in
Baselga M. (ed.), Marai I.F.M. (ed.).
Rabbit production in hot climates Zaragoza : CIHEAM
Cahiers Options Méditerranéennes; n. 8 1994
pages 415-424
Article available on lin e / Article dispon ible en lign e à l’adresse :
--- http://om.ciheam.org/article.php?ID PD F=95605319
--- To cite th is article / Pou r citer cet article
--- El D arawany A.A., Farghaly H.M., Yamani K.A.O., Marai I.F.M. Prelimin ary stu dies on th e effects of u sin g drain age water for drin kin g on produ ctive traits of rabbits in Egypt. In : Baselga M. (ed.), Marai I.F.M. (ed.). Rabbit production in hot climates. Zaragoza : CIHEAM, 1994. p. 415-424 (Cahiers Options Méditerranéennes; n. 8)
---
http://www.ciheam.org/
http://om.ciheam.org/
studies on the effects. of using drainage for drinking on product ive t r a i t s of rabbits in. Egypt
H. M.
M.
EGYPT.
.
-
o fb y
o f drank
words:
The o f
o f
.
may o r
o f
o f o f 1 ,
e t a l . , 1 9 7 1 )
.*
o f
and
,
. o f
i s 1 .
ad a
( 1 % P
was f
S
& &
1 , &
( D G )
% ) ,
SAS
s t a t i s t i c a l l y a n a l y s e d a c c o r d i n g t o t h e f o l l o w i n g models:
l f o r a l 1 ' t r a i t s i n f i r s t o r second t r i a l :
Y,jk= Bi
+
G ei 'k where a l l t r a i t s l n f l i r s t l . or1 J"
second t r i a l ,
= o v e r a l l mean,
= f i x e d e f f e c t due t o i t h ' b.reed, i= 1, 2 and 3
(l= Bau, 2= NZW 3 = C a l ) ,
= f i x e d e f f e c t due t o t h e
j t h water groups, 1, 2
and 3 (1=10 days, 2= 20 days and a l l p e r i o d s o f d r i n k i n g d r a i n a g e w a t e r d u r i n g e i t h e r p r e g n a n c y o r s u c k l i n g ) and
r e s i d u a l random e f f e c t . 2 f o r a l l t r a i t s i n t h i r d t r a i 1:
Yjjklm = B,
+
Pk S, ,e l J k l a where
YjJklp= a l 1 t r a i t s i n t h i r d t r a i l , and B. as d e f i n e d i n model 1.
e f f e c t due t o t h e j t h water groups, j = . l and 2 ( l =
d r i n k i n g d r a i n a g e w a t e r f o r 6 d a y s f r o m b e g i n n i n g s u c k l i n g p e r i o d and 2= d r i n k i n g f r e s h t a p water as a c o n t r o l
group 1 ,
Pk= e f f e c t due t o k t h p a r i t y k = l , . . 2 7 ,
S,= e f f e c t due t o t h e l t h season d e l i v e r y , l= l . ,
.
. 4 (l=W i n t e r 2= Spring Summer 4=Autumn) and
eijkln= r e s i d u a l random e f f e c t . 1
CHEMICAL COMPOSITION WATER
USED THE STUDY:
Maximum p e r m i s s i b l e l e v e l s ( i n d r i n k i n g w a t e r ) and chemical c o m p o s i t i o n o f t a p and d r a i n a g e
water are shown i n Table 1. The n i t r a t e and n i t ' r i t e v a l u e s i n t h e drainage water sample were h i g h e r than the maximum p e r m i t t e d l e v e l s and pH and other components l i e s w i t h i n t h e maximum p e r m i s s i b l e
l e v e l s recommended by W . f i . 0 . (1970 and 1971) and I . S . A . P o u l t r y S e r v i c e s L i m i t e d ( 1 9 8 1 ) .
