• Aucun résultat trouvé

Complex reflection groups as Weyl groups

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Complex reflection groups as Weyl groups"

Copied!
51
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Complex reflection groups as Weyl groups

Michel Brou´e

Institut Henri–Poincar´e

July 2007

(2)

FINITE COMPLEX REFLECTION GROUPS

Afinite reflection group onK is a finite subgroup of GLK(V) (V a finite dimensional K–vector space) generated by pseudo–reflections, i.e., linear maps represented by

ζ 0 · · · 0 0 1 · · · 0 ... ... . .. ... 0 0 · · · 1

A finite reflection group on Ris called a Coxeter group. A finite reflection group on Qis called a Weyl group.

(3)

FINITE COMPLEX REFLECTION GROUPS Let K be a characteristic zero field.

Afinite reflection group onK is a finite subgroup of GLK(V) (V a finite dimensional K–vector space) generated by pseudo–reflections, i.e., linear maps represented by

ζ 0 · · · 0 0 1 · · · 0 ... ... . .. ... 0 0 · · · 1

A finite reflection group on Ris called a Coxeter group. A finite reflection group on Qis called a Weyl group.

(4)

FINITE COMPLEX REFLECTION GROUPS

Let K be a characteristic zero field.

Afinite reflection group onK is a finite subgroup of GLK(V) (V a finite dimensional K–vector space) generated by pseudo–reflections, i.e., linear maps represented by

ζ 0 · · · 0 0 1 · · · 0 ... ... . .. ...

0 0 · · · 1

R

A finite reflection group on Qis called a Weyl group.

(5)

FINITE COMPLEX REFLECTION GROUPS

Let K be a characteristic zero field.

Afinite reflection group onK is a finite subgroup of GLK(V) (V a finite dimensional K–vector space) generated by pseudo–reflections, i.e., linear maps represented by

ζ 0 · · · 0 0 1 · · · 0 ... ... . .. ...

0 0 · · · 1

A finite reflection group on Ris called a Coxeter group.

A finite reflection group on Qis called a Weyl group.

(6)

Let K be a characteristic zero field.

Afinite reflection group onK is a finite subgroup of GLK(V) (V a finite dimensional K–vector space) generated by pseudo–reflections, i.e., linear maps represented by

ζ 0 · · · 0 0 1 · · · 0 ... ... . .. ...

0 0 · · · 1

A finite reflection group on is called a Coxeter group.

(7)

1 The finite reflection groups on Chave been classified by Coxeter, Shephard and Todd.

There is one infinite seriesG(de,e,r) (d ,eandr integers), ...and 34 exceptional groupsG4,G5, . . . ,G37.

2 The group G(de,e,r) (d ,e andr integers) consists of all r×r monomial matrices with entries inµde such that the product of entries belongs toµd.

3 We have

G(d,1,r)'CdoSr

G(e,e,2) =D2e (dihedral group of order 2e) G(2,2,r) =W(Dr).

(8)

1 The finite reflection groups on Chave been classified by Coxeter, Shephard and Todd.

There is one infinite seriesG(de,e,r) (d ,eandr integers),

2 The group G(de,e,r) (d ,e andr integers) consists of all r×r monomial matrices with entries inµde such that the product of entries belongs toµd.

3 We have

G(d,1,r)'CdoSr

G(e,e,2) =D2e (dihedral group of order 2e) G(2,2,r) =W(Dr).

(9)

1 The finite reflection groups on Chave been classified by Coxeter, Shephard and Todd.

There is one infinite seriesG(de,e,r) (d ,eandr integers), ...and 34 exceptional groupsG4,G5, . . . ,G37.

2 The group G(de,e,r) (d ,e andr integers) consists of all r×r monomial matrices with entries inµde such that the product of entries belongs toµd.

3 We have

G(d,1,r)'CdoSr

G(e,e,2) =D2e (dihedral group of order 2e) G(2,2,r) =W(Dr).

(10)

1 The finite reflection groups on Chave been classified by Coxeter, Shephard and Todd.

There is one infinite seriesG(de,e,r) (d ,eandr integers), ...and 34 exceptional groupsG4,G5, . . . ,G37.

2 The group G(de,e,r) (d ,e andr integers) consists of all r×r monomial matrices with entries inµde such that the product of entries belongs toµd.

G(d,1,r)'CdoSr

G(e,e,2) =D2e (dihedral group of order 2e) G(2,2,r) =W(Dr).

