• Aucun résultat trouvé

(Probabilistic) Description Logics

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "(Probabilistic) Description Logics"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Technical Communications of ICLP 2015. Copyright with the Authors. 1

(Probabilistic) Description Logics

Evelina Lamma

University of Ferrara, Italy (e-mail:[email protected])

Abstract

The Semantic Web aims at making information available in a form that is understandable and automatically manageable by machines. Ontologies are engineering artifacts used to this purpose, and Description Logics (DLs) are a family of logic-based languages par- ticularly suitable for modeling (and reasoning upon) ontologies and the Semantic Web.

Great effort has been spent in identifying decidable or even tractable DLs. Efficient DLs reasoners have been implemented in procedural, object-oriented languages or Prolog.

Nonetheless, incompleteness or uncertainty is intrinsic of much information on the World Wide Web. This motivated the research in Probabilistic DLs, some of which derived from approaches from the Logic Programming area. Conversely, for knowledge representation and reasoning, integration with rules and rule-based reasoning is also crucial in the so- called Semantic Web stack vision.

In this talk, I will focus on probabilistic DLs. First, I will briefly overview DLs and reasoning systems. After recalling the Distribution Semantics from Probabilistic Logic Programming, I will show how it and other probabilistic approaches have been applied to DLs, and what inference systems for Probabilistic DLs are available. Learning Probabilistic DL theories is also an interesting issue. A demo of a Web-based system for Probabilistic DLs implemented in SWI Prolog, and SWISH, will conclude this part of the talk.

A further research activity has been conducted by the AI and LP community in order to facilitate the integration of DL theories with rules and rule-based reasoning, since this is also crucial in the Semantic Web. Proposals like Datalog+/- and its extensions, ASP-based systems or Abductive Logic Programming for modeling and reasoning upon ontologies, are significant attempts which should be considered seriously by the LP community. I will briefly mention these approaches, ending the talk.

Références

Documents relatifs

We overview two systems we hve implemented: EDGE, that returns the value of the probabilities associated with axioms tuned using an Expectation Maximization algorithm, and LEAP,

EDGE [14] is based on the algorithm EMBLEM [4, 3] developed for learning the parameters for probabilistic logic programs under the distribution semantics.. EDGE adapts EMBLEM to

Note that if we are confronted with a strict query (classical inclusion axiom C v D), one can determine if it is in the Rational Closure of the KB by checking if it is

Suppose that the Italian News context C in contains the facts that Rooney does not take part to the Italian league in 2010, i.e., ¬> i (Rooney), and that he is not considered a

In this paper we propose and test an algorithm that learns concept definitions using an inductive logic programming approach and then learns probabilistic inclusions using

Unfortunately, using Type 2 semantics to interpret different kinds of probabili- ties complicates not only the representation of statistics but also the combination of

Inspired by the success of Inductive Logic Programming (ILP) [4] and statistical machine learning, in this paper we describe methods that learn ontologies in the recently

Interestingly, in our extension of P-SHIQ (see Section 3) they do (as they should)... The proof will proceed by construction, i.e. It can be achieved by defining a