• Aucun résultat trouvé

Leveraging social and semantic components in adaptive environments

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Leveraging social and semantic components in adaptive environments"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Leveraging social and semantic components in adaptive environments

?

Cristina Gena

Dipartimento di Informatica, Universit`a di Torino Corso Svizzera 185; 10149 Torino, Italy

cgena@di.unito.it

1 Abstract

In a Web 3.0 perspective, web sites and portals require design elements that make them executable environments (following W.L. Hoschs layering: read-only Web 1.0 - read- write Web 2.0 - read-write-execute Web 3.01). A number of interface and software com- ponents have been implemented for providing such elements, with various appraisals with respect to their effectiveness in interaction and communication tasks, such as, e.g., navigation, retrieval, learning.

In this paper, I’ll address an innovative element for the design and implementation of Web 3.0 executability in the context of a learning environment: a semantic layer for supporting tag annotation. We have applied these elements in the project 150 Digit, a web portal designed for (primary, middle, and high) school classes to virtually interact (also in a 3D environment) with the exhibitions that celebrate the 150th anniversary of Italy unity (http://www.150digit.it). In particular, I’ll describe the ontology-based rec- ommendation strategies for tags incorporated in 150 Digit and discuss the results of an evaluation carried out in a real setting. 150 Digit displays the exhibits and the related documents, such as the curators’ notes, some learning objects created by the classes about the displayed items, multimedia presentations created by the teachers about 150th anniversary themes, etc. 150 Digit encourages the active participation of the users (stu- dents, teachers, other registered users) in tagging, voting, and commenting the exhibits and in creating, uploading, and tagging new contents. Tag recommendations support the active participation of the users helping the user to select relevant tags for both an exhibit and a newly uploaded material. Tag recommendations aim at introducing new connections over the site contents, and expanding the semantic categorization of the ex- hibitions from the categories provided by the curators to the semantics emerging from the users tags thus supporting from a 2.0 to a 3.0 perspective.

As shown by [2], semantic tools that exploit taxonomic knowledge already provide an external grounding for the relations among tags that emerge in a folksonomy, open- ing the way to the integration of these two sources of information. The semantic layer of 150 Digit consists of a categorization of the exhibits (also applied to user-contributed

?I would like to thanks my colleagues, Rossana Damiano and Vincenzo Lombardo, which worked with me during the overall steps of this project.

1http://www.britannica.com/blogs/2007/07/web-30-the-dreamer-of-the-vine/

(2)

2 C. Gena

content) through semantic labels that integrate the bottom-up, folksonomic representa- tion of the site contents with their top-down, institutional categorization, thus making the curatorial knowledge available to the learning community and accessible through several exploration paths built upon the annotations of classes. In 150 Digit, the well- known vocabulary problem is addressed through an expansion along the meaning rela- tions encoded in MultiWordnet, given the constraints provided by the semantic labels attached to the exhibits. The semantic component relies on a light ontology, the Word- Net Domains [1], a taxonomy of domain labels originally developed to add semantic information to the meaning of terms in WordNet. While most ontologies require the expert knowledge to understand their structure (consider, for example, the foundational ontologies such as SUMO or DOLCE), the WordNet Domains lend themselves to non expert users, providing an off-the-shelf, portable layer on the top of which semantic recommendation tools can be easily built. The content recommender also follows this approach, by integrating social filtering techniques with the semantic knowledge en- coded in tags.

During a few months, students and teachers have been visiting the largest (and per- manent) exhibition (Fare gli italiani Making Italians), and then attending a set of post hoc laboratories wherein they are required to interact with 150 Digit portal. These lab- oratories have constituted the basis for a thorough evaluation of the system with a two- fold goal: on the one side, to assess the advantage of Web 3.0 approach over Web 2.0 approach in recommendation, on the other, to assess its suitability for learning applica- tions. During the lab sessions, the students were required to analyze the items related to the exhibits and to create and upload new materials, adding tags while doing both these operations; the students, randomly, either interacted with a modified version of the system - with the tag and content recommendation systems disabled - or with the regular one, thus receiving tag and content recommendations. In the talk, I’ll present the results, evaluating the impact of our approach on the following aspects: the acceptance and the accuracy of recommended tags, the tagging activity of users, the quantity and the typology of the inserted tags, and the semantics they convey. The latter point implies an analysis of the collaborative content structure that emerges from the tag sets gener- ated by the two versions of the system. This structure relies on MultiWordnet to capture the semantic relationship over tags and is compared with the semantic (MultiWordnet- based) relationship encoded into the system. In order to gain evidence for our approach, we also assess its benefits for the search function, by comparing the search results on the two sets of annotated data (with and without the semantic recommender).

References

1. Bentivogli, L., Pianta, E., Girardi, C.: Multiwordnet: developing an aligned multilingual database. In: First International Conference on Global WordNet, Mysore, India (2002) 2. Markines, B., Cattuto, C., Menczer, F., Benz, D., Hotho, A., Stumme, G.: Evaluating similarity

measures for emergent semantics of social tagging. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World wide web, April. pp. 20–24. Citeseer (2009)

Références

Documents relatifs

With respect to this scenario, the Ph.D. thesis is devoted to define the notion of i-cloud and a semantic clouding approach for the construction of i-clouds that works over the

And just as we need common formats and standards to be able to retrieve documents from computers all over the world, we need common formats for the

Our approach is different from existing ones in that it uniquely combines 1) spatial tradition (to be able to explicate spatial relations), 2) ontology-based reasoning (to be able

For example, Figure 1 depicts one of InPhO’s interfaces which provides users with pairs of philosophical ideas in their area of expertise for which they can evaluate the relatedness

”how to share part of my identity only to trusted people?”, or ”how to ensure the information I disclose will not be misused or responsible will be made ac- countable?” are

First, to allow Semantic Republishing tools interpreting policies of data web applications must expose not only their data in a machine-interpretable form, but also the related

Part A (Introduction) included general information for the collection of the texts, the purposes of the evaluation process and general instructions to the

WarSampo is a project and semantic portal that aims at this goal by publish- ing large heterogeneous sets of data about the WW2 in Finland as Linked Open Data (LOD)..