GAO Contact
Ed Kratzer, (202) 512-6553Staff
Acknowledgments
Key contributions to this report were made by Nancy Bowser, Chase Huntley, Richard Johnson, Kerry Lipsitz, Jonathan McMurray, Mark Metcalfe, and Nathan Morris. Also contributing to this report were Jonathan Dent, Evan Gilman, Scott Heacock, R. Denton Herring, Kim Raheb, and Greg Wilmoth.
Bibliography
Bakkes, J.A., G.J. van den Born, J.C. Helder, R.J. Swart, C.W. Hope, and J.D.E. Parker. An Overview of Environmental Indicators: State of the Art and Perspectives. Report commissioned by the United Nations
Environment Programme. June 1994.
Bernard, James. State of the Science Ecological Indicators Report.
Unpublished draft prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
April 2002.
Bureau of Economic Analysis. “Integrated Economic and Environmental Satellite Accounts.” Survey of Current Business. Washington, D.C.; April 1994: 33-49.
Carter, J. “Environmental Priorities and Programs—a Message to
Congress.” Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents, vol. 15, no. 26 (July 2, 1979): 1353-1373.
Clarke, David P. “The State of the Nation’s Ecosystems: Measuring the Lands, Waters, and Living Resources of the United States.” Environment, vol. 45, no. 5 (2003): 40-43.
Department of Public Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Environmental Management Systems: Do They Improve Performance?
Project final report: Executive summary prepared for the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency. January 2003.
Duncan, Joseph W., and Andrew C. Gross. Statistics for the 21st Century:
Proposals for Improving Statistics for Better Decision Making. Chicago:
Irwin, 1995.
Energy, Environment, and Resources Center, University of Tennessee.
Expertise and the Policy Cycle, by Jack Barkenbus. Knoxville, Tennessee:
September 1998.
Environment Canada. Environmental Indicators and State of the
Reporting in Canada—Part 1: Current Trends, Status, and Perceptions.
Draft background paper to a national environmental indicator and state of the environment reporting strategy; Washington, D.C.; August 2003.
Environment Canada. Canadian Information System for the
Environment: Sharing Environmental Decisions. Final report by the Task
Bibliography
Force on a Canadian Information System for the Environment. Cat. No.
EN21-207/2001E. Hull, Quebec; October 2001.
Environment Canada. A National Strategy for Environmental Indicators and State of the Environment Reporting in Canada: Proposed Options.
Draft report. Hull, Quebec; August 2003.
Environmental Council of States and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Information Management Workgroup. National Environmental Information Exchange Network: Information Package. Washington, D.C.;
June 2001.
Flynn, Patrice, David Berry, and Theodore Heintz. “Sustainability and Quality of Life Indicators: Toward the Integration of Economic, Social and Environmental Measures.” Indicators: The Journal of Social Health, vol. 1, no. 4 (fall 2002): 1-21.
Harwell, Mark A., Victoria Myers, Terry Young, Ann Bartuska, Nancy Gassman, John H. Gentile, Christine C. Harwell, Stuart Appelbaum, John Barko, Billy Causey, Christine Johnson, Agnes McLean, Ron Smola, Paul Templet, and Stephen Tosini. “A Framework for an Ecosystem Integrity Report Card: Examples from South Florida Show How an Ecosystem Report Card Links Societal Values and Scientific Information.” BioScience, vol. 49, no. 7 (July 1999): 543-556.
Innes, Judith E. Knowledge and Public Policy: The Search for Meaningful Indicators, 2nd ed. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers, 2002.
International Council for Science. Making Science for Sustainable Development More Policy Relevant: New Tools for Analysis. ICSU Series on Science for Sustainable Development No. 8. Paris, 2002.
International Institute for Sustainable Development. “Review Paper on Selected Capital Based Sustainable Development Indicator Frameworks.”
Study for the Steering Committee of the National Roundtable on
Environment and the Economy (Canada). Winnipeg, Manitoba; December 2000.
National Academy of Public Administration. Evaluating Environmental Progress: How EPA and the States Can Improve the Quality of
Bibliography
Enforcement and Compliance Information. Report for the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency. June 2001.
National Academy of Public Administration. Setting Priorities, Getting Results: A New Direction for EPA. Report to the U.S. Congress. Silver Spring, Maryland: Sherwood Fletcher Associates, 1995.
National Council for Science and the Environment. Recommendations for Improving the Scientific Basis for Environmental Decisionmaking.
Report of the first National Conference on Science, Policy, and the Environment. Washington, D.C.; December 2000.
National Research Council. Ecological Indicators for the Nation.
Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 2000.
National Research Council. Our Common Journey: A Transition toward Sustainability. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1999.
National Research Council. Nature’s Numbers: Expanding the National Economic Accounts to Include the Environment. Washington, D.C.:
National Academy Press, 1999.
National Science and Technology Council. Integrating the Nation’s Environmental Monitoring and Research Networks and Programs: A Proposed Framework. Report by the Committee on Environment and Natural Resources. Washington, D.C.; March 1997.
O’Malley, Robin, Kent Cavender-Bares, and William C. Clark. “Providing
‘Better’ Data: Not as Simple as It Might Seem.” Environment, vol. 45, no. 4 (May 2003): 8-18.
Riche, Martha Farnsworth. The United States of America: Developing Key National Indicators. Paper presented at the Forum on Key National Indicators; Washington, D.C.; February 2003.
Sustainability Institute. Indicators and Information Systems for Sustainable Development, by Donella Meadows. Report to the Balaton Group. Hartland, Vermont; September 1998.
Tonn, Bruce, and Robert Turner. Environmental Decision Making and Information Technology: Issues Assessment. NCEDR/99-01. National
Bibliography
Center for Environmental Decision-Making Research. Knoxville, Tennessee; May 1999.
Train, Russell. “The Quest for Environmental Indices.” Science 178, no.
4057 (October 1972): 1.
United Nations, Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting 2003: Handbook of National Accounting. ST/ESA/STAT/SER.F/61/Rev.1.
(1992).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. A Framework for Assessing and Reporting on Ecological Condition: An SAB Report. EPA SAB-EPEC-02-009. Science Advisory Board. June 2002.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Environmental Statistics and Information Division, Office of Policy, Planning, and Evaluation. A Conceptual Framework to Support Development and Use of
Environmental Information in Decision-Making. EPA 239-R-95-012, Washington, D.C.; April 1995.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. National Advisory Council for Environmental Policy and Technology. Managing Information as a Strategic Resource: Final Report and Recommendations of the
Information Impacts Committee. EPA 100-R-98-002. Washington, D.C.;
January 1998.
World Bank. Policy Applications of Environmental Accounting, by G.
Lange. Environmental Economic Series, Paper No. 88. New York, January 2003.
World Conservation Union. Lessons Learned from Environmental
Accounting: Findings from Nine Case Studies, by Joy Hecht. Washington, D.C.; October 2000.
World Resources Institute. Environmental Indicators: A Systematic Approach to Measuring and Reporting on Environmental Policy Performance in the Context of Sustainable Development, by Allen Hammond, Albert Adriaanse, Eric Rodenburg, Dirk Bryant, and Richard Woodward. Washington, D.C.; May 1995.