• Aucun résultat trouvé

Monitoring Electronic Exams

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Monitoring Electronic Exams"

Copied!
17
0
0

Texte intégral

Loading

Figure

Fig. 1: QEA for Candidate Registration
Fig. 4: QEA for Question Ordering
Fig. 5: QEA for Exam Availability
Fig. 8: QEA for Mark Integrity
+4

Références

Documents relatifs

We define these properties, and then express them as ProVerif queries and Quantified Event Automata (QEA). We introduce Auditing QEAs, as extension of QEAs, which additionally

At examination, each registered candidate gets an exam form with questions, answers the questions, and submits her answer to the examination authority.. The exam form may also

We categorize them in two main classes: (a) authentication properties, includ- ing Answer Origin Authentication, Form Authorship, Form Authenticity, and Mark Authenticity, and (b)

We show, with ProVerif, that Exam-Test Markedness test is complete and sound, with honest exam authority and examiner, for the case where we have one accepted exam-test and any

Fig 4: Solution to the puzzle (7 points) Fig 5: Excerpt from the “wishes”-overview for f(u)-luru To help students determine possible solutions and formulate arguments, they

But at the intensive margin, participants' EDA rises in their own ODA only for those who face their own honesty rst ( 0.16 − 0.23 is not signicantly dierent from 0 in Model (5) of

A more reallistic treatment of scattering processes on the disordered potential (by self consistent Born approximation for example) shows that the conductivity presents oscillations

Motile cilia, laterality and primary ciliary dyskinesia The plenary speaker Martina Brueckner (Yale University, USA) opened the scientific part of the meeting with an introduction