• Aucun résultat trouvé

Motivations to care and health motivations: A qualitative study exploring the experience of family caregivers

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Motivations to care and health motivations: A qualitative study exploring the experience of family caregivers"

Copied!
24
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Motivations to care and health motivations

A qualitative study exploring the experience of family caregivers

Elisabeth Spitz1, Barbara Bucki1,2, Michèle Baumann2

1EA 4360 APEMAC, Université de Lorraine, Université Paris Descartes (France)

2INSIDE, Institute Health and Behaviour, University of Luxembourg (Luxembourg)

(2)

Background

• Health of family caregivers

• Health capability of family caregivers

• Contribution of the adapted COM-B system

• Aims

2

(3)

Family caregivers and health

 A growing public health challenge

 Complex care provided day to day in addition to personal life

 About 10% of the population

 Their lifestyle entails risks for their health (2 meta-analyses)

 Problems with physical health (Vitaliano & al., 2003)

 Stress, depression (Pinquart & Sörensen, 2003) + Social isolation (Spitz & Sordes, 2007)

3

Vitaliano, P. P., Zhang, J., & Scanlan, J. M. (2003). Is caregiving hazardous to one’s physical health? A meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 129(6), 946–972.

Pinquart, M., & Sörensen, S. (2003). Differences between caregivers and noncaregivers in psychological health & physical health: a meta-analysis. Psychology and aging, 18(2), 250.

Spitz, E., & Sordes Ader, F. (2007). Qualité de vie, entourage, soutien social. In Qualité de vie et maladies rénales chroniques: satisfaction des soins et autres Patient-Reported Outcomes. John Libbey Eurotext, Paris., pp. 109–123.

Background  Methods  Findings  Discussion

(4)

Conceptual model (Ruger, 2010)

4

Public health, health care system Enabling &interactive environment;

Access to high-quality prevention

& Treatment; Health values;

Norms; Cultural barriers

Intermediate social context

Social norms

Social networks (family, school…) Group membership

Neighborhood/ Community Life circumstances Biology and

genetic predisposition Genes

Personality

Predisposition to disease

Macrosocial, political, and economic

environment

Economic opportunities Moral norms and values

Social structures Empowerment

Security

Health capability

Capacity to achieve one’s optimal health

Ruger, J. P. (2010). Health capability: conceptualization and operationalization.

American Journal of Public Health, 100(1), 41–49.

Background  Methods  Findings  Discussion

(5)

HCFC-8 factors:

An attempt of operationalization

 National stroke survey – Luxembourg

 Health Capability of Family Caregivers instrument (8 factors - 20 items; Bucki, 2014)

o Psychological health (3 items) o Physical health (2 items)

o Self-efficacy (2 items) o Lifestyle value (3 items) o Family support (3 items) o Social capital (3 items)

o Material condition / Security (2 items) o Satisfaction with health services (2 items)

5

Bucki, B. (2014). Health capability of family caregivers: Analyses of the paradigm and means of operationalization. University of Lorraine & University of Luxembourg, Metz, France.

Background  Methods  Findings  Discussion

(6)

How to improve the model?

 In its 8-factor version, the model lacks intentions, emotions, and behaviour-related aspects

 What factors to add?

6

(7)

Aims

 To identify factors of health capability associated with motivation

 To determine potential additional items to the initial HCFC-20 items instrument

7

Background  Methods  Findings  Discussion

(8)

Methods

8

(9)

Procedure

 Design

o Semi-structured interviews

 Participants

o Family caregivers of stroke victims

 Themes

o Health status

o How they take care of their health

o Resources used/needed to achieve optimal health

 Data analysis

o Coding of verbatim about motivations o Item formulation

o Validation by consensus

9

Background  Methods  Findings  Discussion

(10)

Characteristics of the participants

 14 family caregivers of stroke victims

 France: n=8 ; Luxembourg: n=6

 Care since 7.3 years ± 2.9

 50 % male

 63.6 years ± 10.1

 86% partners of the victims

 21% still working 10

Background  Methods  Findings  Discussion

(11)

Findings

Motivations to care

Motivations to maintain health

11

(12)

Motivations to care (1/2)

 Intrinsic

o Love

Ex: “This is all about love. I think if I did not love my wife, I would have gone”

o Need of the relative’s presence

Ex: “I need to see him” ; “I’m unable to live alone”

o Feeling engaged

Ex: “I'm not separated from my wife because I got engaged, I must hold on”

o Avoidance of feeling guilty

Ex: “I was advised not to visit him every day, but if I don’t I just feel guilty”

12

Background  Methods  Findings  Discussion

(13)

Motivations to care (2/2)

o Challenge of making the relative happy

Ex: “One of the goals I have for myself is that I want my husband to have the most enjoyable life”

 Extrinsic

o Avoiding the deception of the relative

Ex: “I don’t want to disappoint her, because she's a fighter”

 Motivation to care was only addressed by French participants.

