A NNALI DELLA
S CUOLA N ORMALE S UPERIORE DI P ISA Classe di Scienze
A. M. B RUCKNER
C HARLES L. T HORNE Density covers
Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Classe di Scienze 3
esérie, tome 27, n
o1 (1973), p. 97-104
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=ASNSP_1973_3_27_1_97_0>
© Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, 1973, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Classe di Scienze » (http://www.sns.it/it/edizioni/riviste/annaliscienze/) implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utilisa- tion commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale.
Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
A. M. BRUCKNER and CHARLES L. THORNE
(1)
1.
Introduction.
Let A be a subset of
~0,1) having
upperdensity dA
at theorigin.
Under certain circumstances it is
possible
to extend A to a set A U B ha-ving density
=dA
at theorigin.
Under othercircumstances,
any extension of A which hasdensity
at theorigin
must havedensity equal
to 1. The main purpose of this article is to determine conditions under which these
phenomena
arise. After a shortpreliminary section,
we look atthese
problems
in aslightly
broadercontext, obtaining
Theorem1,
whosetwo corollaries
give
the conditions we seek. Theproblem
ofextending
aset to one
having density
at agiven point
arises in a natural way in con-nection with certain
problems concerning
theboundary
behavior of harmo- nic functions. Suchproblems
areoutgrowths
of theproblems
studied in[1].
We wish to thank Professor Max Weiss for
calling
our attention to theseproblems
and for some discussions while our work on theproblem
was inits
early stages.
2.
Prelitninaries.
Before
stating
andproving
ourtheorems,
we shall collect some of thenotions,
definitions and notations which appearfrequently
in thesequel.
If A is a measurable set contained in the interval
[0, 1],
we shall denote its upperdensity
at theorigin by dA ;
thatis,
where1 denotes
Lebesgue
measure. Thecorresponding
lower limit is denotedby
Pervenuto alla Redazione il 27 Novembre 1971.
(i) The authors were supported in part by NSF grant GP 18968.
della Scuola Norm. Sup. di PiBa.
98
If =
dA ,
7 we denote this common valueby dA
and call it the den-sity
of A at theorigin.
It will be convenient to use the function9 Â. given
by 9A (x)
= x-1 A(A
n[o, xJ)
to denote the relative measure of the set A in the interval[0, x].
3. Main results.
Theorem 1,
below,
arises in a natural way from thefollowing
obser-vation.
Suppose
a set A hasdensity dA at
theorigin.
Then A isuniformly
distributed near the
origin
in the sense that if the interval[0, b]
is dividedinto k
equal
subintervals and b issufficiently small,
then ~. has relativemeasure
approximately equal
todA
in each of these intervals. The converseis also true. Thus
given
a setA,
we ask for conditions under which we can find a set B such that A U B isuniformly
distributed withdA
u B =dg .
Theproblem
is to add B in such a way that we raise the lowerdensity
without
raising
the upperdensity. Roughly speaking,
Theorem 1 tells usthat this can be done if and
only
if A is« subuniformly
distributed >> in the sense that if the interval[0, b]
is divided into kequal
subintervals and b issufficiently small,
then none of these subintervals has relative measure more thanapproximately dA .
THEOREM 1. For a measurable set A e
~0,1J
and r a real number such that0 - r - 11,
there exists a measurable set[0~1] disjoint
from Asuch that ~1 U B has
(onesided) density
0 if andonly
iffor all natural numbers
PROOF. If exists and
equals r
thenConversely,
supposeFrom the
assumption
we seethat Ik
contains anondegenerate
interval ofthe form
(0, x).
We select a sequence of
points ck inductively.
Let el EIi,
Note thatBy
inductionpick
E suchfr
ck for some
integer
and also such that For each k ~ 1 and each n such that 0~ n ~ nk
letdisjoint
from A such thatNow let . Since the ck decrease to 0 as k- 00, it
suffices to show that for
for some n such that
1 ~ n ~ nk .
SoHence
100
COROLLARY 1. For 3) measurable set A C
[Oy 1]
there exists a measurableset B c:: [0, 1] disjoint
from A such that exists andequals dA
if andonly
ifWe remark in
passing
that for any measurable set AThus the condition of the
corollary
isactually
one ofequality
for allCOROLLARY 2. For a measurable set A c
[0, 1]
thefollowing
two con-ditions are
equivalent.
