R ENDICONTI
del
S EMINARIO M ATEMATICO
della
U NIVERSITÀ DI P ADOVA
C ARLO M ARCHIORO E NRICO P AGANI
Nonlinear stability of a spatially symmetric solution of the relativistic Poisson-Vlasov equation
Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova, tome 78 (1987), p. 125-143
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=RSMUP_1987__78__125_0>
© Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova, 1987, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova » (http://rendiconti.math.unipd.it/) implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions).
Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit conte- nir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
Stability Spatially Symmetric
of the Relativistic Poisson-Vlasov Equation.
CARLO MARCHIORO - ENRICO PAGANI
(*)
SUMMARY - We prove that the distribution functions
f (x, p), spatially
homo-geneous,
possibly nonregular, nonincreasing
inlip II, stationary
solutionsof the relativistic Poisson-Vlasov
equation,
are nonlinear(Liapunov)
stable.
1. Introduction and
description
of theproblem.
A relativistic
plasma,
when the collisions areneglected
and theparticles
interactonly
via a mediumfield,
is describedby
the relativ- istic Vlasovequation [8], that,
when there is oneonly type
of par-ticles,
forsimplicity,
assumes the form:in which x = x~ _
(ct, x) and p
==(p°, p)
are theposition
4-vectorand the momentum 4-vector of a
particle respectively;
m is the rest(*)
Indirizzodegli
AA.: C. MARCHIORO:Dipartimento
di Matematica, Uni- versith di Roma «LaSapienza »,
Piazzale Aldo Moro 5 - 00185 Roma(Italia);
E. PAGANI:
Dipartimento
di Matematica, Universita di Trento - 38050 Povo,Trento
(Italia).
Research
partially supported by
the Italian National Research Council(C.N.R.)
andMinistry
of Public Education(M.P.I.).
mass of the
particles,
that enters into the mass shell conditionand c is the
speed
oflight.
The external 4-force Fit =
(.F*, F,~)
satisfies the conditioni.e. it is
purely
mechanical(it
does notmodify
the rest mass of theparticles).
Thisrequirement
is fulfilledby
the Lorentz4-force,
defined
by
where is the
electromagnetic tensor,
related to the electric andmagnetic
fieldsE,
Bby
theequations:
when
i = 1, 2, 3
pi’ = Bk
when i, j, k
is an evenpermutation
of1, 2,
3 .The function
f
=p)
is called the distributionfunction,
and isdefined on the relativistic
phase
space(x,
p considered as 8independent
scalar
variables).
The absence of « collision terms)) into the
right
hand side of eq.(1.1)
is related to the
assumption
that theparticles
interactonly
via amedium
field;
this is admissible when the gas issufficiently
rarefied.Rewriting (1.1)
in term ofspatial quantities (with respect
to an inertial referencesystem),
we have:(*)
Greek indices run from 0 to 3, and havespace-time meaning;
latinindices run from 1 to 3, and have space
meaning;
g,, =diag
(1, - 1, - 1, - 1).that, substituting (1.2), introducing
the relation between the(spatial) velocity v
and the(spatial) momentum p
and
replacing f
withf through
the definitionbecomes
or
in which F = is the
ordinary (spatial) force, equal
to thetime derivative of the
(spatial) momentum,
evaluated in the inertial referencesystem
defined above.In the
electromagnetic
case, that interests us,or
In
plasma physics
are relevant theMaxwell-Vlasov model,
basedon the
equations
and the Poisson-Vlasov model
In either
models, v
= in the relativistic case, and v =p~m
in the classical one.
As is clear from the
equations,
in the Poisson-Vlasovmodel,
themagnetic
field is assumed to benull,
and thisapproximation,
thatoriginates
from an obviousrequirement
ofsimplicity,
isacceptable
in many
quasi-stationary phoenomena.
The
charge density e
is the sum of a constant(in
time andspace)
term ~O+, and of another one,
depending
on the distribution functionf,
so that the
global charge
is null. In aplasma
model with oneonly type
ofparticles (electrons),
~+ may be identified with the constant and uniformcharge density
of the fixedpositive
ions.Concerning
the mathematicalproblem
of the existence of the solutions of the aboveproblem,
we saythat,
for the non relativistic Maxwell-Vlasovmodel,
the local-in-time existence anduniqueness
ofthe solution is
proved
in[26, 28].
