• Aucun résultat trouvé

The effect of irrigation with drainage water on some chemical soil properties and the yield of different field crops El Guindy S., El Nasser G.A., Abu-Bakr A., El Sissi L. in

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "The effect of irrigation with drainage water on some chemical soil properties and the yield of different field crops El Guindy S., El Nasser G.A., Abu-Bakr A., El Sissi L. in"

Copied!
10
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

in

Bouchet R. (ed.).

Reuse of low quality water for irrigation Bari : CIHEAM

Options Méditerranéennes : Série A. Séminaires Méditerranéens; n. 1 1989

pages 147-155

Article available on lin e / Article dispon ible en lign e à l’adresse :

--- http://om.ciheam.org/article.php?ID PD F=CI000397

--- To cite th is article / Pou r citer cet article

--- El Guindy S., El Nasser G.A., Abu-Bakr A., El Sissi L. Th e effect of irrigation with drain age water on some ch emical soil properties an d th e yield of differen t field crops. In : Bouchet R. (ed.).

Reuse of low quality water for irrigation. Bari : CIHEAM, 1989. p. 147-155 (Options Méditerranéennes : Série A. Séminaires Méditerranéens; n. 1)

---

http://www.ciheam.org/

http://om.ciheam.org/

(2)

The effect of irriaation with drainage wãter on

some chemical soil

properties and the yield of different field crops

Samia Gama1 Abd

-

Cairo -

o f of drainage water for agriculture i n carried out with the cooperation of the

of

One of the main objectives of this project was to study the relation between irrigation water quality and soil properties on plant growth and crop yield in order to recommend suitable cropping patterns that can be adopted according to the quality of drainage water, physical and chemical properties of the soil.

T o carry out this study, a n experimental area of2.5 fedd. was established in Fayoum Governorate (see where drainage, mixed and fresh water have been used for irrigation of common crops in the Fayoum area. Data concerning soil und crops were collected frequently and analysed. This paper presents the resu.lts of the effect of irrigation water quality on some chemical soil properties and the productivity of some field crops.

- methods

1. Execution of the experiment

The was divided into 12

by The six

used

the a pipe line on the

dyke at the middle of two

wheat and onion, followed by maize and followed by

ppm, adj. 51, (1,700 ppm, adj. 22) a n d (1,200 ppm, adj.. 18)

and soil 1986).

(3)

The soil of was

of t h e exchange complex and the of sodium.

The value of was found to be 30 which was a sign of the need to the soil.

of of 1986,

installation of a followed by

ploughing and addition of gypsum to half of the plots st a of 2 tons/fed. Leaching was

two times.

2. and techniques of sampling and analysis

soil to

collected a t 25 cm to

a depth of 1 mixed

collected on a monthly basis.

collected soil sampling.

at the

soluble cations as well a s anion, CaC03, cation exchange capacity and exchangeable sodium

of hand in time and the yield was

- and discussions

. .

l. The effect of irrigation water quality on soil properties

o f t h e s a l i n i t y a depth of 2 m it was found t h a t

have led to

levels and plots with

in the same way (Figure 1).

in the plots with mmhoskm, to soil desalinization.

the dissolved salts the

The EC

11 and 8.5, when

(1,800 ppm)

and mmhoskm.

the same quality to the initial case.

which have initial EC less than can be seen

mixed 3.5 mmhoskm to

7 mmhoskm. plots cultivated with onions and with an initial soil salinity of 2.5 mmhos, the

at the end of the season to 7

between of

season and cultivation of

sh.ow of soil

salinity because of no

to it the

of tomato

to of 2.5 mmhoskm due to

As

season the field a

system.

and mixing with gypsum, it seems that the five a significant effect upon the of exchangeable sodium. The values

in spite of the fact that gypsum needs a long time to affect alkalinity due to its low solubility.

was also noticed that the installation of the tile value due to the leaching of sodium salts. On

of gypsum speeded up the of exchange between the clay complex and the gypsum.

Serie A: Seminaires mediterraneens

(4)

2.The effect of irrigation water quality on yield

Winter crops (1985-86 season)

value of wheat is 7 mmhos soil and about 3,000

ppm El Guindy,

expected due to

a maximum value of 1,200

Table 2, it a

between the yield of

was mainly due to the in soil alkalinity.

Figure 2 shows

b e n o t i c e d t h a t t h e yield was 21%

17. yield obtained was 2.5

yield in the of 2 todfed.

obtained of

Guindy, 1983; FAO, 1975). They concluded that to 2,500 ppm

to a 20% when using 4,000 ppm.

is Table that the maximum yield of onions is 4 ton/fedd., while

is 7.2 todfedd. This could to the fact that the onion plant is

is 1.2 600 ppm

soil salinity of the top (0-50 cm) was about 3.0 mmhodcm. The

with

25 ton/fed. at a soil salinity of 8.5 mmhos/cm.

