Drevelle M Structure des navettes domicile-travail et polarite ´ s secondaires autour de Montpellier Mappemonde 2012; 107(2012-3).

98. INSEE. Les conditions de logement en France. INSEE; 2017. Available from:https://www.insee.fr/fr/ statistiques/fichier/2586377/LOGFRA17.pdf.

99. Callen D. La “fabrique pe´ri-urbaine”, système d’acteurs et production des ensembles pavillonnaires dans la Grande Couronne francilienne. Universite´ Panthe´on-Sorbonne—Paris 1; 2011. Available from:http://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00651441.

100. Mclennan D, Tu Y. Economic perspectives on the structure of local housing markets. Housing Studies. 1996; 11:387–406.https://doi.org/10.1080/02673039608720864

101. Rosen S. Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competitions. Journal of Political Economy. 1974; 72:34–55.https://doi.org/10.1086/260169

102. Sack R. Human territoriality: its theory and history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1986.

103. Cliff AD, Ord JK. Spatial Processes: Models and Applications. Pion; 1981.

104. Bowen WM, Mikelbank BA, Prestegaard DM. Theoretical and Empirical Considerations Regarding Space in Hedonic Housing Price Model Applications. Growth and Change. 2001; 32(4):466–490.

https://doi.org/10.1111/0017-4815.00171

105. Chasco C, Le Gallo J. Hierarchy and spatial autocorrelation effects in hedonic models. Economics Bul- letin. 2012; 32(2):1474–1480.

106. Orford S. Valuing Locational Externalities: a GIS and Multilevel Modelling Approach. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 2002; 29(1):105–127.https://doi.org/10.1068/b2780

107. Fik TJ, Ling DC, Mulligan GF. Modeling Spatial Variation in Housing Prices: A Variable Interaction Approach. Real Estate Economics. 2003; 31(4):623–646.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1080-8620.2003. 00079.x

108. Fritsch B. Tramway et prix des logementsàNantes. L’Espace Ge´ographique. 2007; 36(2007/2):97– 113.

109. Beckerich C. Biens publics et valorisation immobilière. Universite´ Lumière Lyon 2; 2000. Available from:http://demeter.univ-lyon2.fr/sdx/theses/lyon2/2000/beckerich_c.

110. Faburel G, Maleyre I. Le bruit des avions comme facteur de de´pre´ciations immobilières, de polarisa- tion sociale et d’ine´galite´s environnementales. Le cas d’Orly. De´veloppement durable et territoire. 2007;Dossier 9: Ine´galite´s e´cologiques, ine´galite´s sociales(9).

111. Gue´rois M, Le Goix R. La dynamique spatio-temporelle des prix immobiliersàdiffe´rentes e´chelles: le cas des appartements anciensàParis (1990-2003). Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography. 2009; 470:25 p.

112. Smith N. Gentrification and the Rent gap. Annals of the Association of American geographers. 1979; 77(3):462–465.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1987.tb00171.x

113. Cooper C, Orford S, Webster C, Jones CB. Exploring the ripple effect and spatial volatility in house prices in England and Wales: regressing interaction domain cross-correlations against reactive statis- tics. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 2013; 40(5):763–782.https://doi.org/10. 1068/b37062

114. Goodman AC, T T G. Where are the speculative bubbles in US housing markets? Journal of Housing Economics. 2008; 17(2):117–137.

115. Geniaux G, Napole´one C, Leroux B. Les effets prix de l’offre foncière. Revue dE´ conomie Re´gionale et Urbaine. 2015; mai(1-2):273–320.https://doi.org/10.3917/reru.151.0273

116. Scott AJ. The urban land nexus and the State. London: Pion; 1980.

117. Christophers B. For real: land as capital and commodity. Transactions of the Institute of British Geog- raphers. 2016; 41(2):134–148.https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12111

118. Topalov C. Le Profit, la Rente et la Ville. Paris: Economica; 1984.

119. Halbert L. Les acteurs des marche´ s financiers font-ils la ville? Vers un agenda de recherche. Espaces- Tempsnet. 2013;(9 juillet 2013).

120. Webster CJ. Property Rights and the Public Realm: Gates, Green Belts, and Gemeinschaft. Environ- ment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 2002; 29(3):397–412.https://doi.org/10.1068/b2755r

121. Webster CJ. The nature of the neighbourhood. Urban Studies. 2003; 40(13):2591–2612.

122. Charmes E. Cul-de-sacs, Superblocks and Environmental Areas as Supports of Residential Territori- alization. Journal of Urban Design. 2010; 15(3):357–374.https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2010. 487811

123. Le Goix R, Vesselinov E. Gated Communities and House Prices: Suburban Change in Southern Cali- fornia, 1980–2008. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 2013; 37(6):2129–2151.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01139.x

124. Xiao Y, Webster C, Orford S. Can street segments indexed for accessibility form the basis for housing submarket delineation? Housing Studies. 2016; p. 1–23.

