• Aucun résultat trouvé

أثر الثقافة التنظيمية على إدارة المعرفة دراسة عينة من المؤسسات الاقتصادية الجزائرية

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "أثر الثقافة التنظيمية على إدارة المعرفة دراسة عينة من المؤسسات الاقتصادية الجزائرية"

Copied!
220
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

ريــــــيستلا موــــــلع نســـق

République Algérienne Démocratique et Populaire

Ministère de l’Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche Scientifique

 

 

 

 

(2)

76

269

(3)

ب‌

(4)

ج‌

(5)

د‌

01

1 02 1

1 04 2

1 05 3

1 06 4

1 07 5

1 07 6

1

09 7

(6)

ه‌

1 15 11

1 17 12

1 17 13

31

2 32 1

2 33 2

2 35 3

2 3 36 1

2 3 40 2

2 3 42 3

2 3 45 4

2 3 48 5

2 53 4

2 4 53 1

2

4

56 2

(7)

و‌

2 4 58 4

2 60 5

2 5 63 1

2 5 67 2

2 5 71 3

2 5 72 4

2 5 75 5

2 76 6

2 80 7

2 82 8

84

3 85 1

3 86 2

3 88 3

3 91 4

3 4 92 1

3

4

96 2

(8)

ز‌

3 107 5

3 5 108 1

3 5 110 2

3 5 111 3

3 5 114 4

3 5 118 5

3 5 120 6

3 123 6

3 6 123 1

3 6 125 2

3 6 128 3

3 143 7

144

4 145 1

4

145 2

(9)

ح‌

4 157 4

4 173 5

4 179 6

182

194

(10)

ط‌

37

147 150

(11)

ي‌

ANOVA)

ANOVA)

ANOVA)

ANOVA)

ANOVA)

(12)

ك‌

3

50

4

63

5

67

Marquardt

6

78

OSD Comptroller

7

78

Smith & Mclaughlin)

80

9

99

Schein

10

101

11

102

12

109

13

115

1

195

2

201

3

202

(13)

ل‌

137

R

2

46 1

(14)

م‌

approach‌and used both the questionnaire and the interview as means for collecting primary data.

Among the collected questionnaire models only‌137 were accepted for use in statistical analysis and hypotheses testing. The study concluded a number of findings:

The degree of implementation of knowledge management in the surveyed Algerian economic enterprises was high, the highest of which was" The acquisition of knowledge ‌"

dimension , and the lowest « Knowledge creation” dimension.

Algerian economic enterprises possess a strong, positive organizational culture, the highest dimension of which was «Building ‌an organizational ‌memory” and the lowest was

« Individuals oriented” dimension.

The Organizational Culture in term of (shared vision, organizational value, organizational structure, Individuals oriented, teams oriented, and Organizational memory) has a significant statistical impact on the Knowledge Management processes in term of (knowledge acquisition, knowledge conversion, knowledge sharing, knowledge storing, and knowledge application) in the Algerians economics enterprises, with value of R2 equals 46,1.

In light of the above results we have included these recommendations:

the necessity to benefit from the experiences of successful enterprises in regard the adoption of knowledge management Through the appointment of a responsible party for knowledge management initiative according to a deliberate strategy, and evaluation stages of the application.

Construct and assure the knowledge management’s values and improve the capacity of managerial leadership in adopted the KM to develop the organizational performance.

Keywords: knowledge management, knowledge, Organizational culture, Algerians economic enterprises

(15)

ن‌

(16)
(17)

2

1 1

1

2001 1

8

(18)

3

(Mc Donough and Dyer)

2001

1

2006 1

303

(19)

4

Pettigrew

1979

1 2

1 2 1

؛

(20)

5

1 2 2

1 2 3 4

5

1 3

(21)

6

1 4

1 5

(22)

7

1 6

1 6 1

(23)

8

1 6 2

1

2

3

4

(24)

9

6

1 7

.

