HAL Id: jpa-00212378
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00212378
Submitted on 1 Jan 1990
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of
sci-entific research documents, whether they are
pub-lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.
Low frequency vibrational modes related to texture in
silica aerogels
J. Pelous, J.L. Sauvajol, T. Woignier, R. Vacher
To cite this version:
Low
frequency
vibrational modes related
to
texture
in silica
aerogels
J. Pelous
(1),
J. L.Sauvajol
(2),
T.Woignier
(1)
and R. Vacher(1)
(1)
Laboratoire de Science des Matériaux Vitreux(*),
F-34060Montpellier
Cedex01,
France(2)
Groupe
deDynamique
des Phases Condensées(**),
F-34060Montpellier
Cedex 01, France(Reçu
le 25septembre
1989,accepté
sousforme définitive
le 15 novembre1989)
Résumé. 2014 Les modes de vibration basse
fréquence d’aérogels
de silice ont été étudiés parspectrométrie
Raman. Laposition
et lalargeur
despics
observés dans l’intervalle defréquence
5 à 30cm-1 apparaissent
corrélées aux conditions initiales depréparation
et aux traitementsthermiques
de densification. Lafréquence
dupic
estproportionnelle à
l’inverse du rayon degyration
desparticules,
déduit des mesures de diffusionélastique
des neutrons auxpetits angles.
Ceci permet une détermination de la vitesse du son à l’intérieur desparticules.
Deplus,
ladépendance
entempérature
des spectres démontre le caractèreharmonique
des modesresponsables
dupic.
Abstract. 2014 Low
frequency
vibrational modes of silicaaerogels
have beeninvestigated by
Raman spectrometry. Theposition
andlineshape
of thepeaks
observed in the range from 5 to30
cm-1
appear correlated to the initialpreparation
conditions and to the heat treatmentresponsible
for the densification. The maximumfrequency
of thepeak
isproportional
to the inverse of the constitutiveparticle gyration
radius deduced from smallangle
neutronscattering.
This
gives
a determination of the soundvelocity
inside theseparticles.
Moreover, the temperaturedependence
of the spectrum for onesample
demonstrates the harmonic character of the modesresponsible
for thepeak.
ClassificationPhysics
Abstracts 63.50 - 78.30L1. Introduction.
The vibrational
dynamics
ofglassy
networks is a matter of current researchactivity
[1].
Inparticular,
low-frequency
modes areattracting
much interest asthey
are related to collectivemotions of the disordered atoms. Those modes show up in acoustic
properties
as well as in lowfrequency
Ramanscattering
of solids.They
are alsoresponsible
for their lowtemperature
thermalproperties.
It is well known that all of the abovephysical
properties
exhibitintriguing
anomalies inglasses
and,
moregenerally,
in disordered solids[2].
Highly
anharmonicexcitations of still unknown
microscopic
nature, in excess to « normal » acousticphonons,
have been
proposed
to describe those anomalies[3].
At lowtemperature,
coupling
ofphonons
withtunneling
processes of those « two-levelsystems »
(TLS)
explains
thenon-(*)
Unité associée au CNRS 1119.(**)
Unité associée au CNRS 233.434
Debye
behavior ofspecific
heat and thermalconductivity,
as well as sound attenuation anddispersion [2].
Athigher
temperatures,
thepeaks
of acoustic and dielectricabsorption
arelikely
tooriginate
fromthermally-activated
relaxation[4].
Morerecently
a new kind ofanharmonic excitations has been
proposed
as an alternativeexplanation
in disordered solids[5].
Vitreous silica is from far the most
extensively
studiedmaterial,
as it is a commonconstituent of a
large
number ofglasses.
On a more fundamentalviewpoint,
theproperties
ofsilica
glass
caneasily by compared
to those of its stablecrystalline
counterparts.
Amicroscopic
modelinvolving coupled
rotations of a fewSi04
tetrahedra has beenproposed
todescribe the
density
of states deduced from inelastic neutronscattering experiments
[6].
