Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur:
Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.
Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at
PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.
https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits
L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.
Internal Report (National Research Council of Canada. Institute for Research in Construction), 1994-07-01
READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE.
https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright
NRC Publications Archive Record / Notice des Archives des publications du CNRC :
https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=08675a83-11b9-4405-9157-5e6bb413bad9 https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=08675a83-11b9-4405-9157-5e6bb413bad9
NRC Publications Archive
Archives des publications du CNRC
For the publisher’s version, please access the DOI link below./ Pour consulter la version de l’éditeur, utilisez le lien DOI ci-dessous.
https://doi.org/10.4224/20375458
Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at
Data from 13 North American Concert Halls
Data from
13
North American Concert
Halls
B r a d l e y , J . S
Page 1
Acknowledgments
The author is very grateful for the financial support of the Concert Hall Research Group for the travel costs to the 13 halls and for student help in preparing this report. The assistance of Mr. Scott Norcross in making these measurements and of Mr. Jonathon Hughson in producing the plots for this report is gratefully acknowledged and was much appreciated.
Page 2
Table
of Contents
1
.
Introduction...
32
.
Defdtion of Acoustical Measures...
3...
3.
Measurement Systems and Procedures 6...
4.
Description of the Data 7 Akron. Ohio; E.J. Thomas Performing Arts Hall...
11Baltimore. Maryland; Joseph Meyerhoff Symphony Hall
...
19Boston. Massachusetts; Boston Symphony Hall
...
25Brandon. Manitoba; Western Manitoba Centennial Auditorium
...
31Buffalo. New York; Kleinhans Music Hall
...
39Cleveland. Ohio; Severance Hall
...
45...
Detroit, Michigan; Orchestra Hall 51 Lennox. Massachusetts; Tanglewood Music Shed...
57Philadelphia. Pennsylvania; Academy of Music
...
63Troy. New York; Troy Music Hall
...
69Washington. D.C.. Kennedy Center Concert Hall
...
75...
Winnipeg. Manitoba; Manitoba Centennial Auditorium 81 Worcester. Massachusetts; Mechanics Hall...
87Page 3
1. Introduction
This report contains the results of detailed acoustical measurements in 13 North American Concert Halls. Nine of the halls were measured in May 1992 in parallel with measurements by Dr. Anders Gade from the Danish Technical University and Dr Gary Siebein from the University of Florida. These comparative measurements were the first measurement project supported by the Concert Hall Research Group. They were intended to obtain an extensive database of measurements in North American halls and to permit comparisons of the different measurement systems used by the
three
research teams. Details of the comparisons have been reported[l to 61, but the complete data has not been available for bthers to use. This report makes this data, and data from four other halls, available to consultants and other researchers.A recently released draft international standard @SO 3382)[7] includes definitions of most of the auditorium acoustics measures included in this reDort. Thus, the data in
this report give values of these, mostly newer types of acoustical measures, in a wide range of different ha&. It is hoped that the wider distribution of the data will allow a greater number of users to gain experience with the newer measures and to contribute to their further development.
This report contains no analyses of the data other than the calculation of hall-averages and standard deviations of each measure. Many analyses are possible, and it is hoped that others will make use of this data to perform their own investigations. It is also hoped that the data will be of considerable practical value to consultants wishing to gain experience in using the various measures to solve acoustical problems in halls.
2. Definition of Acoustical Measures
The values of 17 different acoustical measures are ~rovided in this report. These include decay times, sound levels, and various ene& ratios.
All
are hcluded on tde associated data d i e t t e . Hall-average values of most of these are included in the data tables for each hall in this report- plots of hall-average values versus frequency are included for the principal measures. For all measures, data is provided for all sixoctave bands from 125 to 4000 Hz. This allows users of the data to perform their own averages over various frequency bands. However, in some cases such as for the Support measures, the results in some octaves may not be very meaningful.
The 17 different acoustical quantities include 14 measures obtained at locations in the audience areas of the halls and 3 on-stage measum representative of conditions that performers would experience. Of the 15 audience area measures, seven relate to spatial impression or binaural effects, and the remaining eight are measures of decay times, relative levels, and the balance between early and late arriving sound energy. Two different decay times were measured. The conventional reverberation time (RT)
Page 4
is stopped. RT values were calculated from straight line fits to the portion of the &cav curve between -5 and -30 dB below the maximum level using Schroeder's integrated impulse response technique[8]. Early decay times (ED5 are also measures of the time required for the sound energy to decrease by 60 dB, but are calculated from straight line fits to the k t 10 dB of the decay. While RT values are physically
important, EDT values are more strongly related to subjectively perceived reverberance
G, the overall strength or relative level indicates the level of the sound at a point in the room relative to that of the same source at a distance of 10 m in a free field. (A
free
field is similar to outdoor conditions with no reflecting surfaces and can beapproximated by measurements in an anechoic test room.) G is defined as follows:
where p(t) is the instantaneous pressure response to an impulse source and p i is the instantaneous pressure response of the same source at a distance of 10 m in
a
free field.Early-to-late arriving sound energy ratios have been calculated for various temporal divisions between early and late reflections. C80 with a 0.08 s early time limit is calculated as follows:
C80 is a measure of clarity or the balance between clarity and reverberance. C35 &d C50 are similarly calculated but with 0.035 and 0.05 s early time limits.
The lateral energy fraction (LF5) is the fraction of the early amving sound energy that arrives from lateral dictions. It is defined as follows:
where p ~ ( t ) is the instantaneous lateral pressure response measured with a figure-of- eight microphone with its directional null pointed towards the centre stage source position. LF5 values are related to spatial impression, which includes an apparent broadening of the sound source.
Three other variations of the lateral energy fraction were also measured. These include two different starting points for the integration of the lateral energy and both
Page 5
cosine and cosine squared directivity patterns, Kleiner's technique for obtaining results approximating a cosine directivity pattern was used[9]. Starting the integration at 0.005 s after the direct sound is intended to better eliminate the
influence of the direct sound, but in practice the effects of shifting the integration start point are very small. Although most measurements in halls have used a cosine
squared directionality, the cosine directionality is closer to the original subjective studies[lO]. These are given in the following table.