(11)

1 The finite reflection groups on Chave been classified by Coxeter, Shephard and Todd.

There is one infinite seriesG(de,e,r) (d ,eandr integers), ...and 34 exceptional groupsG4,G5, . . . ,G37.

2 The group G(de,e,r) (d ,e andr integers) consists of all r×r monomial matrices with entries inµde such that the product of entries belongs toµd.

3 We have

G(d,1,r)'CdoSr

G(e,e,2) =D2e (dihedral group of order 2e) G(2,2,r) =W(Dr).

(12)

FINITE REDUCTIVE GROUPS : POLYNOMIAL ORDER

G is a connected reductive algebraic group over ¯Fq, with Weyl group W, endowed with a Frobenius–like endomorphism F. The group G :=GF is a finite reductive group.

G= GLn(¯Fq) , F : (ai,j)7→(aqi,j), G = GLn(q)

Type of G— The typeG= (X,Y,R,R;Wφ) of G consists of the root datum of Gendowed with the outer automorphismWφdefined byF.

Example

GLn= (X =Y =Zn,R =R =An;φ= 1)

(13)

FINITE REDUCTIVE GROUPS : POLYNOMIAL ORDER

G is a connected reductive algebraic group over ¯Fq, with Weyl group W, endowed with a Frobenius–like endomorphism F. The group G :=GF is a finite reductive group.

Example

G= GLn(¯Fq) , F : (ai,j)7→(aqi,j), G = GLn(q)

Type of G— The typeG= (X,Y,R,R;Wφ) of G consists of the root datum of Gendowed with the outer automorphismWφdefined byF.

Example

GLn= (X =Y =Zn,R =R =An;φ= 1)

(14)

FINITE REDUCTIVE GROUPS : POLYNOMIAL ORDER

G is a connected reductive algebraic group over ¯Fq, with Weyl group W, endowed with a Frobenius–like endomorphism F. The group G :=GF is a finite reductive group.

Example

G= GLn(¯Fq) , F : (ai,j)7→(aqi,j), G = GLn(q)

Type of G— The typeG= (X,Y,R,R;Wφ) of G consists of the root datum of Gendowed with the outer automorphismWφdefined byF.

GLn= (X =Y =Zn,R =R =An;φ= 1)

(15)

FINITE REDUCTIVE GROUPS : POLYNOMIAL ORDER

G is a connected reductive algebraic group over ¯Fq, with Weyl group W, endowed with a Frobenius–like endomorphism F. The group G :=GF is a finite reductive group.

Example

G= GLn(¯Fq) , F : (ai,j)7→(aqi,j), G = GLn(q)

Type of G— The typeG= (X,Y,R,R;Wφ) of G consists of the root datum of Gendowed with the outer automorphismWφdefined byF.

Example

GLn = (X =Y =Zn,R =R =An;φ= 1)

(16)

Polynomial order —There is a polynomial in Z[x]

|G|(x) =xNY

d

Φd(x)a(d)

such that |G|(q) =|G|.

|GLn|(x) =x(n2)d=nY

d=1

(xd−1) =x(n2)d=nY

d=1

Φd(x)[n/d]

(17)

Polynomial order —There is a polynomial in Z[x]

|G|(x) =xNY

d

Φd(x)a(d)

such that |G|(q) =|G|. Example

|GLn|(x) =x(n2)d=nY

d=1

(xd−1) =x(n2)d=nY

d=1

Φd(x)[n/d]

(18)

Admissible subgroups — The toriofG are the subgroups of the shape TF whereT is anF–stable torus (i.e., isomorphic to some

×× · · · ×F¯× in G).

The Levi subgroupsof G are the subgroups of the shape LF where L is a centralizer of anF–stable torus inG.

The split maximal torusT1 = (F×q)n of order (q−1)n The Coxeter maximal torusTc = GL1(Fqn) of order qn−1

Levi subgroups have shape GLn1(qa1)× · · · ×GLns(qas) Cauchy theorem — The (polynomial) order of an admissible subgroup divides the (polynomial) order of the group.

(19)

Admissible subgroups — The toriofG are the subgroups of the shape TF whereT is anF–stable torus (i.e., isomorphic to some

×× · · · ×F¯× in G).

The Levi subgroupsof G are the subgroups of the shape LF where L is a centralizer of anF–stable torus inG.

Example

The split maximal torusT1 = (F×q)n of order (q−1)n The Coxeter maximal torusTc = GL1(Fqn) of order qn−1

Levi subgroups have shape GLn1(qa1)× · · · ×GLns(qas)

Cauchy theorem — The (polynomial) order of an admissible subgroup divides the (polynomial) order of the group.