Morerecently,
harmonic - forfrequencies
higher
than = 0.6 THz - and anharmonic vibrational modes - at lowerfrequencies
-were observed in excess to
propagating
acousticphonons
[7].
The same model was used togive
an unifieddescription
of acoustic and dielectricproperties
at lowtemperatures,
as well as of neutron and Ramanscattering
in thelow-frequency
domain[8].
Thispicture
is veryattractive,
but does not account for the observation of very similar anomalies in disorderedmaterials,
irrespective
of theirmicroscopic
structure.Alternatively,
theconcept
of fractons[9]
provides
apossible explanation
of thoseproperties,
as illustratedby
Alexander et al. in theirstudy
of the thermalproperties
ofquartz
amorphized by
neutron irradiation[10].
This was thestarting point
of somecontroversy
[11]
and stimulated a number of
experiments
[12].
Inparticular,
Ramanscattering
measurements on silicagels
[13],
Na-colloids[14],
andsuperionic glasses
[15]
havegiven
evidence of apower-law dependence
of thespectral intensity,
I (w ) oc co ’.
A calculation of thelight
scattering intensity
in fractal media wasproposed
[13]
from which a relation between theexponent
v, the fractal dimensionD,
the fracton dimensiond,
and the localizationexponent
dcp
[16]
was derived. The results in silicagels
were little sensitive topreparation
conditions,
and a similar behavior was also observed M
Vycor,
aweakly
porousglass
obtained in acompletely
different way.The
study
of disordered materialshaving
a well-established fractal structure canhelp
toclarify
the matter, inasmuch as oneclearly
separates
(i)
the test of fractonpredictions
for thephysical
properties
and(ii)
theiradequation
toglasses. Small-angle
neutron[17, 18]
(SANS)
and
X-ray
[19] (SAXS)
scattering experiments
have demonstrated that silicaaerogels
areexcellent
examples
of porous solidshaving
a fractal structure atlength
scales Llarger
than aparticle
size a and smaller than a correlationlength
e.
Below a and abovee,
the materials ishomogeneous
[18].
Previousinvestigations
of the vibrationaldynamics
of these materials havegiven
evidence of a crossover fromlong wavelength
acousticphonons
to fractons in the Brillouinscattering frequency
range, from = 0.5 to = 5 GHz[20].
Scattering
from fractonswas observed in the very low
frequency
Ramanscattering
region, typically
below 300 GHz(10
cm- 1)
[21].
These studies are relevant to thepoint
(i)
above. Atlarger
frequencies,
whichcan be
analyzed by
conventional Ramanspectrometers,
scattering
oflight originates
fromsurface and internal modes of the
homogeneous
particles. They
cangive
information on thestructure of the
peculiar glass
obtainedby
thesol-gel
route. Thatthey
are related to apossible
fractality
ofglasses
-point
(ii)
above - is stillan open
question.
In the
present
paper, wepresent
the results of a lowfrequency
Ramaninvestigation
of silicaaerogels.
Thefrequency
rangeexplored
isexpected
up to the fractonregime
[21].
We first compare thespectra
obtained on two series ofsamples
corresponding
to differentpreparation
conditions. Thechanges
of the lowfrequency
Ramanspectrum
during
the process ofdensification to
glass
are alsoinvestigated.
The evolution of the lowfrequency
part
of thespectrum
is correlated with the variations of a, observed in SANSexperiments
on similarOur results demonstrate
that,
in thefrequency
range above12 cm-1
(= 400 GHz),
the excitationsresponsible
for Ramanscattering
show an harmonic character.2.
Sample préparation
andexpérimental procedure.
The
aerogels
wereprepared by
hydrolysis
andpolycondensation
oftetramethoxysilane
(TMOS),
followedby
hypercritical
drying.
