Disponibleenlignesur
ScienceDirect
www.sciencedirect.com
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Is bladder voiding efficiency useful to
evaluate voiding function in women older than 65 years?
L’efficacité mictionnelle de la vessie est-elle utile pour évaluer la fonction vesicale chez les femmes de plus de 65 ans?
F.A. Valentini
a,∗, B.G. Marti
a, G. Robain
a, P.E. Zimern
b, P.P. Nelson
aaSorbonneuniversitéandhôpitalRothschild,75012Paris,France
bUTSouthwesternMedicalCenterinDallas,7539TX,UnitedStates
Received3July2019;accepted12August2019 Availableonline28August2019
KEYWORDS Bladdervoiding efficiency;
Ageing;
Woman;
Urodynamics
Summary
Aims.—The aimsofthestudy were toevaluate thereproducibilityofbladdervoidingeffi- ciency(BVE)betweenfreeflow(FF)andintubatedflow(IF)inoldwomen,andtosearchfora relationshipofthisindexwithcomplaintandurodynamicdiagnosis.
Methods.—Urodynamictracingsofnon-neurologicwomenreferredforinvestigationofvarious lowerurinarytractsymptoms(LUTS)wereanalyzed.UrodynamicstudyincludedoneFFfollowed byonecystometryandIF.Postvoidresidualvolume(PVR)wasmeasuredusingaBladder-scan.
Exclusioncriteriawerevoidedvolume<100mlandprolapseofgrade>2.
Results.—Onehundredandninetywomenmetthestudycriteria.Themeanagewas74±6 years[65—96years].Themaincomplaintwasurinaryincontinence:stress(26),urge(53)and mixed(56). Forty-fourwomenhad variouscomplaints withoutincontinence. OverallBVE IF (77.6±25.8) was significantly lower than BVE FF (90.4±15.3) (P<.0001). Age sub-groups stratification ledsimilar results.BVE IFwas significantly lowerthanBVE FF inwomenwith incontinencewhateverthecause.UrodynamicdiagnosiswasposedaccordingtotheICS/IUGA recommendationsand2sub-groupsdefinedaccordingwithinvolvementofdetrusor.BVEIFwas significantlylowerthanBVEFFfordetrusordysfunction,exceptfordetrusoroveractivity.
∗Correspondingauthorat:Servicedemédecinephysiqueetderéadaptation,hôpitalRothschild,5,rueSanterre,75012Paris,France.
E-mailaddress:favalentini@gmail.com(F.A.Valentini).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2019.08.270
1166-7087/©2019ElsevierMassonSAS.Allrightsreserved.
Conclusion.—In thislargecohortofoldnon-neurologicwomenstudiedurodynamicallyfora varietyofLUTS,BVEishigherwhenevaluatedfromaFFwhateverageandfor complaintof urinaryincontinence.Inaddition,alowBVEvaluefromanIFmaysuggestadetrusordysfunction.
Levelofevidence.—4.
©2019ElsevierMassonSAS.Allrightsreserved.
MOTSCLÉS Éfficacité
mictionnelledela vessie;
Vieillissement; Femme; Urodynamique
Résumé
Objectifs.—Lesobjectifsdel’étudeétaientd’évaluerlareproductibilitédel’efficacitémic- tionnelledelavessie (EMV)entredébitmétrielibre (DL)etinstantanémictionnel(IM) chez lesfemmesâgées,etderechercherunerelationentrecetindex,laplainteetlediagnostic urodynamique.
Méthodes.—Lestracésurodynamiquesdepatientesnonneurologiquesprésentantdiverstrou- blesdubas appareilurinaireontétéanalysés. Chaquebilan urodynamiquecomprenaitune débitmétrielibre suivieparune cystomanométrie avecIM. Lerésidu postmictionnel (RPM) était mesuré par échographie (Bladder-scan). Les critères d’exclusion étaient un volume uriné<100ml,uneexpulsionducathéterpendantl’IMetunprolapsusdegrade≥2.
Résultats.—Centquatrevingtdixpatientsremplissaientlescritèresd’inclusion.L’âgemoyen était74±6ans[65—96ans].Pour146patienteslaplainteprincipaleétaituneincontinence:
pour26uneincontinenceurinaired’effort,pour53uneurgenturie,63uneincontinencemixte.
