C OMPOSITIO M ATHEMATICA
J ILL M C G OWAN
The diameter function on the space of space form
Compositio Mathematica, tome 87, n
o1 (1993), p. 79-98
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=CM_1993__87_1_79_0>
© Foundation Compositio Mathematica, 1993, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Compositio Mathematica » (http:
//http://www.compositio.nl/) implique l’accord avec les conditions gé- nérales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utilisa- tion commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une in- fraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit conte- nir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
The diameter function
onthe space of space forms*
JILL McGOWAN
Howard University, Washington, D.C.
Received 21 May 1992; accepted 2 July 1992
(0 1993 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands.
0. Introduction
A manifold whose fundamental group is finite and whose sectional curvature is bounded cannot have an
arbitrarily
small diameter. Thisfollows,
forexample,
from Gromov’s result that for every dimension n, there exists
8(n)
> 0 such that if the sectional curvaturekM
of an n-dimensional manifold M isbounded, |kM| 1,
and the diameter
dM
of M satisfiesdM e(n),
M isfinitely
coveredby
anilmanifold
[3].
Inparticular,
the fundamental group03C01(M)
is infinite. Since amanifold of
positive
Ricci curvature has finite fundamental group[7],
such amanifold cannot have a diameter less than
e(n).
Aspherical
spaceform,
thatis,
amanifold for which
kM
=1,
must therefore have a diametergreater
than orequal
to Gromov’s
03B5(n).
Gromov’s
result,
of course, has far moregeneral implications
thansimply forcing
a lower bound on the diameter of space forms.Among
otherthings,
itforces a lower bound on the diameter of any manifold with bounded curvature and finite fundamental group. In
spite
of the wide range of manifolds to which these lower diameter boundsapply,
the values of those lower bounds were notknown,
even in thesimplest
case - the case of manifolds of constantpositive
curvature. In this paper, we determine lower bounds on the diameters of
spherical
spaces forms and prove thefollowing
theorem:THEOREM 0.1. The
infimum of
diametersfor spherical
spaceforms
is2
arc-cos 1 tan 303C0/10) (It is
not,however, the
actualdiameter of
anyspace form.)
/3
10(It
is not,
however,
the actual diameterof
any spaceform.)
This is an
optimal
lowerbound,
since it is the actual diameter of a space in the Hausdorff closure of space forms. It occurs in dimension three. Dimension three isspecial
for several reasons; notonly
does the minimal lower bound on the diameter of space forms occur withrespect
to three-dimensional spaceforms,
but the groups that act on
S3
toproduce
these space forms are thebuilding
blocks for groups that
produce
space forms of all other dimensions. These groups have beencompletely
describedby
J. Wolf.Except
for reducible actions*This paper contains the results of the author’s Ph.D. dissertation, written under the supervision of
Karsten Grove of the University of Maryland.
and two other
types
of groups, all the elements of these groups may berepresented
as blockmatrices,
in which each block is atwo-by-two complex
matrix that appears as an element of a fundamental group of a three- dimensional space form. In each such group, at least one
generator permutes
thecomplex
coordinates in blocks of two. These groupsonly
occur assubgroups
ofSO(4n + 4)
and act ons4n+3.
Ineffect,
the grouppermutes
the coordinate three-spheres (S3’S)
ins4n+3
and acts on eachthree-sphere
as one of the groupsacting on S3.
The lower bounds we have determined for space forms are
dependent
ondimension,
and increase as dimension increases. In every case, these lower bounds increase to03C0/2
as the dimension increases without bound.(For
acomplete
list of the lower bounds on spaceforms,
see p.19.)
In the even
dimensions,
theonly spherical
space forms are thesphere
andprojective
space. The smallest diameter that occurs when the curvature is normalized to one is therefore03C0/2.
As a consequenceof Klingenberg’s injectivity
radius
estimate,
this lower boundapplies
also forpositively
curved manifolds whose curvature is bounded aboveby
one,not just
to those of constantpositive
curvature. Since the even-dimensional lower bounds
apply
to manifolds ofvariable curvature, we are
presented
with thequestion:
Does the lower bounddetermined here
apply
to manifolds of variable curvature also?1. Limit spaces of space forms
Joseph
Wolf has classifiedspherical
space forms. In each odddimension,
thereare
infinitely
manyisometry types. They
are of the formSn/0393,
where r is a finitesubgroup
ofSO(n + 1).