Four moles of water per mole of TMOS wereused. Two kinds of materials were
investigated namely neutrally
reacted and basecatalysed
samples ;
in the latter case the water wasbrought
to anormality
of 0.05 of ammonia. Thesamples
were oxidized at 500 °C in airduring
15 hours. This treatment removes some residualmethyl
groups and decreases fluorescence lines which sometimesoverlap
the Ramanspectra
of theaerogels.
Densification was obtained
by
heat treatment. Fourpieces
of oxidizedaerogel
of each series were treated at 1 050 "C for various durations. The final densities of thesesamples
aregiven
as labels of the Ramanspectra
in thefigures.
To observe Raman
scattering
from silicaaerogels,
a conventionalexperimental
configur-ation was used. Raman
experiments
wereperformed using
a« Coderg
T800 »triple
monochromatorspectrometer.
Scattering
was obtained with the 5 145 nm line of anargon-ion
laser
(Spectra
Physics
type
2020),
with theoutput
power of the incident beamkept
at500 mW. The scattered
light
was collected inright-angle
configuration
and in VHpolarization.
The instrumental linewidth was 1cm- 1.
At roomtemperature
the lowfrequency scattering
was studied under vacuum to avoid
scattering originating
from air in thesample
pores. Lowtemperature
measurements wereperformed
in a4He
cryostat.
As silicaaerogels
arevery poor heat
conductors,
theprecise
determination of thesample
temperature
becomesmore and more difficult as the
temperature
is lowered. Toimprove
heatexchange,
thesample
holder wasdirectly
immersed inliquid
helium.3. Results and discussion.
The Raman
spectra
I ( W )
have beenanalyzed
at roomtemperature
for the two series ofsamples. Figure
1 compares the results obtained for two untreatedsamples,
oneneutrally
reacted and the other
prepared
under basiccatalysis.
Here we haveplotted
the Ramansusceptibilities, X
(co )
=I (w )/ (n (,w ) + 1 ),
wheren (,w )
+ 1 is theappropriate
Bose Einsteinfactor for Stokes
scattering.
Thedensity
p of eachsample
is indicated in thefigure.
Inagreement
withprevious
results obtainedby
Boukenter et al. on similarsamples,
a broad lowfrequency scattering
is observed from the instrumental limit 1, 7cm- 1
up to = 100cm - 1.
The mean feature of these
spectra
is a well-resolvedpeak.
Suchpeaks
have beententatively
assigned
to the lowest energy torsional mode of silicaparticles.
The meanparticle
sizeR is related to the
peak
frequency
by
where vt is the transverse sound
velocity
inside theparticle.
For
neutrally
reactedsamples,
thepeak
is broader than for thebase-catalyzed
ones. Thiseffect can be related either to a
polydispersity
in theparticle
size,
or topoorly
definedparticle
surfaces. This agrees with SANS results in which a smooth crossover from bulk fractal toPorod surface
scattering
is observed in neutralaerogels
[18].
436
Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig.
1. Lowfrequency
Ramansusceptibilities
X (co
= ’"
for two untreated silicaaerogels :
n(c)+1
a)
neutrally
reactedsample,
b)
basecatalyzed sample.
Fig.
2. -Evolution of the low
frequency
Raman spectra for different times of heat treatment inneutrally
reactedaerogels.
The labels indicate thecorresponding
densities.into the elastic line. An
overintensity
is stillpresent
in curve e offigure
3,
corresponding
top - 1 600
kg.m- 3 -
However the maximum is now below theexperimental
resolution,
andonly
allows an estimation of thehigher
limit of thepeak
position.
In contrast, after the finalstage
of transformation of thegel
intoglass,
thelow-frequency
intensity
becomes veryweak,
as demonstrated in curve d
(Fig. 2).
Thespectrum
of thefully-densified
sample
is similar tothat of vitreous silica.
As illustrated
by
theplot
of P.. vs.P in
figure
4,
thepeak
occurs athigher frequencies
in thespectrum
taken on thesample prepared
under neutralconditions,
than on thegel
of the samedensity
obtained under basiccatalysis.
