HAL Id: jpa-00246789
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00246789
Submitted on 1 Jan 1993
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
Magnetotransport investigation of the low-temperature state of transition (BEDT-TTF)2TIHg(SCN)4 : evidence
for a Peierls-type transition
M. Kartsovnik, A. Kovalev, N. Kushch
To cite this version:
M. Kartsovnik, A. Kovalev, N. Kushch. Magnetotransport investigation of the low-temperature state
of transition (BEDT-TTF)2TIHg(SCN)4 : evidence for a Peierls-type transition. Journal de Physique
I, EDP Sciences, 1993, 3 (5), pp.1187-1199. �10.1051/jp1:1993264�. �jpa-00246789�
J.
Phys.
I France 3 (1993) l187-l199 MAY 1993, PAGE l187Classification
Physics
Abstracts72.15G 73.20D 74.70K
Magnetotransport investigation of the low-temperature state of
(BEDT-TTF)~TlHg(SCN)4
:evidence for
aPeierls-type
transition
M. V. Kartsovnik
(I),
A. E. Kovalev(')
and N. D. Kushch(2)
('
Institute of Solid StatePhysics,
Russian Academy of Sciences, 142432,Chemogolovka,
MD, Russia(2) Institute of Chemical
Physics
inChemogolovka,
Russian Academy of Sciences, 142432, Chemogolovka, MD, Russia(Received 22 December 1992, accepted 26
January
1993)Abstract. Detailed
magnetoresistance
measurements have beenperformed
on(BEDT-TTF)2TlHg(SCN)4.
Ananalysis
ofangle dependent
semi-classicalmagnetoresistance
oscillations is
presented
in connection withpossible changes
in the electron spectrum at low temperatures. Aspin density
wave is proposed to ariseleading
to a modification of the Fermi surface so that new open sheets appear, consistent with the observed angularmagnetoresistance
oscillations. Some details of the Shubnikov-de Haas effect are also presented which can be explained by the existence of a
magnetic
breakdown network, in agreement with the proposed low-temperature electronic state of the compound.
Introduction.
An
investigation
of strongangular
oscillations ofmagnetoresistance
found in alayered organic superconductor fl-(BEDT-TTF )~IBr~
a few years ago[II
has been shown to be very useful inproviding quantitative
information about the Fermi surface(FS)
oforganic
metals[2].
As it has been shown in[3, 4]
such kind of oscillations inQ2D
metals withcylindrical
FS is associated with the semi-classical part of themagnetoresistance
andoriginates
from the fact that the areas of thecyclotron
orbits becomeindependent
of the momentumcomponent along
the FScylinder
axis at certain directions of the
magnetic
field[5, 2].
Similar oscillations have beenobserved,
so
far,
in a number of otherorganic
conductors[6-9]. However,
our recent studies of theangular magnetoresistance
oscillations(AMRO)
in(BEDT-TTF)~TlHg(SCN)4 [8]
revealed substantial differences in their behavior incomparison
with those infl- (BEDT-TTF )~IBr~.
Weargued
that in(BEDT-TTF hTlHg (SCN)4
the AMRO are associated with some markedplane
in the
reciprocal
lattice, e,g. aplane
of openorbits,
and not with closed orbits as infl-
(BEDT-TTF )~IBr~.
In this paper we
present
a detailedanalysis
of the AMRO parameters in the titledcompound
and discuss how dothey
reflect its new electron structureoccurring
below aphase
transitionnear lo K
[10].
We show that aPeierls-type
transition canmodify
the FS so that new open sheets appear which are consistent with the observed AMRO. We also present some details ofthe Shubnikov-deHaas effect which can be
explained by
the existence of amagnetic
breakdown
network,
in agreement with theproposed low-temperature
electronic state of thecompound.
The
compound (BEDT-TTF)~TlHg(SCN)4 belongs
to afamily
of isostructuralorganic
conductors with
mercury-containing polymeric anions, (BEDT-TTF~MHg(SCN)4
whereM
= K
[I II,
Tl[101,
Rb[121
andNH~ [12].
As waspredicted by
the extended HUckel model band calculations[[[l,
the FS of these salts combine elementstypical
of bothquasi-2D
systems(I.e.
acylindrical sheet)
andquasi-ID
ones(I.e. slightly warped planes).
While(BEDT-TTF)~NH~Hg(SCN)~
issuperconducting
below 2K[131,
thecompounds
with M= K, Tl and Rb
undergo
aphase
transition at T= lo K and are notsuperconducting although
remain metallic down to the lowest temperatures.Investigation
of their low-temperature state should be
important
forunderstanding why
these salts are notsuperconduc- ting,
in contrast to their ammoniumanalog.