Les autres plaintes étaient pour 22 une pollakiurie, pour 9 une dysurie et pour 18 divers TUBA (infectionsurinaires récidivantes, cystite interstitielle, douleurs).Globalement l’EMV IM(77,6±25,8)étaitsignificativementinférieuràl’EMVDL(90,4±15,3)(p<0,0001).Lastrat- ificationen sous-groupesd’âgecroissantconduisait àdesrésultatssimilaires.Le diagnostic urodynamique(DU)étaitposeselonlesrecommendationsdel’ICS/IUGAet2sous-groupesdéfi- nisenfonctiondel’implicationdudetrusor.l’EMVIMétaitsignificativementinférieureàl’EMV DLlorsqu’ilexistaitunedysfonctiondudetrusorsauflorsquecelle-ciétaitunehyperactivité.
Conclusion.—Danscetteimportantecohortedepatientesnonneurologiquesprésentantdivers TUBAévaluésenurodynamique,l’EMVestplusélevéeàpartird’uneDLquelquesoitl’âgeet lorsquelaplainteestuneincontinenceurinaire.Parailleurs,unediminutiondel’EMVlorsde l’IMpourraitêtreletémoind’unedysfonctiondudetrusor.
Niveaudepreuve.— 4.
©2019ElsevierMassonSAS.Tousdroitsr´eserv´es.
Introduction
Bladder voiding efficiency (BVE) is defined as the ratio between voided volume and total bladder capacity [1].
Although easy to calculate, this index is not widely used. Cholhanet al. [2] have evaluated bladder voiding efficiency from 2 successive free uroflowmetries (FF) in pre-menopausal women during proliferative and secre- tory phases of the menstrual cycle. In their study on Trans-Obturator Tape (TOT), Park et al. [3] showed a decreaseofemptyingefficiencyintheearlypost-operative period.
Amongthesefewpublishedstudiestheincidenceofaging wasonly mentioned in the study of Seong et al. [4] who underlinedinwomenasignificantincreaseoftheprevalence ofdetrusorunder-activitywithpatientagewithBVE%<90 andabsenceofclinicalobstruction.
Recently,thereliabilityofBVEmeasurementfromafree flow(FF)hasbeendemonstratedinthegeneralpopulation [5].
Forthefirsttime,measurementofBVEcouldbetested inalargecohortofnon-neurologicalwomenolderthan65 years.Aimsofourstudywerefirsttosearchforthecondi- tionwhichhadthepredominantinfluenceonevaluationof BVE(FForintubatedflowIF)andsecondthepossiblerela- tionshipswithageing,complaintandurodynamicdiagnosis.
Materials and methods
Urodynamic tracings of non-neurologic women aged≥65 yearswhowerereferredforinvestigationofvariouslower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) were retrospectively ana- lyzed. Each urodynamic session was performed using a urodynamicunitfromLaborie(MississaugaCanada).Urody- namictestswerecarriedoutaccordingtotheInternational ContinenceSocietyGoodUrodynamicPractices[6].Urody- namic study included one FF in private condition (sitting position)followedbyonecystometry(triplelumenurethral catheter 7F allowing for urethral pressure recording) and
intubatedflow (IF).Cystometry andIFwere performedin sittingposition,IFwithmaximumrespectfortheprivacyof thepatient(caregivers movingawayfromthe urodynamic unit).Bladderwasfilledwithsalineatroom-temperatureat amedium fillingrate of50ml/min. Postvoidresidualvol- umes(PVR)weremeasuredusingaBladder-scan.Exclusion criteriaweretobeunabletovoidand/orexpelledcatheter duringIF, voided volumeeither fromFFor IF<100ml and prolapseofgrade≥2.
Toevaluatetheroleofageing,thepopulationwasstrat- ifiedin4agegroups(65—70,71—75,76—80and>80years).
This retrospective study was conducted in accordance withthedeclarationof Helsinki.The localpracticeof our Ethics Committee does not require a formal institutional reviewboardapprovalforretrospectivestudies.
Statistical analysis
Dataarepresentedasmean±SDandrange.Thepairedt- testwasusedforcomparisonofrelatedsamples,analysisof variance(Anova)tocompareunrelatedsamples.Statistical analysis was performed using SAS, version 5.0 (SAS Insti- tute,Inc.,Cary,NC).Allstatisticalresultswereconsidered significantatP<0.05.
