HAL Id: hal-02957898
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02957898
Submitted on 12 Oct 2020
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of
sci-entific research documents, whether they are
pub-lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.
Sensitivity of the European LGM climate to North
Atlantic sea-surface temperature
Sophie Pinot, Gilles Ramstein, Isabelle Marsiat, Anne de Vernal, Odile
Peyron, Jean-Claude Duplessy, Maria Weinelt
To cite this version:
Sophie Pinot, Gilles Ramstein, Isabelle Marsiat, Anne de Vernal, Odile Peyron, et al.. Sensitivity of
the European LGM climate to North Atlantic sea-surface temperature. Geophysical Research Letters,
American Geophysical Union, 1999, 26 (13), pp.1893-1896. �10.1029/1999GL900361�. �hal-02957898�
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 26, NO. 13, PAGES 1893-1896, JULY 1, 1999
Sensitivity of the European LGM climate to North
Atlantic sea-surface temperature
Sophie
Pinot,
x Gilles
Ramstein,
• Isabelle
Marsiat,
2 Anne de Vernal,
a
Odile Peyron,
• Jean-Claude
Duplessy,
x Maria Weinel•
s
Abstract. Recent reconstructions of Sea-Surface Tem-
peratures
(SSTs)
for the Last Glacial
Maximum
(LGM,
21kyr BP) based on foraminifera
and dinoflagel!ate
proxies suggest that the north Atlantic may have been warmer than estimated by CLIMAP [1981]. To bet-ter understand the impact of such a warm north At-
lantic on the global LGM climate, we used two differ-
ent AGCMs to perform sensitivity studies. With the
new, warmer SSTs, both models simulate a hydrolog-
ical cycle and temperatures very different from those
obtained with the CLIMAP boundary conditions. The
most noticeable differences occur in winter over North
America and Siberia whereas southern Europe is only
weakly affected at all seasons. Whichever the condi-
tions prescribed over the north Atlantic, both models underestimate the large cooling recorded by continen-
tal proxy data over the Mediterranean Basin.
Introduction
Many AGCM simulations (e.g. [Broccoli and Man-
abe, 1987]) have shown
the impact on the general
at-
mospheric circulation of the major changes in bound- ary conditions associated with the LGM. The very coldconditions and sea-ice cover prescribed over the north Atlantic and the presence of Fennoscandian and Lauren-
tide large ice-sheets, perturbed the extratropical atmo-
spheric
circulation
(e.g. [COHMAP members,
1988]).
In particular, these changes in boundary conditions strongly constrain the glacial climate over Europe. However, an intense debate exists about the values of the north Atlantic SSTs at LGM and recent papers based on foraminifera [Weinelt et el., 1996; Veum etel., 1992],
coccoliths
[Hebbeln
et al., 1994],
dinoflagel-
lates [de Vernal
et al., 1997]
and biomarkers
[Rosell-
Mel4 and Koc, 1997] show a very different picture from1Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement,
UMR CEA-CNRS, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
2Dpt. of Meteorology, University of Reading, UK.
aGEOTOP, Universit6 du Qu6bec & Montr6al, Canada.
4CEREGE, CNRS, Aix-en-Provence, France. 5Geologish-palaontologishes Institut, Kiel, Germany.
Copyright 1999 by the American Geophysical Union.
Paper number 1999GL900361.
0094-8276/99/1999GL900361 $05.00
CLIMAP [1981, hereafter
CLIMAP]. These new recon-
structions suggest that the Nordic seas might have beenwarmer than the CLIMAP reconstructions, with less
sea-ice extent.
We have performed several experiments to test the sen- sitivity of two different AGCMs to changes in LGM north Atlantic SSTs, to infer the impact of a warmer north Atlantic on the European terrestrial environment.
Simulation results for PD and LGM
using CLIMAP
SSTs
PD experiments
The AGCMs used are the LMD5 and the UGAMP models. The differences between both models are dis-
cussed in detail in the PMIP documentation (www- pcmdi.llnl.gov/pmip). Both models are able to simu- late the extratropical Present-Day (PD) climate which
is strongly influenced by the thermal contrast between ocean and land, and by orography. Over Europe, the main features of the precipitation and temperature fields are in reasonable agreement with available climatologies
[Masson et al., 1999].
LGM experiments using CLIMAP SST
The two simulations described in this study use the same set of boundary conditions for the LGM simu-
lation, as recommended by PMIP (Paleoclimate Mod-
eling Intercomparison
Project) [Pinot et al., in press]:
the insolation of 21 kyr BP (calendar years), CO2 set at 200ppm partial pressure, paleo-topographies deducedfrom Peltier [1994]
and SSTs
from CLIMAP [1981]
(Fig
la, lb). The vegetation cover is the same for the PDand the LGM runs except over the ice-sheets.
