Interference Alignment with Delayed Differential Feedback for Time-Correlated MIMO Channels
6
0
0
Texte intégral
(2) 012345343163789 1 312
(3) 92 3839553431298 336549 34438230 1138 91 91 !39 91 1 !91 1 "1 34 133 # 1$91 89%9 . 3"223&3!42457'163(2968 196291"23 1)32
(4) 4 " 6. 8 5*83624196*1 9133491 1 ( 234"693163+391 ,19'3492$39-91 91./0012/ #",+*!* 786238! 6312 949183 98339 44 3%892 493356657895" 49'32234163 :;<=>?@=ABCDEFGEFECHEIJKLCMECDNBOPQIRSEECTEJJFEHULV ((349 49o3588
(5) .6l3349'32 3 919 CKWEXIRICEGYHKECDIZZFUIHQDUFEX[HEKCDEFGEFECHEIDQKLQ 95534312985336423542 329 36443823086 RKLCIJDUCUKREFIDKUN\]^P_`UTEaEFbKDXEMICXRLJUSIJHQICCEJ 591 6 1138.7l391'329 232 3438291 9(32
(6) 3312 3 RDIDEKCGUFMIDKUCNc\BPIDSUDQDFICRMKDDEFRICXFEHEKaEFRGUF "09242911533691234'8
(7) 92 53366(692 ZFEHUXEFXERKLCKCUFXEFDUMIdKMKWEDQEM[JDKZJEdKCLLIKC_BC DQKRZIZEFbTEXKRH[RRBOTKDQXEJIeEXXKGGEFECDKIJc\BGEEXSIHf 6124912. 42 34
(8) 3(4'32 33 9231635(29 85336 GUFDKMEVHUFFEJIDEXM[JDKZJEKCZ[DM[JDKZJEU[DZ[DNgBghPSJUHf 91234'8914342 919 9o32 3924291.4l 3 42391 GIXKCLHQICCEJR_iEHUCRKXEFDQEKMZIHDUGXKRDUFDKUCHI[REXSe 492 2919(4'935 1629152 3533691234'8 HQICCEJERDKMIDKUCEFFUFRICXj[ICDKWEXc\BGEEXSIHfXEJIeb 2911(29 8'8 35'34 3 423. ICXDQ[RbYCXICUZDKMIJGEEXSIHfKCDEFaIJDUMKCKMKWEDQKR 1
(9) 3 34 3 52 3((3494 19o3588
(10) .013629100 XKRDUFDKUCbIRTEJJIRDQER[M FIDEZEFGUFMICHE_\ZEHKYHIJJeb
(11) 336492 32 323 38."36291000349'32 3438291 TEXEFKaEDQEMKCKM[M XKGGEFECDKIJGEEXSIHfFIDE_OCXTKDQ DQEGEEXSIHfVHQICCEJHIZIHKDeHUCRDFIKCDbTEG[FDQEFRD[XeDQE 9(32
(12) 3312 3"092429112 3 919 9553431298 FEJIDKUCRQKZSEDTEECDQEIaEFILER[M FIDEICXDQEGEEXSIHf 5336
(13) 3882 33 92316352 3(29 85336 KCDEFaIJ_OCIJeDKHIJFER[JDRIFEaEFKYEXSeRKM[JIDKUCR_ 91234'8542 329 364438236 1138.01362910
(14) 3. 96 2 3 423(3454 163312 99553431298 0.0)3,0) 336076 3 3
(15) 92 92429112 3(29 85336 01234534316389 1 312k07l 3313'38(3135m 5 69312236 19n 32 1832 391234534316312 31 9 9o3 91234'8.0136291
(16) 3(4'932 39 829143 82. 2 3 829(83 91. 9143 43355433 k5l91p 34 00."9"* *! 9123453431636 1138q6r.02 331(4'391q6r2 2
(17) 92 012 9((34
(18) 36 3407 6 3 3
(19) 92 p 3491 8391( 291 83 2( 2k"0"l23 2 36(692 29 364438230 189634p 5 9 1. 6 1138
(20) 191 (34 349 9'31 / 9. .6
(21) 3 4 33 6 2 4 1 9 2 2 3 4 1 4 3639'3493n 9((3 stuvwxy z{|}tuvwx~t{|}tuvwxx k6l
(22) 92 v 1v 1231143(3629'38. 32 241 92 72 9 ")3 2 3t{|}tuvwxx234 36 313 89 983 234y/zp241 92913(31312(2982 6 (432{|}tuvwx12 313'34 3498326 93'3 243 2926443(191 43639'34y/zp. 3 8558391 22285 5.0291962391
(23) 18916 1138635m69312t xy/zp9 q6r2 2542 3p 34063 2 36 93'8359 612122 4 286 123 (486443823
(24) 92 vv