Results
Onehundred andninety women metstudy criteria. Mean age was 74±6 years [65—96years]. Overall, the volume voidedduringFF(241±138ml)wassignificantly(P<0.0001) lower thanvoided volume IF(317±140ml). PVR afterFF (30±59ml) was significantly lower (P<0.0001) than PVR afterIF(90±113ml).
Overall,BVEIF(77.6±25.8)wassignificantlylowerthan BVEFF(90.4±15.3)(P<0.0001).
A decrease between BVE FF and BVE IF wasobserved whateveragesub-groups(Table1);eachdecreasewassig- nificant.Withageing,therewasnodecreaseinBVEFFand decreaseofBVEIFwasnotsignificant.
Maincomplaintwasurinaryincontinence(146 women):
stress(30SUI),urge(53UUI)andmixed(63MUI).Forty-four womenhadvariouscomplaintswithoutincontinence(among which22 hadfrequency(FR)or dysuria(DYS); other com- plaints were recurrent urinarytract infection, interstitial cystitis,pain.
Looking at the main complaint a significant decrease in BVE IF when compared to BVE FF was observed in women with urinary incontinence whatever the sub-type (Table2)andinthesub-groupfrequency-dysuriabutifsub- populationswithoutincontinencewereputtogether,there wasnosignificantdifferencebetweenBVEFF(86.1±22.2) andBVEIF(80.1±23.6)(P=.2347).
Urodynamic diagnosis (UD) wasposed accordingto the ICS/IUGA recommendations. From UD, 2 sub-groups were defined according with involvement of detrusor. The first (116 women) had UD related to detrusor dysfunction (21 bladder outletobstructionBOO, 12detrusorhyperactivity withimpaired contractility DHIC, 31 detrusoroveractivity DO (17 phasic and 14 terminal), 52 detrusor underactiv- ity DU).The second sub-group (74 women) hadUD found
‘‘normal’’(24N),relatedtourethraldysfunction(38intrin- sic sphincter deficiency ISD and 12 voiding triggered by urethralrelaxationURA).BVEIFwassignificantlylowerthan BVEFFexceptforDO,ISD,N,andURAurodynamicdiagnosis (Table3).
Lookingattheinfluence ofdetrusordysfunctionBVEIF wassignificantlylowerinthesub-groupwithdetrusordys- function (73.9±26.0 vs. 86.1±20.6 p=.0008) while it is notthe case for BVE FF (88.6±19.4 vs. 89.9±17.7 n.s.) (Table4).
Discussion
Bladdervoidingefficiency(BVE)quantifiesthepercentage of bladder emptied during voiding. If the real definition:
ratio between voided volume and total bladder capac- ityis well respected when this index is evaluatedduring an intubated flow after a cystometry, but during a free uroflow as voiding is then initiated at normal desire, beforemaximum bladdercapacityandusuallylong before astrongdesire.Thatconditioncan explainthe difference betweeninitialbladdervolumes(voidedvolumeplusPVR).
Itdoesn’texplainthehigherPVRafterIF.Ithasbeendemon- stratedthata7Furethralcatheterproducesnosignificant geometrical obstruction [7] but, on the other hand can induce a urethral reflexleading to an increased PVR [8].
BVE provides information on the bladder emptying qual- ity while PIP [9] (BCI [1]) is used to evaluate detrusor isovolumetricpressureandIFtoguideurodynamicdiagno- sis.
Themainresultistheabsenceofreproducibilitybetween BVEmeasurement from a FF andfrom an IF in this post- menopausepopulation,asobservedinpre-menopauseand peri-menopause populations [5]. That absence of repro- ducibilityissimilarinagesub-groupsstratification.Asmall decreaseofBVEIFwithageingisobservedbutisnotsignif- icant.ThelowervaluesofBVEIFclearlyshowaninability ofoldwomentovoidwithaurethralcatheterinplace.So, BVEFF seemsa more reliableindex of bladder efficiency thanBVEIF.
Complaintofincontinenceresultsofsignificantdecrease inBVEIFwhichcouldbeusefulinformationformanagement.