An alternative measure of spatial impression is the inter-aural cross correlation. The Cross-correlation function is defmed as follows:
Symbol
LF
LF5 LF-c LF5-c
The IACC is the maximum absolute value of the cross-correlation function for
1 d
5 1 ms. Three different variations of the IACC were calculated: IACC(e),IACCO), and IACC(t) that were obtained using the early, late, and total time intervals
of the impulse response. Again the early sound is considered to be the first 0.08 s of the impulse response. Thus the three IACC values can be defined from the above equation and the integration limits in the following table.
Start of lateral energy integration, s 0 0.005 0 0.005
Gade has devised measures of the support that the performer experiences from the hall. These are now defmed for early, late and total parts of the impulse responses measured on-stage at a distance of 1 m from the source[l I]. For these
measurements, the source height was 1.0 m, in conformance with Gade's recommendations. The three support measures are defined as follows,
Directional pattern cosine cosine cosine squared cosine squared Integration limits, s IACC(e) IACC(1) IACC(t) T1 0 0.08 0 T2 0.08 1.0 1.0
Page 6
STCt) = 10. (t)
.
dt/rP2 (t) dt}. dB (7)As for the audience measures, p(t) is the instantaneous pressure response to an impulsive sound. These support measures can be approximately thought of as
reflected to direct sound ratios. Because of the small time internal used for the direct part of the ratio (10 ms), the support measures are not very meaningful at 125 Hz. Gade calculates averages of the results for the four octaves from 250 to 2000 Hz.
3. Measurement Systems and Procedures
The acoustical measures were obtained using two different computer-based
measurement systems. The Room Acoustics Measurement Software (RAMSoft-If) was used to obtain most of the measures including decay times, levels, and energy ratios. The Binaural Room Acoustics Measurement program (BRAM) was used to obtain IACC values.
The RAMSoft-I1 program fxst calculates impulse responses using a Maximum Length Sequence (MLS) signal and a Fast Hadamard Transform procedure[l2]. The MLS signal is output from a digital to analogue converter via a power amplifier to a duodecahedron loudspeaker. The signals from an omni-directional condenser
microphone and a figure-of-eight microphone are digitized using a 16 bit analogue-to- digital converter at a sampling rate of 12,780 samples/second. The broadband
impulse responses are filtered into octave bands and the various measures calculated in software on a portable computer. Decay times are calculated by straight line fits to the reverse integrated decay curves. EarlyAate energy ratios are calculated by fust dividing the broadband impulse response into early and late parts and then filtering both parts into octave bands. This avoids errors due to the smearing of energy past the early time window by the filtering process. The calculated octave band measures are output to standard spreadsheet files for further plotting and processing.
The BRAM program also uses MLS signals and a Fast Hadamard transform
technique to obtain impulse responses. This program samples the microphone signals at 32,000 sample/second. The same duodecahedron loudspeaker is used as the sound source, and the receivers are the two internal microphones of a Briiel and Kjaer head and torso simulator. The
IACC
values are subsequently calculated from each pair of binaural impulse responses in each of the six octave bands from 125 to 4000 Hz and for the early, late, and total parts of the impulse responses.Page 7
Typically, three source positions and 10 to 14 receiver positions were used in each hall for the RAMSoft-II measurements. The centre source position was located at the centre of the stage and approximately 2 m up stage from the fmed leading edge of the stage. (The actual source positions are given with the data for each hall.) In addition to the centre source position, a stage left and a stage right position were also used that were typically about 4 m up stage from the leading edge of the fmed stage and approximately 4 m either side of the centre-line of the hall. For all measurements (except on-stage Support measures), the source was 1.5 m above the stage floor. The conditions on stage during the measurements
are
noted for each hall.The receiver positions were located on one side of each hall because the halls included in this report are all symmetrical about the centre-lime. Receiver positions were
selected to be evenly distributed throughout the audience seating areas.
The BRAM measurements were made using only the centre source position and 6 to
12 receiver positions in each hall. The Briiel and Kjaer head and torso simulator was seated in audience chairs with its ears at a typical ear height.
4. Description of the Data
Six pages of data are included for each hall. In a few cases there are more pages of data because multiple configurations of the same hall were measured.
Swrca Coordinates C ( ~ , . Y , ) L ( X L . Y L) R(XR.YR)
AUDIENCE
figure 1. Source position coordinate system.
The first page for each hall consists of text describing the hall and the measurement positions and conditions. The date of the measurements and the number of audience seats in the hall are given. There were three source positions used in each hall which
Page 8
are referred to as C (centre stage), L (stage-left), and R(stage-right). The coordinate system used to described these positions is describedin Figure 1. The x-coordiate of each position is the distance up-stage from the leading edge of the stage and parallel to the centre lime of the hall. The y-coordiiate is the distance across the stage from the centre-line. A positive y-coordinate refers to a stage-right location and a negative y-coordinate refers to a stage-left position. Receiver positions are given as the actual seat number in the hall and are shown on the sketch of the plan of the half shown on the second page. Finally, there are comments concerning conditions during the measurements and references to publications that describe the hall.
The second page gives a sketch of the plan and longitudinal section of the hall. The sketches are approximately to scale but some details may not be completely accurate. The source and receiver locations are shown on each plan and also where helpful on the section.
The third page presents plots of hall-average and standard deviation values of the principal measures in each hall. There are four pairs of plots on each page; the upper plot of each pair shows the hall-average values, and the lower plot the standard deviation values. The shaded area shows the range of the hall-average values of each quantity for a l l 13 halls included in this report. The upper left plots show the hall- average values of the reverberation time
01T)
and the early decay time(EDT)
of each hall. In this case, the shaded area refers to the range of EDT values and not to the RT values. The upper right hand plots are of the relative level (G) values. The lower left plots are of the C80 values and the lower right the LF5 values.The same haIl-average values are included in tabular form in the top half of the fourth page. This table also includes hall-average values of the three IACC values (IACC(e),
IACCQ,
LACC(t)) and the three support values (ST(e),STQ,
ST(t)). The three plots at the bottom of this page show the hall-average IACC values and the range of these hall-average values for the 13 halls.The fifth page includes three plots of measures versus source-receiver distance.
These are the 1000 Hz values of RT, EDT, and G. A linear regression line was fitted to the data of each ploe Banon's revised theory[l3] is also included on the plot of G
values versus source receiver distance. The equations of the regression lines are included at the bottom of the page.