(25)

10

(26)

11

ISO 04

03 01

 1

ISO 9001

2003

 2

ISO 9001

ISO14001 ISO 18001 2004

2006 2006

3 2.5

1,5

0 0,33

1 0.5 2003

(27)

12

1 9 2 146

02 02

113 110

18 12

15 15

146 137

1 10

02

(28)

13

1 10 1

01 1

5

1 1

5

2 6

10

3 11

14

4 15

21

5 22

26

1 27

32

2 33

38

3 39

43

(29)

14

4 44

50

5 51

56

6 57

61

1 10 2

1 10 3

1 10 3 1

07

03 04

02 01

1 10 3 2 (Cronbach

Alpha) 98

04

(30)

15

35 0.97

06 1 0.87

06 2 0,90

3 05

0.87

06 4 0.90

5 07

0.85

05 6 0.87

26 0.95

1 05

0.84

2 05

0.86

3 04

0.78

4 07

0.89

5 05

0.87

61 0.98

SPSS

SPSS

(31)

16 ( Skweness

: ANOVA

؛

5 1 3 1.33 05

05

3.67 2.33 3.66

2.33

2012 106

(32)

17

؛

1 13

1 13 1

1

303 556

1

2004

(33)

18

1

11

10

1

2005

(34)

19

1

12 1

1 2008

(35)

20

4,04 3,75

54

α 0,05

1

106

1

5 3 2009

(36)

21

112

2

459

1

8 4 2003 13 2

1 2003

(37)

22

1

400

2

6 1

1

15 38 2003

2

11 2 2008

(38)

23

1

14 368

٬

1

2004

(39)

24

1

454

1 13 3

2

9

17 550

450

1

1425 3 2

2

2006

(40)

25

1

2 3

4

1

336 13

1

11 2 2008

(41)

26

1

270

72,9

Raid Moh'd Al-adaile2

The Impact of Organizational Culture on Knowledge Sharing: The Context of Jordan's Phosphate Mines Company.

1

77 2010

2Raid Moh'd Al-adaileh, The Impact of Organizational Culture on Knowledge Sharing: The Context of Jordan's Phosphate Mines Company, 2011 , International Research International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, Issue 63, March, 2011, pp 216 – 228.

(42)

27

1

8

253

Holowetzki

2

The Relationship between Knowledge Management and Organizational Culture: an Examination of Cultural Factors that Support the flow and management of Knowledge within an Organization.

2002 Oregon

1

2009

2 Holowetzki, Antonina, The Relationship between Knowledge Management and Organizational Culture: an Examination of Cultural Factors that Support the flow and management of Knowledge within an Organization, University of Oregon, in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Science, 2002.

(43)

28

1998 2002

Wei Zheng, et al

1

Linking organizational culture, structure, strategy, and organizational effectiveness: Mediating role of knowledge management

301

1Wei Zheng, et al, Linking organizational culture, structure, strategy, and organizational effectiveness: mediating role of knowledge management, Journal of Business research, volume 63,Isuue 7, (2010),pp 763-771

(44)

29

Comeron and Quinn

0,01

1 13 4

1

1Mohsen Allameh et al, The Relationship between Organizational Culture and Knowledge Management (A Case Study: Isfahan University), Procedia Computer Science 3, 2011, 1224–1236.

(45)

30

2

(46)
(47)

32

2 1

(48)

33

Saffady

1

2

،

Nonaka

Polanyi

( Tacit Demension) 1976

3

Erik Sveiby

Intangible Assets

1986

32 1

2

2001

8

2007 3

60

(49)

34

1

Stewart

1997

2

"Don March"

"Drucker" 3

؛

4

06

5

575 1

2001 2

10

32 3

2004 4

106

8 5

(50)

35

90

%

06

Nonaka & Takeuchi (1995) Tsoukas (1996) Wig (1993): Liebowitz (1999) Holsapple & Joshi (1997); Rubenstein et al. (2001) Davenport et al. (1998) Fowler (2000); Liebowitz (2001) Courtney (2001); Bolloju et al. (2001) Liao (2003); Kakabades et al. (2003) Tyndale (2002) McAdam & Reid (2001); Wiekert & Herschel (2001) Rowley (2000); Metaxiotis & Psarras (2003) Weber et al. (2002) Source : Source :K.A. Kanagasabapathy, & R. Radhakrishnan, Empirical Investigation of Critical Success factor and knowledge management structure for successful implementation of knowledge management system – a case study in Process industry, Anna University, Chennai –25 , India, p4.