Looking at the urodynamic diagnosis, an unexpected result is observed: for patients with UD diagnosis of detrusor overactivity, BVE IF is not different from BVE FF. Two hypotheses could be proposed to explain that behavior: first a significant percentage of terminal DO would lead tocomplete bladder emptying and decreased PVR, second increased detrusor contractility induced by DO. The first hypothesis is not verified (14 terminal DO vs. 17 phasic DO) while the second is verified as it has been shown in a previous study that DO pro- duce higher detrusor contractility [10]. In this study the VBN contractility parameter k is 0.57±.06 for the DO sub-groupvs. 0.19±0.29 for the rest ofthe studied pop- ulation.
ThemainlimitationofBVEistheabsenceofcutoffvalue tomakeadiagnosiswithareliableconclusionwhenevalu- atedfromaFForIF.Otherlimitationisthattoourknowledge thereisnouseasanevaluationinbladderfunction.Cholhan andal.proposedBVE>90%fornormaldetrusorfromFFin
Table1 Bladdervoidingefficiency(BVE)fromIFvs.FFinagesub-groups.
Age(y) n BVEIF BVEFF P
65—70 68 81.6±22.5 88.8±17.6 .0136
71—75 54 78.3±28.1 88.4±18.9 .0445
76—80 33 78.2±22.4 92.0±19.8 .0028
>80 35 73.2±25.7 87.7±20.5 .0105
P n.s. n.s.
AllvalueofP<.05issignificant.IF:intubatedflow;FF:freeuroflow:n.s.;nonsignificant.
Table2 Bladdervoidingefficiency(BVE)fromIFvs.FFformaincomplaint.
Complaint n BVEIF BVEFF P
SUI 30 75.7±27.1 93.8±10.8 .0021
MUI 63 81.3±23.5 92.4±13.9 .0004
UUI 53 75.8±26.0 85.1±22.8 .0359
FR-DYS 22 74.5±24.8 91.0±14.6 .0149
Other 22 83.1±22.4 83.1±21.9 n.s.
IF:intubatedflow;FF:freeuroflow;SUI:stressurinaryincontinence;MUI:mixedurinaryincontinence;UUI:urgeurinaryincontinence;
FR-DYS:frequency-dysuria;n.s.:nonsignificant.
Table3 Bladdervoidingefficiency(BVE)fromIFvs.FFforurodynamicdiagnosis.
UD n BVEIF BVEFF P
BOO 21 59.5±25.3 87.6±23.6 .0019
DHIC 12 67.4±32.5 94.8±7.2 .0153
DU 52 76.4±25.3 91.0±16.1 .0001
DO 31 82.5±21.5 84.0±22.9 n.s.
ISD 38 87.4±20.9 92.0±11.5 n.s.
N 24 83.4±21.0 85.6±25.0 n.s.
URA 12 85.5±20.7 88.9±20.0 n.s.
IF:intubatedflow;FF:freeuroflow;UD: urodynamicdiagnosis;BOO:bladderoutletobstruction; DHIC:detrusorhyperactivitywith impaired contractility:DU; detrusor underactivity; DO: detrusor overactivity; ISD:intrinsic sphincterdeficiency; N: normal; URA:
urethralrelaxation;n.s.;nonsignificant.
Table4 Influenceofdetrusordysfunctiononbladdervoidingefficiency(BVE)fromIF.
n BVEIF BVEFF P
Detrusordysfunction 117 73.9±26.0 88.6±19.4 <.0001
Nodetrusordysfunction 73 86.1±20.6 89.9±17.7 n.s.
P .0008 n.s.
AllvalueofP<.05issignificant.IF:intubatedflow;FF:freeuroflow;n.s.:nonsignificant.
womenyoungerthan45years[2].Somestudieshaveused BVE(BVE>75%)topredictingsurgical successin menwith benignprostaticenlargement [11]orpost-treatmentlarge PVR after intravesical injection of by onabotulinum toxin typeA(BVE<89%)inpatientswithoveractivebladder[12].
Some authors have searched for a BVE criterion to diag- nose detrusor underactivity in women; they proposed
association of 3 parameters: Pdet.Qmax<20cmH2O, Qmax<15mls−1 and BVE<90% [13] but without obvious superiority [4] over the association of 2 parameters pdet.Qmax<30cmH2O,Qmax<10mls−1[14].