In[28]
is alsoproved
that the clas- sical solutions of the non-relativistic Maxwell-Vlasovequation
con-verge to the solutions of the Poisson-Vlasov
equation,
when thespeed
of
light
goes toinfinity.
In one spacedimension,
theproblem
of theexistence is treated in
[7].
The Hamiltonian structure of theequation
of motion is discussed in
[18, 12]
and in many other papers refer- red in[12].
Concerning
the non-relativistic Poisson-Vlasovmodel,
the as-sociated
Cauchy problem
has beencompletely
solved in 1 and 2spatial
dimensions
[6, 22, 27].
In 3 spacedimensions,
the existence ofglobal
weak solutions is
proved
in[1, 14, 15], and,
when the initial data aresmall
enough,
the existence ofglobal
classical solutions[3]
is alsoproved.
In 3spatial dimensions,
there exist classicalglobal
solutionsfor
symmetric
initial data[4, 13, 25].
The existence of classical solu- tionscorresponding
to any initial data is an openproblem,
as wellas the
uniqueness problem
of weak solutions. For reader’sutility,
we refer also the papers
[2, 5, 11]
and the review papers[19, 20].
As discussed in
[23, 24],
when thespeeds
of theparticles approach
the
speed
oflight,
the classical MaXwell and Poisson-Vlasov models becomeinadequate,
and must be substitutedby
the relativistic ones.Concerning
theCauchy problem
we refer[10, 29].
In[10]
the3-dimensional relativistic Poisson-Vlasov
equation
istreated,
andthe existence of
global-in-time
classical solutions isproved, assuming spherical symmetry
of the initial data. The relativistic Maxwell- Vlasovequation
in3-space
dimensions is treated in[29],
and the local- in-time existence of classical solutions isproved, starting
fromregular
initial data.
Moreover,
it isproved
that the solutions of the Relativ- istic Maxwell-Vlasovequation
converge in apointwise
sense to thesolutions of the non-relativistic Poisson-Vlasov
equation,
when thespeed
oflight
goes toinfinity.
In this paper we treat the relativistic Poisson- Vlasov
model,
witha
plasma
made ofelectrons,
whosedensity
inphase
space is determinedby
the distribution functionf (x, t, p)
and abackground
ofpositive
fixed
ions, uniformly
distributed on thedomain,
so that theglobal charge
is null.We assume that the domain is a flat v-dimensional torus
Tr, (v = 1, 2, 3), having
dimensions.Lx, .Ly, .Lz respectively,
or,equi- valently,
we assume that the distribution function and all the otherphysical quantities
of thesystem
arespatially periodic.
In order to
simplify
thenotations,
we assume thecharge,
the massof the
particles,
thespeed
oflight
and thecharge density
of thepositive background equal
to1,
and so we obtain thefollowing system
of
equations:
This
system
ofequations
admits a firstintegral,
which is the total energy of thesystem:
In this work we prove that the class of
spatially homogeneous
distribution functions
f (x, p), possibly
nonregular,
y nonincreasing
in
stationary
solutions of the relativistic Poisson-Vlasov equa- tion(1.3)
isnon-linearly (Liapunov)
stable. We stress that theproof
does not use the
regularity property
of thesolution,
y and this fact may bephysically interesting
in somespecial
case.By
nonregular solution,
we mean a solution of the weak formulation of eq.(1.3)
where
g
being
any test function.The
proof
of our result isorganized
into 3 Lemmata(whose proofs,
rather
technical,
will begiven later),
and into a Theorem. The for- mulation of the Lemmata and of theTheorem,
and theirproofs,
when it is
possible,
will notdepend
on the number of space di- mensions.The
proof
relies on theapplication
to the relativistic Poisson-Vlasovequation
of atechnique, suggested by
Marchioro and Pulvirenti[16, 17]
that is based on the observation that the kinetic energy
corresponding
to a stable
stationary
solution is anextremum,
constrained to the orbits of thecoadjoint representation [12]
of the measurepreserving diffeomorphysms
groupacting
on a domain D(when
thesystem
isan
incompressible
ideal fluidoccupying
a domainD,
and so the con-figuration
space of thesystem
is the group ofdiffeomorphysms
ofD),
and the measure
preserving diffeomorphysms
groupacting
on thephase
space,(when
thesystem
is an idealplasma). By
a classicalviewpoint,
these orbits are linked with the conservation of the
vorticity integral,
in two space
dimensions,
and with the Liouville theorem. Seealso,
for this
subject [12, 9, 21].