The sixth page of data shows the initial part of measured impulses at four
representative seat locations for measurements using the centre source position. In
each pair of plots, the upper plot is the impulse response from the omni-directional microphone measurement showing pressure on a linear scale versus time for the first
150 ms of the impulse response. The lower plot shows the magnitude of the impulse response obtained using a Hilbert transform technique.
Page 9
In two halls there are extra sets of hall-average plots. In the E.J. Thomas Hall in Akron, Ohio, three sets of measurements were made. This is a variable geometry hall and the hall was measured: (a) complete with both balconies included, (b) with the ceiling lowered to remove the upper balcony, and (c) with the ceiling lowered to exclude both balconies from the hall. The Western Manitoba Centennial Auditorium
in Brandon, Manitoba, was measured with its acoustically absorbing banners fully exposed (down) and completely withdrawn (up).
The report is available with a computer diskette containing the measurements at individual seats in each halL The contents of this diskette are described in the Appendix.
Page 11
E
J.
Thomas Performing Arts Hall
Akron, Ohio, U.S.A.
Date of measurements: 15 May 1992
Temp: 23°C R.H.: 27% Volume: 19,800 m3 Number of seats Main floor 876 First balcony 1508 Second balcony 585 Total 2969
Source positions: (from the centre of the leading edge of permanent stage, m)
Receiver seat locations: (receiver height 1.2 m)
Main floor G32 G43
N43 N55
First balcony E46 E63
056 080
Second balcony D53 D77
Comments
Variable geometry h a . Measurements were also made for the second balcony closed off, and for the f m t and second balconies closed off.
Music stands and chairs on stage during measurements and orchestra shell in place.
References
EJ. Thomas Performing Arts Page 12
EJ. Thomas Performing Arts EaU Page 13
Frequency, Hz Frequency, Hz
a
'$25 250 500 1000 2000 4000 '125 250 500 1000 2000 4000
Frequency, Hz Frequency. Hz
EJ. Thomas Performing Arts Ball Page 14 I 1 Q h Frequency. Hz Frequency, Hz
a
'125 250 5M) 1000 2000 4000 '125-
250 500 1000 2000 4000 Frequency, Hz Frequency, HzEJ. Thomas Pertorming Arts HsU Page 15 Frequency, Hz Frequency, Hz 6 0.3 3 - 0.1 -6' L 3
-
$h 0.15 s%$<, $$&*&&kX
%?p%@>2:w&c*%3%*$
&vM?,.,yx*<,-$q&yi$<
."s"~**@$~*~~'?~q>$*~~~~~~@~?"":y~*~:":
~Bp&<*&+>*h4x&a:.><\*j$ *cxx 0.1g
?$,"*&$.**& LA*.% : *,.,xyi
% ,%' %3!$943~;x$$*ys;~<3y3 a-<.**
&3.. &*x .%~.*.<3i*pk~2'I'.,<*?*~~*$s*4$<"2P
e*$=*<xd"..- "+;$&&$<$&$b, .A ..,..,:?. ~:+-.<9.. ,+>:%,. ;v.x-;g$> ~ ~ ~ ~ F xrn l - v w$$* \w.:+:,.,: .. $ *--,
*\+
..?*\ +A~"y*.-... d ~ ~ ~ . s ~ ~ * > % ? ~ . : . * v < -,.-~.*-w*ss -*,. 0.05 '.**.-Oi;5 2;0
d o
IWO 20b0 40z0 O12.5 250 500 IMX) 2000 4000Frequency, Hz Frequency, Hz
EJ. Thomas Performing Arts Hall Page 16
Octave band hall-average data.
0.6
-
0Y
-
0.4 - 0.2 - O;w
L 250 500 1030 ZOX 4000 125 2 5 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 Frequency, HzEJ. Thomas Performing Arts Hall Page 17
-10
10 15 20 25 30 35 40
DISTANCE, m
Variation with distance of 1000 Hz data. Linear regression equations:
RT = -0.001
*
DIST+
1.83, s EDT = 0.001*
DIST+
1.65, sE J. Thomas Performing Hal1 Page 18 m a IBDL m. oa .oI. m l ~ m a w,. Ims. -,U1. m. 4mr. dm. -. *,lo. m.
.,M 10.0 a0 Ym 0 m.0 11&0 19.0 IYU1 -~o.c >&,o 11.0 10.0 . wo naa iwr imo
ma.m Trn, n, ,YO m. ,dl% m 11x m. m. )159 M wm IBa nio. 275. (ya 1BB m. 7.l.. nn TW. r m SEAT: G32 SEAT: N55 m 2m. an. am. ma m. ,875 ,m. ,m 7 x 0 7,s. w. m. m 91. 3m.
-30.0 in. m.o ion mo soo noa w . ?ma
ra, "S TM. m.
SEAT: Balcony E46 SEAT: Balcony 080
Page 19
Joseph Meyerhoff Symphony
Hall
Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A.
Date of measurements: 6 May 1992
Temp: 24OC R.H.: 24% Volume: 21,500 m3
Number of seats
Main floor 1359
First balcony 566
Second balcony 540
Total 2465
Source positions: (from the centre of the leading edge of permanent stage, m)
Receiver seat locations: (receiver height 1.2 m)
Main floor HI06
U105 EE106
First balcony E l 11 Box G left, seat 14
Second balcony E l 1 l Sec B left seat C7
Comments
Music stands and chairs on stage during measurements and QRD diffusers around rear and side walls of stage.
References
Beranek, L.L., "Concert Hall Acoustics -1992", J. Acoust Soc. Am., Vol. 92, No. 1, pp. 34, 1992.
Joseph Meyerhoff Symphony Hall Page 20
Joseph Meyerhoff Symphony HPU Page 21 4
-
0.6'
L ' 1 ;s 2&
5d0
lob0 2&0 4&0 '125 250 500 1000 2000 4000Frequency, Hz Frequency, Hz
0
125 250 500 1000 2000 4000
Frequency, Hz Frequency, Hz
Joseph Meywhoff Symphony Hall Page 22
Octave band hall-average data.
oh
I, J250 SM) 1000 2MX) 4000 125 2 5 0 S M ) i W O 2 M M 4 0 0 0
Frequency, Hz
Joseph Meyerhofl Symphony Ed Page 23
Variation with distance of 1000 Hz data. Linear regression equations:
RT = -0.00266
*
DIST+
2.44, sEDT = -0.00301
*
DIST+
2.35, sJoseph Meyerhoff Symphony Hall page 24 SEAT: U105
-
I I-
-2MM
IM 9 0 mP m.0 so* ,700 19.0 7-0 Tim,.. BDm m. am. llIO m. 2% ,m. M &.,on 0 ao mn m.0 m* ,too ,Pa is0 Tm. n.