The lo K transition manifests itself in the
resistivity
versustemperature dependence
as asmall «
hump
»[lo, 141.
Themagnetic
field above 3 Tapplied perpendicular
to thehighly conducting ac-plane
leads to a rathersharp
increase of theresistivity
atcooling
below the transition temperature[lo, 141.
Besides thegiant magnetoresistance,
a number ofintriguing
features of the
low-temperature
state in(BEDT-TTF )~MHg (SCN
)~ in themagnetic
field have beenreported
sofar,
such as strongangle dependent magnetoresistance
oscillations[7-91, negative slope
and « kink » structure of the R(H) dependence
at H> 22 T
(see,
forexample [71),
asurprisingly large magnitude
of the second harmonic in the SdH oscillation spectra[15-
l8l,
etc.Taking
into account the existence of aquasi-
ID band andantiferromagnetic ordering
morelikely occurring
below the transition temperature[161,
one can suppose that aspin density
wave
(SDW)
transitiontypical
ofquasi-
ID conductors takesplace. Still,
the nature of the low- temperature state of thesecompounds
is to be clarified yet, as well as the reasons for the abovementioned anomalies.
Experimental.
For the
experiment,
we usedcrystallographically
orientedcrystals
of(BEDT-TTF )~TlHg(SCN)4 having
aplate-like shape
with the dimensions ofapproximately
I x 0.05 x 0.7
mm~.
A standardac-technique ~f
= 330
Hz)
was used for the measurements ofresistances
R~, R~
and R~along
the a-, b*- and c-directions,respectively (c'
is directed in thecrystal highly conducting ac-plane perpendicular
to the a-axis ; b* is normal to theac-plane).
The
magnetic
field up to 14T wasgenerated by
asuperconducting
magnet.Using
amodulation coil
(AH
= 0.008 T ; F= 20
Hz)
we succeeded inobserving
the SdH oscillations at temperatures up to 6 K in the H I ac orientation and at T=
1.5 K in fields tilted up to 55°
from the b*-axis.
The
samples
were mounted into a cell which could be rotated in twoplanes
with respect to themagnetic
field direction. This arrangement allowed us to measureangular dependences
of themagnetoresistance
for the fieldrotating
in anyplane perpendicular
to thecrystal ac-plane.
The error in deterrnination of the
crystal
orientation was less than I for theangle
p between thefield and the b*-direction and did not exceed ± 2° for the
angle
o between the field rotationplane
and the c'-direction.N° 5 MAGNETORESISTANCE STUDIES OF
(ET)~TlHg(SCN)~
1189Results and discussion.
CLASSICAL PART OF THE MAGNETORESISTANCE.
Figure
I demonstratesangular dependences
of the
magnetoresistance
of(BEDT-TTF )~TlHg(SCN)~
measured at different current direc- tions in themagnetic
field H=
14 T
rotating
in aplane
which forrns anangle
Ho = 24° with the c'-direction andcorresponds
to thegreatest amplitude
of theangular magnetoresistance
oscillations
(AMRO).
Note that all the threedependences
were obtained on the samecrystal.
One can see that while the
position
of the oscillations isindependent
of the current direction theiramplitude
isextremely
sensitive to it. The greatest AMRO are observed for the resistanceR~,
measuredperpendicular
to thehighly conducting plane,
whereasthey
are much smaller forthe
R~
and almost vanish for theR~.
m
la)
©$
'
m
©$
*3
o
~
(b)
ci
~
~ii
o
~
(c)
~
ii
50 ioo iso
@, degrees
Fig.
I. Dependence of magnetoresistance measured along la) b*~, (b) c- and (c) a-axes on theangle
wbetween the magnetic field and b*. The field, H
= 14 T, is rotated in the plane
corresponding
to the maximal AMRO (6 = H~ = 24°).The most distinctive feature of the AMRO in the
(BEDT-TTF)~TlHg (SCN)4
is that theirperiod
varies as 1/cos (o Ho) withchanging
the orientation of the field rotationplane.
Suchbehavior, together
with some otherspecific features,
enables us to propose that some markedplane
exists in the system and the oscillations are associated withrotating
theprojection
of themagnetic
field to thisplane [81.
One cannaturally
suppose that open flat FS sheets mayplay
the role of the markedplane.
Recently,
Osada et al.[191
haveanalyzed theoretically
the behavior of aquasi-
ID metal in a tiltedmagnetic
field andpredicted sharp dips
of its semi-classicalmagnetoresistance
at certain field directions. This result can be understoodqualitatively
as follows[81.