Wolf described these space formsby classifying
theunderlying
groups r. He enumerated sixtypes
of groups. While each group isfinite,
groups of eachtype
may be found that arearbitrarily large [11]. (For
acomplete
list of the groups, see p.16.)
Let K be the set of
compact
subsets of S". If G is a closedsubgroup
ofSO(n + 1),
the orbits Gx in sn arecompact
and therefore are elements of K. We define distance on K as the Hausdorffdistance, dH(X, Y)
=inf{03B5
> 0: the e-neighborhood
of X contains Y and thee-neighborhood
of Y containsX}.
Underthis Hausdorff
distance,
K is acompact
set[5].
Observe that we may consider the space formsS"/r
as subsets of K.Relying
on thisobservation,
we need notexpand
the definition of Hausdorff distancebeyond
thesimple
onegiven
above.We would like to determine when a sequence of these space
forms,
viewed as asubset of
K,
converges in the Hausdorff sense. Werely
on thefollowing
easy result:THEOREM l.l.
If rl is
close tor2
in theHausdorff sense
inSO(n
+1), Sn/03931
isclose to
Snl F2
in theHausdorff
sense in K.If
ri
converges to a set G inSO(n
+1),
G is asubgroup
of0(n
+1).
FromTheorem
1.1,
we can conclude that ifFi
converges to G in the Hausdorff sense,S"lFi
converges toS"IG
in the Hausdorff sense.Moreover,
if M is a limitpoint
inthe set
of space forms,
then M =limi~~ S"/ri,
whereF;
is an infinite sequence of groups at atype
enumeratedby
Wolf. This factcomprises
the easierpart
of our second theorem:THEOREM 1.2.
If
M is in theHausdorff
closureof
the setof space forms,
thenM =
S"IG,
where G is asubgroup of 0(n
+1)
whoseidentity
component is a q- dimensional torus Tq and whosequotient by
theidentity
componentG/Go is finite,
or else G
itse f is a finite
group.Proof.
We use thefollowing
theorem of C. Jordan: If S is a connected Lie group, then there exists aninteger
r =r(S)
with theproperty
that if F c S is a finitesubgroup
ofS,
then F admits an abelian normalsubgroup Fo
such that[F: Fo] r(S) [8].
In our
case, S is SO(n + 1 ).
We have a sequence of finitegroups Fn
c S suchthat
Fn
converges to a group G c S.By
the theorem ofJordan,
for eachFn,
thereexists
F"o,
an abelian normalsubgroup
inFn.
We considerGo
= limFno.
Weclaim that
Go
is an abelian normalsubgroup
of G and that[G: Go] r(SO(n + 1)).
Go
is abelian and normal in G because its elements are limits of elements in theFno
and becausemultiplication
is continuous inSO(n + 1).
If
Go
has more than r cosets inG,
then we have at least r + 1 distinct sequencesfin ~ Fn
such thathnFno -+ giGo.
SincegiGo ~ gj Go
for i~ j,
there is apositive
distance between
gi G°
andgjGo’ (This
is becauseGo
isclosed.)
But then for nlarge enough, finFno ~ finFno.
SoF no
has at least r + 1 distinct cosets. This contradicts the theorem. Therefore[G : Go]
r, so dim G = dimGo.
Since IE G°,
the
identity component
ofG, G°,
must be contained in theabelian,
normalsubgroup Go.
We can conclude thatG°
is abelian.Since
G°
is acompact, connected,
abelian Lie group, it isisomorphic
toTq,
theq-dimensional
torus, for some q ~N.GIGO
isfinite,
because G iscompact,
and the order of G is the number of connectedcomponents
of G. Thiscompletes
theproof.
Often,
it is easier to describe the spaceXIGO
thanX/G.
We therefore willmake
repeated
use of the fact thatXIGIIGIG’
=X/Go
Another fact that we will find useful is stated in the
following
lemma:LEMMA 1.3
(Inclusion lemma). If H
is a closedsubgroup of
a closed groupof
isometries G on
M, M/H
has a diameter at least aslarge
asM/G.