Summer crops (1986 season)

to the salinity and alkalinity spots which of the field, tomato and maize plants failed to in these spots, specially tomatoes i n plots 4 and 5

few

addition to the sensitivity of maize to is 1 . 8 was no homogeneity in the field.

of of leaves, as well as

of the yield, as shown in Table 4.

obtained by used by

low (3.5 mmhoskm and 151,

the salinity and and

24 by about 56%. A t

the same time we can that the maximum

yield is low,

of 1.6 todfed.

Table 5. be noticed that the highest yields of

whole 3.1 todfed.) While

of mixed of

tomato yields 7.3

ton/fed.

of t h e 15 in some spots.

Winter Season 1987 of

in Table 6, only

of with

of the t h e

of

of the effects of

be this table that in

the followed by the

of

yield (with a of 74%) was found in the or mixed whole

On shows t h a t

no could

mixed

values. The of

(5)

- Conclusion

salinity as long as

0f the soil. This means that or mixed

of (1,300 1,700 ppm) the soil it

mmhoskm (2500 ppm). On

4 mmhos, salts will accumulate. Gypsum applications at a of 2 ton/fed., with installation of a

ESP value by about 30%.

up to 1,700 ppm

4

yield, but is affected by ESP 13.

effect of could not .

Nijland and El S. Guindy, 1983. Crop Yields, Water Table Annual

El Guindy S., Study on the of Salinity on

FAO, 1976. Crop water requirement, 24.

FAO, 1976.Water Quality for Agriculture -

29.

1954. of Saline and

Alkali Handbook No. 60.

Serie A: Seminaires mediterraneens

(6)

Table 1: Percentage of exchangeable sodium removed

Plot

1 0

Initial Drainage without Drainage with Gypsum Gypsum

Yo

010 Yo

Table The effect of different irrigation water treatments on wheat yield

Plot Treatment

Fresh water from sowing to harvesting

Fresh water during the first stage and drainage water after Fresh water during the first stage and mixed water after Mixed water during all the period

Drainage water during all the period

Irrigation treatment commonly used by farmers

hectare

+

feddan

Total weight Straw Grain Ton/fed. Ton/fed. Ton/fed.

fresh d rY d rY

(7)

Table The effect of different irrigation water treatments on onion yield

Treatment Fresh water from sowing to harvesting

Fresh water in the first period and drainage water after Fresh water in the first period and mixed water after Mixed water during all the period

Drainage water during all the period

Irrigation treatment commonly used by the farmers

Yield ton/fed 3 . 8 6 4 2 . 6 0 4 4 116 2 520 2 688 2..352

Table 4: The effect of different irrigation water treatments on maize yield in ton/fed.

Treatment Fresh water from sowing to harvesting

Fresh water in the first period and drainage water aftel Fresh water in the first period and mixed water after Mixed water during all the period

Drainage water during all the period

Irrigation treatment commonly used by the farmers

field ton/fed.

0.5948 0.7641 0.8768 0.461 5 0.6909 1 ..O620

options méditerranéennes

Serie A: Seminaires mediterraneens

(8)

Table 5: The effect of irrigation water treatments on summer tomato yield

Treatment

Fresh water from sowing to harvesting

Fresh water in the first period and drainage water after

Fresh water in the first period and mixed water after

Mixed water during all the period

Drainage water during all the period

Irrigation treatment commonl) used by the farmers

Fresh weight of fruit kglplot tonlfed.

l

laole I ne enect alrrerent lrrlgarlon warer rrearmenrs on pppzc- ana wlnrer

Treatment

Fresh water

Fresh water

+

mixed water Fresh water

+

drainage water Mixed water

Drainage water

Treatment commonly used by the farmer

in ton/fed.

Tomato

Nith gypsum without application gypsum application

.

(without gypsum)

Pepper Nith gypsum without

application gypsum application

(without gypsum)

(9)

Y i e l d

-

Straw

. - .

. . . . . .

. . . .

. .

-

. . , . . . . .. . . * .

. . .

.

.

.

.

.

1

13 16

ESP

Serie A: Seminaires mediterraneens

(10)

The location and the general lay out of experimental area

-

U 61 10 ( 3 m

u 10

-

( B 2"

N'... -

o ( 2 84cm3/h )

e

Références

Documents relatifs

Those are the issues to be discussed in this paper that highlights major policy issues in the management of agriculturally used water resources as well as addresses the

9- There is no effective role for media in awareness about environmental problems or it’s effects on human health.. 10- They believe that preservation of environment

Low efficiency of traditional irrigation systems is linked to the great quantity of water lost during irrigation, because the water supply is much larger than plant absorption

The impact of climate change under A1 and B1 scenarios, on crop-yield, water use efficiency (WUE), irrigation energy, energy application efficiency (EAE) and unit production cost

The Sant’ Antnin Sewage Treatment Plant (SASTP) was commissioned in 1983, and since then it has been producing water for irrigation.. During 1990, plant effluent started to be used

It works in the field of water resources develop- ment, conducting studies on the possible projects to be implemented in the upper tributaries of the Nile River and in the Sinai

1 Principal canals receive water directly from the Nile River for conveyance to main canals.. No direct irrigation from these canals is

Table 6.. The total physical input represent 46.3% and the machinery costs is about 28,24%. The total labor cost represent 25,47% of the total variable costs. While in case