SEAT: E E l l
a.s
1
Tm. n
SEAT: First Balcony E l 11
RnaM
SEAT: Second Balcony E l 11
Page 25
Boston Symphony Hall
Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
Date of measurements: 1 May 1992
Temp: 25OC R.H.: 35% Volume: 18,740 m3
Number of seats
Main floor 1486
First balcony 598
Second balcony 547
Total 2631
Source positions: (from the centre of the leading edge of permanent stage, m)
Receiver seat locations: (receiver height 1.2 m)
Main floor H2 1 H30
020 030
221 230
KK20 KK30
First balcony B22 B33 B28 (side balcony)
Second balcony C23 C35 B28 (side balcony)
Comments
Music stands and chairs on stage during measurements. References
Beranek, L.L., "Music Acoustics and Architecture", John Wiley and Sons, pp. 93, 1962.
Boston Symphony HaU Page 26
Boston Sympeolly HPU Page 27
'I", 2 0 5d0
lobo
mb0 40i0'I",
&
40
lo00 mb0 40i0Frequency, Hz Frequency, Hz
-
'125 250 500 1000 2000 4000
Frequency, Hz Frequency, Hz
Boston Symphony Hall Page 28
Octave band hall-average data.
0 1. I , J
125 250 500 1WO 2WO 4WO 125 250 5 0 0 I W O X X X ) 4 0 0 0
Frequency, Hz
Boston Symphony Hall Page 29
Variation with distance of 1000 Hz data.
3 2.5 V) I-- n 2 - W 1.5 1 10 5 m u 0 .
"
-5 -10 5Linear regression equations:
RT = 0.00110
*
DIST+
2.67, s EDT = 0.00705*
DIST+
2.20, s G =-0.150*DIST+8.21,dB-
ne
0 0 E-
0 % n n ,.%- - F- a P ~ - 8 - 0 - - - - 0 0 0 n n--- ---:--- . - - - r - - - - 0 0 0a
n 0 n 0 11 0 - - 0...=
.
--
Barron theory ...---=-a-wa"e
,.,. n... -----
a p- ... ... n=---L.
0 0 - i - * + . k - 9 - - - - n - ,.
0 0 " . - - 10 15 X) 25 30 35 40 45 DISTANCE.rn
Boston Symphony HPn Page 30 SEAT: 0 2 0 SEAT: Balcony B22 SEAT: 230 T o . m. SEAT: Gallery C23 Impulse responses from centre source position.
Page 31
Western Manitoba Centennial Auditorium
Brandon, Manitoba, Canada
Date of measurements: 24 September 1992
Temp: 23OC R.H.: 43% Volume: 12,390 m3
Number of seats
Main floor 867
Total 867
Source positions: (from the centre of the leading edge of permanent stage, m)
Receiver seat locations: (receiver height 1.2 m)
Main floor f28 F8
LA6
L28 L8R46 R28 R8
Comments
Fore-stage in place. Piano on stage, no chairs or music stands.
Western Manitoba Centennial Auditorium Page 32
Western Manitobn Centennial Auditorium Page 33 Frequency, Hz Frequency, Hz 0.3
5
0.2 c3'
4 0.1 0.15:
0.1P
m 0.05 0 125 250 500 1000 2000 moo . . 6 m 3"
g-
9
4 -3 - 6 ' 3 %?g
0 $ 1 Frequency, Hz Frequency, HzHall-average data and associated standard deviations
-
banners up.~ $*,*.$a ~ y * ~ ~ ~ x g <
*xx:x., :<*k<~g:.~~-.
<*a
~.
%&a$&*~?f?$>4Q*&$&<@&$@@$g@jgs4
- **8y*wa$*$~b~*~~+aq~F+~~~e~+@~$$B$&*& * * ~ * & ~ 4 > ~ $ ~ ~ & * $ + @ + $ ~ ~ ? ~ 3 ~ < $
' g<3$&g82>p~&$~*~$+&$$~i~~@$~~@
' * . : > . ; ~ . & ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ * ~ ~ ~ $ ? : & * ~ ~ > ~ > ; ~ ~ ~ ; . . ~ , ~ . ; 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
& 6 ~ c ~ ~ ~ * ~ * I i ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ , 3 ~ ~ . ~ g ~ ~ ~ s ~ P P P P p P P P ' ".:?>:*?p2@?i<
; < : ; ~ j ~ > ~ # ; ~ ~ ~ ; ; ~ g & & ~ ~ ~ g ~ s s * w ~
:
~ a$*+>n ,++,B & ~BBB. $k+e+<bs+,~ ~ , ~."
~ ~ $ 2 ~ & ~ ~ & ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ & ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ x ~ ~ ~ ~~Fwh%*d$*&%3g*& d~>&@~s$*&s*KB4>.**b , >x.>><*.**.+\' ,
$ 3 ; ~
L - $:&, ? $ $ ' $@@*; ,*$x.*y\ *:x*i*&:*y*+,,-""'?**x%+. <pFqP% >%s$$&$$rn:*-".,:*:?%. *x+%F ppcF&$$$ .~ <-** \".,y.p. r. ~*,
"
<%>~~.,.~*x?.b 9%. .r .-?: .~ a,,*y>*>..< *>y*&&, *-.. ..>*a* &A~&;~i~E1~$~&~~?~~*wSS:&:l:~~,"~s:.i$~ -a,22< ss&xw*>, y>*?m$$x, *<v22 .,x.?~ .3>.3$**
%*@. ..x.L++>s &,& * < , ~ ~ X X % . , ~ * & : + ~ ~ * ~ ~ * ~ ~
**$i$w <
*
$&!&$$, !A; . . . , Y G . : . ~ ~ . . .-
*. q>.<+:.*:g*?&9$y$3&&*w*2*4$&.'$&
?%<$.$?h*% "*$**?si%i*3*' 4>.%+ X>.,*~*YYY
~ hwLi
Western Manitoba Centennial Auditorium Page 34
Frequency, Hz Frequency, Hz
-
'125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 '125 250 500 1000 2W0 4000
Frequency, Hz Frequency, Hz
Western Manitoba Centennial Auditorium Page 35
Octave band hall-average data.
o
k5
&
,3 &2 2 &O l d o o2dW
Frequency, Hz
Western Manitoba Centennial Auditorium Page 36
5
%
0 .Variation with distance of 1000 Hz data.
c5
-5-10
Linear regression equations:
RT =-0.00159*DIST+l.l9,s EDT = -0.0180
*
DIST+
1.44, s G = -0.227*
DIST+
4.61, dB. .... _.._
Barron theory - 0..-.~~.----.~~
.. -...