This is in excellentagreement
with SANS results and confirms the known result that the addition of a basiccatalyst
favors the formation oflarger particles
in thegel
[22].
We observe here that these differences betweencatalysis
conditions remain for
partially
densifiedsamples ;
however the gap decreasesduring
thedensification process.
It can be also noted that a linear
extrapolation
of thev a,, (P )
curvesintercept
theFig.
3. - Evolution of the lowfrequency
Raman spectra for different times of heat treatment in basecatalyzed aerogels.
The labels indicate thecorresponding
densities.Fig.
4. - Maximumfrequency
of thepeak
v max observed in the lowfrequency
Raman spectra versusdensity
for(0)
neutral untreated and densifiedaerogels,
(0)
basecatalyzed
untreated and densifiedaerogels.
vitreous silica which is the final material obtained
by
densification. The lowfrequency
Ramanscattering
spectrum
for thefully-densified aerogel,
shown infigure
2d,
is very similar to that of bulk vitreous silica.SANS data
published previously
[23]
in the samesamples
allow a determination of the characteristic size of theparticles
constitutive of the silicagels,
which can be correlated to the438
has been observed in
aerogels.
Itgives
an estimation of thegyration
radiusR.
of aparticle,
asqRg -
1 at the crossover. Infigure
5 we haveplotted
the maximumfrequency
of thepeak
observed in Ramansusceptibility
vs.Rg
1 deduced from SANSexperiments.
Within theaccuracy of the
experiments,
the twoquantities
appearproportional.
Independently
of anymodel,
this resultis,
to ourknowledge,
the first direct andconvincing
evidence for acorrelation between the low
frequency
Ramanspectra
and a structural information onaerogels.
Assuming
that the relation betweenRg
and v max isgiven by equation
(1),
the measurementsof both
Rg
and v max can thus be used to obtain an estimate of the sound velocities at theparticle
scale. Thequantity
is
plotted
vs. R =Rg 3 in
figure
6. The somewhatlarge scattering
ofpoints originates
from uncertainties in the determination ofRg.
However,
we can deduce a meanvelocity
v - 2 150m. s - 1.
This value issignificantly
lower than the transversevelocity
of sound invitreous silica
(’" 3 700 m.s - 1)
andimplies
an excessDebye density
of states than in bulksilica ;
as a matter of fact an excess has beenreally
observedby
neutronscattering
investigation
[24]
which can be related to this low value of the soundvelocity.
The low value for the soundvelocity
at theparticle
scale can be related to an intemal structure different from that of vitreoussilica,
indicating
a more open structure or a residualmicroporosity
in theaerogel particle.
Thenearly
constant value found for thevelocity
(Fig. 6)
wouldimply
that thismicroporosity
is identical whatever thecatalysis
conditions,
and remains in the firstdensification
stages.
Some indications for differences between the local structure of bulk vitreous silica and that ofaerogels
have been observed in thehigh-frequency
part
of theFig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig.
5. - Maximumfrequency
of thepeak
v max observed in the lowfrequency
Raman spectra versus the inversegyration
radius of theparticules
constituve of theaerogels.
Rg
was
deduced from the smallangle
neutronsscattering
results[23].
The results concerns neutral, basecatalyzed
untreated and also densifiedsamples.
Fig.
6. - Sound velocities vRaman
spectrum
[25].
Moreover,
ananalysis
in terms ofcomposite
structure of the elastic moduli of silicagels
leads to a similar conclusion[26].
Another
explanation
for thisdiscrepancy
could be that the numerical factor inequation
(2)
isinadequate.
This factordepends
on theshape
of theparticle.
The value 0.8 is relevant tospherical particles,
while forparticles
of differentshape
the numerical coefficient is notknown. The relation
(2)
can be also erroneous if theparticles
arecoupled.