In this work we assume that when the initial data is « near » the
stationary solution,
theCauchy problem
admits aglobal
in time weak solution.We
finally
remark that similar methods could be used for the relativistic Maxwell-Vlasovequation.
1. Proof of the main result.
DEFINITION. Let 8 be the set of the
stationary
solutions of the eq.(1.3) satisfying
thefollowing
conditions:DEFINITION. VM >
0, given
astationary solution f
we definesthe class
of distribution functions whose kinetic energy
density
is « near » thekinetic energy
density
of1,
Vx E T~.DEFINITION. Given a distribution function we
define the class
The functions of
I(F)
assume the same values assumedby F,
but indifferent
points
of thedomain,
with theproperty
that this rearrange- ment preserves the measure.LEMMA 1. Let and
fo :
be the initial datum of theproblem (1.3).
There existssuch that:
when 6 is
sufficiently
small.LEMMA 2. Let
f E S, f
EI( f )
rlLoo(Tp
anddefining
we have the results:
1)
when v =1,
there exist constantsC,, C,
such that2)
when v =2, 3, and f , f
havecompact supports,
there existsa constant
C,,
such thatLEMMA 3. Let
1
be a functionsatisfying
all theproperties
statedin Lemma
1,
and letf o
E1(1)
n3(j, M), (and, by
Liouvilletheorem, 1(1)).
We have the result:where ~ 0 when 0153 ~ 0.
THEOREM. Let
lES
andJ(Î,M)
be the initialdatum of the
problem (1.3).
ThenPROOF. Let the initial datum
f o
such that1110 -1111
6.By
trian-gular inequality
Using
Lemma1,
there existsf
such that1 ) f o (and by
Liouvilletheorem) E 1(1);
Now we estimate the first term in the
right
hand side of(2.1)
in thefollowing
way:Now,
andusing
Lemma 1.In
concluding
0PROOF OF LEMMA 1.
VA c R+,
we define thefamily
of sets(see [16, 17]) :
and the functions:
Obviously,
the functionf (-)
isnonincreasing,
and satisfiesf o
E1(1).
To prove the second
step
of the Theorem1,
we define the sets:and the
quantities
in which
and I
are thestationary solution,
the initialdatum,
andthe function built
above, respectively. Denoting by X
the set func-tion, we have :
and, by
definitionof f
In
concluding :
and this
completes
theproof
of Lemma 1. DPROOF or LEMMA 2. Let and N be an
integer.
We defi ie the sets
and the
step
functionsX
being
the set function.Now we consider the difference between the kinetic
energies
as-sociated with the functions
f N
andNow the details of the
proof depend
on the number of space dimensions:we
examine,
in the firsttime,
the 1 dimensional case.Using
thedefinitions
the
following
estimates hold:and the
equation (2.2)
becomesUsing
themonotonicity
in[0, oo),
thefollowing
estimate holds
and the
analogous
oneso that
(2.4), taking (2.3b)
intoaccount,
becomesNow, using
theCauchy-Schwartz inequality
in thefollowing
way:that
implies
equation (2.5)
becomesThe
term(VI + p¡ -1) lpk
in(2.6)
goes to 0 when0,
and thisgives
someproblems
inunderestimating
theright
hand side of(2.6)
in terms of
We
choose y
E(0, 1)
and we determine aninteger h
such thatso that the
equation (2.6)
becomesUsing (2.7a),
andtaking
into account thatwe obtain
Solving (2.7b)
withrespect
to Pk andsubstituting
the result into(2.9),
we obtain
and
(2.8)
becomesand, ending N
toinfinity, using
the dominated convergencetheorem,
we have:
and this proves Lemma 2 in one space dimension.
