To prove the last claim we will show that for a vector
uoER n~
the conditionfor every
vE(C~C~(OD)) '~~
such t h a t v is given as the last no component functions of R e ( G ~ f ) , f ( - 1 ) = 0 , and every constant vectoru E R n~
such t h a t(u-T~v)(1)=0,
implies(0, ~ ) [ C ; , N ~ ] ( - 1 ) e Vp(-1).
This will complete the proof of (9). But since every real vector function fi0Eg~
which generates an element from
Vp
has the first nl coordinate functions identically equal to 0 (see the proof of Corollary 2), it is enough to prove the statement for the case where all partial indices are 0 and n l - - 0 .From here on the argument goes very much the same as the one given by Baouendi, Rothschild and Trepreau in [BRT]. We include it for the sake of com- pleteness.
We recall t h a t T. denotes the Hilbert transform on
(C~{'~(OD)) '~
such that for everyvE(C~C~(OD)) n
we have(T,v)(1) =0.
242 Miran Cerne
Also, since all partial indices are 0, the vector function u is in fact a constant such t h a t
(T,,v-u)(1)=O
and henceT~v-u= T,v.
Let uo E R ~~ be a vector with the property t h a t
Uto(T,v)(-1) = 0
for every
ve(C~"(OD)) "~
such t h a tv=Re(G~f),
f ( - 1 ) - - 0 . We recall ([BRT]) t h a t forveC~i~(OD) and ~oEOD
one has(T.v)(~o) =p.v. / f
/ 2~ v(~)(1-~o) ~dO,
Jo ( ~ - 1)(~-~o)where ~ stands for e i~ We denote the vector function t 9
uoG o
by a~. Then for every nonnegative integer q, every vector z o E C m, and a function f of the formf(~)__ (~2_l)~azo (~ e
OD)
one has(12) (13)
(u~)(T.v))(-1) =
p.v. i r_L 27r 2Re(a~(~)f(~)) ~: dO 2i ~o 2~= ~ [~q+la~(~)~o-~q+la~(~)~o ] de.
By our assumption the integrals (12) and (13) axe equal 0 for every nonnegative integer q and every vector
zoEC m.
Since one can also take izo instead of zo, one gets that2i ~o 2~ ~q+la~(~) dO = 0
for every nonnegative integer q. The above identity can be written in terms of Fourier coefficient as
5 o ( - q - 1 ) = 0 (q = 0,1,2,...)
which immediately implies t h a t the real vector u~ generates an element of
Vp.
The identity (9) is proved. []For the next theorem we have to assume more regularity on the fibration
{M(~)}~eOD
and the closed path p. We assume now t h a t we have a C 1,~ fibra- tion with C 3 fibers, i.e., the fibration is given by a set of real functions from theAnalytic discs attached to a generating CR-manifold 243 space
CI"~(OD,
C3(Bro)), and the closed path p shall be of classC 1,a.
Under these conditions one can repeat the proofs of Theorem 1 and Theorem 2 in the C 1,~category. We recall the definition of the mapping G from [BRT]. Let
G: ToA. ~
C m+'~be defined by
~(F) : = ~ F ( e ~~
o=o"
T h e o r e m 3.
Letp and
M(~)CC re+n,~EOD, be as above. Then G maps ToA.
into
Tp(1)M(1)and
(14) (ToA.) = Y (1) •
Proof.
We first observe that for every FET0.A. one has Re([G~,N~ ]F) = 0
on
OD.
Differentiation with respect to 8 and setting 8--0 implies that G mapsTo,4.
into
TpwM(1 ).
The proof of (14) is quite similar to the proof of (9). The inclusion (ToA.) c_ VA1) •
follows as above since the product of any two functions GEVp and
FEToA.
equals 0,(15) G ~ F = 0 .
Namely, the differentiation of (15) with respect to 8 and setting 8--0 yields
Gt(1)OF(eie)
e=0---- 0.To prove the opposite inclusion in (14) we proceed similarly as in the proof of (9) and reduce the problem to the case where all partial indices of the associated maximal real bundle are 0.
Claim.
The vector space{~---o(T,v)(e i~ o=o;v=Re(G~f), f(~)=(~-l)2~qZo,
qENU{O}, z o E C "~}244 M i r a n C e r n e
has dimension n - d e f ( p ) .