In this paper, we will consider
only
odd-dimensionalspheres
S" andonly
irreducible actions
by
the groupsr,
since the other results are well-known.2. Three-dimensional space forms
The
spherical
space forms of dimension three are of the form83/r,
wherer c
SO(4)
is a finite group that actsfreely
andproperly discontinuously
onS3.
We recall from Wolf that the
possible
irreducible groups r may be described asfollows
[11].
Case 1. The group is
generated by
These
generators
aresubject
to the further restrictions that t = 0 mod4, (t(r - 1), m)
=1, (1, t/2)
= 1 andr =1= r2 -
1 mod m.Case 2. r is
generated by
the twogenerators above, subject
to the samerestrictions,
and has one additionalgenerator:
eitherL J
where v - 0 mod 2 and
(u, v)
= 1.Cases 4-6. ris
Zu
xT:, 7Lu
x 0* or7Lu
x I*. These groups,T*,
0* and I* are thepreimages
of thetetrahedral, octahedral,
and icosahedral groups in the unitquaternious
under the cover mapS3 -+ SO(3) by q ~ A, where q
xq-1
= Ax forall
x ~R3. (For
theproduct q x q-1,
x is treated as apurely imaginary quaternion;
thatis, (x1, x2, x3)
is identified withx1i + xjj + x3k.) T*v
and0:
areaugmentations
of T* and 0*. Thatis, Tv*
is formedby substituting
agenerator
of order 3v for thegenerator
of order 3 in T*.THEOREM 2.1. Let
r mt be a
groupof a type
described in cases1,
2 and 3. Thenthe diameter
of S3/ 0393mt is
boundedbelow by n/4. If G
=limm~~,t~~ r mt’ S3/G is
aninterval.
Proof.
We prove the theorem for case 1 groups. The otherproofs
are similar.We note that the extra
generators
in case 2 arealready present
as elements of the limit group in case 1. We observe thatB2
is a scalarmatrix, B2 = e41til/t.
1. As m and t becomeinfinitely large, (A)
and(B2)
converge tolinearly independent
circle
actions,
sinceB2>
converges to{ei03B8.
1 : 03B8 ~[0, 2n)l,
andA>
converges toeic~
(p E[0, 203C0),
c ~1 . Therefore, ~A, B2~
converges to a two-torus of the formei~
e ie where ~ ~ [0, 203C0)
and 03B8 E[0, 203C0).
The orbit spaceS3/T2
istherefore one dimensional. Since we can write
e ~ S3
as x =(r2 eiel,
r2eie2),
whereri + r2 =1,
we find that thepoints
forwhich r1,
= 1 or ri = 0give
rise toisotropy.
This tells us that
S3/T2
is an interval andthat r1
= 1and r1
= 0correspond
to theendpoints
of that interval[6].
The diameter ofS3/T2
is therefore the distance from(1, 0)
to(0, 1)
in thesphere, i.e.,
it isx/2.
If G =
limm~ ~,t~~ 0393mt,
G has an additionalgenerator
outside of this two-torus. It is the limit of B as t ~ oo :
1 1 . T2
ismerely
the connectedcomponent
of theidentity
in G. SoS3/G = S3/T2/G/T2.
SinceB2 E T2,
G/T2=BC 1)~ ~ Z2.
This lastgenerator transposes r = 0
andr, = 1, keeping
themidpoint
fixed. Ineffect,
it folds the interval in half. The diameter ofS3/G, therefore,
is03C0/4.
THEOREM 2.2.
If
r =Zu
xTg, S3/0393
has diameter at leastarccos 2/3.
If
I-’ =Zu
x0*, S3/0393
has diameter at leastt
arccos1/ J3. If
0393 =Zu
x1*, S3/0393
has diameter at
least 1/2
arccos1 tan 37r
In each case, the limit is topo-logically S2.
Proof.
Now we consider space forms of thetype s3/r,
where r is theimage
off3 oc,
for somerepresentation f3 of Zu
and somerepresentation
aof T*,
0* or 1*.For any such
représentation, ~ e203C0i/u is a subgroup.
As u becomcs veryFor any such
representation,
is asubgroup.
