• Aucun résultat trouvé

Coordinating the fight against invasive alien species: 8 years of operational planning in Reunion Island

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Coordinating the fight against invasive alien species: 8 years of operational planning in Reunion Island"

Copied!
4
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Université de la Réunion

Campus du Moufia

POSTERS

(2)

Island Biology

Book of Abstracts

Posters

Third International Conference

on Island Ecology, Evolution and Conservation

8-13 July 2019 University of La R´eunion

Saint Denis, France

(3)

75

Coordinating the fight against invasive alien species: 8 years of

operational planning in Reunion Island

Alexia Dievart ∗† 1, Coline Schartz 1, Isabelle Bracco 1, Elise Amy 2, Bernadette Ardon 3,

Patricia Armand 4, Sarah Caceres 5, Christophe Lavergne 6, Nicolas Payet 7, Benoit Lequette

2, Ronald Manikom 7, Nicolas Payet 8, Mathieu Rouget 9, Marc Salamolard 2, Dominique

Strasberg 10, Julien Triolo 11

1 Direction de l’Environnement, de l’Am´enagement et du Logement de La R´eunion (DEAL R´eunion) – Parc de

la Providence, 12 All´ee de la Forˆet, 97 400 SAINT-DENIS, R´eunion

2 Parc national de La R´eunion (PNRun) – 258 Rue de la R´epublique, 97431 LA PLAINE DES PALMISTES,

R´eunion

3 Soci´et´e R´eunionnaise pour l’ ´Etude et la Protection de l’ENvironnement – R´eunion Nature Environnement

(SREPEN-RNE) – 30 Rue des Deux-Canons, 97 490 SAINTE-CLOTILDE, R´eunion

4 egion R´eunion – Hˆotel de R´egion Pierre LAGOURGUE, Avenue Ren´e Cassin Moufia, B.P 67190, 97 801

SAINT DENIS MESSAG CEDEX 9, R´eunion

5 Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage (ONCFS) – Parc de la Providence, 12 All´ee de la Forˆet,

97 400 SAINT-DENIS, R´eunion

6Conservatoire Botanique National de Mascarin (CBN-CPIE Mascarin) – 2 Rue du Pere Georges, 97436,

St-Leu, R´eunion

7 Direction de l’Alimentation, de l’Agriculture et de la Forˆet de La R´eunion (DAAF R´eunion) – Parc de la

Providence, All´ee de la Forˆet, 97 400 SAINT-DENIS, R´eunion

8epartement de La R´eunion – 2 Rue de la Source, 97488 SAINT-DENIS CEDEX, R´eunion 9 CIRAD UMR Peuplements v´eg´etaux et bioagresseurs en mileu tropical (UMR PVBMT) – 7 chemin de

l’IRAT, 97410 SAINT PIERRE, R´eunion

10 Universit´e de la R´eunion (UR) – 15, avenue Ren´e Cassin - CS92003 -97744 Saint Denis Cedex 9, R´eunion 11Office national des forˆets (ONF) – Boulevard de la Providence, 97400, Saint-Denis, R´eunion

Invasive alien species (IAS) are acknowledged as one of the major causes of biodiversity loss world-wide, especially in oceanic islands. In Reunion Island, pristine natural habitats cover 30% of the territory, the largest area of intact habitats in the Mascarene Archipelago. To ensure the protection of these habitats and rare species, a national park was establised in 2007, protecting 42% of the is-land’s area, and has since been included on UNESCO’s 2010 World Heritage List. To tackle biological invasions, an IAS Strategy was developed in Reunion Island in 2010 and implemented in two Opera-tional Control Plans for Invasive Species (2010-2013 and 2014-2017). Here, we used semi-structured interviews, SWOT analyses, workshops and all relevant data and references about biological invasions in Reunion Island to assess the efficiency of these plans. Costs over 8 years amounted to e 20 million and were mainly allocated to control the expansion of IAS. We identified the most important inva-sive species in terrestrial biomes and developed an online public detection platform to enable prompt, practical responses to new invasions on the island. Hence, early detection of the house crow (Corvus splendens) and the African herb dream (Entada rheedii ) have allowed their eradication. The efforts of various stakeholders (public institutions, research organizations, universities, associations) is at the heart of the control of IAS in Reunion Island. The diversity of stakeholders allowed work to take place simultaneously on several fronts. Despite significant spending for the island and a strong local effort, biological invasions appear to have increased in many protected areas, causing UNESCO World

Speaker

Corresponding author: alexia.dievart@hotmail.fr

(4)

Heritage to drop their conservation status for the island in 2017. Our findings suggest that the IAS Strategy in Reunion Island should be substantially modified if impacts are to be effectively mitigated. Rather than attempting to operate on all species and in all areas, prioritizing both species and areas and setting goals and monitoring their effectiveness through indicators within a framework of adaptive management is essential. Strengthening regulation to prohibit entry of new species is necessary. A greater proportion of human and financial resources should also be allocated to the control against IAS.

Keywords: invasive alien species, Reunion Island, strategy, control, operational planning

Références

Documents relatifs

Before the invasive biotype B (currently known as Middle East-Asia Minor 1 cryptic species) of Bemisia tabaci spread across the world, Reunion Island (South West Indian

Furthermore, other non obligatory endosymbionts, so-called secondary endosymbionts, are known to be linked to adaptive traits which can enhance invasiveness of their host..

To increase local meat production, breeders are primarily oriented to the Boer goat.. But any importation of ruminants is however forbidden for

n The species colonised natural and artificial wetlands in the two regions, notably the park and national nature reserve in the town of Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, as well as

n In 2009, a steering committee for invasive plant species was set up by the water stakeholders in the river basin to identify their mutual needs and define the necessary

complimentary expertise across taxa in each of the respective terrestrial, freshwater and marine environments.. Each expert was given an IAS list relevant to his/her group.

Mean ± standard error estimated finite rate of increase (λ) in Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti at 25 ◦ C in each diet condition (optimal diet in solid lines, limited diet in

The natural areas where management has been performed are smaller than the agricultural areas managed in the context of the noxious weed status, but the