HAL Id: hal-00633086
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00633086
Submitted on 17 Oct 2011
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
High performance metal-insulator-metal capacitor using a SrTiO(3)/ZrO(2) bilayer
Corentin Jorel, Christophe Vallée, Patrice Gonon, E. Gourvest, Christophe Dubarry, Emmanuel Defay
To cite this version:
Corentin Jorel, Christophe Vallée, Patrice Gonon, E. Gourvest, Christophe Dubarry, et al.. High per-
formance metal-insulator-metal capacitor using a SrTiO(3)/ZrO(2) bilayer. Applied Physics Letters,
American Institute of Physics, 2009, 94, pp.253502. �10.1063/1.3158951�. �hal-00633086�
High performance metal-insulator-metal capacitor using a SrTiO 3 / ZrO 2 bilayer
C. Jorel,
1,a兲C. Vallée,
1P. Gonon,
1E. Gourvest,
1C. Dubarry,
2and E. Defay
31
Microelectronics Technology Laboratory (LTM), Joseph Fourier University (UJF), CEA/LETI/D2NT/LTM, 17 Avenue des Martyrs, 38054 Grenoble Cedex 9, France
2
CEA/LITEN, MINATEC, 17 Avenue des Martyrs, 38054 Grenoble Cedex 9, France
3
CEA/LETI, MINATEC, 17 Avenue des Martyrs, 38054 Grenoble Cedex 9, France
共Received 20 May 2009; accepted 4 June 2009; published online 23 June 2009兲
Future integration of metal-insulator-metal capacitors requires devices with high capacitance density and low quadratic voltage coefficient of capacitance 共 ␣ 兲. A major problem is that the increase in capacitance density is usually accompanied by increased voltage nonlinearities. By combining two high-k materials with opposite ␣ , it is demonstrated that it is possible to obtain capacitors with both high capacitance density and minimal nonlinearity. A SrTiO
3/ ZrO
2bilayer was used to elaborate capacitors displaying a voltage coefficient of −60 ppm/ V
2associated with a density of 11.5 fF / m
2. These devices constitute excellent candidates for the next generation of metal-insulator-metal capacitors. © 2009 American Institute of Physics. 关 DOI: 10.1063/1.3158951 兴
Capacitors are key passive components in most of the integrated circuits which are used in analog filtering, dc de- coupling, and analog-to-digital conversion. Following the in- tegration and component size reduction efforts, capacitors are meant to be integrated on-chip, within the back-end met- allization levels. Getting small size capacitors with high ca- pacitance values requires using dielectrics possessing a high capacitance density per unit area, i.e., high- dielectrics.
Therefore, the traditional dielectrics, SiO
2and Si
3N
4, were forsaken because of their low dielectric constant 共 ⬍ 10兲 and there is a lot of ongoing effort to develop high- materials 共 ⬎ 15兲 such as Ta
2O
5, HfO
2, and ZrO
2, to name a few.
1–10An important issue regarding capacitor performances is the voltage linearity, which shows the dependence of capaci- tance 共C兲 on the applied bias 共V兲. For high- oxides it is usual to observe a quadratic voltage dependence of capaci- tance, 关C共V兲-C
0兴 /C
0= ␣ V
2+  V, where C
0is the capacitance at zero bias, and ␣ and  are the quadratic and linear coef- ficients. For most of the high- dielectrics the coefficient ␣ is in the 100– 1000 ppm / V
2range and the coefficient  is in the 100 ppm/V range.
1–11As a consequence, for usual work- ing voltages 共1–3 V兲 the quadratic contribution prevails 共 ␣ V
2⬎  V兲 and the most important parameter that must be controlled is the quadratic coefficient ␣ . Usually ␣ is ob- served to increase dramatically with decreasing oxide thickness.