(20)

TF whereT is anF–stable torus (i.e., isomorphic to some F¯×× · · · ×F¯× in G).

The Levi subgroupsof G are the subgroups of the shape LF where L is a centralizer of anF–stable torus inG.

Example

The split maximal torusT1 = (F×q)n of order (q−1)n The Coxeter maximal torusTc = GL1(Fqn) of order qn−1

Levi subgroups have shape GLn1(qa1)× · · · ×GLns(qas)

(21)

Levi subgroups and type — For

G= (X,Y,R,R;Wφ) a type, a Levi subtype ofG is a type of the shape

L= (X,Y,R0,R0∨;W0wφ)

whereR0 is a parabolic system ofR, with Weyl groupW0, and where w ∈W is such thatwφstablizesR0 andR0∨.

There is a natural bijection between

the set ofG–conjugacy classes of Levi subgroups ofG, and

the set ofW–conjugacy classes of Levi subtypes ofG.

(22)

Levi subgroups and type — For

G= (X,Y,R,R;Wφ) a type, a Levi subtype ofG is a type of the shape

L= (X,Y,R0,R0∨;W0wφ)

whereR0 is a parabolic system ofR, with Weyl groupW0, and where w ∈W is such thatwφstablizesR0 andR0∨.

There is a natural bijection between

and

the set ofW–conjugacy classes of Levi subtypes ofG.

(23)

Levi subgroups and type — For

G= (X,Y,R,R;Wφ) a type, a Levi subtype ofG is a type of the shape

L= (X,Y,R0,R0∨;W0wφ)

whereR0 is a parabolic system ofR, with Weyl groupW0, and where w ∈W is such thatwφstablizesR0 andR0∨.

There is a natural bijection between

the set ofG–conjugacy classes of Levi subgroups ofG,

and

the set ofW–conjugacy classes of Levi subtypes ofG.

(24)

Levi subgroups and type — For

G= (X,Y,R,R;Wφ) a type, a Levi subtype ofG is a type of the shape

L= (X,Y,R0,R0∨;W0wφ)

whereR0 is a parabolic system ofR, with Weyl groupW0, and where w ∈W is such thatwφstablizesR0 andR0∨.

There is a natural bijection between

the set ofG–conjugacy classes of Levi subgroups ofG,

G

(25)

Levi subgroups and type — For

G= (X,Y,R,R;Wφ) a type, a Levi subtype ofG is a type of the shape

L= (X,Y,R0,R0∨;W0wφ)

whereR0 is a parabolic system ofR, with Weyl groupW0, and where w ∈W is such thatwφstablizesR0 andR0∨.

There is a natural bijection between

the set ofG–conjugacy classes of Levi subgroups ofG, and

the set ofW–conjugacy classes of Levi subtypes ofG.

(26)

FINITE REDUCTIVE GROUPS : THE SYLOW THEOREMS

For Φ(x) a cyclotomic polynomial, a Φ(x)–group is a finite reductive group whose (polynomial) order is a power of Φ(x). Hence such a group is a torus.

Sylow theorem —

(polynomial) order the contribution of Φ(x) to the (polynomial) order ofG.

(2) Sylow Φ(x)–subgroups are all conjugate byG (i.e., their types are transitively permuted by the Weyl groupW).

(3) The (polynomial) index of the normalizer inG of a Sylow Φ(x)–subgroup is congruent to 1 modulo Φ(x).

(27)

FINITE REDUCTIVE GROUPS : THE SYLOW THEOREMS

For Φ(x) a cyclotomic polynomial, a Φ(x)–group is a finite reductive group whose (polynomial) order is a power of Φ(x). Hence such a group is a torus.

Sylow theorem —

(1) Maximal Φ(x)–subgroups (“Sylow Φ(x)–subgroups”) ofG have as (polynomial) order the contribution of Φ(x) to the (polynomial) order ofG.

(2) Sylow Φ(x)–subgroups are all conjugate byG (i.e., their types are transitively permuted by the Weyl groupW).

(3) The (polynomial) index of the normalizer inG of a Sylow Φ(x)–subgroup is congruent to 1 modulo Φ(x).

(28)

FINITE REDUCTIVE GROUPS : THE SYLOW THEOREMS

For Φ(x) a cyclotomic polynomial, a Φ(x)–group is a finite reductive group whose (polynomial) order is a power of Φ(x). Hence such a group is a torus.

