• Aucun résultat trouvé

Preface

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Preface"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Preface

Aims and scope of the workshop Information for real life AI applications is usually pervaded by uncertainty and subject to change, and thus demands for non-classical reasoning approaches. At the same time, psychological findings in- dicate that human reasoning cannot be completely described by classical logical systems. Knowledge representation o↵ers a rich palette of methods for uncertain reasoning both to describe human reasoning and to model AI approaches. Its many facets like qualitative vs. quantitative reasoning, defeasible and analogical reasoning, causal reasoning for action and planning, as well as nonmonotonic- ity and belief revision, including techniques from machine learning, among many others, have become very active fields of research. Beyond computational aspects, these methods aim to reflect the rich variety of human reasoning in uncertain and dynamic environments. The aim of this series of workshops is to address re- cent challenges and to present novel approaches to uncertain reasoning and belief change in their broad senses, and in particular provide a forum for research work linking di↵erent paradigms of formal and cognitive reasoning. Previous events of the Workshop on Dynamics of Knowledge and Belief (DKB) took place in Os- nabr¨uck (2007), Paderborn (2009), Berlin (2011), and Koblenz (2013), previous editions of the Workshop on KI & Kognition (KIK) took place in Saarbr¨ucken (2012), Koblenz (2013), and Stuttgart (2014), and joint workshops took place in Dresden (2015) and Dortmund (2017).

Focus of the workshop This year, again we put a special focus on papers that provide a base for connecting formal-logical models of knowledge representation and cognitive models of reasoning, addressing formal as well as experimental or heuristic issues. Reflecting this focus, the workshop Formal and Cognitive Rea- soning at KI 2018 was organized jointly by the GI special interest groups FG Wissensrepr¨asentation und Schließen and FG Kognition. This volume contains the papers presented at the DKB/KIK 2018 workshop on formal and cogni- tive reasoning held on 25-Sep-2018 in Berlin. There were seven submissions to the workshop. Each submission was reviewed by two program committee mem- bers. The committee decided to accept five papers. In consequence, the workshop hosted contributions from diverse fields such as ontology-based query answering, belief change, probabilistic reasoning, intelligent agents, and non-monotonic rea- soning. The program was enriched this year by two interesting keynote talks: Tom Gordon presented a computational model of argument based on argumentation

(2)

schemes that overcomes simplifying assumptions in many of the state-of-the-art approaches to computational argumentation and is able to address general prob- lem solving. Ute Schmid provided a brief history of machine learning research followed by a presentation of specific approaches of symbolic machine learning towards explainable AI.

Acknowledgments The organizers of this workshop would like to thank the or- ganizers of the KI 2018 conference in Berlin for their excellent support. We also would like to thank the members of the program committee for their help in selecting and improving the submitted papers, and finally all participants of the workshop for their contributions. Our wish is that new inspirations and collab- orations between the contributing disciplines will emerge from this workshop.

August 2018 Christoph Beierle

Gabriele Kern-Isberner Marco Ragni Frieder Stolzenburg Matthias Thimm (Chairs)

Références

Documents relatifs

We first introduce the notion of λ-K¨ onig relational graph model (Definition 6.5), and show that a relational graph model D is extensional and λ-K¨ onig exactly when the

1 We present a framework (abstract model) for categorizing knowledge-creating learning processes based on process modeling and Nonaka’s (SECI spiral) theory of knowledge

Product model as an effective support for design method In Section 5.1, different design methods have been assessed according to three specific criteria: concurrent engineering,

As we can see it is quite simple to establish the correspondence between system physical architecture PhysicalPart and the block Physical of the safety model: each Capella block has

Basic local alignment search tool (BLAST) searches in Haloarchaea using cytochrome b sequences from various bacterial and archaeal phyla (Rhodobacter, Sulfolobus, Heliobacterium,

Progam Comittee: Klaus-Dieter Althoff (DFKI), Kerstin Bach (Norwegian University of Science and Technology), Ralph Bergmann (Universität Trier), Michael Fellmann (Universi-

Focus of the workshop This year, again we put a special focus on papers that provide a base for connecting formal-logical models of knowledge representation and cognitive models

More precisely, the compositional account of productivity, that is, the generation of the intended reading of sentences exclusively by formal operations of lexically encoded