• Aucun résultat trouvé

Smallholders farm carbon footprint reduced by agroecological practices (Highlands and East Coast, Madagascar). [P63]

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Smallholders farm carbon footprint reduced by agroecological practices (Highlands and East Coast, Madagascar). [P63]"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Poster Session 2 L2.1 Developing and evaluating climate smart practices

162

63.

Smallholders farm carbon footprint reduced by agroecological practices

(Highlands & East Coast, Madagascar)

Rakotovao Narindra1, Razakaratrimo Joyce1, Razafimbelo Tantely1, Deffontaines Sylvain2, Rakotosamimanana Stéphan2, Jahiel Michel3,4, Albrecht Alain5

1Laboratoire des Radioisotopes, Université d’Antananarivo, BP 3383, Antananarivo, Madagascar 2Agrisud International, Lot VB7 Ambatoroka, 101 Antananarivo, Madagascar

3Centre Technique Horticole de Tamatave, BP 11, Tamatave, Madagascar 4Cirad UR HortSys, BP 11, Tamatave, Madagascar

5Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, UMR Eco&Sols, 34060 Montpellier, France

Carbon footprint calculation is being more and more used to assess the contribution of activities to greenhouse gas emission. This work aims to determine the impact of farm activities and agricultural practices to farm carbon footprint. The carbon footprint is the carbon dioxide equivalent impact of the activities within each farm. Smallholder farms located on two different soil and climate areas of Madagascar have been selected: 12 in the Highlands and 8 on the East Coast. The farms located in the Highlands were characterized by intensification of annual cropping systems using agroecological practices such as intensive rice farming system, composting organic residues and intercropping of annual crop and trees. Farms from the East Coast use agroforestry systems (simple and multiple tree species) and the traditional twice-a-year rice cropping system. Farm resource flow maps were developed in order to represent all of the structures and characteristics of each farm. GHG source and sink compartments’ inventory was performed and emission factors adapted to each zone were selected from the literature. A local/specific farm carbon footprint calculator was developed. Results showed that average farm carbon footprint amounted to 3.04 Mg CO2eq ha-1 y-1 and 7.69 Mg CO2eq ha-1 y-1 in the Highlands and in the East Coast respectively. The intensive rice farming system alternating wet and dry period improved the farm carbon footprint in the Highlands by reducing methane emission while the traditional twice-a-year rice cropping system is an important source of methane in the East Coast. Nevertheless, the contribution of agroforestry systems in the East Coast allowed a farm carbon footprint reduction of between 15 to 51%.

Références

Documents relatifs

Table 1: Estimated CO 2 from training a single French (Com- monVoice) or English (LibriSpeech) state-of-the-art end-to-end speech recognizer on Nvidia Tesla V100 GPUs2. Models CO

Three cropping systems were compared: (1) rotation of upland rice followed by maize intercropped with Crotalaria grahamiana, with no tillage (R-MC_NT), (2) rotation of rice

(2007) Farmers’ adoption of conservation agriculture : A review and synhesis of recent research, Food Policy 32, 25-48. An agroclimatic characterisation of Madagascar. ISRIC

to 30%, and the remaining portion of the footprint included CO 2 e from the production of P fertilizer and pesticides, and from miscellaneous field operations. Crops grown in the

Hence, in this chapter, based on an earlier publication (Nyssen et al. 2006), we will (1) introduce the nature of stepped topography present so widely in northern Ethiopia, (2)

Then, based on the objective function, optimizing algorithm reduces energy consumption or CO 2 emission or non-renewable energy usage respectively and the controller

To examine whether the carbon footprint induce the sustainability lo- cal food production and service system, this study investigate the relationship between consumers’

At the research lab scale, the carbon footprint can be analysed to understand (i), the main emission sources and the relative contribution of each activity, (ii), the