(1)
If B c~0,1 J
ismeasurable, disjoint
from A anddA u B exists,
thenAnother way of
stating Corollary
1 is contained in Theorem2,
below.In essence, it states that A can be extended to a set
having density equal
to
dA
if andonly
if intervals near theorigin
can have « more than theirshare of A »
only
ifthey
are very short.THEOREM 2. For a measurable
[0, 1] J
there exists a measurable set B c:[0, 1] disjoint
from A for whichdA
U B existsand dA U
B =dA
if andonly
if for any 0 a ~ 1 and e > 0 there exists 6>
0 such that if 0 ~PROOF.
Suppose
there exists B c[0, 1] disjoint
from from A for whichdA U B
exists andequals dA.
Let0
a 1 and E>
0.Pick 27
> 0 such... - .. , I .
Conversely, assuming
the abovea, -, 6
condition onA,
we have foreach k > 1 and E ) 0 that there exists 3
~
0 such that if0 a b m 3
This means that
Thus
Corollary
1applies
andprovides
the existence of B with the neces- saryproperties.
Theorem
3, below, gives
severalequivalent
ways, withvarying
geome- triccontent,
ofstating
that a set .A can be extended in the desired fashion.THEOREM 3. For a measurable set A c:
[o,1~
thefollowing
areequivalent.
(1)
There exists a measurable set B e[0, 1] disjoint
from A such thatdA
u B exists andequals d~ .
(2)
For any 0 a 1 and e >0,
there exists 6 > 0 such that if 0. _, J ... BB.
102
For each
For each
For each
PROOF. We have
already
shown theequivalence
of conditions 1 and 2 and 1 and 5. Condition 3 ismerely
a restatement of condition 2. Condition 4 is that the set A be «subuniformly
distributed ». In thiscontext,
con-dition 4 is seen to be a variation of condition 5 with the
special « j »
cases of 4
being merely repetitions
of thegeneral
K k » cases of condition 5.REMARK. If
A,
B e[o,1~
aredisjoint
measurable sets then the proper- ties of lim and lim indicate that- I
So,
inparticular,
if exists andequals dA
thendB
= 0and dB
=4.
Open
sets andinterval
sets.In
considering questions
of thetype
examined in theprevious section,
it is sometimes desirable to
replace
anarbitrary
measurable set with asimpler
sethaving
similardensity properties.
In thissection,
we show thatarbitrary
measurable sets can bereplaced
with open sets if one iswilling
to
ignore
null sets and with interval sets if one iswilling
toignore
setsof
density
zero.THEOREM 4. Let S c:
[0, 1]
be a measurable set. There exists an open set Y and a set Z of measure zero suchPROOF. Almost every
point
of S is apoint
ofdensity
of S.Thus,
ifZs
=Ix E
S : x is not apoint
ofdensity
then AZ1
= 0.Let 81
=Z1.
·For each
pick
an intervalWx
with leftendpoint
x such that ifYx
is an open interval with leftendpoint
x contained inWx
thenÂ.
(S1
nVx) > (I - x)
A(Va;).
Let be the set of all suchVx .
LetC}9
=_ U
~q
Then c))
forms a Vitali coverof S1’
Hence there exists a de-’"" .. ’"
numerable
disjoint family 1
of intervals in such thatIt suffices to show that for 4
this it suffices to show that if But
Sometimes
[2],
it is convenient toreplace
anarbitrary
open set withan interval
set ;
thatis,
a set which is adisjoint
union of open intervalsconverging
to theorigin.
Theorem 4 does not remain valid if onereplaces
« open set »
by
« interval set >> in the statement of the theorem. It is easy toverify, however,
that the statement becomes valid if one relaxes the re-quirement
that Z have zero measure to therequirement
that Z have zerodensity
at theorigin.
We observe that it followsimmediately
from Theo-sem
2,
that if is an interval set with11
then A can be extended to a set A U B such that =
dA only if
lim = 1.
Thus,
forexample,
if 0 a 1and ak
= ocbk
forall k,
k
-
the set A cannot be extended in the desired fashion unless
dA
== 1.University
of
CaliforniaSanta Barbara, California 93106
104
REFERENCES
[1]
T. K. BOEHME and M. L. WEISS, One-sided boundary behavior for certain harmonio fun,- ctions, Proceedings, AMS 27 (1971), 280-288.[2]
A M. BRUCICNER, Density preserving homeomorphisms and a Theorem of Marimoff, Quart.J. Math., Oxford (2) 21 (1970), 337-347.