-..-.
... .
..
. . . . , . , .. . .
.-.. . .
. .. , ..
.- .. -.- - - - _ _ _ _
0d
... Q - - - 0 +-'W-U;-~----
m-Q "- -
I - - _ _ " - 0*----
-
- ., 5 10 15 20 25 DISTANCE, rnWestern Manitoba Centennial Auditorium Page 37 mm. m. w. ma Bm. LYI) 27s. -. am. m. tisi. asa ,m. tya. M . m. n SEAT: L8 ... 61W. as. 25m. ,an. - 3 2 7 5 2 8 0 ~ a. 4101. ,.,- SEAT:
R8
SEAT: R46Page 39
Kleinhans Music Hall
Buffalo, New York, U.S.A.
Date. of measurements: 4 May 1992
Temp: 20°C RH.: 40% Volume: 18,220 m3
Number of seats
Main floor 1575
Fist balcony 1264
Total 2839
Source positions: (from the centre of the leading edge of permanent stage, m)
Receiver seat locations: (receiver height 1.2 m)
Main floor GllO G15
QllO Q2 1
YllO Y15 Y33
F i t balcony E l 12 E25
MI09 M23 M2 1
Comments
Music stands and chairs on stage during measurements. References
Beranek, L.L., "Music Acoustics and Architecture", John Wiey and Sons, pp. 99, 1962.
Kleinhans Music Hall Page 40
Meinham Music Hall Page 41
'125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 5 2 0 4 0 10'00 2000 40iO
Frequency, Hz Frequency, Hz
'125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 '$25
-
250 500 1000 2000 4000Frequency, Hz Frequency. Hz
Meinham Musk Hall Page 42
Octave band hall-average data.
I . I
250 500 iOOO 2WO 4000 125 250 5 0 0 l ~ 2 W O 4 0 0 0
Frequency, Hz
Meinbans Music Hsll Page 43
Linear regression equations:
RT = -0.0000410
*
DIST+
1.69, s EDT = -0.0227*
DIST+
2.00, s G = -0.113*
DIST+
4.90, dB 10 5 m u 0 .6
-5 -10 ... ...-
".
..a,. Barron theory.-n--gF:--_ ... w n
-
- i 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 DISTANCE, m . -Meidam Music Hall Page 44
-
2121 ,~ ~ en ma 1D8. 1 3 8 is* 881. a .,=a. a. -. .,m. -. dm. zn...,b 10.0 n.0 roo m.0 sD0 lld.0 (PO 3roa .,ao lO.0 Pa roo m o sa.0 ,,OD i s 0 croo
Tm. m x n . m am. 22% tm. M -10.0 10.0 P.0 ma IO.0 800 ,,Dl0 I P . 0 1m.o T w , m SEAT: QllO l ( p
I
-~
I'
I -. , , l . l . l ~ l ~ t . l ~,GO w,o roo m~ w r 0 i s a 7-o Tmc. nn
SEAT: Y33
W?
I
I
. ., .
SEAT: Balcony El 12 SEAT: Balcony M51
Page 45
Severance
Hall
Cleveland,
Ohio,
USA.
Date of measurements: 13 May 1992
Temp: 25OC R.H.: 41% Volume: 15,700 m3
Number of seats
Main floor 782
Box level 170
Balcony 938
Total 1890
Source positions: (from the centre of the leading edge of permanent stage, m)
Receiver seat locations: (receiver height 1.2 m)
Main floor Sec. B F11 Sec. C F6
Sec. B 0 1 2 Sec. C 0 8
Box level Box 5B Box 17B
Balcony Sec. E CC4 Sec. D CC6
Sec. E Dl0 Sec. D D8
Sec. E KlO Sec. D K9
Comments
Music stands and chairs on stage during measurements. References
Beranek, L.L., "Music Acoustics and Architecture", John Wiey and Sons, pp. 123, 1962.
Severance Hall Page 46
Severance Aall Page 47
Frequency, Hz Frequency, Hz
6 %,., v ~ s ~ * & ~ < p ~ : ~ ~ + 0.3
,**3Tq:&m?%$&$3:+$
&e.t*kq @g&$ ,*@$i *&@E$ .*F$&$*xs$?$$s**.*>**A. -.+x *>:<..<
3
-
+ $ c 1 + ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ r 8 & b ~ & k * ~ ~m
v , ..,*< **.;~~~.*.vv*~k*~;$.*<*>%>.~
-*,
y~x.:.%:$y$?$: .,*,*3q ;:$$$~~g~g$ <,<x$t><**A*&<3:2$sq$s~z&*3~;&$3*k*~%$**&q*$3g2F3&4
' $ @ W ~ $ B @ & & ~ S : : & $ ~ @ & S ; ~ ~ ~ <
5
0.2"
0 &3sG4p<~*<$$$$~j$~&*@*&~~qp**F$*&+~:
2*>.v :$&*;:. ,... ,.:,xy~&$s*.:<~y.q?~.*s.*2,,,, CI9
..
~ ~ ~ ~ & + s 4 ~ s b ~ F 2 v E w + ~ . * 3 $ ~ ? ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , + s s , ~ k ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ r r + ~ y ~ s % ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ * n ~~~$,.Ayp+~ ,,,* %*A,: . .,a\ 05
-3 -$(~""&@$$B.:$Y~~~"P~&Q. , " .$$$3g3.* *a*adh= 0.1 $&+*> -6
'
0.15 0.05 '155 240 500 l i b 0 20b0 4000 '125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 . Frequency, Hz Frequency, HzSeverance Hall Page 48
Octave band hall-average data.