As u becomes verylarge,
this converges to theHopf
action onS3 : (zl, Z2)
~(eiezl eiOz2)’
The limitspace is therefore
S2 (of
diameter03C0/2).
The finite group(G/S1)
that acts on thisS2
is then
T, 0,
orI, respectively.
Thatis,
since -I Eei03B8. I, 03B8
E[0,203C0)},
the actions of A and - A inT*, 0*,
and I* are identified onS3/S1.
These are theonly
actionsthat are
identified,
sinceAlz
=A2Z
forall ~ S3/S1 only
if for anyz ~ S3
there exists some 0 ~[0, 203C0)
such thatA 1 z
=A2 eiez.
But thenA2-1A1z
=eiez,
so z is aneigenvector
for allZ ~ S3
andeie
is aneigenvalue.
Theonly
elementsof T*,
0* andI* with this
property
are+ I,
since no other elements of the groups have twoequal eigenvalues. Thus, A2 = ± A1,
andS3/S1XT*=S2/T. Therefore,
thediameter of the limit space is the diameter of
S2/T, where S2
is thetwo-sphere
ofradius
2.
S2/T
has fundamental domain shown inFig.
1. Under the action of the tetrahedral group, AB is identified withAC,
and BD with DC. Theresulting
limitspace is
(topologically) again S2,
but not asymmetric sphere.
Its diameter is theFig. 1.
length
of the curve AB. In thesphere
ofradius-!
this isarccos 3. Similarly,
inS2/0,
we have the fundamental domain on thesphere corresponding
to thetriangle
shaded inFig.
2.Again,
AB and AC areidentified,
as are BD and CD.The diameter of this
triangular "envelope"
is the distance AC. In thesphere
ofdiameter 03C0/2,
the distance AC is1 arcsin 2
or1 arccos 1. Similarly, the
fundamental domain in
S2
under the actionby
1corresponds
to the shadedtriangle
inFig.
3. AB and AC areidentified,
as are BD and CD. The diameter ofS2/I
thereforecorresponds
to the distanceAC,
which in thesphere
ofradius-!
isWe have omitted
discussing
the difference betweenTg
and T*. T* hasgenerators X
=e203C0i/3
and P andQ,
where P andQ correspond
togenerators
X =e203C0i/3 e-203C0i/3 , and
P andQ,
where P andQ correspond
toflips
across twoedges
of the tetrahedron in the tetrahedral group.T*
hasFig. 2.
Fig. 3.
generators P, Q
andXv,
whereIn other
words,
the substitution ofXv
for X does not affect thelimiting
case.3.
Space
forms of dimension n = 1 mod 4In this
section,
we will prove thefollowing
theorem:THEOREM 3.1. The diameter
of
a spaceform sn/r,
where n _ 1 mod4,
isbounded below
by
arcsinn-1
bounded below
b y
arcsinn-1
We find this limit
by exploring
the action of onetype
of group on thesphere
S". As
previously noted,
Wolf enumerated sixtypes of groups
in the classification of space forms.(The
list of the groups is located in Section4.) However, only
onetype
of group acts onS",
where n ~ 1 mod 4: groups oftype
I.By
a theorem ofVincent,
a group r that is the fundamental group of a space form of dimension n ~ 1 mod 4 is a group with twogenerators,
A andB,
and relations Am = Bt =1 andBAB-1= Ar [10].
The order of r satisfiesIrl
= mt =mt’d, and,
inaddition, ((r -1)t, m)
=1,
and where d is the order of r in themultiplicative
group of units in7Lm.
Wolf showed that under any irreduciblerepresentation
03C0k,l of a group oftype I,
theimages
of A and B are as follows:and
where
(k, m) = 1 = (l, t’) [11] .
A and B are d x dmatrices,
son + 1 = 2d.
Hence,
these are theonly
irreducible actions onS",
where n - 1 mod 4. We note thatBd
is a scalar matrix:(e203C0i/t’).
I. As m and t becomeinfinitely large,
thesubgroup generated by 03C0k,l(A) and 03C0k,l (Bd)
converges to a torus action on thesphere,
the torushaving
dimension at least two, since(eiO, eio,..., eiO)
and(eil/’, e will represent independent vectors.