However,
it isworth
noticing
that the datapoints
infigure
5 forneutrally
reacted and basecatalyzed
aerogels collapse
on the samestraight
line. As electronmicroscopy
has demonstrated verydifferent
particle shapes
for these two kinds ofsamples
[27],
the aboveexplanation
appearsunlikely.
Nevertheless,
the totalfrequency
spectrum
of the smallparticles, including
surface and bulk modes as calculated for instanceby
Tamura[28],
should be taken into account. In that case the relations(1)
and(2)
appear a crudeapproximation.
A detailedquantitative
analysis
of thepeak
position
needs more information on theshape
of theparticle
andcoupling
of theparticles.
Finally,
we discuss thetemperature
dependence
of the lowfrequency
Ramanspectra
of silicaaerogels.
We studied thetemperature
dependence
of the Ramanspectrum
on oneparticular sample
with p = 240kg.m-3,
prepared
under basic conditions. We firstanalyzed
the Stokes and the anti-Stokes
part
of eachspectrum,
comparing
the ratio of intensities onboth sides at a
given
frequency
to theexpected
value of[n(w)
+1 ]/n(w).
Wenumerically
adjusted
the value of thetemperature
to obtain thesuperposition
of the Stokes andanti-Stokes
part
of thespectrum.
The value of thetemperature
T obtained in this way issystematically
higher
by
a fewdegrees
thatgiven by
a thermometer fixed on thesample.
When the
sample
holder is immersed intoliquid
helium the above determinationgives
T = 20
K,
which is the lowesttemperature
obtained in thisexperiment.
Thecomparison
of the Stokes Ramanspectra
at 300 K and 20 K isgiven
infigure
7,
where the curves have been shiftedarbitrarily along
the ordinate axis. The insert in thisfigure
shows thecorresponding
susceptibilities X
(w ),
inlog-log plot.
The two features of eachspectrum
are a base line with apower-law dependence
of theintensity
vs.frequency
and asuperimposed
well-definedpeak.
Fig.
7. -Comparison
of the lawfrequency
Raman spectra for a basecatalyzed sample
440
The
background power-law dependence
in this range offrequency
has been attributedpreviously [29]
to fractons atlength
scales lower than theparticle
size. Without anyconfirmation of a fractal
geometry
orconnectivity
inside theparticle,
such anassignment
seems
questionable
and asks for furtherinvestigations.
Furthermore,
the poorsignal-to-noise
ratio at lowtemperature,
a fluorescencebackground
and a residual elasticscattering
whichadd to the Raman
intensity
in ourexperiment
makes it difficult to conclude about thetemperature
dependence
of thispower-law background.
On the other hand we note that neither theshape,
nor thefrequency position
of thepeak
vary withtemperature.
Thissimilarity
demonstrates the harmonic character of the vibrational modes related to thesepeaks.
The result confirms theprevious
observation deduced from thetemperature
dependence
of the inelastic neutronscattering signal
for lowerfrequencies [24]
or for thenearly
samefrequency
range[30].
References
[1]
See, e.g. PhononScattering
in Condensed Matter, Eds. A. C. Anderson and J. P. Wolfe(Springer,
Berlin)
1986.[2]
See, e.g.Amorphous
Solids,Low-Temperature
Properties,
Eds. W. A.Phillips, Topics
in CurrentPhysics
Vol. 24(Springer, Berlin)
1981.[3]
ANDERSON P. W., HALPERIN B. I. and VARMA C. M., Philos.Mag
25(1972)
1 ; PHILLIPS W. A., J. LowTemp. Phys.
7(1972)
351.[4]
HUNKLINGER S. and SCHICKFUS M. V., in reference[2].
[5]
SIEVERS A. J. and TAKENO S.,Phys.
Rev. B 39(1989)
3374.[6]
BUCHENAU U., NÜCKER N. and DIANOUX A. J.,Phys.
Rev. Lett. 53(1984)
2316.[7]
BUCHENAU U., PRAGER M., NÜCKER N., DIANOUX A. J., AHMAD N. and PHILLIPS W. A.,Phys.