2 3

(51)

36

1

2

3

K = (I + T) ^S

K

I T S

2 3 1

؛

1

4

2006 1

25

2

2004 4

4 3

113 4

(52)

37

3

07 2

07

6 1

2

2002 23

Juris Kelley, 2002

Amrit Tiwana, 2001,

Georg Von Krogh, Ichijo, and Nonaka,

2000,

(53)

38

Nancy M. Dixon, 2000,

Frances Horibe, 1999, John Wiley & Sons

Debra M. Amidon, 1997

Andrew P. Garvin, 1996

Nonaka Takeuchi, 1995

Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak,

2000

Merriam Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary

10th ed.

1 2

3 1

2 3

1 2

2 3

(54)

39

Source: Anthony Liew,Understanding Data, Information, Knowledge And Their Inter-Relationships, Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, Vol. 8, No. 2, June 2007,p2.

07

؛

؛

1

02

57 1

2Kurt April, Julian Bessa. A Critique of the Strategic CompetitiveIntelligence Processwithin a Global Energy Multinational; Problems and Perspectives in Management / Volume 4, Issue 2, 2006;p88

(55)

40

02 (

؛ 02

1

. 2 3 2

؛

22 1

(56)

41

2

Pfeffer

3

4 Reix

1 2

1

26 28 2004 6

2

1996 5

3

27 1 2007

118

4Pierre , Dubois, et Yves Dupuy, Connaissance et Management, Eonomica, paris, 2007, p 82.

(57)

42

3 4

؛

1

2 3 3

kothuri) 2

kothuri)

1

2006 16 2

(58)

43

1

2

1

2

3

1Tien-Chin Wang , Tsung-Han Chang, 2007 Forecasting the probability of successful knowledge management by consistent fuzzy preference relations, Expert Systems with Applications 32 801–813, p802.

2002 2

205

(59)

44

4

5

6

(60)

45

1

1 (Polonyi)

Micheal Polonyi

1976 1891

Personal Knowledge

2

2005 1

392 2007 2

36

(61)

46

1 2

"Allen"

3

(Polony)

4

؛

5

.

6

1

2004 199

2Ramin Vandaie , The role of organizational knowledge management in successful ERP implementation projects, Knowledge-Based Systems 21 2008 920–926

7 3

5 4

3

2009 296

5 5 6Ramin Vandaie,Op Cit,p 920.

(62)

47

3 (Zouder, Gogut

2

3

45 1

27 2

104 2005 59

573 3

(63)

48 (Know

who)

2 3 5 (Saffady)

(64)

49

3 03

20 1

2 Marquardt, Michael J, Building the learning, Organizations: Mastering the 5 elements for corporate Learning

Davies– Black, publishing company, USA, 2002, P47.

3

2006 316

(65)

50

03 :

2006 316

:

:

1

156 1

(66)

51

(67)

52

1

Loyal Customer

158 1

(68)

53

2 4

2 4 1

،

،

(69)

54

1

2

08 08

Ouintas et al.

(1997)

Allee (1997)

Davenport (1998)

Alavi and Leidner (2000)

Gupta et al . (2000)

٬ 1

هيساي بلاغ

، 2007( ) ، ةفرعملا ةرادإ -

موهفملا مظنلا - تاينقتلا -

، جهانملا راد

، ندرلأا

، 40ص .

34 2

(70)

55

Holm (2001)

Horwitch and Armacost (2002)

Source :K.A. Kanagasabapathy, R. Radhakrishnan, Empirical Investigation of Critical Success factor and knowledge management structure for successful implementation of knowledge management system – a case study in Process industry, Anna University, Chennai –25 , India, p2.

(71)

56

2 4 2

1

44 1

45

(72)

57

1

2 3

4

1 2 3

4

4 1

2Maryam, Alavi , 2005, An Empirical Examination of the Influence of Organizational Culture on Knowledge Management Practices, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 191-224,p 193.

3Minsoo Shin,2004, A framework for evaluating economics of knowledge management systems, Information &

Management 42, 179–196, p79.

24 4

(73)

58

5

2 4 4 Hansen

1

1

2

26 1

97 2004

133

(74)

59

Daft

09 1

09 Daft

27 1 2007

119

1

27 1 119

ةينمضلا ةفرعملا ةحيرصلا ةفرعملا

.