In
fact,
as m increases withoutbound,
the condition that d be the order of r in themultiplicative
group of units inZm
can result in the(d-1)-tuple ... , e21tird-2/m) coming arbitrarily
close to anypoint
in the d-1 torus(eiao, eiat,..., eiad-2).
The limit groupgenerated by
thesepoints
will never bea
d-torus,
since we have the relationml(1+r+r2+...+rd-l).
Thefollowing
theorem is due to Lawrence
Washington.
THEOREM 3.2. For some sequences
of
r and m,~03C0c,l(A) ~
converges to a d -1torus as m increases without bound.
(For
theproof,
see[4].)
We do not answer the
question
of whether03C0k,l(A))
can converge to a smallerdimensional torus
through
asuitably
chosen sequence of r’s and m’s.We also note that
converges to an
independent
circle action. In thelimit, then, 03C0k,l(A), 03C0k,l(Bd)~
can converge to a d-torus.
LEMMA 3.3. The diameter
of
the limit spaceS"IG,
where G = limri,
is boundedbelow
by
arcsin where 2d = n + 1.Proof: Regardless
of the dimension of the torusacting
onS", however,
the distance between the orbits of(1,0,..., 0)
and remains thesame.
Clearly,
nochange
of direction(eiO, 0, ... , 0) brings
the orbits any closertogether
than when0=0,
nor does anyshifting through
thed-cycle generated by
affect their
distance,
since theélément ils
unaffectedby
thissubgroup.
So withrespect
to any limit spaceS"/G,
wherek =
2, ... ,
ord,
we have thefollowing
lower bound on diameteLEMMA 3.4. The diameter
of
anyspace form
is bounded below
by arcsin
^v --
Proof. Any
finite group r will be contained in a groupWith
respect
to the elementsgenerated 03C0k,l(A)
and03C0k,l(Bd),
the containment isclear,
since these arediagonal
matrices whose entries are of the form(eilh,eiB2,...,eiBd)
for some(03B81, ... ,03B8d) ~ [0, 203C0)d.
For anyrepresentation
7rk,l, theimage nk,Z (B)
is aproduct
The left
multiplier
is an element ofT’;
theright
is includedexplicitly
as agenerator
of G. Since thegenerators
of every r = Im nk,l are contained inG,
r c G. Since we have containment of the groups
r c G, by
the inclusion lemma(Lemma 1.3),
the diameter ofSn/0393
is bounded belowby
that ofS"/G. Although
the
representations 1tk,l
oftype
1 groups are theonly
irreducible actions on thespheres
S" with n ~ 1 mod4,
these groups also serve as fundamental groups ofspheres
of other dimensions. All the same conclusions reached in this section withrespect
to the limits of groupsof type
1 and the lower bound on diameter of theresulting
space formsapply
in all dimensions.4.
Représentations
induced from03C0k,l
onsphères
of dimension 3 mod 4Within the six
types
of fundamental groups ofspherical
spaceforms,
Wolfdefined several cases.
Using Fc(G)
to denote the set ofequivalence
classes ofirreducible, complex, fixed-point
freerepresentations
of a groupG,
Wolf describes 13general
classesFc(G)
from which allrepresentations
of fundamental groups of space forms are derived. The classesFc(G)
andgeneral
information about the groups aregiven
in thefollowing
table.For the purposes of this paper, it shall be convenient to deal with the
representations
ak,l and03B2k,1
as aunit,
andseparately
from therepresentations
ofgroups of
types III, IV, V,
and VI. These latter groups may bethought
to act onpairs of complex coordinates,
as will beexplained
further in the next section. It is less convenient to think of (Xk,l in this way, and not useful toconsider 03B2k,1
in thisfashion.
Moreover,
(Xk,l andPk,l
are both built on therepresentations
1tk,l’Table 1
Representations
ak,l are induced from nk,l.By
"inducedrepresentation,"
wemean the
representation
crgiven
in block formby ij g)= a(bi-lgbj),
where u isdefined on a normal
subgroup,
thebi’s
constitute acomplete
set of cosetrepresentatives
of thatsubgroup
in the whole group, anda(bi- 1 gbj)
is taken tobe zero when
bi-lgbj
is not in thesubgroup.
Under thisdefinition,
akn=k,l,
where the
subgroup
isA, B>.