So,despitetheselimitationsanditsretrospectivedesign, our study introduces some characteristics of BVE in older femalepopulation.
Conclusion
BVEisaneasilymeasuredindex.Inthislargecohortofold non-neurologicwomenstudiedurodynamicallyforavariety ofLUTS,BVEishigherwhenevaluatedfromaFFwhatever ageandforcomplaintofurinaryincontinence.Inaddition, alowBVEvaluefromanIFcouldbetheconsequence ofa detrusordysfunction.
Disclosure of interest
Theauthorsdeclarethattheyhavenocompetinginterest.
References
[1]AbramsP.Bladderoutletobstructionindex,bladdercontractil- ityindexandbladdervoidingefficiency:threesimpleindices to define bladder voiding function. BJU Int 1999;84:14—5, http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.00121.x.
[2]CholhanH,JuliaJ,HutchingsT,KocurB.Voidingefficiency:a newmethodofassessingbladderemptyingfunctioninwomen.
NAU2010;29:863—4.
[3]ParkSH,ChangYK.Evaluationofpostoperativevoidingeffi- ciency after a transobturator tape (TOT) procedure and identification of the factors predictive of post TOT voiding dysfunction.JMinimInvasiveGynecol2010;17:S47—68.
[4]Seong JJ, Jung KL, Kwang MK, Harim K, Sung YC, Seung-June O. How do we diagnose detrusor underac- tivity? Comparison of diagnostic criteria based on an urodynamic measure. Investig Clin Urol 2017;58:247—54, http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/icu.2017.58.4.247.
[5]Valentini FA, Marti BG, Zimmern PE, Robain G, Nelson PP.
Comparisonofbladdervoidingefficiencyinwomenwhencal- culatedfrom a free flow versus anintubated flow. Bladder 2018;5(4):e36,http://dx.doi.org/10.14440/bladder.2018.790.
[6]RosierPFWM,SchaeferW,LoseG,GoldmanHB,GuralnickM, Eustice S, et al. InternationalContinence Society Good
Urodynamic Practices and Terms2016: Urodynamics, uroflowmetry, cystometry, and pressure-flow study.
Neurourol Urodyn 2017;36(5):1243—60, http://dx.doi.
org/10.1002/nau.23124[Epub2016Dec5].
[7]Valentini FA, Nelson P, Zimmern PE. Obstructive effect of the urethral catheter during voiding: myth or realty? UrotodayInt J 2013;6(5), http://dx.doi.org/
10.3834/uij.1944-5784.2013.10.08.
[8]ValentiniFA,RobainG,HennebelleDS,NelsonPP.Decreased maximumflowrateduringintubatedflowis notonlydueto theurethralcatheterinsitu.IntUrogynecolJ2013;24:461—7, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1856-2.
[9]Schäfer W. Analysisof bladderoutlet function withthelin- earizedpassive urethral resistance relation, linPURR, and a disease-specificapproachforgradingobstruction:Fromcom- plextosimple.WorldJUrol1995;13:47—58.
[10]Valentini FA, Nelson PP, Zimmern PE, Robain G.
Detrusor contractility in women: influence of age- ing and clinical conditions. Progr Urol 2016;26:425—31, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2016.03.004.
[11]Choo MS, Cho SY, Han JH, Lee SH, Paick JS, Son H. The cutoffvalueofbladdervoidingefficiencyforpredicting sur- gical outcomes afterGreenLight HPSTM laser photoselective vaporizationoftheprostate.JEndourol2014;28(8):969—74, http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2014.0067.
[12]HsiaoSM,LinHH,KooHC.Urodynamicprognosticfactorsfor largepost-voidresidualurinevolumeafterintravesicalinjec- tionofonabotulinumtoxintypeAforoveractivebladder.Sci Rep2017;7:43753[1038/srep43753].
[13]Gammie A, Kaper M, Dorrepaal C, Kos T, Abrams P. Signs and Symptoms of Detrusor Underactivity: An Analy- sis of Clinical Presentation and Urodynamic Tests From a Large Group of Patients Undergoing Pressure Flow Studies. Eur Urol 2016;69(2):361—9, http://dx.doi.org/
10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.014.
[14]Abarbanel J, Marcus EL. Impaired detrusor contractility incommunity-dwelling elderly presenting withlower urinary tractsymptoms.Urology2007;69:436—40.