صخش لخذم -

ىلإ - قئاثولا ىلإ دارفأ لخذم صخش

ايجولونكتلا

تايللآا

(75)

60

09

2 5

"King"

(76)

61

Alee

(Arthur Andersen

(Davenport)

Nonaka and Takeuchi

1

2002 67

8 2

(77)

62

10 04

10

Wiig (1993)

1 2 3 4

2001 Parikh

1 2 3 4

2002 Horwitch and Armacost

1 2 3 4 5

Source: Mohsen Allameh , and authers, The Relationship between Organizational Culture and Knowledge Manageme , Procedia Computer Science 3, 1224–1236 , 2011, p1228.

(78)

63

Source: Heisig, P. (2001) Business Process Oriented Knowledge Management. In Mertins, Berlin: Springer, p28

04

2 5 1

(79)

64

1

1

2

3

17 1

(80)

65

1

168 1

(81)

66

05 1

27 1

(82)

67

2001 27

2 5 2

1995

1

1Pierre , Dubois, et Yves Dupuy, op cit, p82.

(83)

68

2

؛

1

2004 2002،72 48

2005 83

(Seci)

23 1

42 2

(84)

69

1

90 1

(85)

70

(86)

71

Stein 2

and Zwass

3

73 1

30 2

318 3

(87)

72

1

2 5 4

11 1

2Mehdi Abzari , Investigating Impact of Organizational Climate on Intention to knowledge Sharing Behavior by Using Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), Journal Of Cotemporary Research In Business, Vol 2, No 12, 2011, p122.

(88)

73

Dexosa

1

Coakes)

.

240 1

2004 18

2006 240

47 2

(89)

74

Alavi)

1

2

K= (p+I)²

K

318 1

2001 2

27

(90)

75

P I

s

1

2 5 5

2

109 1

13 2

(91)

76

1

2 6

2 6 1 Jaston ,2006)

&

(Gupta

Gupta Jaston

3

45 1

122 2

3Atul, Gupta, And Jason, McDaniel, 2006,Creating Competitive Advantage By Effectively Managing Knowledge: A Framework For knowledge Management, Journal of Knowledge Management, volume 10 Number 4, 2006, p15.

(92)

77

2 6 2 Marquardt

1

1 2 3 4 5 06

1Marquardt, Michael J, op cit,p27

(93)

78

06 :

Marquardt

Source: Marquardt, Michael J, Building the learning Organizations: Mastering the 5 elements for corporate Learning, Davies– Black publishing company, USA, 2002, p27.

2 6 3 OSD comptroller

comptroller

1 07

07 : OSD Comptroller

2006 50

50 1

(94)

79

:

1

2

3

1Liang-Chu Chen, What Individual-level Antecedents Influence Knowledge Management effectiveness? Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2009, p5.

(95)

80

08

Smith & Mclaughlin)

Source: Liang-Chu Chen What Individual-level Antecedents Influence Knowledge Management effectiveness? , Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2009, p5.

2 7

11

1.

Microsoft, Dell, Google & Nokia

؛

1 Ching-Chiao Yang et al, Knowledge management enablers in liner shipping, journal of Transportation Research Part E 45 (2009) 893–903.

(96)

81

1

11

Davenport et al 1998

Knapp 1998

Van Buren 1999

Grover and Davenport 2001

Gold et al 2001

Nemati 2002

Lee and Choi 2003

Chuang 2004

Yeh et al.

2006

Source: Ching-Chiao Yang et al, Knowledge management enablers in liner shipping, journal of Transportation Research Part E 45, (2009), 893–903

1 Ali Shirazi et al, 2011, Factors Affecting Employees’ Readiness for Knowledge Management, European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, ISSN 1450-2275 Issue 3,2011,p168.

(97)

82

2 8

Polony 1962

؛

(98)

83

(99)
(100)

85

؛

(101)

86

3 2

1

؛

.2

1981

2002 1

198

156 2

(102)

87

1

Z Theory Z (

Ouchi

1981 )

2

The Art of Japanese Management

"

( Pascale and Athos’s

1982 )

3

Corporate cultures Deal & Kennedy

1982

4 In Search of Excellence

Peters and

Waterman’s

1982 )

ً 1981

1980

Business Week Fortune

Corporate culture

1Kathryn Baker, Organizational Culture, Access date: 07/09/2014, from : http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/doe/benchmark/ch11.pdf

(103)

88

3 3

1

3 3 1

Anthropologists

cultura cultus

Terpstra and David

؛

2

1997 1

99 2006 2

65

(104)

89

2

Brigitte Berger

3

(Edward B Tylor)

4

1

1948 1

13

1995 2

79

16 3

4Imran U Khan et al , An Organizational Culture Model for Comparative Studies: A Conceptual View , International Journal of Global Business,2010, 3 (1), 53-82, ,p53.