(25) 92 v1v12311236 241 92234 36 2 34919553431286913 . 3 (8916 1138 9 38389 92353366 1138
(26) 92 6(692 143639'3443(3629'38. 49 ((46 3239 12 3(4363454076 3 3 6124912(34591 86. 2 43639'3493m13 '3331(4(391q6r q7r
(27) 92 68354 8 291 343639'39 1822 3 1q4rqr
(28) 92 923429'38 291.7882 33543 312913 t xyt xt x~ t xt x~t x
(29) 43(3112 3 (2912 236 241 922341 43639'341
(30) 2 35 88"0.
(31) 3'342 99 424389o3 y/zpk7l 2 36(69253366 113892(968889 923.02 331
(32) 191qrq5r
(33) 92 89 9235336922 3 9
(34) 34331232 3v/ 2( 29 18'36242 1 829(83 91. 9161386 93'8391"0"23 92 3v91( 29 18'36242.t x43(43312
(35) 38891 8391( 2 829(83 2( 2k"0l10 2 3 2 6 1138635m6931254 2
(36) 96 9v 23
(37) 343533642392988 9 54(46296807 249
(38) 92 913(313121931296889249 23k9.9.l 9 (83 312291.
(39) 3'34
(40) 312 36 1138929 3'491 v6 ( 8 9131249329591 ¡t0¢£x.9v 92
(41) 83 5m69312253362 395534316356136 29'3 /19833' 362422 32 43639'34 3839.9.6 (83 "0. 8 9 1' 498329591 ¡t0¢¤x. 012 9((34
(42) 391'329 23076 3 3 91 9553431298 5336'3429 364438230 9123453431636 1138 ¥¦§¨©©ª«ª¬¨®¯°ªª±²®³´µ¶±ª¯
(43) 92 9242916 32 36 1138329 291344412 3 ,91 2 3 9 89389 k!l6 1138329 291 n 129o3"0533638. 3 9161249 29152 9 2 3"05241 92234 243639'34613329 232.
(44)
(45)
(46)
(47)
(48)
Documents relatifs
The receiver employs MLD and has knowledge of the exact channel coefficients, while the transmitter only knows the channel statistics, i.e., the Ricean factor, the LOS component,
Thus, the above result implies that, for large K, the sum rate of a system using an efficient user selection algorithm and beamforming based on these scalar feedback metrics
Degrees of Freedom (DoF) and Interference Alignment (IA) multi-cell multi-user: Interfering Broadcast Channel (IBC) Weighted Sum Rate (WSR) maximization and UL/DL duality
Assuming W to be infinitely large, we can easily see that user selection based on ranking-based CSIT is equivalent to minimum complementary (CCDF) scheduling. channel distribu-
The feedback strategy proposed for MIMO communica- tions, which is based on a differential quantization of the channel correlation matrix using geodesic routes, has sev- eral
If the ZF filters are replaced by MMSE receive filters that are the optimal interference sup- pressing filters (c.f Sec. 5) we conjecture a sum-rate duality for the K-user
A variant of ergodic IA for delayed feedback was proposed in [7], it shows that the full sum DoF K/2 of the SISO IC can be preserved for feedback delay as long as half the
This method can be seen as arriving at the K -link MIMO IFC for which the existence of an IA solution is to be analyzed, by successively adding a single TX and computing the
