• Aucun résultat trouvé

Interprofessional care

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Interprofessional care"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

1206

  Canadian Family PhysicianLe Médecin de famille canadien  Vol 53: july • juillet 2007

Fast Facts

National Physician Survey

T

he 2004 National Physician Survey (NPS) asked FPs to indicate the kinds of health care providers with whom they shared patient care within their main patient care setting. Nationally, 87% of FPs shared care with other FPs, 48% of FPs shared care with nurses, and 40% of FPs shared care with other specialists. Family physicians also shared care with dieticians (28%), phar- macists (26%), social workers (25%), and physiothera- pists (25%). A smaller number of FPs shared care with psychologists (21%), occupational therapists (16%), and nurse practitioners (14%).

More female than male FPs shared care with the fol- lowing health care providers: other FPs, nurse practi- tioners, nurses, dieticians, psychologists, and social workers (P < .001); and occupational therapists (P < .05).

More male FPs than female FPs shared care with other specialists (P < .05). There was no difference in the pro- portion of male and female FPs sharing care with phys- iotherapists or pharmacists.

One third (33.6%) of FPs indicated that they shared care with 1 of the 10 types of health care providers listed above. Overall, 36.1% of FPs shared care with 2

to 4 of the 10 kinds of health care providers. This was more likely the case among female FPs than male FPs, and younger FPs than older FPs (Figure 1).

The analysis is based on the 88% of FP respondents (n = 9666) who indicated that they provided patient care, in addition to indicating the different kinds of health care providers with whom they shared patient care.

Results from the 2007 NPS will be available in the fall of 2007 at www.nationalphysiciansurvey.ca and will provide further detail regarding whether FPs regu- larly collaborate with a more extensive list of health care providers, and whether that collaboration is part of a formal arrangement.

The NPS is a collaborative project of the College of Family Physicians of Canada, the Canadian Medical Association, and the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. If you would like the opportu- nity to develop and write a future Fast Fact using the NPS results, please contact Sarah Scott, National Physician Survey and Janus Project Coordinator, at 800 387-6197, extension 289, or sks@cfpc.ca.

Interprofessional care

PHYSICIAN CHARACTERISTICS FAMILY PHYSICIANS SHARING CARE (%)

020

40 60 80 100

Male Female <35 y 35-44 y 45-54 y 55-64 y >65 y All FPs

Figure 1. Family physicians sharing care with different kinds of health care providers*

0 kinds 1 kind 2-4 kinds 5-10 kinds

* The 10 different kinds of health care providers were other FPs, other specialists, nurses, dieticians, pharmacists, social workers, physiotherapists, psychologists, occupational therapists, and nurse practitioners.

Références

Documents relatifs

Objective To report on the findings of the CanIMPACT (Canadian Team to Improve Community-Based Cancer Care along the Continuum) Casebook project, which systematically

Here we describe a collaboration initiated by the Thames Valley Family Health Team (TVFHT) in south- western Ontario and researchers at the Centre for Studies in Family Medicine

Collaborative primary care in Canada involves family doctors working with midwives, dietitians, pharmacists, physiotherapists, social workers, nurses, chiropodists, and other allied

Recommendations from the 2009 New Zealand Guidelines Group (NZGG), 6 the 2004 Australian National Health and Medical Research Council, 15 the 2005 National Institute for Health

• Clinical features that are associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer include a palpable rectal or abdominal mass; rectal bleeding, especially in combination

For patients and families, the extended interprofessional visit allows sufficient time and “space” for patients and family members to raise and discuss multiple problems with a

• This paper describes an interprofessional, integrated geriatric program within a family health team and includes a preliminary evaluation from the perspective of primary

Consult by telephone Discuss patients or clinical issues electronically Meet together to review patients or clinical problems Share patient care decisions Discuss new evidence and