Let us consider thefollowing dispersion
law near the Ferrni level for aquasi-ID system
with its ID-axisalong
the x-direction :s(k)
=
hv~ (
k~k~ ) £
t~~ cos(ma~
k~ + na~k~)
,
(I)
m, n
with transfer
integrals
t~~ « s~. For ageneral
direction of themagnetic
field in theplane perpendicular
to tileID-axis,
H=
(0,
H sin p, Hcosp),
the electrontrajectory being
reduced to the first Brillouin zone
(BZ)
tends to fill the whole of its area(Fig. 2a). Therefore,
the transversevelocity
components, v~ and v~, take allpossible values,
bothpositive
andnegative,
and afteraveraging
over the time interval of the orderv
(r
is the momentum relaxationtime)
tend to zero in ahigh enough magnetic
field.However,
if the field is orientedso that an electron moves
along
one of thereciprocal
latticeperiods,
K=
pK~
+qK~
~p and qare
integers),
itstrajectory
reduced to the first BZ consists ofonly
a finite set of lines as shown infigure
2b. In this case, the transversevelocity
takesonly
a limited set of valuesprescribed by
the electron's initial coordinates in the
k-space,
andbeing
timeaveraged
it should be non-zero.Therefore,
at thespecial angles,
p~, between themagnetic
field and thek~-axis, satisfying
thecondition,
tan p~ =
~~~
,
(2) qKy
dips
of the transverse resistance components,p~
and p~, areexpected [191.
In a moregeneral
case, the field is rotated in a
plane forrning
anangle
o with the open FSplane,
H
=
H(sin
p sin o, sin p cos o, cos p),
and the directions ofK~
andK~
vectors do not coincide with the y- and z-axes,K~
=(0,
K~~, K~~) andK~
=(0,
K~~,K~~).
Then, since the oscillations are connected withrotating
themagnetic
field componentparallel
to theyz-plane, Hi
=
H(0,
sin p cos o, cosp),
the condition for the criticalangles
takes the form :z z
j
+oj~#o
fl pxi
t°~
yc~q~
p,qmo,* i>
z...y Y
(°) (b)
Fig.
2. Schematic view of the electron motionalong
aslightly warped
FSparallel
toyz-plane
under tiltedmagnetic
field (a)general
case (incommensurate) the electrontrajectory
reduced to the first BZ tends to frill its whole area(shaded region)
; and (b) commensurate case ; the reduced electrontrajectory
consists of a finite set of lines only (dashed lines).
N° 5 MAGNETORESISTANCE STUDIES OF
(ET)2TlHg(SCN)4
1191or, if K~~ =
0,
pK~
~~~ ~'~ ~°~ ° ~°~~ " ~
qK~
sin a~~'~
where a is an
angle
between theK~
andK~
vectors.This model describes both the
periodic sharp dips
of themagnetoresistance
attilting
themagnetic
field and thedependence
of the oscillationperiod
on theangle
o.Moreover,
therelationship
between the oscillationsamplitude
for the resistanceR~,
R~ andR~
obtained in ourexperiment (Fig. 1)
is also in agreement with this consideration[191
if we take into account theanisotropy
of thecompound [201.
There is a number of other theories
[21-24]
whichpredict magnetoresistance
oscillations forquasi-lD
systemsrotating
in themagnetic
field. Some of them are discussed in[251
in connection withangular
oscillations in(TMTSF)~CIO~
which are similar to those described here but much less in themagnitude.
All these modelsbeing
connected with the electron motionalong
the openFS,
lead to the same condition for the criticalangles (3), despite proposing
different mechanisms for the AMRO.However,
the abovepresented
model seems to be the mostappropriate
in our case since itexplains easily
notonly
theperiodic sharp dips
of themagnetoresistance
at the criticalangles
but also the observeddependence
of the oscillationsamplitude
on thetransport
current direction. Furtherexperiments
are necessary foeestablishing
the actual mechanisms
responsible
for the observedphenomenon,
e-g-investigation
of themagnetic susceptibility
or heatcapacity
as function of the field direction.Anyway,
aconclusion can be made that the oscillation8 are associated with
rotating
themagnetic
field componentparallel
to theplane
of the open FS sheets.At first
sight,
one could attribute tile AMRO in(BEDT-TTF)2TlHg(SCN)4
to the open FSsheets
predicted
for the(BEDT-TTF)2MHg(SCN)~ compounds by
the band structurecalculations
[I11 using
the roomtemperature crystal p_arameters.