Both the LMD5 [e.g. Fabre et al., 1998] and the
UGAMP [Dong and Valdes,
1998] models
reproduce
the major characteristics of the LGM climate found in
previous simulations (an important cooling over the ice- sheets and over the north Atlantic due to the ice cover,
a smaller temperature decrease in the equatorial area
[Pinot et al., in press] and a reduced globally hydrolog- ical cycle).
On Europe, the common response of both models to
full glacial boundary conditions, is mainly explained by
the presence of extensive sea-ice over the Atlantic ocean.
This forcing factor induces adiabatic cooling over the
northern Atlantic and determines a zonal circulation
1894 PINOT ET AL.- LGM CLIMATE SENSITIVITY TO NORTH ATLANTIC SST
I
III
I I
.
J
in winter, because the sea-ice cover reduction in win- ter increases the interaction between atmosphere and
ocean.
It should be pointed out that the composite SST re- construction is based on different micropaleontological
indicators (the dinoflagellate cysts and the planktonic foraminifers). They still need an intercalibration before
a consistent picture of the sea-surface conditions over the north Atlantic during the LGM can be obtained. This evaluation is the object of the on-going EPILOG project, and is beyond the scope of this paper. The ma- jor aim of this new SST reconstruction is to investigate
the impact of a warm LGM north Atlantic on the Eu- ropean climate in contrast with the cold north Atlantic
situation depicted by CLIMAP.
Figure 1. top' LGM CLIMAP [1981] SST (Fig 2a and 2b); middle: new warm SST LGM reconstruction (Fig 2c and 2d); bottom: differences between the two reconstructions (Fig 2e and 2f). The results are given
on the LMD5 grid, on the right for the summer season
and on the left for the winter season (K).
over north Atlantic and western Europe
al., 1999].
[Kageyaraa et
A sensitivity experiment for the LGM
The composite SST data set
We have first built a new sea-ice data set, merging the
reconstructions
based
on dinofiagellates
cysts
[de Vernal
et al., 1997] for the western north Atlantic and based onforaminifera
faunal changes
[Weinelt et al., 1996]
for
the northeastern Atlantic ocean. We then derived anSST data set consistent with the first one and using the SST reconstructions from both indicators. Along the 20øW meridian, differences between the warmer SSTs
based on dinofiagellate and the colder ones based on
foraminifera have been smoothed. Everywhere else, the CLIMAP SSTs have been used, with.a gradual transi-
tion to the other data sets at 10øN (the differences
at
this latitude were inferior to iøC).The differences between CLIMAP and the new LGM
SST reconstructions
are larger
in summer
(Fig lf) than
in winter (Fig le). In the new reconstruction, sea-ice isreduced over the northeastern Atlantic ocean in summer and over the central and northeastern Atlantic ocean in
winter. The SSTs are warmer than CLIMAP by up to
2øC in winter and 8øC in summer. Despite the SST
changes being more important in summer, the stronger impact of this new SST data set on the atmospheric
circulation and on the continental temperatures occurs
Results of sensitivity experiments
The same LGM sensitivity experiment has been per- formed with the LMD5 and the UGAMP models, mod-
ifying only the north Atlantic SSTs. In this section, the simulation using the CLIMAP SSTs serve as our
reference LGM simulation.
Hydrological cycle. Over the north Atlantic, the
warmer SSTs (less sea-ice) induce a strong change in the rate of evaporation at the surface. However, most
of the increase in the transfer processes constituting the hydrological cycle remains local and only contributes to reinforce local recycling For the CLIMAP LGM sim-
ulations, local recycling is equal to 88% for LMD5 and
77% for UGAMP. In contrast, it reaches values of 98% for LMD5 and 86% for UGAMP for the warmer SST ex- periments. The evaporation increase when using warm
LMCELMD5 model
I I ,,, i t II I I
UGAMP model
!
18o 1sow 12ow t,ow 6ow .--low
-10 -4 -2 -0.5
t • ,.J t i
1 3 5 15
-15 -5 -3 -1 0.5 2 4 !0
Figure 2. Temperature of the coldest month (K) in
the northern hemisphere, differences between the ex-
periment with CLIMAP SST and the experiment with the new warm SST reconstruction.