Since the whole group is(A, B, R>
and R= Bt/2,
there are
only
two cosets:A, B)
andRA, B>.
SoNote that in each row and in each
column,
there isonly
one nonzeroentry.
Ifg E
A, B>,
thenRg ft A, B>,
and so on.THEOREM 4.1. Arcsin
n n + 1 1 is
a lower bound on the diametersof space formes
n+1
of
the typeSn/0393,
where r is theimage of
afinite
group under ak,l or03B2k,l.
Proof.
We have seen that for all k andl,
1 - ....II 1
Groups
withrepresentations
ak,l have an additionalgenerator,
R. We haveand
Therefore,
if r =lm ak,l’
When ak,j is
reducible,
Otk,l =03B2k,l
O03B2k,l,
arepresentation
of half thedegree.
Therefore,
if r =Im 03B2k,l,
r cTd, P(d)>
=G,,
whereP(d)
is asubgroup
of thesymmetric
group on dsymbols, represented by elementary
matrices whichpermute d complex
coordinates.The orbit of
(1, 0, ... , 0)
underGrx
is{ei03B8 ·
es : 0 e[0, 203C0),
es is the s th standard normal coordinate vector, SE{1, 2,..., 2d}}.
This is because the torus actionserves to
multiply
thegiven
vectorby eiO,
and thepermutation subgroup,
is a transitive action on the coordinate axes. The distance between a
diagonal point
and the orbit of
(1,0,
... ,0)
is(as before)
arcsin2d 2d -1.
2d Here n + 1=4d,
soarcsin
2d -1= arcsin n 1.
2d n + 1 Therefore, diameter ’Sn/G03B1 l nr- 1n + 1
Since all the finite groups rare contained in
Ga,
the diameter ofS"IF
isbounded
by
this numberby
the inclusion lemma.The
argument
forGp
followsexactly
the samereasoning, except
that if0393 = Im 03B2k,l,
r hasdegree d,
so thediagonal
element isand the distance to the orbit of
(1, 0, ... , 0)
isarcsin
5. Actions
by
groups oftypes III, IV,
V and VI onsphères
ofdimension 3 mod 4
Our
strategy
fordetermining
lower bounds on the diametersof space
forms withfundamental groups of
types III, IV,
V and VI is to consider the action of therepresentations
onpairs
of coordinate axes. Thatis,
anypoint x ~ S4n + 3,
writtenas a
point
inC2n+2,
has an even number of coordinates. If all but onepair
ofcoordinates
(say (zl, Z2))
are zero, the nonzeropair
of coordinates may bethought
of as apoint
inS3,
since thenzlzl + z2z2
=1.Pairing
the coordinates this way, we think of eachpair
as a coordinateS3
inS4n + 3.
The actions under groups oftypes
IIIthrough
VI treat these coordinates inpairs.
Thatis,
thesubgroups
of the torus actions on thesespheres
areactually
scalarmultiplica-
tion on each coordinate
S3 ; they
converge to theHopf
action on each coordinateS3
in the limit.Moreover,
thepermutation
elements of the groupspermute
thecomplex
coordinates inpairs; they
are nolonger
transitive actions on thecomplex
coordinate axesOfC2n+2 ,
butonly
on thepairs
of coordinate axes. Forinstance,
replaces
as an element of the
permutation subgroup
in the limit groups.In
fact,
as we shall see, the groups all converge to a group of the form(Td, P(d), F>. Here, Td
is a d-dimensional torus,P(d)
is a transitivesubgroup
ofthe
symmetric
group on dsymbols,
and F is a finite group that acts on each of the coordinate3-spheres,
withoutinterchanging
them. F has the same re-striction, F,
to any coordinate3-sphere.
Therepresentation
hasdegree
2d overC. To estimate the diameters of space forms
S"/ r,
where r~ Td, P(d), F>,
weuse the
following
theorem.THEOREM 5.1.
Sn/ Td P(d), F>
has diameter at least1
cosB
whereId
S3.
B = diameter
S3/81
xF,
andF
is the restrictionof
F to any coordinateS3.
S"/(T2d, P(2d), F>
has diameter at least arccos(12d
cos B .Proof.
We use the law of cosines forspheres.