It isimportant, however,
that these sheetslying
in the b*c-plane
do not coincide with theplane
of the maximum AMROmaking
anangle
Ho= 24° with the latter. It more
likely
means that some newperiodicities
in the(BEDT-TTF)~TlHg(SCN)4
electron structure appear at low temperatures. One canexpect
these
changes
to occur at thephase
transition[101.
Thissuggestion
issupported by
thetemperature dependence
of the AMROamplitude
shown infigure
3. The AMRO arisejust
below the transition temperature, T~ = 9 K and growsharply
withcooling
thesample
: the oscillationsamplitude
at 1.5 K is at least 2 orders ofmagnitude greater
than that at 8.5 K while the mean freepath
grows not more titan four times, if estimated from thesample
resistance.The new
periodicity
can be determined from the AMRO parametersusing
tile abovegiven
conditions
(3-3')
for the criticalangles
p~. First ofall,
we notethat,
as was established in[8],
the criticalangles obey
the relation(3').
It means that the vectorKb
of the new BZ remainsperpendicular
to thecrystal ac-plane
as defined at the roomtemperature.
The other vector,K~,
lies in aplane forming
anangle
Ho = 24° with thecrystal
b*c-plane
and is inclinedby
~ 65° with respect to
K~.
As will be shown below, agood agreement
with theexperimental
data can be achieved
by proposing
a commensurate superstructure with a wave vector,Q
=
~
K~
+ K~~ +I K~
=(( 0,ll, 0.21,
J~ 0,llh~
'(4)
where K~~, K~~ and K~~ are the basic vectors of the initial
reciprocal
lattice deduced from thecrystallographic parameters
at roomtemperature [201,
ao=
10.05
h, ho
=
20.55
h,
co =
9.93
h,
ao =
103.6°, flo
= 90.5° and yo = 93. 3° ; tileintegers
( and J~ areequal
to I or + I. The latteruncertainty originates
from the fact that the deviation of the real triclinicI
~
i
~ ~
'
4 ,
~ ,
~
,
4
' '~ 1~
~ ,
z
'~ ~o
a '
~ '
l c~
I 'q
@
O ~
O 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 lo
T, x
Fig. 3.-Temperatur dependence
of the AMROamplitude.
The field is rotated in the plane corresponding to the maximal AMRO, H= 14 T.
structure from more
symmetrical
orthorombic side-centered-A structure with parameters A= ao, B
=
2 b sin
a o and C
= co is too small and cannot be resolved within our
experimental
accuracy. For
choosing
the correctsigns
of ( and J~, aprecise
orientation of thecrystal
axes in the real coordinatesystem
should be determined.Up
to now, no band structure calculations have been done for the(BEDT-
TTF)2TlHg(SCN)4.
One can howeversuggest
its FS to be very close to thatpredicted
for theisostructural
analog, (BEDT-TTF)~KHg(SCN)4 Ill].
In this structure, the value of2
k)~ corresponding
to thequasi-ID
band is aboutK~/6
= 0.1
A~ Comparing
this value with theQ,-component (4)
andsuggesting
that aPeierls-type
transition(e.g.
an SDWtransition)
occurs at
T~,
wenaturally
propose thatQx
= 2kj~, (5)
so that
Q
is the wave vector of the SDW.Introducing
the vectorQ
into the initialreciprocal
lattice we obtain a new BZ with the basic vectors,~
l~ l~
~~2 ~°~2
~°'K~
=K~
,
(6)
and
K
=
Q~,
in which the
quasi-
lD banddisappears
under the SDWpotential. Taking
into account the fact that theperiodic
SDWpotential
should also influence thequasi-2D
band we find thecorresponding
transformation of thecylindrical
FS sheet. Thesechanges
are illustrated infigure
4 in which the FS is shownschematically (a)
above and(b)
below the transitiontemperature.
One can see small « lenslike »cylinders
andcorrugated planes arising
belowN° 5 MAGNETORESISTANCE STUDIES OF
(ET)2TlHg(SCN)4 )193
~
j
o
/ /
-J
T > T~ T ~ T~
a) b)
Fig.
4. Transformation of the FS of(BEDT-TTF)2TlHg(SCN)4
at thephase
transition(schematically).
The FS (a) above and (b) below the transition both
figures
are in the same scale. Thequasi-lD
band becomes dielectric below T~ while the cylindrical FS sheet is modified by the superstructure
periodic potential
to form new open sheets and smallcylinders.
Thus amagnetic
breakdown network withdifferent closed orbits (Ao, A
j and their combinations) arises.