Proof of the claim.
We are using a similar notation as in the proof of (9). Let u0 E R n be a real n-vector which annihilates the above vector space. Also, let a t bet *
the vector
uoG o.
We recall ([BRT]) t h a t, O ) t 1
6 = 0
1
Replacing zo by
izo
and adding thefo mr R e ( a t ( ~ ) f ( ~ ) ) f
dO
(~_1)2O0 2 ~
[a ~o( ~)~q+ l zo-.l.-at ( ~)~q+ l zo ] dO.
identities one gets 0 2~ at(~)~ q+l dO = 0
for every nonnegative integer q. In terms of Fourier coefficients we have
& 0 ( - q - l ) = 0
for every q ~ N U { 0 } . Thus the real vector u0 generates an element from
V v.
This finishes the proof of the claim and so also the theorem. []Remarks and examples.
In the case when the partial indices of the p a t h p in the generating CR-fibration{M(~)}~eOD are
not all nonnegative, the conclusions in Theorems 2 and 3 are not true even if we consider only the case where all indices are greater or equal to - 1 . One problem, of course, occurs if the total index k happens to be negative. T h e n the number of free parameters is strictly less t h a n the number of additional equations we have to satisfy. Here we give two examples in C 2 for which k > 0 b u t the conclusions of Theorems 2 and 3 still do not hold.Example
1. In this example we find a maximal real fibration in C 2 for which the set of attached discs passing through the point (0, 0) does not form a manifold.Let the maximal real fibration
{M(~)}eeOD
be given by the set of equationsand
Im(z~) = 0
Re(wr(~)) = Re(r(~)) Re((z~)2).
It is easy to check t h a t the partial indices of the p a t h p ( ~ ) = 0 ,
~EOD, are 2 and
- 1 , and so the t o t a l index k equals 1 and the defect of the p a t h p is 1. Hence the dimension of the spacesVp(~) • (~ E OD)
i
Analytic discs attached to a generating CR-manifold 245 isMso 1.
Claim.
The family of holomorphic discs with boundaries in the maximal real fibration{M(~)}feOD
which all pass through the point (0, 0) at ~=1 is not a man- ifold.Proof of the claim.
Let (z, w) be a holomorphic disc with boundary in the maximal real fibration {M(~)}~eaD and such that (z(1), w(1))=(0, 0). Then from the first equationIm(z(~)~) = 0 we get
z(r = ~ - 2 Re(w) + ~ for some complex number w. The second equation
Re(w(()r(()) = Re(r(()) Re((z(()~) 2) ( ( 9
OD)
implies
Re(w(~2)~) = Re(~) Re((z(~2)~) 2) (~ E
OD).
A short calculation shows t h a t the right hand side of the last equation equals to
Re(w2~5 + (w2-4w Re(w) )~3 + (21wl2 +4(Re(w) )2-4w Re(w) )~).
Thus
w(~) = w2~ 2+ (w 2-4w Re(w))~+(21w[ 2+4(Re(w)) 2-4w Re(w))
and so at ~ = 1 one must have
w2+(w 2 - 4 w Re(w))+ (2[w[ 2 +4(Re(w)) 2 - 4 w Re(w)) = 0 or after division by 2
~ - 4 ~ a e ( ~ ) + I~I ~ + 2(ae(~)) ~ = o.
If we write
w=x+iy,
then the imaginary part of the last equation yields-2xy = O.
Thus the constant w has to be either real or purely imaginary. So the set of solutions of the above equations is the union of two intersecting curves in
(A~ 2 and
therefore not a manifold. []
246 Miran 0 e r n e
Example
2. Let the maximal real fibration in 12 2 be given by Im(zr(~) ) ---- 0and
Im(wr( )) = Re((zr( ) )3).
Then the partial indices of the closed path p(~)=0,
~EOD,
are 1 and - 1 and the total index is 0. Also, the defect def(p) is 1 and the dimension of the spacesVp-L(~), ~EOD,
is 1. Let (z, w) be a holomorphic disc with boundary in the maximal real fibration{M(~)}~eOD
and such that (z(1), w(1))=(0, 0). Then from the first equation we getz(r = ia(~-
1)for some real number a. The second equation now implies Im (w (~2)~) = Re( (ia (~ - ~) ) 3 )
o r
Im(w(~2)~) ---- 2a 3 Im(~ 3-3~).