3,7,8,11Thus, the effort to increase the capacitance density 共C
S=
0/t兲 by decreasing the thickness 共t兲 is always limited by a large increase of ␣ . The difficulty to obtain both high C
Sand low ␣ can be quantified by introducing the ratio
␣ / C
S2. The reason for introducing C
S2, instead of C
S, is the following. For practical applications the capacitance varia- tion is written as a function of V, but physically 共C-C
0兲 / C
0should vary with the electric field 共E = V /t兲, i.e., it should be independent of the oxide thickness. Rewriting 共C-C
0兲 /C
0as a function the electric field, 关C共E兲-C
0兴/ C
0= ␣ E
2t
2+  Et, it is seen that the relative capacitance variation does not depen- dent on the oxide thickness if ␣ varies with 1 / t
2. In that case
the ratio ␣ /C
S2
is also expected to be independent of the oxide thickness.
11These ideas are summarized in Fig. 1 which shows ␣ as a function of C
Sfor different materials. On this plot the ratio ␣ / C
S2appears as a material’s figure of merit which varies from 10 共ppm m
2/ V
2fF
2兲 for materials such as HfO
2, down to one for oxides such as Ta
2O
5. According to the International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors 共ITRS兲,
12in a few years application will require ␣
⬍ 100 ppm / V
2and C
S⬎ 10 fF / m
2. This is a difficult challenge which is better seen in Fig. 1 as a more general difficulty to get ␣ / C
S2⬍ 1.
A way to reduce ␣ was proposed by Kim et al.
1It con- sists in using a bilayer capacitor where a dielectric 共 SiO
2兲 with a negative ␣ is used to compensate the oxide 共 HfO
2兲 with a positive ␣ . By using a 12 nm HfO
2/ 4 nm SiO
2stack, these authors
1obtained a very low ␣ value of 14 ppm/ V
2and a ␣ / C
S2ratio which is clearly below unity. However, the low value of SiO
2prevented them to get high C
Svalues
a兲Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail:
corentin.jorel@cea.fr.
FIG. 1. Quadratic coefficient␣as a function of capacitance densityCSfor different materials of the literature. The figure of merit␣/CS2is expressed in ppmm2/V2fF2. The shaded area represents long term
共
2016兲
ITRS re- quirements共
Ref.12兲
.APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS 94, 253502 共 2009 兲
0003-6951/2009/94
共
25兲
/253502/3/$25.00 94, 253502-1 © 2009 American Institute of PhysicsDownloaded 25 Jun 2009 to 132.168.24.153. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://apl.aip.org/apl/copyright.jsp
共6 fF/ m
2兲. Since then, other multilayer structures were in- vestigated, but none of them were successful in getting
␣ / C
S2⬍ 1 to fulfill roadmaps requirements 共see Fig. 1兲.
3,4In the present work we studied SrTiO
3共STO兲 / ZrO
2bilayers.
ZrO
2is a high- dielectric with positive ␣ in the 100– 1000 ppm / V
2range
10共Fig. 1兲. STO was chosen as a dielectric with a negative ␣ to compensate for the ZrO
2posi- tive ␣ coefficient. Contrary to SiO
2, STO can reach high- values 共65 in this study兲 which allows to maintain an overall high capacitance density. By carefully engineering the STO / ZrO
2thickness ratio it is demonstrated that STO/ ZrO
2capacitors provide ␣ /C
S2⬍ 1 and appear as a solution to meet the long-term ITRS roadmap.
STO layers were deposited at room temperature by argon ion beam sputtering on Pt 共 100 nm 兲 / TiO
2共10 nm兲 /SiO
2共500 nm兲/ Si substrates.
13STO postan- nealings 共1 h兲 were performed in air at 450 or 550 ° C 共as specified in the discussion兲. ZrO
2layers were deposited on STO by metal-organic chemical-vapor deposition at 400 ° C, in Ar/ O
2mixtures containing Zr共Obut兲2共mmp兲2 as a Zr pre- cursor. Gold top electrodes were deposited by electron beam evaporation to form metal-insulator-metal 共MIM兲 capacitors.