In two space
dimensions,
theproof
must be modified as follows.We define
through
the conditions:and, by monotonicity
of( (1~1-f- p 2 -1 ) /p ~ in [0 , oo), we
haveand, performing
an obviouschange
of variableWe bound the denominator in
(2.12) by observing that, by
defini-tion of
f3 k
so that
and
using
theCauchy-Schwartz inequality
We observe that
0,
the coefficient ofX(Ak) 111 approaches
a non nullvalue,
so here we have not thedifficulty
of theprevious
case.Despite
ofthis,
this coefficient goes to zero when pk -~ oo, sothat,
in order to underestimateT(fN)
-T(iN)
in terms ofIlfN - iN111’
we must assume thecompactness
of thesupports
off
and
f .
In thishypothesis,
when N - oo,In 3 space
dimensions,
we define pk,~k, ~k
in thefollowing
way:so that the
equations (2.11)
and(2.12)
becomeBy
definition of we obtainso that
and
using
theCauchy-Schwartz inequality
As well as in 2 space
dimensions,
the coefficient ofX(II) ~~1 approaches
a non null value 0.Moreover,
this coefficient goes to zero oo, and so, as in 2 spacedimensions,
we mustrequire
thecompactness
of thesupports
off
andf .
In thishypothesis,
ywhen N --~ co
and this
completes
theproof
of Lemma 2.We note that in the
analogous problem
ofstability
for the nonrelativistic Poisson-Vlasov model
[17],
in 2 spacedimensions,
thehypothesis
ofcompactness
of thesupport
of theperturbation
wasnot necessary. D
PROOF OF LEMMA 3. Let
f
t be the time evolution offo by (1.3).
Using (1.4)
we haveand, by positivity
of thepotential
energySubtracting T(i)
we have:Now
By hypothesis
so thatf o E ~( f , .l~’ ), i.e.,
theintegral
inthe last
equation
isconvergent,
and we have thedecomposition:
and
Q(P) -
0 when P - 00.(A possible
choiche for P is( ~~ fo Using
theperiodicity
of theboundary conditions,
where G is the Green function for L1 with
periodic boundary
conditions.By
the boundedness of(~ ~Oo( ~ ) 00’ (following by 10
EJ(ï, M)
f1f1 that
implies
we haveIn
concluding, taking (2.15)
and(2.16)
intoaccount, (2.14)
becomeswhere
g(x)
- 0 when x --~ 0. DREFERENCES
[1] A. A. ARSEN’EV, Global existence
of
a weak solutionof
Vlasov’s systemof equations,
U.R.S.S.Comput.
Math. and Math.Phys.,
15 (1)(1975),
pp. 131-143.
[2] A. A. ARSEN’EV, Existence and
uniqueness of
the classical solutionsof
Vlasov’s system
of equations,
U.R.S.S.Comput.
Math. and Math.Phys.,
15 (5) (1975), pp. 252-258.[3] C. BARDOS - P. DEGOND, Global existence
for
the Vlasov-Poissonequation
in three space variables with small initial data, C. R. Acad. Sc. Paris, 297, Sez. 1 (1983), p. 131.
[4] J. BATT, Global
symmetric
solutionsof
the initial-valueproblem
in stellardynamics,
J. Diff.Eq.,
25 (1977), pp. 342-364.[5] J. BATT, The nonlinear Vlasov-Poisson system
of partial differential
equa- tions in stellardynamics,
Publ. C.N.E.R. Math. PuresAppl.
Année 83,vol.
5,
fasc. 2 (1983), pp. 1-30.[6] J. COOPER, Galerkin
approximations for
the one-dimensional Vlasov- Poissonequation,
Math. Meth. in theAppl.
Sci., 5 (1983), pp. 516-529.[7] J. COOPER - A. KLIMAS,
Boundary
valueproblem for
the Vlasov-Xaxwellequations in
one dimension, J. Math. Anal.Appl.,
75 (1980), pp. 306-329.[8] S. R. DE GROOT - C. G. VAN WEERT - W. A. VAN LEEUWEN, Relativi- stic Kinetic
Theory. Principles
andApplication,
North Holland, Am- sterdam (1980).[9]
C. S. GARDNER, Bound on the energy availablefrom
aplasma, Phys.