Hence we get
w(~)---- 2a3(~-3)
which can be 0 at ~-- 1 if only if a-- 0. Thus we showed that the only holomorphic disc attached to the fibration
{M(~)}~eOD
and which is passing through the point (0, 0), is the zero discp(~)=O, ~EOD.
Analytic discs attached to a generating CR-manifold 247 of analytic discs attached to real manifolds, Preprint.
BEDFORD, n., Stability of the polynomial hull o f T 2, Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa Cl. Sci. 8 (1982), 311-315.
BEDFORD, E., Levi fiat hypersurfaces in C 2 with prescribed boundary: Stability, Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa Cl. Sci. 9 (1982), 529-570.
BEDFORD, E. and GAVEAU, S., Envelopes of holomorphy of certain two-spheres in C 2, Amer. J. Math. 105 (1983), 975-1009.
BOGGESS, A. and POLKING, J. C., Holomorphic extension of CR-functions, Duke Math. J. 49 (1982), 757-?84.
BOTT, R. and TU, L. W., Differential FolTr~8 in Algebraic Topology, Graduate Texts in Math. 52, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1982.
CARTAN, H., Calcul diffdrentiel, Hermann, Paris, 1967.
(~ERNE, M., Ph.D. Thesis, Madison, Wis., 1994.
CIRKA, E. M., Regularity of boundaries of analytic sets, Mat. Sb. 117 (1982), 291-334 (Russian). English transl.: Math. USSR-Sb. 45 (1983), 291-336.
CLANCEY, K. and GOHBERG, I., Factorization of Matrix Functions and Singular Integral Operators, Birkh~user Verlag, Basel-Boston-Stuttgart, 1981.
ELIASHBERG, YA., Filling by holomorphic discs, in Geometry of Low-dimensional Manifolds 2 (Donaldson, S. K. and Thomas, C. B., eds.), London Math. Soc.
Lecture Note Ser. 151, pp. 45-67, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1990.
FEDERER, H., Geometric Measure Theory, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1969.
FORSTNERIG, F., Analytic disks with boundaries in a maximal real submanifold of C 2, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 37 (1987), 1-44.
FORSTNERI(~, F., Polynomial hulls of sets fibered over the circle, Indiana Univ.
Math. J. 3 7 (1988), 869-889.
GLOBEVNIK, J., Perturbation by analytic discs along maximal real submanifold of C ~, Math. Z. 217 (1994), 287-316.
GLOBEVNIK, J., Perturbing analytic discs attached to maximal real submanifolds of C ~, Preprint.
GOLUSlN, G. M., Geometrische Funktionentheorie, Deutscher Verlag der Wis- senschaften, Berlin, 1957.
GROMOV, M., Pseudo-holomorphic curves in symplectic manifolds, Invent. Math.
81 (1985), 307-347.
KRANTZ, S., Function Theory of Several Complex Variables, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1982.
LEMPERT, L., La m~trique de Kobayashi et la repr6sentation des domaines sur la boule, Bull. Soc. Math. France 109 (1981), 427-474.
OH, Y.-G., The Fredholm-regularity and realization of the Riemann-Hilbert prob- lem and application to the perturbation theory of analytic discs, Preprint.
OH, Y.-G., Predholm theory of holomorphic discs with Lagrangian or totally real boundary conditions under the perturbation of boundary conditions, Preprint.
248 Miran Cerne: Analytic discs attached to a generating CR-manifold
[T] TUMANOV, A. E., Extension of CR-hmctions into a wedge from a manifold of finite type, Mat. Sb. 136 (1988), 128-139 (Russian). English transl.: Math
USSR-Sb. 64 (1989), 129-140.
[Vl] VEKUA, N. P., Systems of Singular Integral Equations, Nordhoff, Groningen, 1967.
IV2] VEKUA, N. P., Systems of Singular Integral Equations, 2nd ed., Nauka, Moscow, 1970 (Russian).
[W] WEBSTER, S. M., On the reflection principle in several complex variables, Proc.
Amer. Math. Soe. 71 (1978), 26-28.
Received June 27, 1994 Miran Cerne
Department of Mathematics University of Ljubljana Jadranska 19
61 111 Ljubljana Slovenia