C-V measurements were performed at 100 kHz using a HP4284 capacitance meter.
Figure 2 shows 关C共V兲-C
0兴 / C
0for a 20 nm STO layer in three different states 共as-deposited, annealed at 450 ° C and annealed at 550 ° C兲. As-deposited STO is in an amorphous state and displays a positive ␣ 共2200 ppm / V
2兲 and a quite low value of about 20. An annealing at 450 ° C reverses the sign of the voltage coefficient 共 ␣ = −3800 ppm / V
2兲. Still, the value of this annealed film remains low 共 20 兲 indicating that crystallization is partial. Annealing at 550 ° C further drives ␣ toward negative values 共−12 800 ppm/ V
2兲 and al- lows to reach higher values 共 65 兲 . This demonstrates that the ␣ value of STO layers can be tuned from positive values 共as-deposited, amorphous layers兲 to negative values 共air an- nealed, semicrystalline layers 兲 . Crystalline and stoechiomet- ric STO is a paraelectric perovskite material which is known to display negative voltage coefficients.
14The positive volt- age coefficient measured for the amorphous films is probably due to the loss of the crystalline state, as well as oxygen deficiencies. Indeed, amorphous BaTiO
3also has a positive voltage coefficient which decreases upon oxygen addition
during deposition.
15Moreover, oxygen vacancies are likely defects to be at the origin of nonlinearities observed in MIM capacitors.
16Therefore, in amorphous dielectrics such as SrTiO
3or BaTiO
3共perovskite family兲 it is thought that oxygen vacancies control nonlinearities. Upon annealing in oxygen 共air兲 the material crystallizes and recovers oxygen stoechiometry, leading to a “normal” negative voltage coefficient.
14Starting from STO layers with negative ␣ , ZrO
2layers were deposited on top of the STO films. Stacks with different STO and ZrO
2thicknesses were tested 共see Fig. 3 and Table I 兲 . The STO 共 20 nm 兲 / ZrO
2共 20 nm 兲 bilayer is clearly the most interesting one in terms of performances. Correspond- ing ␣ and C
Sare −60 ppm/ V
2and 11.5 fF / m
2共figure of merit ␣ / C
S2= 0.46⬍ 1兲. These characteristics meet long-term ITRS requirements 共Fig. 1兲. The dc leakage current was also measured and the values are shown in Table I. For the 20 nm/20 nm bilayer, the leakage current at 2 V is 3.5
⫻ 10
−8A/ cm
2, close to ITRS specifications 共⬍10
−8A/ cm
2at 1.8 V兲. The breakdown field of the 20 nm/20 nm stack was measured around 4 MV/cm 共 15 V across the capacitor 兲 . Since the value of ZrO
2is three times lower than the STO one, most of the electric field is applied to the ZrO
2layer, which supports higher breakdown electric fields 共typically 5 MV/cm compared to 1 MV/cm for STO兲. It is also noted that the 共 C 共 V 兲 -C
0兲 / C
0curve is asymmetrical with respect to
FIG. 2. Normalized capacitance vs bias for a 20 nm STO layer
共
as-deposited, annealed in air at 450 ° C, and annealed in air at 550 ° C兲
. FIG. 3. Normalized capacitance vs bias for STO/ZrO2stacks. The stacks make use of STO annealed at 450 ° C共
upper curves兲
or at 550 ° C共
lower curves兲
. Best performances are obtained with STO共
550 ° C , 20 nm兲/
ZrO2共
20 nm兲
.TABLE I. Capacitance density, experimental quadratic coefficient, and theoretical quadratic coefficient calculated from Eq.