T~. The new
planes
lieparallel
to theK~ K~-plane
of the new BZ and form anangle
26° with thecrystal
b*c-plane
as defined at room temperature. Thisangle
is consistent with the observedHo " 24°
taking
into account theexperimental
error, ho= ±
2°,
and some variation of thecrystal parameters
withchanging
the temperature. The ratioKjK~
= 1.21 or 1.23 and theangle
a between
K~
andK~
is 64. 7° or 67.3° for J~= + I or
I, respectively.
These values are also in agreement with those obtained from the AMRO parameters(KjK~)~~~
=l.22 ± 0.02 and a~~~ =
65° ± 1°.
So,
we conclude that aPeierls-type
SDW transition with the commensuratenesting
vectorQ
may takeplace
at T~modifying
the electronic structure, so that new open FS sheets ariseresponsible
for the observed AMRO.It should be noted that an additional series of AMRO has been
found,
mostpronounced
at theangles
o= Ho ± 90° and o
= 25° and 155°. In
figure
5 the R (p curve for o= Ho + 95°
is
represented
with theupward
and downward arrowscorresponding
to the main and additional AMROseries, respectively.
The second series is describedby
theproposed
model if one puts thesign
oftin (4)
to beopposite
to that for the main series so that thecorresponding
superstructure vector,
Q',
is the mirror reflection ofQ
withrespect
to theab*-plane.
The existence of the second AMROsystem
is mostlikely
associated with thecrystal twinning.
Such
twinning
seemst6
be ratherprobable
since thecrystallographic angle po
is very close to 90° and the reflection of the b-axis withrespect
to theab*-plane
is directedapproximately along
the(b-c)-direction.
So,
the AMRO observed in the(BEDT-TTF)~TlHg(SCN)4
indicate a newsuperstructure
inthe electronic system
arising
at lowtemperatures
and mostlikely
associated with the Peierls- type transition(SDW).
Recently
an anomalousmagnetoresistance
kink has been found in(BEDT- TTF)2TlHg(SCN)4
at H» 20 T
[271
very similar to that observed in theK-containing analog [7, 171. Preliminary
measurements of themagnetoresistance anisotropy [271
revealedsubstantial
changes
in the AMRO behavior above 20 T. One can suppose thathigh magnetic
field suppresses the
antiferromagnetic ordering
and restores thehigh-temperature
state. It isworth
noting
that theextensively investigated (BEDT-TTF)2KHg(SCN)4
shares all thecharacteristic
properties
with itsTl-containing analog.
We believe that more closeinvestigation
-1 o
fl-8~=95°
a
~ i
-2
_
3
p~ -7
6
o -1
-t4-12-lO-8 -6 ~ -2 0 2 4 6 8 lo1214
i~iTl§2
Fig.
5. Two series of theangular magnetoresistance
oscillations atrotating
the field ina
plane corresponding
to H= H~ + 95°. The up- and downward arrows indicate the main and the additional AMRO systems.
of the AMRO in both
compounds
in thehigh-field
range isindispensable
forclarifying
thenature of their electronic state and the
unique interplay
between the one- and two-dimensionalfeatures.
THE QUANTUM OSCILLATIONS OF MAGNETORESISTANCE.- As was
reported
in[181
theShubnikov-de Haas oscillations
(SdHO)
have been observed above 8T in(BEDT-
TTF)2TlHg(SCN)4 corresponding
to aweakly corrugated cylinder
with its axisalong
the b*- direction and the cross-sectional area 6.4 x10'~
cm~ ~ Within ourmodel,
the existence of theSdHO below the
phase
transition may be associated with themagnetic
breakdownthrough
small gaps at the
edges
of the new BZ. In this case, the fundamentalharmonic, Fo
= 670T, corresponds
to the orbitAo (Fig. lb).
The breakdown results in a
decreasing
of the number of electronsmoving along
the openorbits which are
responsible
for the AMRO. We observe the saturation of the AMROamplitude
in the field m lo T.Assuming
H= lo T to be breakdown
field,
we estimate the gap,E~
80 K.In addition to
Ao,
other orbits can exist as well. As was mentioned in[181, -surprisingly
strong second harmonic, 2Fo
= 340
T,
is observed in the studiedcompound.
The SdHOwith
highly pronounced
second harmonic arerepresented
infigure
6. Thefrequency
of the second harmonic growsperfectly
as I/cos p attilting
themagnetic
field(inset b)
inFig. 6).
A very similar effect observed in the K-salt was attributed in[15, 161
to the direct observation of thespin-splitting
effect.However,
thefollowing
several facts canhardly
beexplained
within thissuggestion
:(I)
the directsplitting
of the SdH oscillations due to tilespin-splitting
isusually
observed infields near the quantum limit when the contribution of the
highest
harmonics becomessignificant [261.
