Window Flow Control in FIFO Networks with Cross Traffic
Texte intégral
Figure
Documents relatifs
Proof: If HP is a Hamiltonian i—j path obtained with the proposed algorithm, then adding edge ij we find a HC for which the cost is equal to:. It follows that c (SHC) ^ 2
OPTIMAL CONTROL OF THE TIME-VARYING FLOWS IN NETWORKS 339 A question to answer is where to place the end of queue x ; at t = (n+1) A in figure 3 representing the resulting
Given that in most cases of cross border traffic accidents, the victim/claimant has the choice between the courts of different countries (see all scenarios exposed above), before
Given that in most cases of cross border traffic accidents, the victim/claimant has the choice between the courts of different countries (see all scenarios exposed above), before
For conservative dieomorphisms and expanding maps, the study of the rates of injectivity will be the opportunity to understand the local behaviour of the dis- cretizations: we
Recalling the impossibility of doubting his existence and looking back to his “sum”-intuition, the Cartesian
But for finite depth foliations (which have two sided branching), there are many examples where it is impossible to make the pseudo-Anosov flow transverse to the foliation [Mo5] and
A second scheme is associated with a decentered shock-capturing–type space discretization: the II scheme for the viscous linearized Euler–Poisson (LVEP) system (see section 3.3)..