Sylow theorem —

(polynomial) order the contribution of Φ(x) to the (polynomial) order ofG.

(2) Sylow Φ(x)–subgroups are all conjugate byG (i.e., their types are transitively permuted by the Weyl groupW).

(3) The (polynomial) index of the normalizer inG of a Sylow Φ(x)–subgroup is congruent to 1 modulo Φ(x).

(29)

FINITE REDUCTIVE GROUPS : THE SYLOW THEOREMS

For Φ(x) a cyclotomic polynomial, a Φ(x)–group is a finite reductive group whose (polynomial) order is a power of Φ(x). Hence such a group is a torus.

Sylow theorem —

(1) Maximal Φ(x)–subgroups (“Sylow Φ(x)–subgroups”) ofG have as (polynomial) order the contribution of Φ(x) to the (polynomial) order ofG.

(2) Sylow Φ(x)–subgroups are all conjugate byG (i.e., their types are transitively permuted by the Weyl groupW).

(3) The (polynomial) index of the normalizer inG of a Sylow Φ(x)–subgroup is congruent to 1 modulo Φ(x).

(30)

FINITE REDUCTIVE GROUPS : THE SYLOW THEOREMS

For Φ(x) a cyclotomic polynomial, a Φ(x)–group is a finite reductive group whose (polynomial) order is a power of Φ(x). Hence such a group is a torus.

Sylow theorem —

(1) Maximal Φ(x)–subgroups (“Sylow Φ(x)–subgroups”) ofG have as (polynomial) order the contribution of Φ(x) to the (polynomial) order ofG.

(2) Sylow Φ(x)–subgroups are all conjugate byG (i.e., their types are transitively permuted by the Weyl groupW).

Φ(x)–subgroup is congruent to 1 modulo Φ(x).

(31)

FINITE REDUCTIVE GROUPS : THE SYLOW THEOREMS

For Φ(x) a cyclotomic polynomial, a Φ(x)–group is a finite reductive group whose (polynomial) order is a power of Φ(x). Hence such a group is a torus.

Sylow theorem —

(1) Maximal Φ(x)–subgroups (“Sylow Φ(x)–subgroups”) ofG have as (polynomial) order the contribution of Φ(x) to the (polynomial) order ofG.

(2) Sylow Φ(x)–subgroups are all conjugate byG (i.e., their types are transitively permuted by the Weyl groupW).

(3) The (polynomial) index of the normalizer inG of a Sylow Φ(x)–subgroup is congruent to 1 modulo Φ(x).

(32)

The centralizers of Φd(x)–subgroups are called thed–split Levi subgroups.

Φd(x)–subgroups. They are all conjugate underG. Example

For eachd (1≤d ≤n), GLn(q) contains a subtorus of order Φd(x)[nd]

Assume n=md+r withr <d. Then a minimal d–split Levi subgroup has shape GL1(qd)m×GLr(q).

(33)

The centralizers of Φd(x)–subgroups are called thed–split Levi subgroups.

The minimal d–split Levi subgroups are the centralizers of Sylow Φd(x)–subgroups. They are all conjugate underG.

Example

For eachd (1≤d ≤n), GLn(q) contains a subtorus of order Φd(x)[nd]

Assume n=md+r withr <d. Then a minimal d–split Levi subgroup has shape GL1(qd)m×GLr(q).

(34)

The centralizers of Φd(x)–subgroups are called thed–split Levi subgroups.

The minimal d–split Levi subgroups are the centralizers of Sylow Φd(x)–subgroups. They are all conjugate underG.

Example

For eachd (1 d n), GLn(q) contains a subtorus of order Φd(x)[nd]

Assume n=md+r withr <d. Then a minimal d–split Levi subgroup has shape GL1(qd)m×GLr(q).

(35)

The centralizers of Φd(x)–subgroups are called thed–split Levi subgroups.

The minimal d–split Levi subgroups are the centralizers of Sylow Φd(x)–subgroups. They are all conjugate underG.

Example

For eachd (1≤d ≤n), GLn(q) contains a subtorus of order Φd(x)[nd]

Assume n=md+r withr <d. Then a minimal d–split Levi subgroup has shape GL1(qd)m×GLr(q).

(36)

d

subgroups.

The minimal d–split Levi subgroups are the centralizers of Sylow Φd(x)–subgroups. They are all conjugate underG.