In our case the oscillationssplitting
is observed for both K- and Tl-salts atN° 5 MAGNETORESISTANCE STUDIES OF
(ET)~TlHg(SCN)~
l1959 ~~
~
W
~
# 0 2 3 4
c 6 r, id T
~
.
5
~ 4
£
3b)
~' 2
o
-I
o. 07 o. as o. 09 o. io
I /H, T~~
Fig.
6. Shubnikov-de Haas oscillations at T= 1.5 K, the
magnetic
field isparallel
to the b*-axis.Insets : (a) fast Fourier transform this data and (b)
angular dependence
of the second harmonicfrequency
in polar coordinates.
magnetic
fields lo ÷ 15 T I.e. too far from thequantum
limitand, despite enormously
strongsecond
harmonic,
no traces ofhigher
harmonics have been found(see
e.g.Fig. 6a)
;(it)
the distance between tile «splitting
» oscillationpeaks
varies asI/cos
p attilting
thefield,
whereas for thespin-splitting
effect one should expect the distance between thepeaks
corresponding
to theopposite spin
directions to beindependent
of the field direction(iii)
as is seen e.g. fromfigure
I in reference[161
for the K-salt and confirmedby preliminary
measurements for the Tl-salt[27],
the oscillationsplitting
isbeing
enhanced up to the field 20 T and diminishesrapidly
at furtherincreasing
thefield,
so that nosplitting
isobserved at H
» 23 T.
The facts
(I)
and(it)
prove that we deal with the second harmonic of the fundamentalfrequency,
not with directspin-splitting.
One could attribute the low ratio between tile fundamental and the second harmonicamplitude
to the «spin-splitting
zero » of the harmonic ratio[26]
as was done in[271
for the(BEDT-TTF)~NH4Hg(SCN)~. Still,
in our case the fact(iii)
remains unclear within thespin-splitting
model.All the mentioned features can be
understood,
at leastqualitatively,
if one considers themagnetic
breakdown networkpresented
infigure
4b. Theamplitude
of the second harmonic of SdHO may behigher
for such a network than for thesingle cylinder
because of the additionallarge orbits,
while the next harmonics may be indiscemible due tobigger
masses. The increase of themagnetic
field results in theincreasing probability
of themagnetic
breakdown anddecreasing
the contribution of theselarge
orbits. Moreover, as was discussed above fields above 23 T areexpected
to suppress thelow-temperature antiferromagnetic ordering
and restore tilehigh-temperature
state with theonly
closed orbitalong
thecylindrical
FS sheet(Fig. 4a).
In addition to
Fo
and 2Fo,
anotherfrequency, Fj
= 860T,
is observed in the temperatureregion
2 ÷ 5 K. Theexample
of the SdHO with Fj is
presented
infigure
7 for T=
4.2 K. This
frequency
maycorrespond
to the sum of the orbits(Ao
+ Aj
(Fig. 4b).
It should be noted that theamplitude
of the harmonicFj
increase veryslowly
incomparison
with the fundamental withlowering
of the temperature, so that its contribution becomes almostnegligible
at T < 2 K(see Fig. 6).
This fact can indicate that thecorresponding
effective mass is very small. Thereason for this is not clear yet.
Incidentally,
thefrequency
close toF~
was found in the K-containing
salt at rather low temperature, T = 0.5 K[171,
however there was no information about the temperaturedependence
of theamplitude.
According
to the scheme infigure
4b one shouldexpect
the SdHOcorresponding
to the small closedorbits,
Aj. Therefore the small
peak
at about 200 T in the Fourier transform for 4.2 K(inset
inFig. 7)
can be attributed to these orbits.However,
thefrequency
is rather low and theamplitude
is too small for an accurateanalysis.
5
~
~=
~ g
~ «
~ 3 t
~
Ji
2~' O-O O-S I-O t.5 2.~
Q$ F, tO'T
i
tIi
~
j'
~ cC~ _~
q2
~.
07 0. 08 0. 09_~ 0. lo 0. I I
I /H, T
Fig.
7. Shubnikov-de Haas oscillations at T = 4.2 K, magnetic field isparallel
to the b*-axis. The beats are clearly visible, inset represents fast Fourier transform of the data.Finally,
we will consider thedependence
of the SdHOamplit~lde
on theangle
p between themagnetic
field direction and the b*-axis.Figure
8 shows the trace of the resistancederivative,
dR/dH, attilting
thefield,
H=
Ho
+Hi
cos wt whereHo
=
14
T, Hi
= 8 mT and
w =
120 Hz, from b*. The field rotation
plane
forms anangle
o= Ho + 90° with the b* c-
plane. (As
was mentioned above, this orientationcorresponds
to thenon-oscillating
behavior of the semi-classicalmagnetoresistance.)