Fluids, 6 (1963), pp. 839-840.[10]
R. GLASSEY - J. SCHAEFFER, Onsymmetric
solutionsof
the relativistic Vlasov-Poisson system, Comm. Math.Phys.,
101 (1985), pp. 459-473.[11] R. GLASSEY - W. STRAUSS,
Singularity formation in a
collisionlessplasma
could occurr
only
athigh
velocities, Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. (inprint).
[12] D. D. HOLM - J. E. MARSDEN - T. RATIU - A. WEINSTEIN, Nonlinear
stability of fluid
andplasma equilibria, Physics Reports,
123 (1985),pp. 1-116.
[13] E. HORST, On the classical solutions
of
the initial-valueproblem for
theunmodified
nonlinear Vlasovequation
I, II, Math. Meth.Appl.
Sci., 3 (1981), pp. 229-248; 4 (1982), pp. 19-32.[14] E. HORST - R. HUNZE, Weak solution
of
the initial-valueproblem for
theunmodified
nonlinear Vlasovequation,
Math. Meth.Appl.
Sci., 6 (1984),pp. 262-279.
[15] R. ILLNER - H. NEUNZERT, An existence theorem
for
theunmodified
Vlasovequation,
Math. Meth.Appl.
Sci., 1(1979),
pp. 530-554.[16] C. MARCHIORO - M. PULVIRENTI, Some considerations on the nonlinear
stability of stationary planar
Eulerflows,
Comm. Math.Phys.,
100 (1985).pp. 343-354.
[17] C. MARCHIORO - M. PULVIRENTI, A note on the nonlinear
stability of
aspatial symmetric
Vlasov-Poissonflow,
Math. Meth.Appl.
Sci. (inprint).
[18] J. E. MARSDEN - A. WEINSTEIN, The Hamiltonian structure
of
the Max-well-Vlasov
equations, Physica,
4 D (1982), pp. 394-406.[19] H. NEUNZERT, An introduction to the nonlinear Boltzmann-Vlasov equa- tion, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1048
(Springer-Verlag,
Berlin, 1984), pp. 60-110.[20] H. NEUNZERT,
Approximation
methodsfor
thenonmodified
Vlasov-Poisson system,Proceedings
of the« Workshop
on Math.Aspects
of Fluid andPlasma
Dynamics »
(Trieste,Italy, May
30 - June 2, 1984), editedby
C.
Cercignani,
S. Rionero, M. Tessarotto, pp. 439-455.[21] M. N. ROSENBLUTH,
Topics
in microinstabilities, in Advanced PlasmaPhysics,
M. Rosenbluth, ed.(Academic
Press, New York, 1964).[22] S. UKAI - T. OKABE, On classical solutions in the
large
in timeof
twodimensional Vlasov’s
equation,
Osaka J. Math., 15 (1978), pp. 245-261.[23] N. G. VAN KAMPEN - B. V. FELDERHOF, Theoretical Methods in Plasma
Physics,
North Holland, Amsterdam (1967).[24] E. WEIBEL,
L’equation
de Vlasov dans la théoriespéciale
de la relativité, PlasmaPhys.,
9 (1967), pp. 665-670.[25] S. WOLLMAN, The
spherically symmetric
Vlasov-Poisson system, J. Diff.Equations,
35 (1980), pp. 30-35.[26] S. WOLLMAN, An existence and
uniqueness
theoremfor
the Vlasov-Max- well system, Commun. PureAppl.
Math., 37 (1984), pp. 457-462.[27] S. WOLLMAN, Global in time solutions
of
the two dimensional Vlasov- Poisson system, Commun. PureAppl.
Math., 33 (1980), pp. 173-197.[28] P. DEGOND, Local existence
of
solutionsof
the Maxwell-Vlasovequation
and convergence to the Vlasov-Poisson
equation for infinite light velocity,
Int.
Rep.
117, Centre deMathématiques Appliquées,
ÉcolePolytéchni-
que, Paris (1984).
[29] J. SCHAEFFER, The classical limit
of
the relativisticVlasov-Maxwell system,
Commun. Math.
Phys.,
104 (1986), pp. 403-421.Manoscritto pervenuto in redazione il 9