125. Le Goix R, Huet A. The interactions between suburban street patterns, property values and socio- occupational trajectories in the western suburbs of Paris. In: American Association of Geographers Annual Meeting—AAGs 2013; 2013. Available from:https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs- 00933810[cited 6 march 2019].

126. Le Goix R. Sur le front de la me´tropole. Une ge´ographie suburbaine de Los Angeles. Paris: Publica- tions de la Sorbonne; 2016.

127. Grasland C, Mathian H, Vincent JM. Multiscalar Analysis and map generalisation of discrete social phenomena: Statistical problems and political consequences. Statistical Journal of the United Nations ECE. 2000;(17):1–32.

128. Stewart JQ. A Measure of the Influence of a Population at a Distance. Sociometry. 1942; 5(1):63–71.

https://doi.org/10.2307/2784954

129. Grasland C. Spatial analysis of social facts. A tentative theoretical framework derived from tobler’s first law of geography and blau’s multilevel structural theory of society. In: Bavaud F, Mager C, editors. Handbook of Quantitative Geography. University of Lausanne; 2009. 46 p. Available from:http:// halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00410669/[cited 28 may 2012].

130. Tobler W, Wineburg S. A Cappadocian Speculation. Nature. 1971; 231(5297):39–41.https://doi.org/ 10.1038/231039a0PMID:16062545

131. Plumejeaud C, Vincent JM, Grasland C, Bimonte S, Mathian H, Guelton S, et al. HyperSmooth: A Sys- tem for Interactive Spatial Analysis Via Potential Maps. In: Bertolotto M, Ray C, Li X, editors. Web and Wireless Geographical Information Systems: 8th International Symposium, W2GIS 2008, Shanghai, China, December 11-12, 2008. Proceedings. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2008. p. 4–16. Available from:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89903-7_2.

132. Tobler WR. A computer Movie Simulating Urban Growth in the Detroit Region. Economic Geography. 1970; 46(Supplement: Proceedings. IGU Commission on Quantitative Geography):234–240.https:// doi.org/10.2307/143141

133. Stouffer SA. Intervening opportunities: a theory relating mobility and distance. American Sociological Review. 1940; 5(6):845–867.https://doi.org/10.2307/2084520

134. Commenges H, Giraud T, Boulier J. SpatialPosition; 2015. Available from:https://cran.r-project.org/ web/packages/SpatialPosition/index.html.

135. Commenges H, Giraud T, Lambert N. ESPON FIT: Functional Indicators for Spatial-Aware Policy- Making. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization. 2016; 51(3):127–136.https://doi.org/10.3138/cart.51.3.3148

136. Mikelbank B. Neighborhood De´jàVu: Classification in Metropolitan Cleveland, 1970-2000. Urban Geography. 2011; 32(3):317–333.https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.32.3.317

137. Delmelle EC. Five decades of neighborhood classifications and their transitions: A comparison of four US cities, 1970–2010. Applied Geography. 2015; 57(February 2015):1–11.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. apgeog.2014.12.002.

138. Gabadinho A, Ritschard G, Mu¨ller NS, Studer M. Analyzing and visualizing state sequences in R with TraMineR. Journal of Statistical Software. 2011; 40(4):1–37.https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v040.i04

139. Rouge L. L’accessionàla proprie´ te´ d’un pavillon pe´riurbain entre appropriation et enfermement. In: Actes de la Journe´ e d’e´tude Jeunes chercheurs du 20 mai 2005. Le logement et l’habitat comme objets de recherche. Paris: GIS Socio-e´ conomie de l’habitat; 2005. p. 10 p.

140. Le Ne´chet F, Nessi H, Aguilera A. La mobilite´ des me´nages pe´riurbains au risque des crises e´conomi- ques et environnementales. Ge´ographie, e´conomie, socie´te´. 2016; 18(1):113–139.

141. Duncan OD, Duncan B. A Methodological Analysis of Segregation Indexes. American Sociological Review. 1955;(41):210–217.https://doi.org/10.2307/2088328

142. Pinc¸on M, Pinc¸on-Charlot M. Dans les beaux quartiers. Paris: Editions du Seuil; 1989.

143. French S, Leyshon A, Wainwright T. Financializing space, spacing financialization. Progress in Human Geography. 2011; 35(6):798–819.https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510396749

144. Brenner N, Theodore N. Cities and the Geographies of “Actually Existing Neoliberalism”. Antipode. 2002; 34(3):349–379.https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00246

145. Peck J. Economic geography: Island life. Dialogues in Human Geography. 2012; 2(2):113–133.