The SdHo are
clearly
observable up to theangles
p =±50°. The second harmonic contribution is resolved at small p and decreasesrapidly
attilting
the fieldvanishing
at (q~ »18°. Meanwhile. the fundamental harmonic grows up at theseangles
and exhibitsN° 5 MAGNETORESISTANCE STUDIES OF
(ET)~TlHg(SCN)~
l19740
35 '?
v~
4~ 30
K~~
_~i
25
~ ~
20 1.i i~ i~
J4 1/©raw
15
_io tC
~ 5
'
p~ o
~ -5
-1 o
-1 5
-20
-60 -45 -30 -15 0 15 30 45 60
#
,
degrees
Fig.
8. Shubnikov-de Haas oscillations at the field, H=
14 T,
rotating perpendicular
to the ac-plane, Ho + 90° T 1.5 K. The inset demonstrates the inversion of the oscillationphase
at the node.maxima at p
= ±
20°,
in agreement with that that wasreported
in[181. Besides,
a zero ofamplitude
at p = 39° and aslight
bend atp =40° are observed. The inset in
figure
8 demonstrates inversion of the oscillationphase
atpassing through
theamplitude
zero. Abeating-like
behavior is also observed atsweeping
thefield,
for the field directions nearp =
40°
(Fig. 9).
Such a behavior may be considered as a result of asuperposition
oft.
&~
mJ
M i-o
C
~
o-s
4l
o. o 4$
td
1'
m~D4
~
o. o» o. n9
_, n. io o. ii
I /H, T
Fig.
9. The fielddependence
of the oscillatory parI of the resistance derivative, dR/dH, for the field directioncorresponding
to w 38° infigure
8, I-e- near the oscillation node.oscillations with two
slightly
differentfrequencies
andamplitudes
close to each other. If this is the case, the beatfrequency, SF,
should be rather low.Indeed,
at any fielddirection,
we findnot more than one node in the whole field interval
(8 ÷14)T
in which the SdHo areobservable. It means that SF cannot exceed
j (
= 19 T that is less than 3 9b of tile fundamental
frequency, F~.
One cannaturally
attribute these beats to two extreme orbitsoriginated
from weakwarping
of tile FSalong
thek~-direction. Meanwhile,
otherpossible
mechanisms should not be overlooked. In
particular, magnetic
breakdown circumstances andspin-splitting
effect may be essential for the studiedcompound distinguished
for the unusual features of tilespin system
atlow-temperatures.
Summarizing,
we haveperformed
detailedmagnetoresistance
measurements on(BEDT- TTF)2TlHg(SCN)4
in thelow-temperature
state. Theanalysis
of theangle dependent
semi- classicalmagnetoresistance
oscillations reveals substantial differences in the electronicstructure, in
comparison
with thatexpected
at roomtemperature.
We argue that aPeierls-type
transition with a commensurate wave vector
(4)
may transform the Fermi surface of thecompound,
so that new open sheets arise which are consistent with the observed oscillation parameters.Specific
features of the Shubnikov-de Haasoscillations,
such asextremely
strong second harmonic contribution and the existence of an additionalharmonic,
Fj, appear to be in agreement with the
proposed
model of thelow-temperature
state.Acknowledgements.
We are
grateful
to Prof. I. F.Schegolev
for hissupport
of the work and numeroushelpful discussions,
Dr. R. P. Shibaeva and Mrs. L. P.Rozenberg
for determination of thecrystal
orientation. We would also like to thank Dr. S.
Brazovskii,
Dr. M. A.Tanatar,
Dr. D. V.Mashovets and Dr. V. N. Laukhin for fruitful discussions.
References
Ii KARTSOVNIK M. V., KONONOVICH P. A,, LAUKHIN V. N. and SCHEGOLEV I. F., Pis'ma v Zh. EKSP.
Teor. Fiz. 48 (1988) 498 [JETP Lett. 48 (1988) 541].
[2j KARTSOVNIK M. V., LAUKHIN V. N., PESOTSKII S, I,, SCHEGOLEV I. F. and YAKOVENKO V, M., J,
Phys.
I France 2 (1992) 89.[3j YAGI R., IYE Y., OSADA T. and KAGOSHIMA S., J.
Phys.
Soc.Jpn
59 (1990) 3069.[4] PESCHANSKY V. G., ROLDAN LOPEz J. A. and TOYI GNADO YAO, J.
Phys.
I France 1(1991) 1469.[5] YAMAJI K., J.