0 k 5
I. 1
250 500 loo0 20(]0 4W0 125 250 5 a ) l w O 2 0 ( ] 0 4 W O
Frequency, Hz
Severance Hall Page 49
Variation with distance of 1000 Hz data.
3 2.5 ul I--
u
2 - 1.5 1 3 2.5 In+-
n 2 - W 1.5 1 to 5 m D 0 .ci
-5 -to 5Linear regression equations:
RT = 0.00209
*
DIST+
1.73, s EDT = -0.00758*
DIST+
1.86, s G = -0.117*
DIST+
5.92, dB --
*-&-,,-=---
E+fa---e-n+* - - n - - f a - - - S a n - fa-
-
-
-
.
fa 0 fa fa.
B I3Q fa - - - P---
fa ---e--D---n---5,faa---Q--_o_rT fa fa fa-
fao fa fa f a n f a --
..I. .a,...-
----
0.. f a-
.
a . f a '1JBerron
theory m-- -
c:.@2:.:3..-
....
- - - ~ ~ r + + _ - . . a ... .fa f a n --o--z-r, fa - - 10 $5 20 25 30 35 40 DISTANCE,rn
. - . .Severance Hall Page 50 nn. nn SEAT: F11 Rm,m SEAT: 0 8 M
'DO 'DO S O YID DO eoo l l a o 0 !(a0 Trn. m
SEAT: Balcony D l 0 SEAT: Balcony K9
Page 51
Orchestra
Hall
Detroit, Michigan, U.S.A.
Date of measurements: 12 May 1992
Temp: 23OC R.H.: 47% Volume: 15,700 m3
Number of seats
Main floor 95 1
Box level 168
Balcony 903
Total 2022
Source positions: (from the centre of the leading edge of permanent stage, m)
Receiver seat locations: (receiver height 1.2 m)
Main floor H8 H24 P8 P26 EE8 ee26 Box level 04 V3 Balcony D8 D28 M8 M28 BB8 DD28 Comments
Music stands and chairs on stage during measurements. Both stage l i i raised to make full fore stage.
Orchestra E M Page 52
OrchesbP Hall Page 53 '125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 '125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 Frequency, Hz Frequency, Hz
-
'125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 '125-
250 500 1000 2000 4000 Frequency, Hz Frequency, HzOrchestra Hall Page 54
Octave band hall-average data.
0
2
-
250 5W loo0 2WO 4000 125 250
Frequency, Hz
Orchestra Hall Page 55
Variation with distance of 1000 Hz data.
10
Barron theory
Linear regression equations:
RT = 0.000132
*
DIST+
1.93, s EDT = -0.00410*
DIST+
1.88, s G = -0.0916*
DIST+
5.86, dB m u 0 .ci
-5 -10 0 n 0-
- 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 DISTANCE. mSEAT: EE28 SEAT: P8
SEAT: Balcony D8 SEAT: Balcony DD28
Page 57
Tanglewood Music Shed
Lennox, Massachusetts,
U.S.A.
Date of measurements: 23 August 1993
Temp: 23OC RH.: 78% Volume: 42,450 m3
Number of seats
Main floor 5121
Total 5121
Source positions: (from the centre of the leading edge of permanent stage, m)
Receiver seat locations: (receiver height 1.2 m)
Main floor Section Row Seat
1 2 4 6 Box 8 12 14 16 18 20 10 10 10 I 1 (rear side) 12 10 6 7 7 4 Comments
Music stands and chairs on stage during measurements. References
Beranek, L.L., "Music Acoustics and Architecture", John Wiey and Sons, pp. 139,
Tanglewood Music Shed
Plan and section sketches showing hall source and receiver positions.
Tanglewd Mosic Shed Page 59
5 2 0 5& lob0 2000 4dO 0lk5 2 5do lo00 2000 40iO
Frequency, Hz Frequency. Hz
0.05
'125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 '125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 . .
Frequency, Hz Frequency. Hz
Tanglewood Music Shed Page 60
Octave band hall-average data.
O
:is
I, I
250 500 1WO XYX) 4WO 125 250 5 0 0 1 W O 2 0 0 0 4 W O
Frequency, Hz
Tanglewood Music Shed Page 61
fi-
n
2W
Linear regression equations:
RT = 0.00239
*
DIST+
3.01, s EDT = 0.0135*
DIST+
2.52, s G = -0.172*
DIST+
4.43, dB 10 5 m 0 0 :6
-5 -10 ......
Barron theory ... - - Q Q F ~c"'.".
.-
- - = - - - - E E L - - "L.
... Y- -
-- - - _ _
0 o-=--.LL---_- 0 0 - - - g m o 0 iiana--o.O-o----
0 n - 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 DISTANCE,m
. -Tanglewood Music Shed Page 62 SEAT: 4G10 SEAT: 6G11 ,om. nsL m (7% m. 3,s m B. & na S(B m -7,s. BB. .I%. 1 0 R . a.
0 ,a0 w.0 IoD m 0 ?loo lWlD 3- - 3 10.0 S O 0 10.0 i a o ,100 iw.0 laor
T m m TW. m
. ..-
SEAT: 14K6 SEAT: 18K7
Page 63
Academy
of Music
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,
U.S.A.
Date of measurements: 7 May 1992
Temp: 23OC RH.: 20% Volume: 15,720 m3
Number of seats Main floor 1295 First balcony 540 Second balcony 577 Third balcony 572 Total 2984
Source positions: (from the centre of the leading edge of permanent stage, m)
Receiver seat locations: (receiver height 1.2
m)
Main floor C l l l C7
N l l l T33
W113 W9
First balcony C113 A39
Second balcony El13 C35
Third balcony Dl13 C35
Comments
Music stands and chairs on stage during measurements. References
Beranek, L.L., "Music Acoustics and Architecture", John Wiley and Sons, pp. 165,
Academy of Music
Academy of Music h g e 65
I 1 P I
0.6
'
L _I3
-
0.1 - RT
O1;5 ;2
5d0
10b0 2i00 &-0 O1;5 2;05d0
lob0 2 ~ 0 $0Frequency, Hz Frequency, Hz
-
'125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 '125
-
250 500 1000 2000 4000Frequency, Hz Frequency. Hz
Academy of Music Page 66
Octave band hall-average data.