(105)

90

2

3

4

5

3 3 2

1

1997 1

444

(106)

91

3 4

(107)

92

-3 - 4

- 1 (Ott

1989

1 70

?

2

Barney Clark) تُس

)1986

، ( schein تُس ،1985

ٔ )1992 ، ( Pettigrew تُس

)1979 ، ( Ouchi تُس )1990 ، ( Denison تُس

)1982 ، ( Deal &Kennedy تُس

.)1972

Kotter & Heskett,) تُس

)1992

، ثاسٛئ

اْ

(

Denison & Mishra تُس

)1995

،

Cameron & Freeman 1991

O’Reilly Chatman& Caldwell تُس

)1991

.3

12

12

1 2 3 4 5

1Miha Škerlavaj et al,( 2010) , Organizational learning culture, innovative culture and innova tions in South Korean firms, journal Expert Systems with Applications ,2010, 37,p 6391.

2 Jay Y. Wu , A and New Definitions of Organizational Cultures, The Journal of Socio-Economics 37, 2008, 2535–

2545, p2535.

3Anne S. Tsui et al , Unpacking the relationship between CEO leadership behavior and organizational culture, The Journal of Leadership Quarterly 17, p113.

(108)

93

12

(Ouchi,1985)

( Jones,2001)

)Schein،1992)

(Hofstede,1991)

(Pittegrew,1979)

Z 1

1985 62

77 2 3Edgar H. Schein, The Corporate Culture Survival Guide, Jossey-Bass , 2009, p 27.

1641 4

1641 5

(109)

94

(

،ٙتٕٚرقنا )2009

(Denison & Mishra)

، (Wilderom et al)

قفٔ .

DeLong (1997)

مثي

Kostova & Wilderom et al) (International

Journal of Global Business) (McDermott & O‟Dell)

ٔ

Kostova) )

2009 1

172

(110)

95

Martins &Terblanche

Wilderom and Berg Hofstede

(Wilderom)

1

Hofstede

Hofstede

(Waterman and peters)

2

Asef 2011 2003

3 2000

1Imran U Khan et al, An Organizational Culture Model for Comparative Studies: A Conceptual View, International Journal of Global Business, 3 (1), 2010, 53-82, p53

1641 2

3Asef, Frah, Estimating the impact of Denison's (1996), "what is the difference between organizational culture and organizational climate? A native's point of view on a decade of paradigm wars", Journal of business Research, V64,2011, p 454.

(111)

96

1

. 2

Ekvall

"

Ashforth

"

.

3 4 2

1Deshpandy, and Fahey , organizational culture market oriented, innovativeness, and firm performance :an international research odyssey, International Journal of research marketing, V 21,usa, 2004, 3– 22 , p6.

2 Miseung Shim ,Factors influencing child welfare employee's turnover: Focusing on organizational culture and climate, Children and Youth Services Review 32,2010 .p848.

(112)

97

2 3

4 5

3 4 3

2

) (c2Yaakov & Nava

Narayanan & Nath)

2006 1

3 2

2006 225

183 2

(113)

98

1

(Pettigrew) 2

رٛشٛف Hofstede

3

4

1

2

3

4

09

1 Zheng et al, Linking organizational culture, structure, strategy, and organizational effectiveness: mediating role of knowledge management, Journal of Business research, V 63, I 7, 2010, 763–771, p765.

2Gregory et all , Organizational culture and effectiveness: A study of values, attitudes, and organizational outcomes, Journal of Business Research 62 , 2009, 673–679, P675

3Saeed, Tahir et al , Knowledge Management Practices: Role Of Organizational Culture, Proceedings of ASBBS , V 17 N 1, 2010, p130.

2008 4

342

(114)

99

O M

E

2008 342

1

1

2

3

4

1

2003 35

36

(115)

100

5

6 7

3 4 4

1 Schein

Schein

10

(116)

101

Source: Edgar H. Schein, The Corporate Culture Survival Guide, Jossey-Bass , San Francisco, 2009, p 21.