Example

For eachd (1≤d ≤n), GLn(q) contains a subtorus of order Φd(x)[nd]

Assume n=md+r with r <d. Then a minimal d–split Levi subgroup has shape GL1(qd)m×GLr(q).

(37)

GENERIC AND ORDINARY SYLOW SUBGROUPS

Let `be a prime number which does not divide|W|.

If`divides|G|=G(q), there is a unique integer d such that`divides Φd(q).

Then the Sylow `–subgroups ofG are nothing but the Sylow

`–subgroupsS` of S =SF (Sa Sylow Φd(x)–subgroup of G). We have

NG(S`) =NG(S) and CG(S`) =CG(S).

(38)

GENERIC AND ORDINARY SYLOW SUBGROUPS Let `be a prime number which does not divide|W|.

G Φd(q).

Then the Sylow `–subgroups ofG are nothing but the Sylow

`–subgroupsS` of S =SF (Sa Sylow Φd(x)–subgroup of G). We have

NG(S`) =NG(S) and CG(S`) =CG(S).

(39)

GENERIC AND ORDINARY SYLOW SUBGROUPS

Let `be a prime number which does not divide|W|.

If`divides|G|=G(q), there is a unique integer d such that`divides Φd(q).

Then the Sylow `–subgroups ofG are nothing but the Sylow

`–subgroupsS` of S =SF (Sa Sylow Φd(x)–subgroup of G). We have

NG(S`) =NG(S) and CG(S`) =CG(S).

(40)

GENERIC AND ORDINARY SYLOW SUBGROUPS

Let `be a prime number which does not divide|W|.

If`divides|G|=G(q), there is a unique integer d such that`divides Φd(q).

Then the Sylow `–subgroups ofG are nothing but the Sylow

`–subgroupsS` of S =SF (Sa Sylow Φd(x)–subgroup of G).

NG(S`) =NG(S) and CG(S`) =CG(S).

(41)

GENERIC AND ORDINARY SYLOW SUBGROUPS

Let `be a prime number which does not divide|W|.

If`divides|G|=G(q), there is a unique integer d such that`divides Φd(q).

Then the Sylow `–subgroups ofG are nothing but the Sylow

`–subgroupsS` of S =SF (Sa Sylow Φd(x)–subgroup of G).

We have

NG(S`) =NG(S) and CG(S`) =CG(S).

(42)

CYCLOTOMIC WEYL GROUPS AND SPRINGER THEOREM

Let L(orL, orL) be a minimal d–split Levi subgroup, the centralizer of a Sylow Φd(x)–subgroupS.

G ' G G ' W L

Weyl group ofL).

Denote that group byWG(L).

(2) Forζ a primitived-th root of the unity, we have

|WG(L)|=G(ζ)/L(ζ).

Example

Forn =mr+d (d <r), we have WG(L)'CdoSr

(43)

CYCLOTOMIC WEYL GROUPS AND SPRINGER THEOREM Let L(orL, orL) be a minimal d–split Levi subgroup, the centralizer of a Sylow Φd(x)–subgroupS.

(1) We haveNG(L)/L'NG(S)/CG(S)'NW(L)/W0 (where W0 is the Weyl group ofL).

Denote that group byWG(L).

(2) Forζ a primitived-th root of the unity, we have

|WG(L)|=G(ζ)/L(ζ).

Example

Forn =mr+d (d <r), we have WG(L)'CdoSr

(44)

CYCLOTOMIC WEYL GROUPS AND SPRINGER THEOREM Let L(orL, orL) be a minimal d–split Levi subgroup, the centralizer of a Sylow Φd(x)–subgroupS.

(1) We haveNG(L)/L'NG(S)/CG(S)'NW(L)/W0 (where W0 is the Weyl group ofL).

Denote that group byWG(L).

|WG(L)|=G(ζ)/L(ζ).

Example

Forn =mr+d (d <r), we have WG(L)'CdoSr

(45)

CYCLOTOMIC WEYL GROUPS AND SPRINGER THEOREM Let L(orL, orL) be a minimal d–split Levi subgroup, the centralizer of a Sylow Φd(x)–subgroupS.

(1) We haveNG(L)/L'NG(S)/CG(S)'NW(L)/W0 (where W0 is the Weyl group ofL).

Denote that group byWG(L).

(2) Forζ a primitived-th root of the unity, we have

|WG(L)|=G(ζ)/L(ζ).

Example

Forn =mr+d (d <r), we have WG(L)'CdoSr

(46)

Let L(orL, orL) be a minimal d–split Levi subgroup, the centralizer of a Sylow Φd(x)–subgroupS.