We wish tocompute
the distance between a well-chosenpoint
in thediagonal
and a "farthest" orbit in a coordinate three
sphere
={(q’, 0,
... ,0)| |q’ =
(Z3, Z4)Z3Z3
+Z4Z4
=1}.
Refer toFig.
4.Fig. 4.
First,
we determine the diameter of the orbit space of a coordinateS3
under the action. This will be the diameter ofS3/(F, S1>.
Wegenerally computed
thesediameters in Section 2. We take two
points q ~ S3
andq’ E S3
on a coordinatethree-sphere
that realize this diameter. Then the closestpoint
in thediagonal
to(q, 0, ... , 0)
isclearly
The distance between
(q, 0, ... , 0)
and thisdiagonal point
iseasily
seen to bearccos =
Call this distance C. No otherpoint
on any coordinatethree-sphere
is any closer to this
diagonal point.
No otherpoint
in the orbit of(q, 0, ... , 0)
isany closer to this
diagonal point,
either. If we takeT ~ Td, F>, T(q, 0,..., 0) = (q", 0, ... , 0),
whereq"
ES3
is anotherpoint
in the coordinate 3-sphere. Moreover,
ifwhere q
has been moved to another coordinate threesphere.
Neither of thesetransformations decreases distance.
Together, they generate
all the trans-formations of the group. So the distance between the orbits of
cosines for
spheres,
we know thatA,
the distance fromsatisfies
cos A = cos B cos C + sin B sin C cos 0.
The
angle
0 is that between the minimalgeodesic
from A to the coordinateS3
and thetangent
space to theS3. Therefore, 0
=03C0/2,
and we can writecos A = cos B cos C.
As we have
already determined,
where B is the diameter of the coordinate
S3
after identifications underF.
No element in the orbit of(q’, 0,..., 0)
is any closer toA,
since forand
because q
andq’
realize the distance between therespective
orbits. SinceP(d)
fixes the
diagonal,
it has no effect on the distance from A to(q’, 0, ... , 0).
Therefore, Sn Td, P(d), F>
has diameter at leastarccos 1
cos B.Where the
representation
hasdegree 4d,
the limit group is contained inT2d, P(2d), F>,
and the distance Cequals arccos 1 2d
so A =arccos 1 2d
cos B.Wolf’s groups
give
rise to four basic actions on the coordinatethree-spheres:
the
quaternion
group, and thebinary tetrahedral, octahedral,
and icosahedral groups. We therefore have four estimates for diameters.THEOREM 5.2. The
quaternionic, tetrahedral, octahedral,
and icosahedral actions on the coordinatethree-spheres give
rise tothe following
lower bounds onthe diameters
of Sn/0393 (respectively):
and
Proof.
First we consider thoserepresentations
thatgive
rise to thequater-
nionic action on the coordinatethree-spheres:
Pk,l and ’1k,l.Representations
ofthe first
type,
,uk,l are ofdegree
2d.(The
actioninterchanges d
coordinate three-spheres.) Representations of type
’1k,1 are ofdegree
4d. If r = Im 03BCk,l, the diameter 2of
S"IF /
is at least arccos2 . n+1 The finite group g p acting
g on each coordinate
three-sphere
isgenerated by
P= l -i and Q = [ - 1 1]
So each coor-dinate
three-sphere
issubject
to the circle actionei03B8I2
and to the actionby (P, Q>.
The diameterof S3/S
is03C0/2.
The action of(P, Q~
on thisS2
is reducedby half, since - I ~ S1. Therefore,
the effective action on the orbit spaceS2
is arotation group of order
four, i.e.,
the dihedral group ofdegree
2. Itinterchanges
the
positive
andnegative
rays of each of the three coordinate axes. The orbit space is therefore one octant of thetwo-sphere
of radius one-half. Its diameter isn/4.
Applying
Theorem5.1,
we find that diameterB
is at least
arccos ( 2013;= cos 2013 )
=arccos 1
Hère 4d = n+1,
so arccosf2
is at least
arccos Jd 4
= arccos2d
Here 4d= n +
1,
soarccos n + 1
By
Lemma1.3,
diameterSn/Im 03BCk,l
is also boundedby
this number.Similarly,
ifr = Im ~k,l
the
diameter ofSn/0393
is boundedby
arccos2/ n + 1
Thede g ree of ’1k
,lis 4d.