2

1

Stories

Heros

تًؼَ1

ٙجافخنا

،

ٙبناغنا رٕصُي ٔ

، قباس عجره

، ص .343

(117)

102

Rites and Rituals

Symbols

11 11

344 2008

(118)

103

"

artefacts

4

2 Ott

Ott

3 4 5

1Russell Mannion et al , Measuring and Assessing Organizational Culture in the NHS (OC1), the National Co- ordinating Centre for the National Institute for Health Research Service Delivery and Organization Programme (NCCSDO), University of New York 2008, ,p19.

2J.S .Ott , The Organizational Culture Perspective, New York, 1989 Books/Cole, P71.

(119)

104

1

Harrisson

2

1

2005 198

204 2009 2

33

(120)

105

Peters

IBM Mars

Honda Sony

( Tom Peters)

Pettigrew

McDonalds, IBM, FORD

(121)

106

1

(Peters & waterman

(Peters & waterman In Search of Excellence

Schein. 1985

Schein

1

18 4

2003 191

(122)

107

(Van Maanen and Barley)

3 5

؛ .

(123)

108

3 5 1

1

1

2

3

؛

26 1

2

2010 125

(124)

109

12

،فٛطهنا ذبػ رٔد

تًٛٛظُتنا تٕٚٓنا ةٕقب ؤبُتنا ٙف تًٛٛظُتنا تفاقثنا

، تينىناقلاو تيداصتقلاا مىلعلل قشهد تعهاج تلجه ذهجًنا ،

دذؼنا ،26 ،2

ص ،2010 .125

1

؛

2007 1

124

(125)

110

3 5 2

1

1

2

3

4

2

2009 1

266

2007 2

77

(126)

111

2

3

4

3 5 3

1

267 1

(127)

112

2

3

:

1

2

1

1

2005 1

112

(128)

113

3

1 Daft

1

2

3

4

/

/

1

13 1 2009

218

(129)

114

.

Ouchi

1

3 5 4

2

ر 1

1Miseung Shim , Factors influencing child welfare employee's turnover: Focusing on organizational culture and climate,Children and Youth Services Review, 2010 ,32 p848.

2009 2

40

(130)

115

نقر لكشلا 13 (

) اهصئاصخ تللادب توظنولا تفاقث داعبأ تكبش

،ٙجافخنا تًؼَ

يويظنتلا تفاقثلا ة

،ٌدرلأا ،٘رٔزاٛنا راد ، ص ،2009

40

2

ٍٛهياؼنا غٛجشت تجرد غي مياؼتنأ عاذبلإن

رطخنا

تطشَأ ٗهػ ذكؤتنا تجرد ٗهػ ةرذقنأ تًظًُنا

تتباث ًَٕ تبسَ قٛقحت

ثارارقنا رٛثؤت ٖذي تًْاسي ٗهػ آجئاتَٔ

ىٓئارآب دارفلأا ىْدٕٓجٔ

طبض تَٛاكيإ ٍٛهياؼنا غقٕت تجرد مٛصافتنا . سٛكرتٔ آهٛهحتٔ

آب واًتْلاأ ِابتَلاا .

تٛئاذؼنأ تٛسفاُتنا تجرد تغن ٍػ اضٕػ دارفلأا ٍٛب

ّتٛحٔر ٔ ٌٔاؼتنا

ٗهػ قٚرفنا حٔر تًُْٛ

محب مًؼنا تطشَأ ىٛظُت تَٛاَلأا ٔ تٚدرفنا

ٍي لاذب جئاتُنا ٗهػ سٛكرتنا تققحًنا ثاٛهًؼنأ بٛناسلأا

لاًػلأا جئاتُن

(131)

116

3

4 06

(132)

117

Hofstede

1998 ;Hofstede et al 1991 Hofstede

1

1642 1

(133)

118

3 5 5

(134)

119

1

2

ٔ

Hofstede (2001)

3

1Pierre A. Balthazard & Robert A. Cooke Organizational Culture and Knowledge Management Success: Assessing The Behavior–Performance Continuum Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences – 2004p2

