammatory  cytokine  levels  in  Japanese  periodontitis  patients.  

J  Periodontal  Res;  40:  53-­‐58.   inflammatory  responses  to  periodontal  therapy.  J  Clin  Periodontol;  36:  287-­‐294.  

peripheral  markers  of  inflammation  in  the  first  week  of  ischaemic  stroke  correlate  with   uncomplicated  malaria  or  healthy  controls.  Infect  Immun;  72:  5630-­‐5637.  

17. Gorska  R,  Gregorek  H,  Kowalski  J,  et  al.  (2003)  Relationship  between  clinical  parameters   and  cytokine  profiles  in  inflamed  gingival  tissue  and  serum  samples  from  patients  with   chronic  periodontitis.  J  Clin  Periodontol;  30:  1046-­‐1052.  

18. Cionca  N,  Giannopoulou  C,  Ugolotti  G,  Mombelli  A.  (2009)  Amoxicillin  and  metronidazole   as   an   adjunct   to   full-­‐mouth   scaling   and   root   planing   of   chronic   periodontitis.   J   Periodontol;  80:  364-­‐371.  

19. Armitage  GC,  Cullinan  MP,  Seymour  GJ.  (2010)  Comparative  biology  of  chronic  and   aggressive  periodontitis:  In-­‐  troduction.  Periodontol  2000;  53:7-­‐11.  

20. Eickholz  P,  Siegelin  Y,  Scharf  S,  et  al.  (2013)  Non-­‐surgical  periodontal  therapy  decreases  

This  work  was  supported  by  the  Swiss  National  Science  Foundation,  Grant  No.  320030-­‐122089  

for   all   of   you   before,   during   and   at   this   final   step.   Mom,   Dad,   my   sister   Basma,   my   brothers   Ibrahim  and  Zaher  you  have  given  me  the  warmest  love  that  helped  me  to  drive  this  road  with   strength   and   motivation,   Thank   you   forever.   My   great   uncle   Murshed   and   aunt   Najat   I   am   grateful  for  you  and  I  acknowledge  you  for  your  kind  emotional  support.  

Few  words  I  have  to  say  it  to  my  wife  Amal:  you  kept  my  heart  beating  and  the  enthusiasm  for   this  stage  was  quit  intellectual  between  us.  I  couldn't  have  hoped  for  a  better  partner  to  share   these  events  of  progress  while  watching  our  children  grow.  You're  an  incredible  woman,  and  I'm   so  grateful  to  have  been  blessed  with  your  continuous  warm  feelings  and  support  throughout   this  period  and  for  the  future  to  build  a  wonderful  life.  

Finally,  thank  you  very  much  my  country;  kingdom  of  Saudi  Arabia  for  giving  me  this  very   precious  opportunity  to  advance  my  level  of  education  and  knowledge  from  the  land  of  real   science,  piece,  civilization,  democracy,  ethics,  respect,  fairness  and  precision;  Switzerland.    

   

   

 

   

I

II

III

IV

Documents relatifs