共
1兲
, where共STO
兲
= 65, ␣共
STO兲
= −12 800 ppm/V2共
this work兲
, 共ZrO2兲
= 20,␣
共
ZrO2兲
= +250 ppm/V2共
Ref.10兲
, and leakage current of STO/ZrO2ca- pacitors. STO was postannealed in air at 550 ° C during 1 h.Layers
CS
共
fF/m2兲
at 100 kHz␣
共
ppm/V2兲
Expt.␣
共
ppm/V2兲
Theor.IS
共
A/cm2兲
at 2 V STO共
nm兲
ZrO2共
nm兲
40 20 9 ⫺350 ⫺644 2.5⫻10−8
40 10 16.5 ⫺2280 ⫺2153 2.7⫻10−8
20 20 11.5 ⫺60 ⫺54 3.5⫻10−8
20 10 19.5 ⫺1900 ⫺644 3.4⫻10−8
20 ¯ 29 ⫺12 800 ¯ 1⫻10−7
253502-2 Jorelet al. Appl. Phys. Lett.94, 253502
共
2009兲
Downloaded 25 Jun 2009 to 132.168.24.153. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://apl.aip.org/apl/copyright.jsp
the sign of V 共 20 nm/20 nm stack, STO annealed at 550 ° C, Fig. 3兲. This can be explained by the importance of the linear coefficient  共+143 ppm/ V兲 which gives a linear contribu- tion as important as the quadratic one. However, in practice the  coefficient has less importance because it can be more easily compensated by circuit design.
17At 125 ° C the characteristics worsen. The ␣ coefficient increases to
−135 ppm/ V
2. Though the characteristics are good at room temperature, studies are still needed to assess their thermal stability.
Low ␣ values of the STO / ZrO
2stacks can be explained as follows. Let us denote by C
1, t
1,
1, ␣
1, and 
1; the ca- pacitance, the thickness, the dielectric constant, the voltage coefficients of the STO layer, and V
1the voltage across this layer 共 correspondingly, C
2, t
2,
2, ␣
2, 
2, and V
2for the ZrO
2layer兲. The total capacitance C is 共C
1C
2兲/ 共C
1+ C
2兲 and the voltage across the stack is V = V
1+ V
2. Calculation of ␣ and as a function of ␣
1, ␣
2, 
1, and 
2is made by writing 共dC/ dV兲 = 2 ␣ C
0V +  C
0= 2 ␣ C
0共V
1+ V
2兲+  C
0. We can also write 共dC / dV兲= 共 ␦ C/ ␦ C
1兲共 ␦ C
1/ ␦ V兲 + 共 ␦ C/ ␦ C
2兲
⫻共 ␦ C
2/ ␦ V兲 and 共 ␦ C
1/ ␦ V兲 = 共 ␦ V
1/ ␦ C
1+ ␦ V
2/ ␦ C
1兲
−1= 共 ␦ C
1/ ␦ V
1兲共 1 + ␦ V
2/ ␦ V
1兲
−1. Using 共 ␦ C
1/ ␦ V
1兲 = 2 ␣
1C
10V
1+ 
1C
10and the displacement field continuity at the interface
1共V
1/ t
1兲=
2共V
2/ t
2兲 共dC/ dV兲 can now be expressed as a function of ␣
1, ␣
2,
1, and
2. Comparing with the expres- sion of 共dC/ dV兲 as a function of ␣ and  , one finds
␣ = ␣
1冢 1 + 1 12t t
21冣
3+ ␣
2冢 1 + 1 21t t
12冣
3, 共1兲
t t
12冣
3, 共1兲
 = 
1冢 1 + 1 12t t
21冣
2+ 
2冢 1 + 1 21t t
12冣
2. 共2兲
t t
12冣
2. 共2兲
As explained in the introduction, we will focus on the quadratic coefficient ␣ 关Eq. 共1兲兴. In this work we measured
1= 65 and ␣
1= −12 800 ppm/ V
2共see Table I兲. From Ref.
10 we consider
2= 20 and ␣
2= +250 ppm/ V
2. Reporting these values in Eq. 共 1 兲 共 with t
1= 20 nm and t
2= 20 nm 兲 we get ␣ = −54 ppm / V
2, which is very close to the experimental value of −60 ppm/ V
2. The experimental and the theoretical
␣ also agree very well for the 40 nm/10 nm stack and are of the same order of magnitude for the 40 nm/20 nm and for the
20 nm/10 nm stacks 共 Table I 兲 . Thus, on average, Eq. 共 1 兲 appears to predict the final voltage coefficient quite well 共 provided that the characteristics of individual layers are known兲.