Rev. B 34
(1986)
5665.[8]
BUCHENAU U., ZHOU H. M., NÜCKER N., GILROY K. S. and PHILLIPS W. A.,Phys.
Rev. Lett. 60(1988)
1318.[9]
ALEXANDER S. and ORBACH R., J.Phys.
France Lett. 43(1982)
L625.[10]
ALEXANDER S., LAERMANS C., ORBACH R. and ROSENBERG H. M.,Phys.
Rev. B 28(1983)
4615.[11]
See, e.g., GRAEBNER J. E., GOLDING B. and ALLEN L. C.,Phys.
Rev. B 34(1986)
5696 ; GRAEBNER J. E. and GOLDING, ibid. , 5788.[12]
ROSENBERG H. M.,Phys.
Rev. Lett. 54(1985)
704 ;PAGE J. H. and MCCULLOCH R. D.,
Phys.
Rev. Lett. 57(1986)
1324 ;DIANOUX A. J., PAGE A. J. and ROSENBERG H. M.,
Phys.
Rev. Lett. 58(1987)
886 ; FRELTOFT T., KJEMS J. and RICHTER D.,Phys.
Rev. Lett. 59(1987)
1212.[13]
BOUKENTER A., CHAMPAGNON B., DUVAL E., DUMAS J., QUINSON J. F. and SERUGHETTI J.,Phys.
Rev. Lett. 57(1986)
2391.[14]
DUVAL E., MARIOTTO G., MONTAGNA M., PILLA O., VILIANI G. and BARLAND M.,Europhys.
Lett. 3
(1957)
333.[15]
FONTANA A., ROCCA F. and FONTANA M. P.,Phys.
Rev. Lett. 58(1987)
503.[16]
ALEXANDER S., ENTIN-WOHLMAN O. and ORBACH R.,Phys.
Rev. B 32(1985)
6447.[17]
SCHAEFER D. W. and KEEFER K. D.,Phys.
Rev. Lett. 56(1986)
2199.[18]
VACHER R., WOIGNIER T., PELOUS J. and COURTENS E.,Phys.
Rev. B 37(1988)
6500.[19]
DOS SANTOS D. I. , AEGERTER M. A., CRAIEVICH A. F., LOURS T. and ZARZYCKI J., J.Non-Cryst.
Solids 95-96(1987)
1143.[20]
COURTENS E., PELOUS J., PHALIPPOU J., VACHER R. and WOIGNIER T.,Europhys.
Lett. 6(1988)
245.[21]
TSUJIMI Y., COURTENS E., PELOUS J. and VACHER R.,Phys.
Rev. Lett. 60(1988)
2757.[23]
VACHER R., WOIGNIER T., PHALIPPOU J., PELOUS J. and COURTENS E., RevuePhys.
Appl.
24(1989)
C4.[24]
REICHENAUER G., FRICKE J. and BUCHENAU U.,Europhys.
Lett. 8(1989)
415.[25]
WALRAFEN G. E., HOKMABADI M. S., HOLMES N. C., NELLIS W. T. and HENNING S., J. Chem.Phys.
82(1985)
2472.[26]
MURTAGH M., GRAHAM E. and PANTANO C., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 69(1986)
775.[27]
BOURRET A.,Europhys.
Lett. 6(1988)
731.[28]
TAMURA A., HIGETA K. and ICHINOKAWA T., J.Phys.
C. Solid StatePhys.
15(1982)
4975 ; TAMURA A. and ICHINOKAWA T., J.Phys.
C. Solid StatePhys.
16(1983)
4779.[29]
ROUSSET J. L., DUVAL E., BOUKENTER A., CHAMPAGNON B., MONTEIL A., SERUGHETTI J. and DUMAS J., J.Non-Cryst.
Solids 107(1988)
27 ;BOUKENTER A., CHAMPAGNON B., DUVAL E., ROUSSET J. L., DUMAS J. and SERUGHETTI J., J.