13

Background  Methods  Findings  Discussion

(14)

Motivations to maintain health (1/2)

 Intrinsic

Ex: “it has to be your own choice. You don’t stop smoking because somebody tells you to. You stop smoking

because you want it yourself”

 Amotivation

Ex: “I don’t see. What motivation can you have? I don’t know”

14

Background  Methods  Findings  Discussion

(15)

Motivations to maintain health (2/2)

 Extrinsic

o Responsibility of being a caregiver

Ex: “in those moments, his presence allows me not letting go. Because I have to react for me and for him”

o Desire to enjoy grandchildren

Ex: “I want to see my grandchildren grow up [...] to often see them, play with them, all that, it motivates me and it gives me strength”

o Family encouragements

Ex: “my daughters, they say ‘don’t force mom, stop, we need you to keep healthy”

o Material reasons

Ex: “I earn the most money so it is not very romantic, but be it for money, it’s very important that I’m in good health”

15

Background  Methods  Findings  Discussion

(16)

Factors and items generated

Motivation to be a caregiver

« I care for him/her because... »

1. if I didn’t, I would feel like I abandon him/her, I would feel guilty.

2. I need his/her presence.

3. I want him/her to have the most enjoyable life possible.

4. I love him/her.

5. it is my duty.

6. I don’t want to disappoint him/her.

16

Background  Methods  Findings  Discussion

Intrinsic

Extrinsic

(17)

Factors and items generated

Motivation to maintain health

« Taking care of my health is important because...

»

1. I have to be able to work as it makes us live.

2. I want to see my grandchildren grow up and take care of them.

3. I need to take care of him/her.

4. noone else could care for him.

5. my relatives tell me I must keep healthy.

6. I don’t want to be sick.

7. I am not motivated to take care of my health.

17

Background  Methods  Findings  Discussion

Intrinsic Extrinsic

Amotivation

(18)

Discussion

18

(19)

Main findings

 Most motivations to care refer to a sense of duty

o Altruistic norm (Schwartz, 1977)

o Informed choice to be and remain a family caregiver?

o Caregiving value?

 Health motivations are rather extrinsic

o Most refer to duties, relationships

o Importance of family support (Bucki & al., 2015 - submitted)

o Healthy behaviours are associated with self- determined motivation (Ryan & Deci, 2000)

19

Background  Methods  Findings  Discussion

(20)

Correspondences with the COM-B system

 A framework for understanding behaviour

(Michie & al., 2011) Capability

Motivation

Opportunity

Behaviour 20

Background  Methods  Findings  Discussion

Physical Psychological

Reflective Automatic

Physical Social

(21)

Health Capability of Family Caregivers and COM-B

Capability Motivation Opportunity

Behaviours reflecting health capability of family caregivers

Reflective

Motivation to care

Health motivation

Automatic

Caregiving value

Physical

Access to health services

Material conditions

Social

Social capital Family support

Physical

Physical functioning

Psychological

Ψ functioning Self-efficacy 21

Background  Methods  Findings  Discussion

(22)

Practical implications

 Psycho-educational interventions

o Activation of health capability of family caregivers

 Motivational interventions can help:

o Elucidating the inner reasons why the person keeps caregiving

o To differenciate between their own vs. relatives’

health needs

 Clinical context

o Importance of paying attention to motivations

22

Background  Methods  Findings  Discussion

(23)

Research perspectives

 Validate the extended model (10 factors)

 Identify the interactions between motivation and other factors of health capability

 Determine their contribution to the model

o Helps to orient the conception of interventions promoting health capability

23

Background  Methods  Findings  Discussion

(24)

Thank you.

Contact: barbara.bucki@gmail.com

24

Références

Documents relatifs

R 2.3 (p.14): Facilitate mental health service providers taking more time to share up-to-date information about the range of community, social and mental health services available

The effort made by the Ministry of Health for the development, maintenance and support of medical libraries in the Syrian Arab Republic in general and this library in particular is

Indeed, companies that have a higher probability of leaving the stock market have generally an important level of Free Cash Flow and low growth opportunities

13 Family support Social capital Material conditions and security Enabling health services Psychological health Physical health Self-efficacy towards health services Lifestyle

Sixty-two caregivers (mean age 59.3 years; 40 women and 22 men) responded face to face, to a questionnaire including 20 items measuring eight aspects of health capability

Some requirements can be on the minimum quality level of the data and the way to adapt to the diversity of the sources (data fu- sion / aggregation), on the network mechanisms used

A higher absenteeism rate implies (i) lower average productivity and (ii) an indirect subsidy from the low-absenteeism-rate segment to the high- absenteeism-rate segment through

The Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, in its general recommendation N° 30 (2004) on non-citizens, and the Committee on Economic, Social and