PINOT ET AL.: LGM CLIMATE SENSITIVITY TO NORTH ATLANTIC SST 1895
Table 1. Energy budget over northern Atlantic ocean
(60øW 5øE - 50øN 90øN) and over Europe (10øW 50øE - 30øN 60øN) for the PD, LGM with CLIMAP SST (LC) and LGM with the new warm SST reconstruc- tions (LW). Fluxes are counted positively for the atmo-
sphere, LHF - Latent heat flux, SHF - sensible heat flux, HBA = heat budget for the atmosphere, GT - ground temperature. LMD5 UGAMP ATL. OC. PD LC LW PD LC LW LHF 34 8 31 41 12 35 SHF 16 2 22 26 9 30 HBA -40 -75 -37 -44 -72 -33 GT 5.8 -13.2 -3.2 3.7 -15.4 -5.3 EUROPE PD LC LW PD LC LW LHF 41 27 29 24 13 15 SHF 37 35 34 57 49 49 HBA -20 -24 -24 -23 -36 -36 GT 13.9 6.5 7.2 13.2 4.2 6.2
and UGAMP models depict a strong cooling over NPA
(10øC for LMD5 and 12øC for UGAMP) whereas SPA
only experiences a cooling of around 8øC and 10øC re- spectively. These models are therefore far from repro- ducing the large temperature decrease estimated from
pollen reconstructions.
On the other hand, using warmer north Atlantic SSTs, LMD5 and UGAMP models simulate winter tempera- tures 5øC warmer than those estimated using the CLIMAP boundary conditions over NPA and 1 or 2øC higher
MTCO over SPA (Fig 2) .
The important result is that the terrestrial tempera- ture over SPA and NPA simulated by both models, un-
der both cold (CLIMAP) or warm (composite new data set) north Atlantic SST conditions, are largely under-
estimated. As far as we do not expect a north Atlantic SST reconstruction drastically outside these limits, we strongly believe that the discrepancy between model re- suits and terrestrial data for southern Europe at LGM
is not due to the uncertainty that still remains on the north Atlantic SSTs reconstruction.
SSTs at LGM is associated with more latent heat re- lease, which reaches values close to those obtained in
the PD simulation
(22W/m
2 for LMD5, 30W/m
2 for
UGAMP). Conversely, the latent heat release is strongly
damped
when
using
CLIMAP SSTs
(SW/m 2 for LMD5,
12W/m 2 for UGAMP) (Table 1). Using
warm compos-
ite SSTs also leads to a severe increase in the sensibleheat flux reaching
22W/m
2 for LMD5 and 30W/m
2 for
UGAMP. These values are even higher in LGM simula-
tion using the new SST data set than for PD (Table 1). Over Europe, the energy budget of the atmosphere (Ta- ble 1) is similar to the reference LGM CLIMAP SST
run. As shown before, all the changes in the hydrologi- cal cycle over the Atlantic ocean essentially lead to more local recycling. Indeed, the latent heat transport from the Atlantic ocean toward Europe is reduced for both LGM simulations when compared to the PD simulation. Temperature changes. We observe that the tem- peratures, when warm Nordic SSTs are prescribed, are
colder in winter in Siberia and North America whereas the temperature over Europe are warmer (these changes are associated to changes in circulation). Nevertheless, over •the Mediterranean basin both models are weakly affected (Fig 2) by the changes in boundary conditions.
Comparison of LGM simulations with pollen data over Southern Europe. New estimates of cli- matic conditions prevailing over the north of the Py-
renees-Alps line (NPA, >40øN) and south of that line
(SPA, including
sites
in Italy, Greece
and Turkey) have
been obtained recently at 15 pollen data sites [Pey- ton et al., 1998]. The LGM temperatures of the coldest month (MTCO) deduced from the pollen data are dras- tically colder than today by 30øC (+/-10øC) over NPA and around 15øC (+/-5øC) over SPA.Using CLIMAP SSTs as boundary conditions, the LMD5
Discussion and conclusion
We have tested the sensitivity of both the LMD5 and UGAMP AGCMs to warmer than CLIMAP [1981]
LGM north Atlantic SSTs using new reconstructions based on foraminifera and dinofiagellates. We used
two different AGCMs in order not to obtain model-
dependent results. We found that these new SSTs have a major impact on the hydrological cycle and energy budget over the north Atlantic ocean, but a rather small impact over southern Europe: these re- sults show the weak sensitivity of the Mediterranean basin terrestrial temperatures simulated by both mod- els to the prescribed LGM north Atlantic SST changes.
Whichever north Atlantic SST reconstruction is used (cold: CLIMAP or warm: new SST data set), model
results underestimate the cooling inferred from pollen
data.
Among the causes for such a discrepancy, a plausible explanation is the vegetation impact. This forcing fac- tor is not accounted for in these experiments mainly because no realistic global reconstruction is currently
available. Previous sensitivity studies (using an asyn- chronously coupled global atmosphere-biome model [Ku- batzki and Claussen, 1998] or using an AGCM with
an ice-age vegetation reconstruction as boundary con-
ditions [Crowley and Baum, 1997]) showed that the
climatic impact of vegetation changes may explain a cooling over the Mediterranean basin. Additional ex- periments also suggest that colder than CLIMAP SST in the north Pacific and the tropics, as well as ice-sheets
higher than those estimated by Peltier [1994] may also contribute to explain differences between models and
data.