EFFECTS OF USING DRAINAGE WATER
FOR DRINKING OF DOES DURING
PREGNANCY ON THEIR OFFSPRINGS:
Table summar i z e s t he means f S . E . o f doe performance t r a i t s o f t he t h r e e groups d r i n k i n g drainage water during 10, 20 and a l l days g e s t a t i o n p e r i o d . The means o f l i t t e r s i z e a t b i r t h and 21 'days were s i g n i f i c a n t l y (P<O.Ol and r e s p e c t i v e l y ) h i g h e r i n Group than Group The means o f l i t t e r w e i g h t a t
b i r t h and 21 days were
s i g n i f i c a n t l y lower i n Group than i n t h e o t h e r g r o u p s . L i t t e r s i z e and l i t t e r weight a t
weaning d i d n o t show any
s i g n i f i c a n t d i f f e r e n c e s among t h e t h r e e groups. Bunny weight a t b i r t h was s i g n i f i c a n t l y ( P < O ; O O l )
lower i n Group than i n t h e o t h e r groups, While; i t increased s i g n i f i c a n t l y ( P < 0 . 0 5 and 0.001)
i n t h e same group a t 2 1 days and a t weaning than i n o t h e r s . D a i l y g a i n a t t h e d i f f e r e n t p e r i o d s s t u d i e d i n c r e a s e d s i g n i f i c a n t l y
(P<O.O5 and 0.001) i n Group 3 t h a n i n t h e o t h e r groups. Group 3 showed the highest percentages
( P < O . O l ) o f Sb, M20 and TM,
f o1 lowed by Group 2. M20
i n c r e a s e d s i g n i f i c a n t l y ( P < O . O l ) i n Group than i n t h e o t h e r
groups. M20 Sb, and TM
s i g n i f i c a n t l y ( P < O . O l ) increased i n Group 3 than i n t h e o t h e r
groups. M21-30 and M30 d i d n o t show s i g n i f i c a n t d i f f e r e n c e s
among the three groups.
DOES
2
suck were
0 . 0 5 ) l
DG20
Sb
Tab t
S.E.
8 7
DG20 S b , ' M Z O
( P < 0 . 0 5 )
A l s o ,
et a l
A l s o ,
0 . 4 % um
A o f
l .
( 1 9 7 6 )
1977).
On
1 9 7 5 ) .
1994).
.
W . ( 1 9 7 1 ) .
1971..
S . E . ,
( 1 9 9 4 ) . 4 : 6 0 - 69.
( 1 9 7 5 ) . R e v i e w o f c h e m i s t r y . 15th
( 1 9 9 3 ) .
( 1 9 8 1 ) . of
MORISES, J . P . , E .
( 1988 1
.
o f 4th
( 1 9 7 7 ) .
on
> s .
WAGGONER, R . E . , GOOD, W . and GOOD, R.E. ( 1 9 8 5 ) . Water q u a l i t y and p o u l t r y p r o d u c t i o n . A r b o r
A e e r s i n f o r m a t i o n . ( C i t e d a f t e r Abu-Zeid 1 9 8 8 ) .
N a t i o n a l Academy o f Sciences, Washington, D.C.
RAND, M.C. (W.P.C.F.), ARNOLD, E . (A.P.H.A. 1 and MICHAEL, J .
( A . W . W . A . ) ( 1 9 7 6 ) . S t a n d a r d methods f o r t h e e x a m i n a t i o n o f
water and waste water. 1 4 t h
E d i t i o n e d i t e d . by A.P.H.A.- A.W.W.A.-W.P.C.F.
SAS STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
SYSTEM I N S T I T U T E I N C . ( 1989 1
.
SASGuide: S t a t i s t i c s , V e r s i o n 6 E d i t i o n , Cary, NC.
W . H . O . WORLD HE AL T H ORGANIZATION ( 1 9 7 0 ) . European s t a n d a r d s f o r d r i n k i n g w a t e r .
Ed., Geneva.
. W O R L D .HE AL T H O R G A N I Z A T I O N " 4 1 9 7 1 ) . I n t e r n a t i o n a l s t a n d a r d s f o r d r i n k i n - g w a t e r . ' p a l a i s de N a t i o n s , Geneva.
. SELL, J.L. and ROBERTS,
W . K . ( 1 9 6 3 ) . E f f e c t o f d i e t a r y n i t r a t e on t h e ch.ick growth,
l i b e r v i t a m i n A s t o r e s and t h y r o i d w e i g h t . J o u r n a 1 N u t r i t i o n , 79:171-178.
1 .
o f
B EC, TS'
6 . 5 - 9 . 2 75 3 0 250
-
- - - -
0 - 0 . 1 0-45 75- 125
-
0-200 0-200
-
750
T
Tap 6 . 7 8 13
6 3 106 Q Q Q 0 . 2 19
o.
194 3 . 39 153 3 95
1 .o2 6 5 2 . 5
i
7 . 6 0 18 19 6 178 8 t3
1 1 140 8 74 58 190 18 126 768. O
e
1 . 2 0
( % l 3 8 . 4 6 216.66 100.00
6 7 . 9 2 8
Q
5 4 0 0 . 0 0 6 3 6 . 8 4 4 1 10.52 7 2 . 0 9 4 8 . 7 1 2 4 . 1 8 500.00 3 2 . 6 3 78.43 2 . 3 7
. . . . . .
(v
d 8
4
+i &l
~
. . .
U U U
. . .
..
*
Q)
s j
Q'F
r-tt
. . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
u f f u
..I