Phys.
Soc. Jpn 58 (1989) 1520.[6) KAJITA K., NISHIO Y., TAKAHASHI T., SASAKI W., KATO R., KOBAYASHI H., KOBAYASHI A. and IYE Y., Solid. State Commun. 70
(1989)
1189.17] OSADA T., YAGI R., KAWASUMI A., KAGOSHIMA S., MIURA N., OSHIMA M. and SAITO G., Phys.
Rev. B 41
(1990)
5428.[8j KARTSOVNIK M. V., KOVALEV A. E., LAUKHIN V. N, and PESOTSKn S. I., J.
Phys.
I France 2 (1992) 223.[91 OSADA T., KAWASUMI A., YAGI R,, KAGOSHIMA S., MIURA N,, OSHIMA M., MORI H,, NAKAMURA T. and SAITO G., Solid State Commun. 75
(1990)
901.[10j KUSHCH N. D., BURAVOV L. I., KARTSOVNIK M. V,, LAUKHIN V, N,, PESOTSKII S, I., SHIBAEVA R, P,, ROzENBERG L, P., YAGUBSKII E. B. and ZVARIKINA A. V., Synth. Met. 46 (1992) 271.
[I II OSHIMA M., MORI H., SAITO G. and OSHIMA K., Chem. Lett. (1989) l159.
[12j MORI H., TANAKA S., OSHIMA K., OSHIMA M., SAITO G., MORI T., MARUYAMA Y. and INOKUCHI H,, Solid State Commun, 74 (1990) 1261.
[13) WANG H. H., CARLSON K. D., GEISER U., KWOK W. K., VASHON M. D,, THOMPSON J, E,, LARSEN N. F., MCCABE G. D., HULSCHER R. S. and WILLIAMS J. M.,
Physica
C 166 (1990) 57.N° 5 MAGNETORESISTANCE STUDIES OF
(ET)~TlHg(SCN)~
l199[14] SASAKI T., TOYOTA N., ToKumoTo M., KINOSHITA N, and ANzAI H., Solid State Commun. 75 (1990) 93.
[lsj TOKUMOTO M,, SWANSON A, G,, BROOKS J, S,, AGOSTA C, C,, HANNAHS S. T., KINOSHITA N.,
ANzAI H., TAMURA M., TAJIMA H., KURODA H. and ANDERSON J.R., in
Organic
superconductivity,
V. Z. Krezin and W. A. Little Eds.(Plenum
Press, New York,1990)
p. 167.
[16] SASAKI T., SATO H. and TOYOTA N., Synth. Met. 41.43 (1991) 2211.
[17j PRATT F. L., SINGLETON J., DOPORTO M., FISHER A. J., JANSSEN T, J. B. M,, PERENBOOM J. A. A. J., KURMOO M., HAYES W. and DAY P.,
Phys.
Rev. B 45 (1992) 13904.[18] KARTSOVNIK M. V., KOVALEV A. E., LAUKHIN V. N., PESOTSKII S. I. and KusHcH H. D., Pis'ma v Zh. EkA.p. Teor. Fiz. 55
(1992)
337 [JETP Lett. 55(1992)
339].[19] OSADA T., KAGOSHIMA S. and MIURA N.,
Phys.
Rev. B 46 (1992) 1812.[20j
SCHEGOLEV A, I,, LAUKHIN V. N,, KHOMENKO A. G., KARTSOVNIK M. V., SHIBAEVA R. P., ROzENBERG L. P. and KOVALEV A. E., J. Phys. I France, in press.[21] LEBED'A. G., Pis'ma v Zh.
Eksp.
Teor. Fiz. 43 (1986) 137[JETP
Lett. 43(1986)
174].[22] LEBED' A. G. and BAK P.,
Phys.
Rev. Lett. 63 (1989) 1315.[23] MONTAMBAUX G. and LITTLEWOOD P. B.,
Phys.
Rev. Lett. 62 (1989) 953.[24] YAKOVENKO V. M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 (1992) 3607.
[25] NAUGHTON M. J., CHUNG O. H., CHAPARABA M., Bu X. and COPPENS P.,
Phys.
Rev. Lett. 67 (1991) 3712.[26] SHOENBERG D.,
MagneIic
oscillations in metals(Cambridge University
Press,Cambridge,
1984).[27] KARTSOVNIK M. V., LAUKHIN V. N. and GILEWSKII A., unpublished.
[28j WOSNITZA J., CRABTREE G. W., WANG H. H., GEISER U., WILLIAMS J. M, and CARLSON K. D., Phys. Rev. B 45, 6 (1991) 3018.