Applying
Theorem 5.1 and Lemma1.3,
we find that the diameter ofsn/r
isat least
2
Hère, 8d = n + 1,
so the diameter is boundedby
arccosn+ 1 2
Now we consider
representations
whose actions on the coordinateS3’S
aregenerated by subgroups
of the circle and thebinary
tetrahedral group. These arevk,l, vk,l,j, 03B3k,l,
03B6k,l,j,
and 03B3k,l,j. The first two, vk,l and vk,l,j, havedegree
2d. Theothers have
degree
4d.Although
Im03B6k,l,j
contains0:
as asubgroup, 0:
isinduced from
T*v,
and the additionalgenerator
does not appear aspart
of the action onS3,
but aspart
of thepermutation subgroup P(2d).
The space forms of the
type 5’"/r,
where r is theimage
under vk,l, vk,l,j, Yk,l’03B3k,l,j, or 03B6k,l,j
of a finite group, have diameter at least arccos3(n 8 + 1)
We saw inSection
2, thé
diameter ofS3/T*, S1>
isarccos .
Thedegree
of vk,l orvk,l,j
is2d.
By
Theorem5.1 thé
diameter ofSn/0393
is at least arccos3d 2 .
Here 4d= n+ 1,
’8
so the diameter is at least arccos
3(n + 1)
.Now let r = Im Yk,l,
Im 03B3k,lj of Im 03B6k,l,j.
Thedegree
of eachrepresentation
is 4d.Therefore,
the diameter ofS"/r
is bounded belowby
since 8d = n + 1.
Groups
r whose restrictions to the coordinateS3’s
involve octahedral actions haverepresentations 03C8k,l.
Since03C8k,l
hasdegree
2d and the diameter ofS3/S10*>
> is1 arccos 1
Theorem 5.1 tells us that the diameter ofSnlr
is atleast
Groups
oftypes
V and VI are theonly
nonsolvable fundamental groups of space forms.They
contain I* as asubgroup. Any
space formS"/r,
wherer =
Im lk,l,j
orIm ki,l,
has diameter at leastThe restriction of r to a coordinate
S3
is contained inS1, I*)S3/S’, 1:)
hasTable II
diameter 2 arccos 73 (tan 10) B y Theorem 5.1 since
the degree
of lk,l,j is 2d
’
we have the diameter of
5"yr
boundedby
If r = Im xk,l, its
degree
is 4d. Therefore Theorem 5.1 and the result of Section 2imply
that the diameter ofS"/Ir
is also bounded belowby
A
comparison
with the lower bounds for diameters of space forms in all dimensionsyields
the theorem of theintroduction: 1/2 arccos fi ( tan )
servesas a lower bound on diameters of space forms of all dimensions.
To
summarize,
we maycompile
our results in Table II.References
1. Cheeger, J. and Ebin, D. G.: Comparison Theorems in Riemannian Geometry, American Publishing Co., Inc., New York, 1975.
2. Gromoll, D. and Grove, K.: A generalization of Berger’s rigidity theorem for positively curved manifolds, Ann. Scientifiques de l’Ecole Normale Supérieure, 20 (1987), 227-239.
3. Gromov, M.: Almost flat manifolds, J. Differential Geometry 13 (1978), 231-241.
4. McGowan, J.: The diameter function on the space of space forms, dissertation, University of Maryland, 1991.
5. Michael, E.: Topologies on spaces of subsets, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society
71 (1951), 152-182.
6. Mostert, P. S.: On a compact Lie group acting on a manifold, Annals of Mathematics 65 (1957),
447-455 and Errata 66, 589.
7. Myers, S.: Riemannian manifolds in the large, Duke Math. J. 1 (1935), 39-49.
8. Raghunathan, M. S.: Discrete Subgroups of Lie Groups, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1972.
9. Varadarajan, V. S.: Lie Groups, Lie Algebras, and Their Representations, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1984.
10. Vincent, G.: Les groupes Lineaires finis sans points fixes, Commentarii Mathematici Halvetici 20
(1947), 117-171.
11. Wolf, J. A.: Spaces of Constant Curvature, Publish or Perish, Wilmington, 1984.