2

13 1

2009 218

3 Mran U Khan et al, An Organisational Culture Model for Comparative Studies: A Conceptual View , International

Journal of Global Business, 3 (1),2010 ,53-82, 53,p

(135)

120

3 5 6

؛

1

Porter and Steers

2

1

2

193 1

2002 2

317

(136)

121

4

1

2

2

2006 1

37 2004 2

96

(137)

122

1 1

5 10

129 1

(138)

123

3 6 1

1

(Delong and Fahey,2000)2

1

17 1

2Allameh Mohsen et all, The Relationship between Organizational Culture and Knowledge Management(A Case Study:

Isfahan University), Procedia Computer Science 3,2011 ,1224–1236, p 1229.

(139)

124

2 3 4

1

2

137 1

22 2

2010 12

(140)

125

1

Prahalad and Hemet

2

Wallach 1983

3

3 6 2

1Octavia-Luciana Porumbeanu , ) Implementing Knowledge Management in Romanian Academic Libraries: Identifying the Elements that Characterize their Organizational Culture, The Journal of Academic Librarianship, Volume 36, Number 6, 2010 ,549–552, p450.

6 2

3 Dorothy Leidner, The Role of Culture in Knowledge Management: A Case Study of Two Global Firms, International Journal of e-Collaboration, 2(1), 2006, 17-40, p 21.

(141)

126

:

1

78 1

(142)

127 :1

2

1

2 2006

232

19 2

(143)

128

3 6 3

3 6 3 1

1

-

-

-

2008 1

221

(144)

129

-

Al-Busaidi & Olfman (2005)

1

why do we exist

2

1 Liang-Chu Chen , What Individual-level Antecedents Influence Knowledge Management effectiveness? Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, Vol. 10, No. 2, June 2009.p5

2Constantin Bratianu , Ivona Orzea , Organizational Knowledge Creation, Management, Marketing Challenges for Knowledge Society Vol. 5, No. 3, 2010 pp 41-62, p45. ,

(145)

130

1

3 6 3 2

2

Harris,1993

1

25 1

2011 127

399 2

(146)

131

2

3

4

1

139 2009

183

2

30 3 2003 403

126 3

22 4

2010 13

(147)

132

3 6 3 3

1

2

3

4

٪ 72

3 1

2010 40

23 2

3

2001 340

20 4

4 2005

69

(148)

133

1

2

3 6 3 4

3

1M. Lemon , P.S. Sahota, Organizational culture as a knowledge repository for increased innovative capacity

,

Technovation 24 2004, 483–498, p485.

2

2006 148

17 3

(149)

134

1

2

3 6 3 5

1

03 4

2009 555

138 2

(150)

135

2

3

Jones

4

201 1

2

12 01 2010 60

33 3

1

2006 113

4

31 1

2004 25

(151)

136

1

2

27 1

23 2

74 13

(152)

137

Child & Mansfield

2

1

2

1

17 1 1995 101

146 2

(153)

138

Stewart

3

4

Stewart,1997

(154)

139

3 6 3 6

Walsh and Ungson

1

March & Olsen Argyris & Schon

Sandelands & Stablin

2

1 Casey, Andrea , and Olson, Tova, The Relationship Of Organizational Identity And Memory In Knowledge Creation, Organizational Learning and Knowledge 5th International Conference, 2003, p6.

2M. Lemon, P.S. Sahota ,Organizational culture as a knowledge repository for increased innovative capacity , Technovation 24, 2004, p 486.

Références

Documents relatifs

We see that horizontal communication systems affect organizational flexibility and connections between components (i.e. coordination); vertical communication systems

This paper reports on our work on three complementary di- rections, aimed at developing: (i) a theoretical framework named UFO (Unified Foundational Ontology) for (re)

In order to allow a complete description of the organizational domain, the conceptual modelling language must provide constructs for all elements of the organizational domain,

Through the perspective of patient representatives and cohort professionals we interviewed, participants wish to receive research results (both aggregate and individual),

Selecting the grain size is challenging because: (1) the optimal grain size depends on the hardware; (2) the optimal grain size depends on the instantiation of the code, in the case

Global rules, routines, and procedures can hinder organizational agility whereas responding creatively for agility can locally undermine the global organizational

Our experience shows that the above view is simple yet complete in identifying and combining the key domains impacted by a change in the current digital era and that in