I n J
250 500 1WO 2CW 4WO 125 2 5 0 5 0 0 1 W O 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 0
Frequency,
Hz
Academy of Musk Page 67
Variation with distance of 1000 Hz data. Linear regression equations:
RT
= -0.00229*
DIST+
1.36, s EDT = -0.0108*
DIST+
1.48,s
Aeademy &Musk Page 68 em. lyg. ~ ~ MI. 3C1 6110. * ller ,,= -31s. IlP. m. a. -. *. -3- U01.
-SOD IOD SD sn mo so.& srnn m a ma . a 10.0 DD 5 ) ~ 10s s0.0 110.0 1310 150.0
Ih. mi Tnn rn SEAT: C l l l SEAT: W9 m. m. aa 2821. as. am ,en. lm. m. ,m. I t b , t b m. W . m m
0 . 0 0 oa 100 10.0 so0 3lDo ,or llao
l. mi T*n. m.
SEAT: Balcony C113 SEAT: Second Balcony El 13
Impulse
. ~ ~ . ~. ~~~~~ responses ~- from centre source position.
Page 69
Troy Music Hall
Troy, New York,
U.S.A.
Date of measurements: 30 April 1992
Temp: 20°C RH.: 26% Volume: 11,320 m3 Number of seats Main floor First balcony Second balcony Boxes Total 1255
Source positions: (from the centre of the leading edge of permanent stage, m)
Receiver seat locations: (receiver height 1.2 m)
Main floor Sec. C G108 Sec. D GI0
Sec. C 01018 Sec. K 1
Sec. 173 Sec. J 44
Fist balcony Sec. 0 30 Sec. Q 16
Second balcony Sec. C 18 Sec. D 12
Comments
Music stands and chairs on stage during measurements. References
Troy Music Hall Page 70
Troy Music Hall Page 71
. "*I ",
0.6
'
L3
-
O1;5 2& 5& lob0 20b0 40b0 Oi25 2&
5d0
lob0 2 4 0 40b0Frequency. Hz Frequency, Hz
-
'125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 '125
.
250 5WI
1000 2000 4000Frequency, Hz Frequency, Hz
Troy Musk Hall Page 72
Octave band hall-average data.
I, I
250 5Ml 1WO 2000 4000 125 250 5 W 1 ~ 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 0
Frequency, Hz
Troy Musk H.ll Page 73
10
D
5 - Barron theory
DISTANCE,
m
Variation with distance of 1000 Hz data. Linear regression equations:
RT = 0.000710
*
DIST+
2.69, s EDT = 0.00123*
DIST+
2.32, sTroy Musk Hall Page 74 %.ma SEAT: G108 w . I ' , I
,
I . , . , . , . , . 0 0 9.0 50D m.0 m.0 7700 19.0 Wn T m "mSEAT: Fist Balcony 030
L n
SEAT: 144
Page 75
Kennedy Center Concert Hall
Washington, D.C., U.S.A.
Date of measurements: 9 May 1992
Temp: 23OC R.H.: 42% Volume: 19,300 m3
Number of seats Main floor 1638 Box tier 244 F i t balcony 391 Second Balcony 486 Total 2759
Source positions: (from the centre of the leading edge of permanent stage, m)
Receiver seat locations: (receiver height 1.2 m)
Main floor HllO H13
RllO R13
AAllO AA13
KKllO KK13
Box Tier Box 3 (middle seat)
F i t balcony B113 A311
Second balcony C113
Comments
Music stands and chairs on stage during measurements. References
Harris, C.M., "Acoustical Design of the John F. Kennedy Center for the
Kenwdy Center Concert Hall Page 76
Kennedy Center Concert Hall Page 77
01k5 2&
5d0
lob0 2&0 d 0 0lk5 2 0&
lob0 2000 40iOFrequency, Hz Frequency, Hz
. .
Frequency, Hz Frequency, Hz
Kennedy Center Concert Hall Page 78
Octave band hall-average data.
1 0.4 0.2 0 0.6 - 0
Y
-
0.4-
0.2 - . . ~. O65
254 500 loo0 2000 4000 125 250 5 0 0 1 o o 0 m 4 0 0 0 Frequency,Hz
Kennedy Center Concert Hall Page 79
Variation with distance of 1000 Hz data. Linear regression equations:
RT = 0.00124
*
DIST+
1.96, s EDT = -0.0123*
DIST+
2.14, sKennedy Center Concert HaU
SEAT: RllO
M
SEAT: Fist Balcony B 113
SEAT: KK13
Trn. w
Manitoba Centennial Auditorium
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Date of measurements: 9 May 1992
Temp: 23OC RH.: 36% Volume: 28,751 m3
Number of seats Main floor 1522 Loges 106 First balcony 335 Second Balcony 341 Total 2304
Source positions: (from the centre of the leading edge of permanent stage, m)
Receiver seat locati011~: (receiver height 1.2 m)
Main floor 9 Row 12 22 Row 12
9 Row 20 22 Row 20
9 Row 27 22 Row 27
First Balcony 8 Row 3 22 Row 3
Second balcony 8 Row 3 22 Row 3
Comments
Music stands and chairs on stage during measurements, and a full orchestra shell was in place. A fore stage extension was in place over the fust three rows of seats. References
Manitoba Centennial Auditorium Page 82
Manitoba Centennial Auditorium Page 83
Frequency, Hz Frequency. Hz
Frequency. Hz Frequency. Hz
Manitoba Centennial Auditorinm Page 84
Manitoba Centennial Auditorium Page 85
DISTANCE, m
Variation with distance of 1000 Hz data.
35 3 2.5 10 b-
n
2 - W 1.5 1Linear regression equations:
RT = 0.00382
*
DIST+
2.30, s EDT = 0.00201*
DIST+
2.05, s G = -0.158*
DIST+
2.78, dB --
n 0 n n n 0 n n w t P - - - ~ a - - - nm-aF
n---%- . - - 0 - - 0 0 n n 0 0-
-
10 5%
0 ;6
-5 -10-
Barron theory ... ... .. ,. ,.., ,...-, .. ..
L.
..
.. .
..
. ..
. . ..
. ..