To conclude, high performance MIM capacitors are ob- tained by combining two high-k materials with opposite qua- dratic voltage coefficient of capacitance. By adjusting the thickness of each layer 关Eq. 共1兲兴, it is possible to minimize the quadratic voltage coefficient, while maintaining high ca- pacitance density 共 ␣ / C
S2⬍ 1 兲 . This concept was applied to STO / ZrO
2stacks, but it can be extended to other couples of dielectrics.
1S. J. Kim, B. J. Cho, M.-F. Li, S.-J. Ding, C. Zhu, M. B. Yu, B. Narayanan, A. Chin, and D.-L. Kwong,IEEE Electron Device Lett. 25, 538
共
2004兲
.2V. Mikhelashvili, P. Thangadurai, W. D. Kaplan, and G. Eisenstein,Appl.
Phys. Lett. 92, 132902
共
2008兲
.3S.-J. Ding, H. Hu, C. Zhu, S. J. Kim, X. Yu, M.-F. Li, B. J. Cho, D. S. H.
Chan, M. B. Yu, S. C. Rustagi, A. Chin, and D.-L. Kwong,IEEE Trans.
Electron Devices 51, 886
共
2004兲
.4M. Kahn, C. Vallée, E. Defay, C. Dubourdieu, M. Bonvalot, S.
Blonkowski, J. R. Plaussu, P. Garrec, and T. Baron,Microelectron. Reliab.
47, 773
共
2007兲
.5E. Deloffre, L. Montès, G. Ghibaudo, S. Bruyère, S. Blonkowski, S. Bécu, M. Gros-Jean, and S. Crémer,Microelectron. Reliab. 45, 925
共
2005兲
.6S. J. Kim, B. J. Cho, M. F. Li, X. Yu, C. Zhu, A. Chin, and D.-L. Kwong, IEEE Electron Device Lett. 24, 387
共
2003兲
.7L. Goux, H. Vander Meeren, and D. J. Wouters,J. Electrochem. Soc. 153, F132
共
2006兲
.8M. Lukosius, C. Wenger, S. Pasko, L. Costina, J. Dabrowski, R. Sorge, H.
J. Mussig, and C. Lohe,IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 55, 2273
共
2008兲
.9Y. H. Jeong, J. H. Paik, Y. J. Lee, and S. Nabm,J. Electrochem. Soc. 155, G214
共
2008兲
.10S. Blonkowski,Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 172903
共
2007兲
.11C. Durand, C. Vallée, C. Dubourdieu, M. Kahn, M. Derivaz, S.
Blonkowski, D. Jalabert, P. Hollinger, Q. Fang, and I. W. Boyd,J. Vac.
Sci. Technol. A 24, 459
共
2006兲
.12The International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors
共
ITRS兲 共
Semiconductor Industry Association, 2008兲
, Table RFAMS3 On-Chip Passives Technology Requirements, http://www.itrs.net/Links/2008ITRS/Home2008.htm.
13E. Defaÿ, B. Andre, F. Baume, G. Tartavel, D. Muyard, and L. Ulmer, Ferroelectrics 288, 121
共
2003兲
.14See, for instance, C. Ang and Z. Yu,Phys. Rev. B 69, 174109
共
2004兲
, and references therein.15F. El Kamel, P. Gonon, and C. Vallée, Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 172909
共
2007兲
.16P. Gonon and C. Vallée,Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 142906
共
2007兲
.17D. Dornisch, G. Wilk, G. Li, K. M. Ring, D. J. Howard, and M. Racanelli, ECS Trans. 6, 755
共
2007兲
.253502-3 Jorelet al. Appl. Phys. Lett.94, 253502