Acknowledgments. This work have been supported by CEA, CNRS and EC under contracts number ENV4-
1896 PINOT ET AL.: LGM CLIMATE SENSITIVITY TO NORTH ATLANTIC SST
CT95-0075. We thank the EPD (European Pollen Database)
for providing the pollen reconstructions. The sea-surface temperature data set from the German group of Kiel was kindly provided by Dan Seidov. The authors thank Ger- hard Krinner and Masa Kageyama for fruitful comments on
the manuscript.
References
Broccoli, A. J., S. Manabe, The influence of continental ice, atmospheric CO2, and ]and albedo on the climate of the
last glacial maximum. Clim. Dyn. •:8%99, 1987.
CLIMAP (1981) Seasonal reconstructions of the Earth's sur- face at the last glacial maximum. Technical Report MC- 36 Geological Society of America Map Series Boulder, Col-
orado
COHMAP members (1988) Climatic changes of the last 18,000 years: observations and model simulations. Sci-
ence 241:1043-1052
Crowley T. J., Baum S. K. (1997) Effect of vegetation on
an Ice-Age climate model simulation. J. Geophys. Res. 102(D 14):16463-16480
de Vernal A., Rochon A. , Turon J., Matthiessen J. (1997)
Organic-wailed dinoflage]]ate cysts: palyno]ogical tracers of sea-surface conditions in mid(fie to high latitude marine environments. Geobios 30(7):905-920
Dong B. , Valdes P. (1998) Simulations of the LGM climates
using a general circulation model: prescribed versus com-
puted sea surface temperatures. Clim. Dyn. 14:571-591 Fabre A., Ramstein G., Ritz C., Pinot S., Fournier N.
(1998) Coupling an AGCM with an ISM to investigate the ice sheets mass balance at the last glacial maximum.
Geophys. Res. Lett. 25(4):531-534
Hebbeln D. , Dokken T., Andersen E. , Hald M. , Elverhol A. (1994) Moisture supply for northern ice-sheet growth during the Last Glacial Maximum. Nature 370:357-360
Kageyama M. , Valdes, P. J., Ramstein, G. , Hewitt, C. D. ,
Wyputta, U. (1999) Northern Hemisphere storm-tracks in present day and last glacial maximum climate simulations: a comparison of the European PMIP models. Clim. Dyn.
12:742-760
Kubatzki C., Claussen M. (1998) Simulation of the global
bio-geophysical interactions during the Last Glacial Max-
imum. Clim. Dyn. 14:461-471
Masson V., Cheddadi R., Braconnot P., Joussaume S. , Texier D. , PMIP participating groups (1999) Mid- Holocene climate in Europe: what can we infer from PMIP model-data comparisons? Clim. Dyn. 15:163-182 Peltier W. (1994) Ice age paleotopography. Science 265:185-
201
Peyron O., Guiot J., Cheddadi R., Tarasov P., Reille M., de Beaulieu J.-L., Bottema S., Andrieu V. (1998) Climatic reconstruction in Europe for 18.000 years B.P.
from pollen data. Quat. Res. 49(2):183-196
Pinot S., Ramstein G., Harrison S., Prentice I., Guiot J. , Stute M. , Joussaume S. , PMIP participating groups (1998) Tropical paleoclimates at the Last Glacial Max- imum: comparison of PMIP simulations and paleodata.
Clim. Dyn. In press.
Rosell-Mel• A. , Koc N. (1997) Paleoclimatic significance of the stratigraphic occurence of photosynthetic biomarker pigments in the Nordic seas. Geology pp 49-52
Veum T., Jansen E. , Arnold M., Beyer I., Duplessy J.-C. (1992) Water mass exchange between the North Atlantic
and the Norwegian Sea during the past 28.000 years. Na-
ture 356:783-785
Weinelt M. , Sarnthein M. , Pfiaumann U. , Schulz H. , Jung S., Erlenkeuser H. (1996) Ice-free nordic seas during the last glacial maximum? Potential sites of deepwater
formation. Paleoclimates 1-4:283-309
J.-C. Duplessy, S. Pinot and G. Ramstein, Laboratoire
des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, UMR CEA-
CNRS, Bat. 709, Orme des Merisiers, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette,
France. (e-mail: pinot@lsce.saclay. cea.fr)
I. Marslat, Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, RG6 6BB Reading, UK.
O. Peyron, CEREGE, CNRS, B.P. 80, 13545 Aix-en-
Provence cedex 4, France
A. de Vernal, GEOTOP, Universitd du Quebec • Montreal, C.P. 8888, Montrdal, Canada.
M. Weinelt, Geologish - palaontologishe Institut,
Universitat of Kiel, 24118 Kiel, Germany.
(Received December 7, 1998; revised April 2, 1999; accepted April 30, 1999.)