. . . 0---.--=s----
- 0 Y - - - 4 --
.@-*--a----
on&J-,*a
--
El--
u- .-
-
10 15 2-3 25 30Manitoba Centennial Auditorium Page 84 Bm m m. am. m ,sg W. ,m. m. 9 t m a m . Ba 1101 Bm M SO. & SEAT: 22R12 SEAT: 9R27 Ym w
-
aa ,m 1m *& BIP & am BBt I
IB(B tm m. ,m. D. m. m. mm M m ,m . m l l b m M tm all. & Tm%m TW. IDSEAT: First Balcony 22R3 SEAT: Second Balcony 22R3
Page 87
Mechanics
Hall
Worcester, Massachusetts,
U.S.A.
Dare of measurements: 30 April 1993
Temp: 25OC RH.: 25% Volume: 10,760 m3
Number of seats
Main floor 825
Balcony 575
Total 1400
Source positions: (from the centre of the leading edge of permanent stage,
m)
Receiver seat locations: (receiver height 1.2 m)
Main floor K7 K105
W
PI05V7 Vl05
First Balcony D l 1 Dl05 BB73
Comments
No music stands or chairs on stage during measurements. Stage extended. References
Cavanaugh, W.J., "Preserving the Acoustics of Mechanics Hall", Technology and Conservation, pp. 24-28, Fall, 1980.
Howland, R., "Mechanics Hall, Meeting House for Music", Audio, pp. 64-67, January, 1993.
Mechanics Hall
Mechanics Hall Page 89
Frequency, Hz Frequency, Hz
'125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 '12.5
a
250 5 W 1000 2000 4000Frequency, Hz Frequency. Hz
Mechanics Hall Page 90
Octave band hall-average data.
0.4
-
0.2
-
. -. * .
Frequency, Hz
Mofh& Hnll Page 91
DISTANCE, m
Variation with distance of 1000 Hz data. Linear regression equations:
RT = -0.00423
*
DIST+
2.10, sEDT = -0.00219
*
DIST+
2.05, s G = -0.178*
DIST+
8.90, dBSEAT: PI05 SEAT: V7 UU PY I
1
*a. . J 0 8 . dl. l . I I I . I . ~ . I . ~ . . $ 0 9.0 r s m.0 sao ,109 9 7- T a T . nrSEAT: Balcony Dl05 SEAT: ~ a l c o n y Dl1
REFERENCES
Gade,
kc.,
Bradley, J.S., and Siebein, G.W., "Effects of Measurement Procedure and Equipment on Average Room Acoustic Measurements", J. Acoust. Soc. Am.,Vol. 93, No. 4, pp. 2265, (1993).
Bradley. J.S., Gade, k c . , and Siebeii, G.W., "Comparison of Auditorium Acoustics Measurements as a Function of Location in Halls", J. Acoust. Soc. Am., Vol. 93,
No. 4, pp. 2265, (1993).
Siebein, G.W., Chiang, W-h, Madaras, G.S., Doddington, H.W., Schwab, W.K., and Bradley, J.S., "Effects of Measurement Equipment and Procedure on IACC
Measurements", J. Acoust. Soc. Am., Vol. 93, No. 4, pp. 2266, (1993).
Gade,
kc.,
and Bradley, J.S., "Acoustical Measurements on Stages of Nine U.S. Concert Halls", J. Acoust. Soc. Am., VoL 93, No. 4, pp. 2266, (1993).Siebein, G.W., Chiang, W-h, Madaras, G.S., Doddington, H.W., Schwab, W.K., Bradley, J.S., and Gade,
kc.,
"Statistical Relations Among Architectural Features and Objective Acoustical Measurements of Concert Halls", J. Acoust Soc. Am.,Vol. 93, No. 4, pp. 2266, (1993).
Bradley, J.S., "Comparisons of IACC and LF Measurements in Halls", J. Acoust Soc. Am., Vol. 93, No. 4, pp. 2283, (1993).
Measurement of the Reverberation time of Rooms with Reference to Other Acoustical Parameters, Draft International Standard, IS0 3382, (1994).
Schroeder, M.R, "New Method of Measuring Reverberation Time", J. Acoust Soc.
Am., Vol. 37, NO. 3, pp. 409-412 (196.5).
Kkiier, M., "A New Way of Measuring Lateral Energy Fractions", AppL Acoust Vol. 27, pp. 321-327 (1989).
Barron, M. and Marshal, k R , Spatial Impmion Due to Early Lateral Reflections in Concert Halls: The Development of a Physical Measure, J.Sound Vibr., Vol. 77,
No. 2, pp. 11-232 (1981).
Gade, A.C., Practical Aspects of Room Acoustic Measurements on Orchestra Platforms, Proc. of 14th International Congress on Acoustics, paper M-5, Beijing,
(1992).
Halliwell RE. and Bradley J.S., RAMSoft-11: A Computer Based Room Acoustics Measurement System, Presented at Baltimore meeting of ?he ASA, May 1991, J.
Acoust Soc. Am., Vol. 89, No. 4, Pt 4, p. 1897 (1991). . . - .
Bamon, M. and
Lee,
L.-J., Energy Relations in Concert Auditoria I, J. Acoust. Soc.Page 94
Appendix Contents of Data Diskette
The data diskette is a 3.5 inch high density IBM PC format diskette. The 16 spreadsheet files are in Lotus 123 com~atible format.
(i.e.
they have names of the form *.%XI). Each file includes a complete set of ofRAM SO^^-11
measurements for one configuration of a hall. In each spreadsheet file, each row of data corresponds to all of the measured values for one source&xeiver combination. The first two c~lumns give the source and receiver locations. Subsequent columns give octave band values of the various measures. Hallaverages and standard deviations about these averages are given in rows at the bottom of each spreadsheet.
The 16 files have the following names and contents.
Akron, Ohio; E.J. Thomas Performing Arts Hall (complete hall)
Akron (2nd balcony excluded)
Akron (1st and 2nd balcony excluded)
Baltimore, Maryland; Joseph Meyerhoff Symphony Hall
Boston, Massachusetts; Boston Symphony Hall
Brandon, Manitoba; Western Manitoba Centennial Auditorium Buffalo, New York; Kleinhans Music Hall
Cleveland, Ohio; Severance Hall
Detroit, Michigan; Orchestra Hall
Lenox, Massachusetts; Tanglewood Music Shed Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Academy of Music Troy, New York; Troy Music Hall
Washington, D.C.; Kennedy Center Concert Hall
Winnipeg, Manitoba; Manitoba Centennial Auditorium Worcester, Massachusetts; Mechanics Hall