(1) We haveNG(L)/L'NG(S)/CG(S)'NW(L)/W0 (where W0 is the Weyl group ofL).

Denote that group byWG(L).

(2) Forζ a primitived-th root of the unity, we have

|WG(L)|=G(ζ)/L(ζ).

Example

(47)

The case d = 1 — The Sylow Φ1(x)–subgroups, as well as the minimal d–split subgroups, coincide with the split maximal tori.

In case Gis split (i.e., the automorphism φinduced by F is the identity), then the groupWG(L) coincides withW.

Springer and Springer–Lehrer theorem —The group WG(L) is a complex reflection group (in its representation over the complex vector spaceC⊗X((ZL)Φd)).

Example

Forn =mr+d (d <r), we have WG(L)'CdoSr The group WG(L) is called thed–cyclotomic Weyl group.

IfG is split, the 1–cyclotomic Weyl group is nothing but the ordinary Weyl group W.

(48)

The case d = 1 — The Sylow Φ1(x)–subgroups, as well as the minimal d–split subgroups, coincide with the split maximal tori.

In case Gis split (i.e., the automorphism φinduced by F is the identity), then the groupWG(L) coincides withW.

G L complex reflection group (in its representation over the complex vector spaceC⊗X((ZL)Φd)).

Example

Forn =mr+d (d <r), we have WG(L)'CdoSr The group WG(L) is called thed–cyclotomic Weyl group.

IfG is split, the 1–cyclotomic Weyl group is nothing but the ordinary Weyl group W.

(49)

The case d = 1 — The Sylow Φ1(x)–subgroups, as well as the minimal d–split subgroups, coincide with the split maximal tori.

In case Gis split (i.e., the automorphism φinduced by F is the identity), then the groupWG(L) coincides withW.

Springer and Springer–Lehrer theorem —The group WG(L) is a complex reflection group (in its representation over the complex vector spaceC⊗X((ZL)Φd)).

Example

Forn =mr+d (d <r), we have WG(L)'CdoSr The group WG(L) is called thed–cyclotomic Weyl group.

IfG is split, the 1–cyclotomic Weyl group is nothing but the ordinary Weyl group W.

(50)

The case d = 1 — The Sylow Φ1(x)–subgroups, as well as the minimal d–split subgroups, coincide with the split maximal tori.

In case Gis split (i.e., the automorphism φinduced by F is the identity), then the groupWG(L) coincides withW.

Springer and Springer–Lehrer theorem —The group WG(L) is a complex reflection group (in its representation over the complex vector spaceC⊗X((ZL)Φd)).

Example

Forn =mr+d (d <r), we have WG(L)'CdoSr

G L

IfG is split, the 1–cyclotomic Weyl group is nothing but the ordinary Weyl group W.

(51)

The case d = 1 — The Sylow Φ1(x)–subgroups, as well as the minimal d–split subgroups, coincide with the split maximal tori.

In case Gis split (i.e., the automorphism φinduced by F is the identity), then the groupWG(L) coincides withW.

Springer and Springer–Lehrer theorem —The group WG(L) is a complex reflection group (in its representation over the complex vector spaceC⊗X((ZL)Φd)).

Example

Forn =mr+d (d <r), we have WG(L)'CdoSr The group WG(L) is called thed–cyclotomic Weyl group.

IfG is split, the 1–cyclotomic Weyl group is nothing but the ordinary Weyl group W.

Références

Documents relatifs

We now use the representations obtained above for 2 and 3-dimensional exceptional groups in order to verify some of the conjectures on the structure of cyclotomic Hecke algebras

The paper is organized as follows: 1-2 contain preliminaries on the soft and hard liberation operations, in 3-4 we discuss the quantum reflection groups, in 5-6 we discuss the

In this section we introduce, for any finite Coxeter system (W, S), a statistic defined in terms of odd reflections. We also prove product formulas for its sign-twisted

The most important advances in the analysis of the infinite simple groups of finite Morley rank have drawn upon three mathematical resources: the theory of linear algebraic groups

In [Bon2], the author constructs singular curves and surfaces arising from invariants of com- plex reflection groups by using extensive computations (see also [Bon1]).. For

It has recently been discovered that complex reflec- tion groups play a key role in the theory of finite reductive groups, giving rise as they do to braid groups and generalized

Complex reflection groups in representations of finite reductive groups. Michel

Complex reflection groups and associated braid groups. Michel